Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Army Evaluation Center

ARDT&EFully Reconciled0605716A
What it is
Army Evaluation Center — a research & development program run by Army.
What changed
-$10.9M FY25→26
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$71.1M
FY25 Total
$73.2M
FY26 Request
$62.3M
FY25→26 Change
-$10.9M

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
FY24: $71.1MFY25: $73.2MFY26: $62.3MFY24FY25FY26
FY24
$71.1M
FY25
$73.2M
FY26
$62.3M
Decade view — each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY26

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$54.5M$52.3M$55.5M$56.0M$56.5M$60.5M$56.8M$65.7M$67.1M$71.1M
Enacted$52.7M$55.9M$56.2M$57.0M$60.8M$56.8M$65.9M$67.1M$71.1M$73.2M
Request$55.9M$56.2M$57.0M$60.8M$63.1M$65.9M$67.1M$71.1M$73.2M$62.3M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2021 book requested $63.1M for FY2021; the PB2023 book reports $56.8M actually spent — $6.31M below the request.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Army Evaluation Center

This funding line supports test and evaluation (T&E) of Army Transformation Priority Programs. This Program Element (PE) provides the resources to operate the Army Evaluation Center (AEC), the Army's independent evaluator for Army Futures Command (AFC) Cross Functional Team (CFT) efforts and all other Army and Joint Service programs (currently over 900 programs in total). AEC is the lead agent to plan, direct, and evaluate all required program testing and is the unbiased, independent authority for reporting on system progress to enable the Army to dominate in the multi-domain operational environment. AEC is the focal point in test strategy development, system safety verification, and data analyses from early developmental consumer tests through operational tests. AEC develops Critical Operational Issues and Criteria in conjunction with AFC to narrow the focus of testing to what is essential. AEC reviews and shapes system requirements to ensure they do not drive unnecessary testing. AEC provides critical independent assessments on system effectiveness, suitability, survivability (ESS), and safety to include cybersecurity; electronic warfare (EW); artificial intelligence (AI); machine learning (ML); safety of materiel solutions; and viability of emerging technologies and engineering change proposals to support major acquisition/fielding decisions including but not limited to acquisition milestones, materiel changes, and materiel releases. AEC is responsible for all assigned developmental and independent operational evaluations of Army materiel, information, and acquisition systems. AEC must remain independent from the development community. AEC assists the Chief of Staff of the Army decision making process by supporting Army Capabilities Integration Development System processes as well as supporting the AFC through the CFT concept. AEC evaluates operational effectiveness by determining if the system provides intended benefits to the Force. AEC assesses, confirms, and releases system safety for use by Soldiers upon fielding and during government sponsored experiments and demonstrations. AEC determines impacts to readiness through Human Systems Integration, Unit Systems Integration, and Army Systems Integration, as well as doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership and education, personnel, facilities, and policy impacts. AEC evaluates ballistics survivability and lethality missions, adversarial assessments/threat computer network operations, cooperative vulnerability and penetration assessments, and EW (attack, support) countermeasures in support of the National Defense Authorization Act 2016 Section 1647, establishment of Cybersecurity and Electromagnetic Affects. AEC manages, plans, and executes Information Assurance operational assessments during annual Combatant Command and Army Service exercises in support of the congressionally mandated Office of the Secretary of Defense Director, Operational Test and Evaluation assessment, and performs operational test agency duties for the Missile Defense System of Systems. This PE funds direct civilian labor and minimum non-labor requirements to include personnel training, career development, supplies and equipment, hardware, software, temporary duty travel, and other external Other Government Agency support as well as methodology development required to evaluate emerging technologies and instrumentation requirements. AEC consists of seven directorates - Analytics, AI, and Digital Engineering Evaluation Directorate; Aviation-Fires Evaluation Directorate; Ballistic Missile Defense Evaluation Directorate (primarily funded by the Missile Defense Agency); Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Cyber, and Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance Evaluation Directorate; Mounted Systems Evaluation Directorate; Soldier Evaluation Directorate; and Survivability Evaluation Directorate - and a lean headquarters (HQ) element as AEC receives staff services from the Army Test and Evaluation Command HQ. AEC provides direct support to AFC with personnel geographically co-located with eight CFTs - Long Range Precision Fires; Next Generation Combat Vehicle; Future Vertical Lift; Network; Assured Positioning, Navigation, and Timing; Air and Missile Defense; Soldier Lethality; and Synthetic Training Environment - and the Rapid Capabilities Critical Technology Office and the AI Task Force. The AEC primary competencies are: identify what decision makers need to know; plan and direct T&E strategies; evaluate operational ESS, and safety; and provide senior leadership unbiased advice on Army and Joint Service programs. The FY 2026 request was reduced by $1.1 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative." The FY 2026 request was reduced by $0.389 million for civilian personnel to optimize the workforce in compliance with Executive Order 14210, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Workforce Optimization Initiative."

