Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0605518N/ — data as of July 28, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
CONVENTIONAL PROMPT STRIKE (CPS)
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
- FY24
- $1.08B
- FY25
- $903.9M
- FY26
- $798.3M
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $0 | $747.4M | $1.28B | $1.26B | $1.08B | ||
| Enacted | – | $766.6M | $1.33B | $1.23B | $901.1M | $903.9M | |
| Request | – | – | $1.37B | $1.21B | $901.1M | $903.9M | $798.3M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $901.1M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reports $1.08B actually spent — $175.0M above the request.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — CONVENTIONAL PROMPT STRIKE (CPS)
Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) capability will enable precise and timely strike in contested environments across multiple platforms. In coordination with the Army, the Navy CPS Program is designing a common All Up Round (AUR) comprised of a Common Hypersonic Glide Body (C-HGB) and a 34.5" two-stage booster. The Navy is responsible for C-HGB design and plans to assume responsibility for C-HGB production from the Army in FY 2026. The Navy will design, develop, and produce the missile booster, and will integrate the missile booster with the C-HGB. Each service will use the resulting common hypersonic missile while developing individual weapon control systems and launchers tailored for launch from sea or land. Development efforts under this program element lead to a weapon system capability that: (1) is non-ballistic over the majority of the flight path; (2) controls stage drop; (3) provides positive control and precision accuracy from launch to impact; (4) provides adequate cross-range/maneuverability to avoid over-flight issues; (5) provides prompt lethal effects on targets; and (6) is man-safe and deployable for surface and submerged platforms. The FY 2026 cost of the CPS Middle Tier of Acquisition effort is $798.337 million, including RDT&E and procurement of prototype units. The Department will certify FYDP funding in a future budget submission.
Mission — Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS)
The Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) Weapon System will deliver a hypersonic conventional offensive strike capability through a depressed boost-glide trajectory to prosecute deep-inland, time-critical, soft and medium-hardened targets in contested environments. The CPS Weapon System will enhance U.S. conventional power projection through longer range, shorter time of flight, and higher survivability against enemy defenses compared to current capabilities. The CPS weapon system or major elements of the weapon system will be deployed onboard multiple launch platforms. The CPS program is a partnered effort between services. Specifically, the Navy and Army are collaborating to design and deliver a common All Up Round (AUR) in accordance with an inter-service Memorandum of Agreement. To meet Navy requirements and Army priorities, the Navy is designing and developing the Common Hypersonic Glide Body (CHGB) and 34.5" Booster, and integrating the C-HGB with the Navy-produced 34.5" booster to create a common AUR. The Navy plans to assume responsibility for production of the C-HGB from the Army in FY 2026. To enable weapon system integration to meet Navy mission requirements, near-term design, development, and experimentation are required across the weapon system's components. Design and development efforts will focus on boosters; thermal protection systems; navigation, guidance and control systems; capability enhancements; payload modules; weapon control systems and interfaces to existing fire control systems; support equipment; and launcher systems. Component and subsystem technology maturity will be demonstrated, and risk reduction accomplished, through Modeling and Simulation (M&S) assessments, Hardware-in-the-Loop (HWIL) / Software-in-the-Loop (SWIL) testing, ground-based testing, in-air and underwater launch testing, and flight tests. Furthermore, with each platform deployment, risk continues to be reduced for weapon subsystems and components until prototyping efforts culminate in an initial operational Blk V VIRGINIA Class submarine weapon system capability. The program will capitalize on commonality between platform implementations. CPS supports the National Defense Strategy by supporting modernization initiatives for hypersonic technologies and enabling a more lethal force. The CPS program plan: (1) Provides rapid delivery of capability through multiple acquisition increments and configurations; and (2) Provides flexibility to allow for additional capability phases as the weapon system and warfighter requirements evolve. In order to meet current Top Level Requirements (TLR) and future warfighter needs, the program has developed a Technology Insertion (TI) strategy with pre-planned insertion points to enable the program to regularly insert baseline upgrades and mature advanced technologies to support capability improvements into the Navy and Army systems. To support the TI Strategy, the program has developed a Science and Technology / Advanced Capability (STAC) process to mature advanced technology and fill Navy and Army warfighting capability gaps to ensure continued battlefield dominance. The FY 2026 Budget incorporates updated Cost Categories from the FY 2025 Budget to categorize CPS funding in a way that more precisely aligns to program efforts.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (6)
Test & Evaluation
The Testing and Evaluation (T&E) category provides system level test plans and the execution of JFC test events. The Test and Evaluation category additionally supports test execution demonstrating platform integration of AUR Canister, APM, and WCS capabilities including but not limited to safety, lethality, survivability, In-Air and Underwater Launch (IAL and UWL), and shipboard testing.
AUR/APM Development
The AUR/APM Development category includes efforts associated with design and development of a common Army/Navy All Up Round (AUR), to include the Glide Body, as well as development of the Navy AUR Canister, Launcher, Advanced Payload Module (APM), and related Simulators and Emulators.
Product Support
The Product Support category includes efforts to advance research, development, and technical validation required for the CPS Weapon System. This includes prototype transportation solutions, initial training concept development for test execution aboard ZUMWALT, feasibility studies for facilities and infrastructure, and early-stage logistics assessments necessary for CPS integration and operational readiness.
Platform Fielding
The Platform Fielding category includes efforts associated with fielding the CPS capability on ZUMWALT Class DDGs and Virginia Class SSNs to include platform simulators and Navy Weapons Control System (WCS).
Science and Technology / Advanced Capabilities (STAC)
The STAC budget category identifies, develops, tests, matures, and transitions new technologies and Weapon System capabilities to close Navy and Army warfighting gaps. The STAC program liaises with the broader DoD Science and Technology (S&T) community and industry partners to identify emerging technologies and then develops component, subsystem, or other capabilities needed to improve affordability, manage obsolescence, and increase the CPS weapon system's capabilities against existing and emerging threats. The STAC program consists of three supporting elements: 1) Technology identification, feasibility, and development to provide advanced capabilities for the CPS Weapon System (WS) to address warfighting gaps leveraging the DoD S&T community, Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR), and industry partners; and improve manufacturability, scalability, and affordability to reduce overall CPS WS costs. 2) Technology evaluations to validate readiness for transition into the CPS WS that include modeling and simulation, hardware in the loop, and various levels of component testing (wind tunnel, ground, sled, and flight). 3) Technology transition into the CPS WS through the CPS Technology Insertion (TI) process. STAC focuses on advanced capabilities that increase CPS WS's capabilities against the following program Top Level Requirement (TLR) categories: 1) Priority targets; 2) Emerging threat environments; 3) Flight effectiveness 4) Accuracy; 5) Range; and 6) Command, Control and Communications (C3) interoperability. Details are available at a higher classification level.
Program Office Support
The Program Office Support category includes essential technical, engineering, and acquisition management functions directly tied to critical Program Office operations. Efforts represent cost-effective solutions that strengthen internal Program Office expertise and efficiency.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY24 Actuals | $1.08B |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Enacted | $903.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Total | $903.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Disc. Request | $798.3M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Total | $798.3M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $3.06B | $1.08B | $903.9M | $798.3M | $798.3M |
| 3334: Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) | $3.06B | $1.08B | $903.9M | $798.3M | $798.3M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →