Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Survivability/Lethality Analysis

ARDT&EFully Reconciled0605604A
What it is
Survivability/Lethality Analysis — a research & development program run by Army.
What changed
-$5.51M FY25→26
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$37.0M
FY25 Total
$36.8M
FY26 Request
$31.3M
FY25→26 Change
-$5.51M

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
FY24: $37.0MFY25: $36.8MFY26: $31.3MFY24FY25FY26
FY24
$37.0M
FY25
$36.8M
FY26
$31.3M
Decade view — each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY26

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$33.2M$33.1M$38.2M$41.3M$39.9M$33.6M$36.0M$35.0M$35.8M$37.0M
Enacted$33.2M$38.6M$41.8M$40.5M$35.1M$36.0M$36.4M$36.5M$37.5M$36.8M
Request$38.6M$41.8M$40.5M$35.1M$36.0M$36.4M$36.5M$37.5M$37.6M$31.3M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2020 book requested $35.1M for FY2020; the PB2022 book reports $33.6M actually spent — $1.44M below the request.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Army Survivability Analysis & Evaluation Supp

This Project funds objective vulnerability assessment products necessary for the inherently-governmental Army Test & Evaluation Command/Army Evaluation Center (ATEC/ AEC) mission, and for the Research and Development and analysis communities. Products result from investigating, analyzing, assessing, experimenting and reporting on the survivability of Soldiers, and on the survivability, lethality and vulnerability (SLV) of the highest-priority Army and threat systems. Products are leveraged within the Army Futures Command (AFC), the Cross-Functional Teams (CFTs), and Program Managers / Program Executive Offices (PM/PEO) to exercise constructive design influence over materiel development and to provide credible engineering-level underpinning and input to the Army Analytical Community. This Project provides quantitative analyses and data for fielded and developmental systems as the Army pursues its modernization priorities and ensures readiness through the fielding of lethal and survivable systems for multi-domain operations. This Project funds engineering level analysis and experimentation supporting all CFTs including Long Range Precision Fires systems, Next Generation Combat Vehicles, Future Vertical Lift, Network / Command, Control, Communications (C3I), Air & Missile Defense, Soldier Lethality, and other highest Army priority efforts Principal data and analysis domains are integrated materiel performance, cyber resilience, human engineering and performance, Electronic Warfare threat defense, and mission threat analysis. Assessments funded by this Project are conducted across the spectrum of multi-domain battlefield threats to include: guns, missiles, mines and other methods of inflicting physical damage; jammers, countermeasures, and other electronic warfare techniques; cyber threats from insiders to nation states; and directed energy weapons. Many different kinds of technical capabilities are used to generate these analyses, including specialized equipment, modeling & simulation, and experimental facilities. This Project ensures these capabilities can represent a live, virtual, or constructive hostile environment required for credible assessment, thus enabling evaluators, developers, users, and decision makers to make informed Acquisition judgments. This technical data from earliest AFC experimentation to final operational test is retained and serves as AFC's repository of analysis and information for supporting an ever-improving body of evidence to drive Milestone Decisions. This body of evidence enables properly informed decisions concerning acquisition and production; maximizes Army overmatch in systems and tactics; informs investment priorities; and mitigates system weaknesses prior to actual combat. Technical data and analysis results funded by this Project are efficiently leveraged for many different Army uses, reducing total cost to the Army by eliminating the need for duplicative capabilities funded by individual system developers. Central funding of this mission assures accurate and consistent technical treatment across all formal system Evaluations, and across the Army's analytical community as it conducts analyses of alternatives and other studies. The United States (U.S.) Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM) and ATEC/AEC integrate the results from the work program into Army's formal Evaluation process to ensure ATEC can comply with its legally-mandated responsibility to assess system survivability along with effectiveness and suitability. Work in this Project is performed by the United States Army Futures Command (AFC), U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM) Analysis Center (DAC), Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD

Mission Survivability/Lethality Analysis

This Program Element (PE) funds objective vulnerability assessment products necessary for the inherently-governmental Army Test & Evaluation Command/Army Evaluation Center (ATEC/ AEC) mission and for the Research and Development and analysis communities. Products result from investigating, analyzing, assessing, experimenting and reporting on the survivability of Soldiers, and on the survivability, lethality and vulnerability (SLV) of the highest-priority Army and threat systems. Products are leveraged within the Army Futures Command (AFC), the Cross Functional Teams (CFTs) and Program Managers / Program Executive Offices (PM/PEO) to exercise constructive design influence over materiel development and to provide credible engineering-level underpinning and input to the Army Analytical Community. This PE provides quantitative analyses and data for fielded and developmental systems as the Army pursues its modernization priorities and ensures readiness through the fielding of lethal and survivable systems for multi-domain operations. This PE funds engineering level analysis and experimentation supporting all CFTs including Long Range Precision Fires systems, Next Generation Combat Vehicles, Future Vertical Lift, Network / Command, Control, Communications (C3I), Air & Missile Defense, Soldier Lethality, and other high Army priority efforts. Principal data and analysis domains are integrated materiel performance, cyber resilience, human engineering and performance, Electronic Warfare threat defense, and mission threat analysis. Assessments funded by this PE are conducted across the spectrum of multi-domain battlefield threats to include: guns, missiles, mines and other methods of inflicting physical damage; jammers, countermeasures, and other electronic warfare techniques; cyber threats from insiders to nation states; and directed energy weapons. Many different kinds of technical capabilities are used to generate these analyses, including specialized equipment, modeling & simulation, and experimental facilities. This PE ensures these capabilities can represent a live, virtual, or constructive hostile environment required for credible assessment, thus enabling evaluators, developers, users, and decision makers to make informed acquisition judgments. This technical data from earliest AFC experimentation to final operational test is retained and serves as AFC's repository of analysis and information for supporting an ever-improving body of evidence to drive Milestone Decisions. This body of evidence enables properly informed decisions concerning acquisition and production; maximizes Army overmatch in systems and tactics; informs investment priorities; and mitigates system weaknesses prior to actual combat. Technical data and analysis results funded by this PE are efficiently leveraged for many different Army uses, reducing total cost to the Army by eliminating the need for duplicative capabilities funded by individual system developers. Central funding of this mission assures accurate and consistent technical treatment across all formal system Evaluations, and across the Army's analytical community as it conducts analyses of alternatives and other studies. The United States (U.S.) Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM) and ATEC/AEC integrate the results from the work program into Army's formal Evaluation process to ensure ATEC can comply with its legally-mandated responsibility to assess system survivability along with effectiveness and suitability. The FY 2026 request was reduced by $0.167 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative." The FY 2026 request was reduced by $0.39 million for civilian personnel to optimize the workforce in compliance with Executive Order 14210, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Workforce Optimization Initiative."

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (3)

Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C4ISR) System Survivability Assessments

This effort produces assessments of the survivability of C4ISR systems in Electronic Warfare (EW) and cyber threat environments and conducts Electronic Attack (EA) and cyber analyses that reveal critical vulnerabilities in C4ISR systems. It also defines, demonstrates, and recommends mitigation options to proponents and evaluators of C4ISR. A cyber vulnerability database is maintained for the benefit of the community.

Survivability, Lethality, Vulnerability Analyses (SLVA) for Ground, Aviation, Munitions, and Soldier Systems

This activity provides integrated multi-domain Survivability, Lethality, Vulnerability (SLV) Analyses for highest priority Ground, Aviation, Munitions, and Soldier Systems.

Survivability, Lethality, Vulnerability (SLV) Analyses for Developmental Air and Missile Defense Systems

Conduct integrated SLV analyses for developmental air and missile defense systems, pre-planned product improvements of current systems, and recently fielded systems.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY24 Actuals$37.0M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY25 Enacted$36.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY25 Total$36.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY26 Disc. Request$31.3M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY26 Total$31.3M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

ProjectFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
675: Army Survivability Analysis & Evaluation Supp$37.0M$36.8M$31.3M$31.3M
Program Element$37.0M$36.8M$31.3M$31.3M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →