Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Army Modeling & Sim X-Cmd Collaboration & Integ

ArmyRDT&EReconciledPE0605718A
What it is
Army Modeling & Sim X-Cmd Collaboration & Integ (0605718A) is an Army research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 2 projects.
What changed
+$568.0K FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$6.14MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$11.3MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$11.8MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$568.0KR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $6.14MFY25: $11.3MFY26: $11.8MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$6.14M
FY25$11.3M
FY26$11.8M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$1.08M$901.0K$7.65M$1.76M$2.71M$2.42M$2.48M$2.54M$5.87M$6.14M
Enacted$938.0K$7.96M$1.83M$2.80M$2.53M$2.48M$2.63M$6.10M$11.2M$11.3M
Request$7.96M$1.83M$2.80M$2.53M$2.57M$2.63M$6.10M$11.2M$11.3M$11.8M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $11.2M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $6.14M as actual total obligation authority — $5.07M below the request. 6.1 − 11.2 = -5.1 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Army Modeling & Sim X-Cmd Collaboration & Integ

This Program Element (PE) promotes the Army's Modeling and Simulation (M&S) strategy, defined by five guiding priorities: (1) formulate Army M&S policies; (2) develop and employ management processes for models, simulations and data; (3) develop M&S standards, architectures, networks and environments; (4) develop/employ new M&S tools and simulation technology; (5) develop an M&S workforce. Specifically, this PE focuses on priorities 3 and 4 to include the modernization of the Center for Army Analysis (CAA) models, simulations, and analytic capabilities. M&S Standards, Architectures, Networks and Environments: The consistent use of standards, architectures, networks and environments advances the goal of interoperability. The Army coordinates with Joint, Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Multinational (JIIM) partners along with industry and academia to develop/employ standards that promote collaboration and facilitate the sharing of tools, data and information. The Army oversees procedures and processes for the appropriate use of standards to foster common formats and increase M&S and data reuse. The Army ensures these standards, architectures, networks and environments are readily accessible and can be reliably applied by users. M&S Tools and Simulation Technology: The Army must have credible M&S tools and data to support the full range of Army organizational missions and functional responsibilities. M&S results that are timely and credible enhance decision making. The Army must develop and accredit reliable M&S tools so that decision makers and senior leaders benefit from the results and thus support the continued development, integration and use of such tools. To ensure credibility and reliability of results, M&S managers, developers and users must make the capabilities, constraints, limitations and assumptions of their M&S tools readily accessible. PE 0605718A provides for the development and employment of tools in the form of models, simulations and data that support the full range of Army missions and deliver timely information to Army senior leaders. Moreover, these tools can be documented, verified, validated and accredited for their intended purpose in order to provide timely, credible results. This program element supports modernization of the analytic tools utilized by Center for Army Analysis. CAA conducts analysis of senior-level decisions for current and future national security issues. The suite of models, simulations, and analytic tools must remain relevant, current, and responsive to the ever-changing Operational Environment in order to support effectively the Army's analytic requirements. This program element supports the Center for Army Analysis (CAA) mission to conduct decision support analysis across the spectrum of conflict in joint and multinational contexts for the purpose of supporting senior level decisions on current and future national security issues. In partial furtherance of this mission, CAA leverages a theater campaign model representing joint and combined operational maneuver that requires updating to suitably reflect emerging operational concepts such as Multi-Domain Operations. This program element enables realization of a modernized theater campaign analysis model that provides a tractable, flexible, and extensible representation of Army capabilities and their effects on major combat operations in crisis and conflict. The FY 2026 request was reduced by $0.668 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative." The FY 2026 request was reduced by $0.015 million for civilian personnel to optimize the workforce in compliance with Executive Order 14210, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Workforce Optimization Initiative."

Mission — HQDA DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS & SERVICES

HQDA Decision Support Tools and Services assesses existing modeling and simulation tools, available data sources, and completed and ongoing research in order to implement adapt, and/or create algorithms and software that improve the accuracy and relevance of theater campaign analysis performed in joint and combined multi-domain contexts.

Mission — Analysis M&S Tools and Services

This Project has two functions: Function 1 (Priority 3 of the "Army Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Strategy") -- Develop M&S standards, architectures, networks and environments that promote sharing, interoperability, access, and reliable application of tools, formats, data and information among/for users. Function 2 (priority 4 of the "Army M&S Strategy") -- Develop and improve tools and technology in the form of models, simulations and data that support the full range of Army interests and deliver timely information to enhance effective decision making. These tools can be documented, verified, validated and accredited for their intended purpose. Resources under Project S03 support the M&S communities (Acquisition, Analysis, Experimentation, Test & Evaluation, Training, Intelligence) at the enterprise level through enabling efforts. These efforts include the following: (a) design models, simulations, data and tools that are resident within one organization but reusable and trusted by M&S users and specialists across the Army M&S enterprise; (b) leverage industry and academia; (c) promote interoperability within M&S and between M&S and operational capabilities.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (3)

Campaign Model Modernization

This project assesses extant modeling and simulation tools, available data sources, and completed and ongoing research in order to implement, adapt, and/or create algorithms and software improving the accuracy and relevance of theater campaign analysis performed in joint and combined multi-domain contexts.

Develop M&S tools and technology

Develop and improve tools and technology in the form of models, simulations and data that support the full range of Army interests and deliver timely information to enhance effective decision making. These tools can be documented, verified and validated for their intended purpose.

Develop M&S standards, architectures, networks and environments

Develop M&S standards, architectures, networks and environments that promote sharing, interoperability, access, and reliable application of tools, formats, data and information among/for users.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY24 Actuals$6.14M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY25 Enacted$11.3M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY25 Total$11.3M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY26 Disc. Request$11.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY26 Total$11.8M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$6.14M$11.3M$11.8M$11.8M
S02: HQDA DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS & SERVICES—$8.33M$8.31M$8.31M
S03: Analysis M&S Tools and Services$6.14M$2.92M$3.51M$3.51M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Army Modeling & Sim X-Cmd Collaboration & Integ. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.