Mission Army Evaluation Center

This Project provides the resources to operate the Army Evaluation Center (AEC), the Army's independent evaluator for Army Futures Command (AFC) Cross Functional Team (CFT) efforts and all other Army and Joint Service programs (currently over 900 programs in total). AEC is the lead agent to plan, direct, and evaluate all required program testing and is the unbiased, independent authority for reporting on system progress to enable the Army to dominate in the multi-domain operational environment. AEC is the focal point in test strategy development, system safety verification, and data analyses from early developmental consumer tests through operational tests. AEC develops Critical Operational Issues and Criteria (COIC) in conjunction with AFC to narrow the focus of testing to what is essential. AEC reviews and shapes system requirements to ensure they do not drive unnecessary testing. AEC provides critical independent assessments on system effectiveness, suitability, survivability (ESS), and safety to include cybersecurity; electronic warfare (EW); artificial intelligence (AI); machine learning (ML); safety of materiel solutions; and viability of emerging technologies and engineering change proposals to support major acquisition/fielding decisions including but not limited to acquisition milestones, materiel changes, and materiel releases. AEC is responsible for all assigned developmental and independent operational evaluations of Army materiel, information, and acquisition systems. AEC must remain independent from the development community. AEC assists the Chief of Staff of the Army decision making process by supporting Army Capabilities Integration Development System (A-CIDS) processes as well as supporting the AFC through the CFT concept. AEC evaluates operational effectiveness by determining if the system provides intended benefits to the Force. AEC assesses, confirms, and releases system safety for use by Soldiers upon fielding and during government sponsored experiments and demonstrations. AEC determines impacts to readiness through Human Systems Integration, Unit Systems Integration, and Army Systems Integration, as well as doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership and education, personnel, facilities and policy impacts. AEC evaluates ballistics survivability and lethality missions, adversarial assessments/threat computer network operations, cooperative vulnerability and penetration assessments, and EW (attack, support) countermeasures in support of the National Defense Authorization Act 2016 Section 1647, establishment of Cybersecurity and Electromagnetic Affects. AEC manages, plans, and executes Information Assurance operational assessments during annual Combatant Command and Army Service exercises in support of the congressionally mandated Office of the Secretary of Defense Director, Operational Test and Evaluation assessment, and performs operational test agency duties for the Missile Defense System of Systems. This Project funds direct civilian labor and minimum non-labor requirements to include personnel training, career development, supplies and equipment, hardware, software, temporary duty travel, and other external Other Government Agency support as well as methodology development required to evaluate emerging technologies and instrumentation requirements. AEC consists of seven directorates - Analytics, AI, and Digital Engineering Evaluation Directorate; Aviation-Fires Evaluation Directorate; Ballistic Missile Defense Evaluation Directorate (primarily funded by the Missile Defense Agency); Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Cyber, and Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance Evaluation Directorate; Mounted Systems Evaluation Directorate; Soldier Evaluation Directorate; and Survivability Evaluation Directorate - and a lean headquarters (HQ) element as AEC receives staff services from the Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) HQ. AEC provides direct support to AFC with personnel geographically co-located with eight CFTs - Long Range Precision Fires; Next Generation Combat Vehicle; Future Vertical Lift; Network; Assured Positioning, Navigation, and Timing; Air and Missile Defense; Soldier Lethality; and Synthetic Training Environment - and the Rapid Capabilities Critical Technology Office (RCCTO) and the AI Task Force. The AEC primary competencies are: identify what decision makers need to know; plan and direct test and evaluation (T&E) strategies; evaluate operational ESS, and safety; and provide senior leadership unbiased advice on Army and Joint Service programs.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (2)

Army Evaluation Center Civilian Pay

AEC provides integrated technical and operational evaluations and continuous evaluation of assigned weapon systems and major automated information systems for major milestone decisions, materiel changes, and materiel releases in support of the Army Acquisition Executive and force development. AEC develops the evaluation strategy, designs technical and operational tests, and evaluates the test results to address the combat ESS, and safety factors pertinent to the decision process for more than 900 systems/programs across the Army, other Services, and Agencies. AEC prepares integrated AEC evaluation plans and conducts integrated technical and operational evaluations for all assigned systems. In support of real-world events, AEC provides AEC evaluation reports and safety verification documents. AEC assists the Chief of Staff of the Army decision making process by supporting A-CIDS processes. AEC exercises enterprise authority to prioritize, synchronize, and resource evaluations and assessments in support of Army Transformation and in accordance with AFC priorities. As a principal member of the ATEC Board of Directors, AEC partners with other ATEC organizations to provide enterprise oversight and decision making and coordinate enterprise initiatives to accelerate and reduce the cost of evaluations and assessments. AEC supports the A-CIDS process by reviewing and shaping COIC that are operationally relevant, total system focused, and that can be evaluated while driving essential T&E. AEC provides direct support to AFC by resourcing coordinators geographically co-located with eight CFTs, the RCCTO, and the AI Task Force. AEC resources eight integrators dedicated to each CFT to lead synchronization efforts across the T&E enterprise. AEC enables rapid capability development by partnering with and dedicating coordination efforts with RCCTO. AEC employs innovative and adaptive T&E processes through applying flexibility given limited resources and shifting priorities while leveraging all credible data sources. AEC develops and deploys enhanced T&E capabilities focusing on modernizing capabilities while refining the investment process. AEC partners with analytic and strategic partner organizations to share resources, gain evaluation and assessment efficiencies, and increase capacity to support AFC. AEC applies new and innovative techniques in data mining, data visualization, and presentation of large data sets; and develops methodologies for the evaluation of AI, ML, and hypersonic weapons.

Army Evaluation Center Operations Support

AEC operational support costs. Contract services include facilities maintenance and repair and custodial support to ensure safety, health and hygiene of the AEC workforce; sustainment services such as grass cutting, snow removal, and security for AEC facilities; software licenses required for scientific and statistical methods in developing rigorous, defensible test plans and evaluating the results; training for the highly technical civilian and military workforce (484 total number); life cycle replacement of information technology (IT) equipment, printers, video teleconferencing equipment, wireless communications; contract support services for IT helpdesk, network, cybersecurity, etc.; and annual consumable supplies.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY24 Actuals$71.1M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY25 Enacted$73.2M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY25 Total$73.2M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY26 Disc. Request$62.3M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY26 Total$62.3M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

ProjectFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$71.1M$73.2M$62.3M$62.3M
302: Army Evaluation Center$71.1M$73.2M$62.3M$62.3M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →