Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0605706A/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Materiel Systems Analysis
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $23.4M |
| FY25 | $23.3M |
| FY26 | $19.1M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $20.6M | $20.2M | $21.5M | $21.7M | $21.0M | $21.2M | $21.8M | $20.8M | $22.0M | $23.4M | ||
| Enacted | $20.4M | $21.7M | $21.9M | $21.2M | $21.3M | $21.8M | $21.6M | $22.0M | $26.9M | $23.3M | ||
| Request | $21.7M | $21.9M | $21.2M | $21.3M | $21.9M | $21.6M | $22.0M | $26.9M | $27.4M | $19.1M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $26.9M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $23.4M as actual total obligation authority — $3.50M below the request. 23.4 − 26.9 = -3.5 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Materiel Systems Analysis
This Program Element (PE) resources the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM) Analysis Center (DAC) to conduct integrated material performance analyses to support Army decisions in technology, materiel acquisition, and the design, development, fielding and sustainment of Army materiel systems. The analysis products funded by this PE are leveraged to support Materiel Acquisition decisions and influence the design, development, and sustainment of Army weapon/materiel systems in support of the current and future force in the areas of Long-Range Precision Fires, Next Generation Combat Vehicles, Future Vehicle Lift, Network/Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence, Air and Missile Defense, Soldier Lethality and other Army Priority efforts. As the Army's center for integrated materiel performance analysis, the DAC supports Army and Department of Defense (DoD) decision makers throughout the entire acquisition process in responding to analytical requirements across the full spectrum of materiel. The DAC's unique in-house, consistent, integrated analytical capability provides the U.S. Army Futures Command (AFC) and Army leadership with timely, independent, unbiased, reliable, and high quality analysis to support complex decisions required for Current Operations and the development of the Future Force. The DAC's integrated set of skills, tools, and data repository are focused on the highest Army Priorities with a core mission to build the body of evidence and deliver objective analysis and experimentation across the entire life cycle to ensure Readiness today and a more lethal Future Force tomorrow. This PE develops and certifies system level, and systems-of-systems level, performance and effectiveness data across a broad range of capabilities such as target acquisition, probability of inflicting catastrophic damage, personnel and vehicle survivability, mobility, network, system reliability, and several additional capability areas used in Army studies. The PE funds the development of item-level performance methodology, and Models and Simulations (M&S) for the current and future operational environments and emerging threats. The M&S capabilities support the development, linkage and accreditation of live, virtual, and constructive simulations, and provide unique tools that support systems analysis of individual systems and the combined arms environment. This M&S infrastructure provides a hierarchical modeling framework that is unique to the DAC and allows for a comprehensive performance and effectiveness analysis and prediction capability that can be utilized to support trade-off and investment decisions prior to extensive and expensive hardware testing of proposed systems/technologies. This PE funds the Center for Reliability Growth (CRG), to develop critical tools, methodologies, policies, guidance and educational materials required to help acquisition programs achieve required reliability during the acquisition process. The CRG develops and applies engineering approaches to assess the reliability of Army materiel and provides recommendations on ways to improve reliability, thereby, reducing logistics footprints and life cycle costs, and extending failure-free periods for materiel. The CRG has developed an integrated set of skills and tools focused on its core competencies to be responsive in delivering objective data and analysis across the entire life cycle to ensure Readiness today and a more lethal future force tomorrow. The FY 2026 request was reduced by $0.142 million for civilian personnel to optimize the workforce in compliance with Executive Order 14210, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Workforce Optimization Initiative."
Mission — Materiel Sys Analysis
This Project resources the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM) Analysis Center (DAC) to conduct integrated material performance analyses to support Army decisions in technology, material acquisition, and the design, development, fielding and sustainment of Army materiel systems. The analysis products funded by this Project are leveraged to support Materiel Acquisition decisions and influence the design, development, and sustainment of Army weapon/materiel systems in support of the current and future force in the areas of Long-Range Precision Fires, Next Generation Combat Vehicles, Future Vehicle Lift, Network/Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence, Air and Missile Defense, Soldier Lethality and other Army Priority efforts. As the Army's center for integrated materiel performance analysis, the DAC supports Army and Department of Defense (DoD) decision makers throughout the entire acquisition process in responding to analytical requirements across the full spectrum of materiel. The DAC's unique in-house, consistent, integrated analytical capability provides the U.S. Army Futures Command (AFC) and Army leadership with timely, independent, unbiased, reliable, and high quality analysis to support complex decisions required for Current Operations and the development of the Future Force. The DAC's integrated set of skills, tools and data repository are focused on the highest Army Priorities with a core mission to build the body of evidence and deliver objective analysis and experimentation across the entire life cycle to ensure Readiness today and a more lethal Future Force tomorrow. This Project develops and certifies system level, and systems-of-systems level, performance and effectiveness data across a broad range of capabilities such as target acquisition, probability of inflicting catastrophic damage, personnel and vehicle survivability, mobility, network, system reliability, and several additional capability areas used in Army studies. The Project funds the development of item-level performance methodology, and Models and Simulations (M&S) for the current and future operational environments and emerging threats. The M&S capabilities support the development, linkage and accreditation of live, virtual, and constructive simulations, and provide unique tools that support systems analysis of individual systems and the combined arms environment. This M&S infrastructure provides a hierarchical modeling framework that is unique to the DAC and allows for a comprehensive performance and effectiveness analysis and prediction capability that can be utilized to support trade-off and investment decisions prior to extensive and expensive hardware testing of proposed systems/technologies. This Project funds the Center for Reliability Growth (CRG), to develop critical tools, methodologies, policies, guidance and educational materials required to help acquisition programs achieve required reliability during the acquisition process. The CRG develops and applies engineering approaches to assess the reliability of Army materiel and provides recommendations on ways to improve reliability, thereby, reducing logistics footprints and life cycle costs, and extending failure-free periods for materiel. The CRG has developed an integrated set of skills and tools focused on its core competencies to be responsive in delivering objective data and analysis across the entire life cycle to ensure Readiness today and a more lethal future force tomorrow.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)
Materiel Systems Analysis
This activity provides for systems and engineering analyses to support the entire Future Force Modernization Enterprise decisions in technology, materiel acquisition, and the design, development, fielding and sustainment of Army materiel systems; the development of system level performance and effectiveness data and item-level performance methodology, and models and simulations; and the development of critical tools, methodologies, policies and guidance as the Center for Reliability Growth to improve reliability, extend failure-free periods, and reduce support costs.
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY24 Actuals | $23.4M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY25 Enacted | $23.3M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY25 Total | $23.3M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY26 Disc. Request | $19.1M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY26 Total | $19.1M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $23.4M | $23.3M | $19.1M | $19.1M |
| 541: Materiel Sys Analysis | $23.4M | $23.3M | $19.1M | $19.1M |
Follow the dollar
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Materiel Systems Analysis. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J184
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2017 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J151
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2017_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2018 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J166
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2018_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2019 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J166
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2019_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2020 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J190
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2020_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2021 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J199
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2021_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J176
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J175
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J174
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J176
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
RDTE - Vol 4 - Budget Activity 6 · www.asafm.army.mil
PDF page 148