Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Support of Operational Testing

ArmyRDT&EReconciledPE0605712A
What it is
Support of Operational Testing (0605712A) is an Army research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
-$12.5M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$74.1MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$76.1MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$63.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$12.5MR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $74.1MFY25: $76.1MFY26: $63.6MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$74.1M
FY25$76.1M
FY26$63.6M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$49.0M$49.1M$49.6M$50.7M$52.1M$52.3M$54.1M$54.8M$69.9M$74.1M
Enacted$49.3M$49.7M$51.0M$52.7M$52.7M$54.1M$55.1M$70.7M$75.1M$76.1M
Request$49.7M$51.0M$52.7M$52.7M$54.5M$55.1M$70.7M$75.1M$76.1M$63.6M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $75.1M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $74.1M as actual total obligation authority — $1.00M below the request. 74.1 − 75.1 = -1.0 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Support of Operational Testing

This funding line supports testing of Army Transformation Priority Programs. This Program Element (PE) provides resources to the United States (U.S.) Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) to operate the Army's Operational Test Command (OTC). OTC conducts independent operational tests that provide significant data to Army decision-makers on key Army systems and concepts. This PE finances recurring costs for OTC that are essential for conducting realistic and continuous testing in the critical areas of equipment, doctrine, force design and training. These recurring costs include civilian pay, requirements for test support contracts, sustainment of test technology, network support, temporary duty, training, supplies, and equipment. The FY 2026 request was reduced by $5.863 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative." The FY 2026 request was reduced by $0.46 million for civilian personnel to optimize the workforce in compliance with Executive Order 14210, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Workforce Optimization Initiative."

Mission — ATEC Activities

This Project provides funding to the Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) to operate the Operational Test Command (OTC) which conducts independent operational tests that provide significant data to Army decision makers on key systems in support of the Army's transformation priorities. These operational tests are required by public law (Title 10 USC 2399). This Project finances recurring costs for OTC that are essential to conduct realistic and continuous testing in the critical areas of equipment, doctrine, force design and training. These recurring costs include civilian pay, requirements for test support contracts, sustainment of test technology, network support, training, supplies, equipment, and temporary duty travel. OTC consists of four forward Test Directorates (Airborne and Special Operations Test Directorate, Fort Bragg, North Carolina; Air and Missile Defense Test Directorate, Fort Bliss, Texas; Fires Support Test Directorate, Fort Sill, Oklahoma; and the Intelligence Electronic Warfare Test Directorate, Fort Huachuca, Arizona) together with four additional Test Directorates (Aviation; Maneuver; Mission Command; Maneuver Support and Sustainment) and OTC Headquarters at Fort Cavazos, Texas. These activities support the development and fielding cycle of all Army acquisition programs including rapid fielding initiatives in support of the Army's Transformation Initiatives. The primary mission of these test directorates is to perform detailed planning, execution, and reporting of Customer Tests, Early User Tests, Limited User Tests (LUT), Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOTE), and Follow-On Operational Tests (FOT) in support of the Army's Signature Transformation Efforts. OTC also supports Army Futures Command's Soldier Touch Points and other early assessments of potential new systems the Army seeks to acquire in support of Army transformation. Funding provides essential sustainment of models, simulations, and instrumentation for operational testing of airborne/aviation systems, mission command systems, fires systems, intelligence systems, real-time casualty assessment (RTCA), and common live-virtual-constructive (LVC) tools.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (3)

Operational Test Command Civilian Pay

This funding supports the cost of the OTC civilian workforce. OTC civilians provide trusted, and independent operational testing in support of Army and DoD acquisition. OTC plans and execute testing for Army and DoD programs, with a priority effort to Army Futures Command Cross Functional Team (CFT) programs. OTC deploys teams of Civilians globally to replicate future operating environments, provide real-time test control, and collect data on mission-effectiveness, system suitability, and survivability in support of AEC and DOT&E evaluations. OTC collaborates with ATEC test centers and the training, experimentation, and threat communities to drive the acquisition and evolution of test technologies, threats, and targets needed to provide trusted, relevant test environments for those systems.

Operational Test Command Operations Support

OTC operational costs including mission support and information technology contracts, logistics training, equipment, travel, facility maintenance and supplies.

Test Technology Sustainment

This project sustains OTC Test Assets used to emulate contested Multi Domain Operation (MDO) Future Operating Environments (FOE), providing real-time test monitoring and control while supporting end-to-end data requirements that range from data collection to analysis and visualization. Funds are utilized for scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, or to replace existing assets that are no longer serviceable or manufacturer-supportable with new assets that address the same or similar requirement. This includes modifications to existing assets undertaken to extend the life of the asset beyond what was previously planned. This project sustains expertise responsible for employing modeling and simulation tools to support operational tests while continuously striving for interoperability and integration between existing and newly acquired assets. All actions will reduce test costs and demand for live units by simulating realistic, future-focused tactical engagements, adjacent and higher headquarters units, mission command message traffic, and battlefield kinetic and non-kinetic effects. Project funding will similarly sustain video data capture equipment, appended data collection devices, software used to collect and analyze system performance, and technical expertise/software required to maintain cyber security of assets in accordance with Risk Management Framework (RMF) Accreditation.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY24 Actuals$74.1M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY25 Enacted$76.1M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY25 Total$76.1M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY26 Disc. Request$63.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY26 Total$63.6M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$74.1M$76.1M$63.6M$63.6M
V02: ATEC Activities$74.1M$76.1M$63.6M$63.6M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Support of Operational Testing. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.