Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0605518N/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
CONVENTIONAL PROMPT STRIKE (CPS)
Watch this program
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $1.08B |
| FY25 | $903.9M |
| FY26 | $798.3M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $0 | $747.4M | $1.28B | $1.26B | $1.08B | ||
| Enacted | – | $766.6M | $1.33B | $1.23B | $901.1M | $903.9M | |
| Request | – | – | $1.37B | $1.21B | $901.1M | $903.9M | $798.3M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $901.1M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $1.08B as actual total obligation authority — $175.0M above the request. 1,076.1 − 901.1 = 175.0 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — CONVENTIONAL PROMPT STRIKE (CPS)
Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) capability will enable precise and timely strike in contested environments across multiple platforms. In coordination with the Army, the Navy CPS Program is designing a common All Up Round (AUR) comprised of a Common Hypersonic Glide Body (C-HGB) and a 34.5" two-stage booster. The Navy is responsible for C-HGB design and plans to assume responsibility for C-HGB production from the Army in FY 2026. The Navy will design, develop, and produce the missile booster, and will integrate the missile booster with the C-HGB. Each service will use the resulting common hypersonic missile while developing individual weapon control systems and launchers tailored for launch from sea or land. Development efforts under this program element lead to a weapon system capability that: (1) is non-ballistic over the majority of the flight path; (2) controls stage drop; (3) provides positive control and precision accuracy from launch to impact; (4) provides adequate cross-range/maneuverability to avoid over-flight issues; (5) provides prompt lethal effects on targets; and (6) is man-safe and deployable for surface and submerged platforms. The FY 2026 cost of the CPS Middle Tier of Acquisition effort is $798.337 million, including RDT&E and procurement of prototype units. The Department will certify FYDP funding in a future budget submission.
Mission — Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS)
The Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) Weapon System will deliver a hypersonic conventional offensive strike capability through a depressed boost-glide trajectory to prosecute deep-inland, time-critical, soft and medium-hardened targets in contested environments. The CPS Weapon System will enhance U.S. conventional power projection through longer range, shorter time of flight, and higher survivability against enemy defenses compared to current capabilities. The CPS weapon system or major elements of the weapon system will be deployed onboard multiple launch platforms. The CPS program is a partnered effort between services. Specifically, the Navy and Army are collaborating to design and deliver a common All Up Round (AUR) in accordance with an inter-service Memorandum of Agreement. To meet Navy requirements and Army priorities, the Navy is designing and developing the Common Hypersonic Glide Body (CHGB) and 34.5" Booster, and integrating the C-HGB with the Navy-produced 34.5" booster to create a common AUR. The Navy plans to assume responsibility for production of the C-HGB from the Army in FY 2026. To enable weapon system integration to meet Navy mission requirements, near-term design, development, and experimentation are required across the weapon system's components. Design and development efforts will focus on boosters; thermal protection systems; navigation, guidance and control systems; capability enhancements; payload modules; weapon control systems and interfaces to existing fire control systems; support equipment; and launcher systems. Component and subsystem technology maturity will be demonstrated, and risk reduction accomplished, through Modeling and Simulation (M&S) assessments, Hardware-in-the-Loop (HWIL) / Software-in-the-Loop (SWIL) testing, ground-based testing, in-air and underwater launch testing, and flight tests. Furthermore, with each platform deployment, risk continues to be reduced for weapon subsystems and components until prototyping efforts culminate in an initial operational Blk V VIRGINIA Class submarine weapon system capability. The program will capitalize on commonality between platform implementations. CPS supports the National Defense Strategy by supporting modernization initiatives for hypersonic technologies and enabling a more lethal force. The CPS program plan: (1) Provides rapid delivery of capability through multiple acquisition increments and configurations; and (2) Provides flexibility to allow for additional capability phases as the weapon system and warfighter requirements evolve. In order to meet current Top Level Requirements (TLR) and future warfighter needs, the program has developed a Technology Insertion (TI) strategy with pre-planned insertion points to enable the program to regularly insert baseline upgrades and mature advanced technologies to support capability improvements into the Navy and Army systems. To support the TI Strategy, the program has developed a Science and Technology / Advanced Capability (STAC) process to mature advanced technology and fill Navy and Army warfighting capability gaps to ensure continued battlefield dominance. The FY 2026 Budget incorporates updated Cost Categories from the FY 2025 Budget to categorize CPS funding in a way that more precisely aligns to program efforts.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (6)
AUR/APM Development
The AUR/APM Development category includes efforts associated with design and development of a common Army/Navy All Up Round (AUR), to include the Glide Body, as well as development of the Navy AUR Canister, Launcher, Advanced Payload Module (APM), and related Simulators and Emulators.
Platform Fielding
The Platform Fielding category includes efforts associated with fielding the CPS capability on ZUMWALT Class DDGs and Virginia Class SSNs to include platform simulators and Navy Weapons Control System (WCS).
Product Support
The Product Support category includes efforts to advance research, development, and technical validation required for the CPS Weapon System. This includes prototype transportation solutions, initial training concept development for test execution aboard ZUMWALT, feasibility studies for facilities and infrastructure, and early-stage logistics assessments necessary for CPS integration and operational readiness.
Test & Evaluation
The Testing and Evaluation (T&E) category provides system level test plans and the execution of JFC test events. The Test and Evaluation category additionally supports test execution demonstrating platform integration of AUR Canister, APM, and WCS capabilities including but not limited to safety, lethality, survivability, In-Air and Underwater Launch (IAL and UWL), and shipboard testing.
Science and Technology / Advanced Capabilities (STAC)
The STAC budget category identifies, develops, tests, matures, and transitions new technologies and Weapon System capabilities to close Navy and Army warfighting gaps. The STAC program liaises with the broader DoD Science and Technology (S&T) community and industry partners to identify emerging technologies and then develops component, subsystem, or other capabilities needed to improve affordability, manage obsolescence, and increase the CPS weapon system's capabilities against existing and emerging threats. The STAC program consists of three supporting elements: 1) Technology identification, feasibility, and development to provide advanced capabilities for the CPS Weapon System (WS) to address warfighting gaps leveraging the DoD S&T community, Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR), and industry partners; and improve manufacturability, scalability, and affordability to reduce overall CPS WS costs. 2) Technology evaluations to validate readiness for transition into the CPS WS that include modeling and simulation, hardware in the loop, and various levels of component testing (wind tunnel, ground, sled, and flight). 3) Technology transition into the CPS WS through the CPS Technology Insertion (TI) process. STAC focuses on advanced capabilities that increase CPS WS's capabilities against the following program Top Level Requirement (TLR) categories: 1) Priority targets; 2) Emerging threat environments; 3) Flight effectiveness 4) Accuracy; 5) Range; and 6) Command, Control and Communications (C3) interoperability. Details are available at a higher classification level.
Program Office Support
The Program Office Support category includes essential technical, engineering, and acquisition management functions directly tied to critical Program Office operations. Efforts represent cost-effective solutions that strengthen internal Program Office expertise and efficiency.
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY24 Actuals | $1.08B |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Enacted | $903.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Total | $903.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Disc. Request | $798.3M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Total | $798.3M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $3.06B | $1.08B | $903.9M | $798.3M | $798.3M |
| 3334: Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) | $3.06B | $1.08B | $903.9M | $798.3M | $798.3M |
Follow the dollar
Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.
Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →
The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.
Related awards
Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →
| Recipient | PIID | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP | N0003019C0025 | high |
| THE CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY, INC. | N0003025C6005 | high |
Contractor concentration
No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.
Lobbying mentions
15 mentions from the Senate LDA disclosure database.
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Oversight
GAO oversight of this program
GAO assessed Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) in its June 2025 Weapon Systems Annual Assessment, as a Navy MTA program.
“The Navy's CPS program aims to develop an intermediate-range, hypersonic missile in phases. We assessed phase one, an MTA rapid prototyping effort. That effort plans to conduct a cold-gas launch—in which the booster ignites after the missile ejects—in spring 2025. The second phase, a planned MTA rapid fielding effort, aims to field the missile on a surface ship by 2027. The third phase, a planned major defense acquisition program, aims to field the missile on Virginia class submarines by the early 2030s. The CPS program partners with the Army's Long Range Hypersonic Weapon program, which we assessed separately.”
GAO-25-107569, p. 119 — the assessment page in GAO’s 2025 report
Earlier editions of the same assessment: June 2024 · June 2023
GAO assessed Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) in its June 2024 Weapon Systems Annual Assessment, as a Navy MTA program.
“The Navy's CPS program aims to develop an intermediate-range, hypersonic missile in phases. We assessed phase one, an MTA rapid prototyping effort. That effort plans to conduct a cold-gas launch—in which the booster ignites after the missile ejects—by 2024. The second phase, a planned MTA rapid fielding effort, aims to field the missile on a surface ship by 2025. The third phase, a planned major defense acquisition program, aims to field the missile on Virginia class submarines by 2030. CPS partners with the Army's Long Range Hypersonic Weapon program, which we assessed separately.”
GAO-24-106831, p. 155 — the assessment page in GAO’s 2024 report
GAO assessed Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) in its June 2023 Weapon Systems Annual Assessment, as a Navy MTA program.
“The Navy's CPS program aims to develop an intermediate-range, hypersonic missile in phases. We assessed phase one—an MTA rapid prototyping effort. That effort plans to conduct a cold-gas launch—in which the booster ignites after the missile ejects—by 2024. The second phase—a planned MTA rapid fielding effort—aims to field the missile on a surface ship by 2025. The third phase—a planned major defense acquisition program—aims to field the missile on Virginia class submarines by 2030. CPS partners with the Army's Long Range Hypersonic Weapon program.”
GAO-23-106059, p. 167 — the assessment page in GAO’s 2023 report
GAO assessed the program, not this budget line. CONVENTIONAL PROMPT STRIKE (CPS) is one of the lines that funds it, and GAO’s work above says nothing about this line’s own figures. Which line each GAO item attaches to is a hand-ratified crosswalk — how it was checked.
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not CONVENTIONAL PROMPT STRIKE (CPS). GAO's program-level work on this line is above. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J341
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J336
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J326
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J324
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J326
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
RDTEN BA1-3 Book · www.secnav.navy.mil