Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Technical Information Activities

ArmyRDT&EReconciledPE0605803A
What it is
Technical Information Activities (0605803A) is an Army research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 5 projects.
What changed
-$5.79M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$30.4MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$32.4MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$26.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$5.79MR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $30.4MFY25: $32.4MFY26: $26.6MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$30.4M
FY25$32.4M
FY26$26.6M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$28.8M$26.0M$29.9M$39.6M$28.2M$30.4M$25.8M$31.2M$36.8M$30.4M
Enacted$28.5M$33.3M$33.9M$29.0M$30.1M$25.5M$32.0M$37.7M$31.3M$32.4M
Request$33.3M$33.9M$29.1M$25.1M$26.2M$26.8M$28.8M$31.3M$32.4M$26.6M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2023 book requested $28.8M for FY2023; the PB2025 book reported $36.8M as actual total obligation authority — $8.07M above the request. 36.82 − 28.75 = 8.07 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Technical Information Activities

This Program Element (PE) supports oversight of the development and defense of the Army Science and Technology (S&T) budget, and development of Army S&T strategy, policy and guidance. Additionally, it supports upgrading the accuracy, timeliness, availability, and accessibility of scientific, technical, and management information at all levels of the Army Research and Development (R&D) community. Management of this information is critical to achieve the goals established by the Army's Senior Leadership. Use of accurate and timely technical information is essential to successfully meeting S&T transitions and milestones, allowing Army Science and Technology (S&T) leadership to refine investment strategy and quickly react to emerging opportunities and issues. This PE includes initiatives to improve information derivation, storage, access, display, validation, transmission, distribution, and interpretation, along with initiatives to develop and enhance a single business model for Army S&T knowledge management information technology and to provide for Independent Review Team analysis of technology maturity as part of the Technology Readiness Assessment. Develops and publishes Army S&T strategy and policies, sets Army S&T priorities, establishes and tracks S&T metrics to determine earned value and return on investment, and performs S&T studies in support of the ASA(ALT) in Project 727. Project 731 provides funding for support for Army high performance computing centers. Project 733 provides funding for improvements to the Army's acquisition process. Project CC2 provides funding for Expeditionary Technologies (xTech Search) to evaluate the feasibility and potential application of disruptive technologies to Army capability gaps. Project DW3 supports Army Geospatial Enterprise (AGE) Implementation with systems engineering, architecture, and test and certification of Army Acquisition Systems. The cited work is consistent with the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering Science and Technology Critical Technology Areas and the Army Modernization Strategy. Work in this PE is performed by the Army Corps of Engineers' Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC), Vicksburg, MS; the Army Geospatial Center (AGC) in Alexandria, VA; the Information Management Office, Arlington, VA; the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army, Acquisition, Logistics and Technology (ASA(ALT)), The Pentagon, Arlington, VA; Army Futures Command (AFC) Combat Capabilities Development Command (CCDC) Army Research Laboratory (ARL), Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD; and AFC CCDC Ground Vehicle Systems Center, Warren, MI. The FY 2026 request was reduced by $6.87 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative."

Mission — Tech Info Activities

This Project funds the governance, strategy development and oversight of science, research, and technology investments within the Department of the Army. These efforts include developing strategic direction, policy development, supervision and management of the Army's S&T portfolio including resource allocation. This project includes civilian manpower and contractor support required to implement a set of management decision aids and tools to support technical and budgetary decisions at the Department of the Army (DA). Includes the research and development planning, programming and execution for Army S&T, the Army Applied SBIR program, the Army Manufacturing Technology program, Technology Maturation Initiatives program, Technology Transition policy, and Laboratory Management policy. Covers the development and tracking of S&T metrics across the enterprise and supports development of Army plans, programs and policies for OSD and Congress. Most of the efforts in this project are on-going activities to support Army Research and Development programs. Effective exploitation of Science and Technology (S&T) information is critical to achieving the goals established by Senior Army Leadership for the Army of 2040. Funding in this program supports Independent Review Team analysis of technology maturity as part of the Technology Maturation Initiative and Technology Area Readiness Assessments. The cited work is consistent with the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering Science and Technology Critical Technology Areas and the Army Modernization Strategy. Work in this Project is performed by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army, Acquisition, Logistics and Technology (ASA(ALT)), The Pentagon, Washington, DC.

Mission — Army High Performance Computing Centers

This Project provides funding for high performance computing (HPC) research, as well as education, infrastructure sustainment, and outreach support associated with the Army High Performance Computing Center at the United States (U.S.) Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM), specifically, DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory (ARL). The Army High Performance Computing Center provides high fidelity modeling, simulation, and analysis of materials, systems, and operational constructs while working with researchers across the Army to explore new HPC computing environments, algorithms, and supporting technology necessary to support critical efforts in the areas of computational research. The cited work is consistent with the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering priority focus areas and the Army Modernization Strategy.

Mission — Acquisition Tech Act

This project funds efforts to meet the Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act (DAWIA), as well as Congressional, SECDEF, and SECARMY mandates to provide program management execution tools, systems integration and architectural analysis, information technology infrastructure development, knowledge management, and technical workforce management. Funding also provides the framework for Army business and acquisition transformation for development and enhancement of capabilities to allow data to be readily available, automatically extracted to facilitate DoD-wide analysis and manage business operations, and the establishment of a set of activities that use data analysis, measurement, and evaluation-related methods to improve acquisition program outcomes and inform business re-engineering. These efforts afford stability and improvements to the Army Acquisition programmatic and financial data by integrating major acquisition systems and processes, applying decision support and expert information systems, supporting analysis, ability to measure effectiveness, and evaluation of alternative acquisition strategies in meeting Army modernization strategy requirements. This integrated set of capabilities will provide OSD and Army acquisition leadership insights needed to effectively manage a complex portfolio of acquisition programs through more timely and reliable access to authoritative acquisition data to assist in making acquisition, procurement, and logistics decisions in order to provide quality equipment to the Soldiers. The cited work is consistent with Section 911-913 of the FY 18 NDAA, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering Science and Technology priority focus areas, and the Army Modernization Strategy.

Mission — Expeditionary Technologies

This Project evaluates the feasibility and potential application of disruptive technologies to Army capability gaps. Expeditionary Technology Search (xTechSearch) partners with small, non-traditional companies to apply novel techniques and applications to Army problems through a non-dilutive prize competitions, business accelerators, and outreach activities. These programs will uncover novel dual-use technology solutions that otherwise would not be identified by the Department of Defense. Work in this Project is performed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) and the Army Science and Technology Enterprise. The cited work is consistent with the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering critical technology areas and the Army Modernization Strategy.

Mission — Army Geospatial Enterprise Implementation

This effort provides the geospatial systems engineering, architecture, and geospatial interoperability certification required by AR 525-95 to ensure Army Acquisition Systems meet interoperability requirements and modernization priorities. Additionally, this effort provides geospatial domain expertise to Mission Command (MC) systems and to all Cross Functional Teams ((CFTs) (with a focus on Network, Synthetic Training Environment (STE), Soldier Lethality, and APNT)) in modernizing soldier situational awareness and understanding and enabling use of 2D and 3D information across Army, Joint, and Coalition Mission Partner Environments (MPE). Enables data sharing, reduces duplication of effort, and enables a common operating picture across the Common Operating Environment (COE), Army Futures Command modernization priorities, National Agencies and Mission Partners. Enables Army systems to consume geospatial data from National-Geospatial Intelligence Agency (NGA) and National System for Geospatial-Intelligence (NSG) partners as required by Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 5000.56. Continues implementation of the Army 3D Geospatial Data Integration Strategy as assigned in HQDA EXORD 154-20 and FRAGO1. Geospatial is a Mission Command Essential Capability and a critical enabler for the COE, Army modernization, multi-domain operations and the warfighter.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (8)

Conduct and support S&T program portfolio assessments and analysis.

Supports identification, development and demonstration of technology options that inform and enable effective and affordable capabilities for the Soldier Providing Soldiers with the technology supporting the Army of 2040. Supports Aviation, Network, Ground, Soldier, Basic Research, Medical, Weapons, and Sensing & Intel Portfolio Directors, responding to scientific, technical and programmatic challenges. Supports Independent Review Team analysis of technology maturity as part of Technology Area Readiness Assessments. Serves as Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army, Research and Technology (DASA(R&T)) central point of contact for S&T Metrics, Army S&T strategy development, Strategic Portfolio Analysis Review, evaluation of technical risks, earned value assessment, and technical and financial health of S&T projects.

Support Army S&T strategic planning, analysis, and prioritization.

Coordinates efforts with and across the Army S&T portfolios; manage proposal nomination and selection process; track and provide oversight of ongoing efforts; recommend resolutions/prioritization in the event of conflicting requirements and/or resource constraints; support the full spectrum of Planning, Programming and Budget Execution (PPBE) as it relates to the Army S&T Program; and supports technology transition. Provide senior level technical and analytical support for the Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD) program and Technology Maturation Initiative (TMI) by assisting with investment analysis, strategies and oversight. Provide financial management recommendations and insights with regards to JCTDs, TMI, Manufacturing Technology (ManTech) and Defense Manufacturing Initiatives. A variety of scientific and technical taxonomies applied at the task level allow responsive reporting on S&T programs to Congressional, OSD and Army leadership.

Provide funding and support for Army Acquisition Program Technology Readiness Assessments for Program Milestone Decisions.

Coordination and alignment with Programs of Record. Demonstrate technical feasibility at system and subsystem level. As technology transitions and spirals to acquisition, ensure a rapid insertion of new technology.

Provide Army support to Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering Executive Staff for Department of Defense (DoD) wide Science and Technology oversight.

Supports Army engagement in DoD/Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and cross agency Communities of Interest (COI) and committees.

Sustain the High Performance Computing Environment and Infrastructure in Support of the CCDC Army Research Laboratory (ARL)

The HPC center provides levels of computational capacity to support the development and modernization of tactical capabilities that increase the effectiveness of Army Soldiers around the world. Algorithm design and software engineering approaches are investigated to effectively partition and use binary processing cores to reduce time to solution for Army relevant problems. Factors such as performance, portability, and power will be considered in conjunction with developing new models to quantify computing capabilities in hybrid systems to facilitate algorithm signature mapping to available resources.

ACQUISITION TECH ACT

This effort supports the Acquisition Domain effort to reduce IT investments in programmatic and financial management tools through data standardization and governance, integration of existing acquisition business systems, and processes supporting key Acquisition capabilities at the enterprise level with the goal of reducing redundancy, improving systems operations, and improving management of data resulting in dramatically improved transparency, efficiency, and effective management of the Acquisition process. This support entails analysis required to develop, upgrade, enhance, deploy, and architect enterprise tools within an integrated program management environment on multiple (unclassified/classified) hosting platforms to support analysis of acquisition programs fiscal programming and budgeting requirements against enacted appropriations, conduct long range programming, planning and policy analysis, resource allocation analysis, cost tracking, and analysis. This support will upgrade the knowledge management and enterprise tools, including Project Management Resource Tools (PMRT), that assist acquisition community and professionals with day-to-day program management tasks throughout the Acquisition program's lifecycle. This support also helps implement standards for data management and service-oriented design methodology to facilitate efficiency and interoperability as well as providing some business intelligence services. These standards will help inform changes and creation of domain-level requirements, governance processes, and policies.

Expeditionary Technology Search (xTechSearch)

Funds technical scouting and competition in Army-wide disciplines through rigorous technical assessment, Soldier feedback, mentorship sponsoring, and cash prizes.

Enterprise Support Branch (formerly Geospatial Acquisition Support Office)

This effort provides the geospatial systems engineering, architecture, and geospatial interoperability certification required by AR 525-95 to ensure Army Acquisition Systems meet Common Operating Environment (COE) requirements and modernization priorities. This effort provides geospatial domain expertise to Mission Command (MC) in implementing the Army Geospatial Enterprise (AGE) enabling a common operating picture across the Common Operating Environment, Army Futures Command modernization priorities, National Agencies and Mission Partners. Enables Army systems to consume geospatial data from National-Geospatial Intelligence Agency (NGA) and National System for Geospatial-Intelligence (NSG) partners as required by Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 5000.56. Enables an interoperable geospatial baseline system of systems across Army and Defense programs and in a Mission Partner Environment (MPE). Continues execution and implementation of the Army 3D Geospatial Data Integration Strategy as assigned in HQDA EXORD 154-20. Geospatial is a Mission Command Essential Capability and a critical enabler for the Common Operating Environment (COE), Army modernization and the warfighter. Key lines of effort include standardizing geospatial data between echelons, ensuring a Standard, Sharable Geospatial Foundation (a Mission Command Essential Capability) across Mission Command, developing new geospatial standards, evaluating emerging geospatial technologies early in their development processes, and certifying systems as AGE compliant. These critical capabilities enable geospatial interoperability across Mission Command, Cross-Functional Team (CFT) initiatives, and with our National and UAP partners ensuring a common operational picture enhancing soldier situational awareness and increasing mission success.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY24 Actuals$30.4M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY25 Enacted$32.4M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY25 Total$32.4M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY26 Disc. Request$26.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY26 Total$26.6M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$30.4M$32.4M$26.6M$26.6M
727: Tech Info Activities$12.5M$13.0M$7.06M$7.06M
731: Army High Performance Computing Centers$2.17M$2.23M$2.22M$2.22M
733: Acquisition Tech Act$5.00M$5.30M$3.81M$3.81M
CC2: Expeditionary Technologies$5.47M$6.21M$6.19M$6.19M
DW3: Army Geospatial Enterprise Implementation$5.33M$5.64M$7.30M$7.30M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Technical Information Activities. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.