Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

CONVENTIONAL PROMPT STRIKE (CPS)

NRDT&EPartial Reconciliation0605518N
What it is
CONVENTIONAL PROMPT STRIKE (CPS) — a research & development program run by Navy.
What changed
-$105.6M FY25→26
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$1.08B
FY25 Total
$903.9M
FY26 Request
$798.3M
FY25→26 Change
-$105.6M

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
FY24: $1.08BFY25: $903.9MFY26: $798.3MFY24FY25FY26
FY24
$1.08B
FY25
$903.9M
FY26
$798.3M
Decade view — each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
FY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY20FY26

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

SeriesFY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$0$747.4M$1.28B$1.26B$1.08B
Enacted$766.6M$1.33B$1.23B$901.1M$903.9M
Request$1.37B$1.21B$901.1M$903.9M$798.3M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $901.1M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reports $1.08B actually spent — $175.0M above the request.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission CONVENTIONAL PROMPT STRIKE (CPS)

Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) capability will enable precise and timely strike in contested environments across multiple platforms. In coordination with the Army, the Navy CPS Program is designing a common All Up Round (AUR) comprised of a Common Hypersonic Glide Body (C-HGB) and a 34.5" two-stage booster. The Navy is responsible for C-HGB design and plans to assume responsibility for C-HGB production from the Army in FY 2026. The Navy will design, develop, and produce the missile booster, and will integrate the missile booster with the C-HGB. Each service will use the resulting common hypersonic missile while developing individual weapon control systems and launchers tailored for launch from sea or land. Development efforts under this program element lead to a weapon system capability that: (1) is non-ballistic over the majority of the flight path; (2) controls stage drop; (3) provides positive control and precision accuracy from launch to impact; (4) provides adequate cross-range/maneuverability to avoid over-flight issues; (5) provides prompt lethal effects on targets; and (6) is man-safe and deployable for surface and submerged platforms. The FY 2026 cost of the CPS Middle Tier of Acquisition effort is $798.337 million, including RDT&E and procurement of prototype units. The Department will certify FYDP funding in a future budget submission.

Mission Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS)

The Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) Weapon System will deliver a hypersonic conventional offensive strike capability through a depressed boost-glide trajectory to prosecute deep-inland, time-critical, soft and medium-hardened targets in contested environments. The CPS Weapon System will enhance U.S. conventional power projection through longer range, shorter time of flight, and higher survivability against enemy defenses compared to current capabilities. The CPS weapon system or major elements of the weapon system will be deployed onboard multiple launch platforms. The CPS program is a partnered effort between services. Specifically, the Navy and Army are collaborating to design and deliver a common All Up Round (AUR) in accordance with an inter-service Memorandum of Agreement. To meet Navy requirements and Army priorities, the Navy is designing and developing the Common Hypersonic Glide Body (CHGB) and 34.5" Booster, and integrating the C-HGB with the Navy-produced 34.5" booster to create a common AUR. The Navy plans to assume responsibility for production of the C-HGB from the Army in FY 2026. To enable weapon system integration to meet Navy mission requirements, near-term design, development, and experimentation are required across the weapon system's components. Design and development efforts will focus on boosters; thermal protection systems; navigation, guidance and control systems; capability enhancements; payload modules; weapon control systems and interfaces to existing fire control systems; support equipment; and launcher systems. Component and subsystem technology maturity will be demonstrated, and risk reduction accomplished, through Modeling and Simulation (M&S) assessments, Hardware-in-the-Loop (HWIL) / Software-in-the-Loop (SWIL) testing, ground-based testing, in-air and underwater launch testing, and flight tests. Furthermore, with each platform deployment, risk continues to be reduced for weapon subsystems and components until prototyping efforts culminate in an initial operational Blk V VIRGINIA Class submarine weapon system capability. The program will capitalize on commonality between platform implementations. CPS supports the National Defense Strategy by supporting modernization initiatives for hypersonic technologies and enabling a more lethal force. The CPS program plan: (1) Provides rapid delivery of capability through multiple acquisition increments and configurations; and (2) Provides flexibility to allow for additional capability phases as the weapon system and warfighter requirements evolve. In order to meet current Top Level Requirements (TLR) and future warfighter needs, the program has developed a Technology Insertion (TI) strategy with pre-planned insertion points to enable the program to regularly insert baseline upgrades and mature advanced technologies to support capability improvements into the Navy and Army systems. To support the TI Strategy, the program has developed a Science and Technology / Advanced Capability (STAC) process to mature advanced technology and fill Navy and Army warfighting capability gaps to ensure continued battlefield dominance. The FY 2026 Budget incorporates updated Cost Categories from the FY 2025 Budget to categorize CPS funding in a way that more precisely aligns to program efforts.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (6)

Test & Evaluation

The Testing and Evaluation (T&E) category provides system level test plans and the execution of JFC test events. The Test and Evaluation category additionally supports test execution demonstrating platform integration of AUR Canister, APM, and WCS capabilities including but not limited to safety, lethality, survivability, In-Air and Underwater Launch (IAL and UWL), and shipboard testing.

AUR/APM Development

The AUR/APM Development category includes efforts associated with design and development of a common Army/Navy All Up Round (AUR), to include the Glide Body, as well as development of the Navy AUR Canister, Launcher, Advanced Payload Module (APM), and related Simulators and Emulators.

Product Support

The Product Support category includes efforts to advance research, development, and technical validation required for the CPS Weapon System. This includes prototype transportation solutions, initial training concept development for test execution aboard ZUMWALT, feasibility studies for facilities and infrastructure, and early-stage logistics assessments necessary for CPS integration and operational readiness.

Platform Fielding

The Platform Fielding category includes efforts associated with fielding the CPS capability on ZUMWALT Class DDGs and Virginia Class SSNs to include platform simulators and Navy Weapons Control System (WCS).

Science and Technology / Advanced Capabilities (STAC)

The STAC budget category identifies, develops, tests, matures, and transitions new technologies and Weapon System capabilities to close Navy and Army warfighting gaps. The STAC program liaises with the broader DoD Science and Technology (S&T) community and industry partners to identify emerging technologies and then develops component, subsystem, or other capabilities needed to improve affordability, manage obsolescence, and increase the CPS weapon system's capabilities against existing and emerging threats. The STAC program consists of three supporting elements: 1) Technology identification, feasibility, and development to provide advanced capabilities for the CPS Weapon System (WS) to address warfighting gaps leveraging the DoD S&T community, Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR), and industry partners; and improve manufacturability, scalability, and affordability to reduce overall CPS WS costs. 2) Technology evaluations to validate readiness for transition into the CPS WS that include modeling and simulation, hardware in the loop, and various levels of component testing (wind tunnel, ground, sled, and flight). 3) Technology transition into the CPS WS through the CPS Technology Insertion (TI) process. STAC focuses on advanced capabilities that increase CPS WS's capabilities against the following program Top Level Requirement (TLR) categories: 1) Priority targets; 2) Emerging threat environments; 3) Flight effectiveness 4) Accuracy; 5) Range; and 6) Command, Control and Communications (C3) interoperability. Details are available at a higher classification level.

Program Office Support

The Program Office Support category includes essential technical, engineering, and acquisition management functions directly tied to critical Program Office operations. Efforts represent cost-effective solutions that strengthen internal Program Office expertise and efficiency.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY24 Actuals$1.08B
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Enacted$903.9M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Total$903.9M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Disc. Request$798.3M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Total$798.3M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$3.06B$1.08B$903.9M$798.3M$798.3M
3334: Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS)$3.06B$1.08B$903.9M$798.3M$798.3M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →