Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0605718A/ — data as of July 28, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Army Modeling & Sim X-Cmd Collaboration & Integ
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
- FY24
- $6.14M
- FY25
- $11.3M
- FY26
- $11.8M
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $1.08M | $901.0K | $7.65M | $1.76M | $2.71M | $2.42M | $2.48M | $2.54M | $5.87M | $6.14M | ||
| Enacted | $938.0K | $7.96M | $1.83M | $2.80M | $2.53M | $2.48M | $2.63M | $6.10M | $11.2M | $11.3M | ||
| Request | $7.96M | $1.83M | $2.80M | $2.53M | $2.57M | $2.63M | $6.10M | $11.2M | $11.3M | $11.8M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $11.2M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reports $6.14M actually spent — $5.07M below the request.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Analysis M&S Tools and Services
This Project has two functions: Function 1 (Priority 3 of the "Army Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Strategy") -- Develop M&S standards, architectures, networks and environments that promote sharing, interoperability, access, and reliable application of tools, formats, data and information among/for users. Function 2 (priority 4 of the "Army M&S Strategy") -- Develop and improve tools and technology in the form of models, simulations and data that support the full range of Army interests and deliver timely information to enhance effective decision making. These tools can be documented, verified, validated and accredited for their intended purpose. Resources under Project S03 support the M&S communities (Acquisition, Analysis, Experimentation, Test & Evaluation, Training, Intelligence) at the enterprise level through enabling efforts. These efforts include the following: (a) design models, simulations, data and tools that are resident within one organization but reusable and trusted by M&S users and specialists across the Army M&S enterprise; (b) leverage industry and academia; (c) promote interoperability within M&S and between M&S and operational capabilities.
Mission — Army Modeling & Sim X-Cmd Collaboration & Integ
This Program Element (PE) promotes the Army's Modeling and Simulation (M&S) strategy, defined by five guiding priorities: (1) formulate Army M&S policies; (2) develop and employ management processes for models, simulations and data; (3) develop M&S standards, architectures, networks and environments; (4) develop/employ new M&S tools and simulation technology; (5) develop an M&S workforce. Specifically, this PE focuses on priorities 3 and 4 to include the modernization of the Center for Army Analysis (CAA) models, simulations, and analytic capabilities. M&S Standards, Architectures, Networks and Environments: The consistent use of standards, architectures, networks and environments advances the goal of interoperability. The Army coordinates with Joint, Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Multinational (JIIM) partners along with industry and academia to develop/employ standards that promote collaboration and facilitate the sharing of tools, data and information. The Army oversees procedures and processes for the appropriate use of standards to foster common formats and increase M&S and data reuse. The Army ensures these standards, architectures, networks and environments are readily accessible and can be reliably applied by users. M&S Tools and Simulation Technology: The Army must have credible M&S tools and data to support the full range of Army organizational missions and functional responsibilities. M&S results that are timely and credible enhance decision making. The Army must develop and accredit reliable M&S tools so that decision makers and senior leaders benefit from the results and thus support the continued development, integration and use of such tools. To ensure credibility and reliability of results, M&S managers, developers and users must make the capabilities, constraints, limitations and assumptions of their M&S tools readily accessible. PE 0605718A provides for the development and employment of tools in the form of models, simulations and data that support the full range of Army missions and deliver timely information to Army senior leaders. Moreover, these tools can be documented, verified, validated and accredited for their intended purpose in order to provide timely, credible results. This program element supports modernization of the analytic tools utilized by Center for Army Analysis. CAA conducts analysis of senior-level decisions for current and future national security issues. The suite of models, simulations, and analytic tools must remain relevant, current, and responsive to the ever-changing Operational Environment in order to support effectively the Army's analytic requirements. This program element supports the Center for Army Analysis (CAA) mission to conduct decision support analysis across the spectrum of conflict in joint and multinational contexts for the purpose of supporting senior level decisions on current and future national security issues. In partial furtherance of this mission, CAA leverages a theater campaign model representing joint and combined operational maneuver that requires updating to suitably reflect emerging operational concepts such as Multi-Domain Operations. This program element enables realization of a modernized theater campaign analysis model that provides a tractable, flexible, and extensible representation of Army capabilities and their effects on major combat operations in crisis and conflict. The FY 2026 request was reduced by $0.668 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative." The FY 2026 request was reduced by $0.015 million for civilian personnel to optimize the workforce in compliance with Executive Order 14210, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Workforce Optimization Initiative."
Mission — HQDA DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS & SERVICES
HQDA Decision Support Tools and Services assesses existing modeling and simulation tools, available data sources, and completed and ongoing research in order to implement adapt, and/or create algorithms and software that improve the accuracy and relevance of theater campaign analysis performed in joint and combined multi-domain contexts.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (3)
Develop M&S standards, architectures, networks and environments
Develop M&S standards, architectures, networks and environments that promote sharing, interoperability, access, and reliable application of tools, formats, data and information among/for users.
Campaign Model Modernization
This project assesses extant modeling and simulation tools, available data sources, and completed and ongoing research in order to implement, adapt, and/or create algorithms and software improving the accuracy and relevance of theater campaign analysis performed in joint and combined multi-domain contexts.
Develop M&S tools and technology
Develop and improve tools and technology in the form of models, simulations and data that support the full range of Army interests and deliver timely information to enhance effective decision making. These tools can be documented, verified and validated for their intended purpose.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY24 Actuals | $6.14M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY25 Enacted | $11.3M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY25 Total | $11.3M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY26 Disc. Request | $11.8M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY26 Total | $11.8M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
| Project | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S03: Analysis M&S Tools and Services | $6.14M | $2.92M | $3.51M | $3.51M |
| S02: HQDA DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS & SERVICES | — | $8.33M | $8.31M | $8.31M |
| Program Element | $6.14M | $11.3M | $11.8M | $11.8M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →