Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0605232A/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Hypersonics EMD
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $772.2M |
| FY25 | $469.8M |
| FY26 | $513.0M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $0 | $0 | $107.4M | $533.5M | $772.2M | ||
| Enacted | – | $0 | $111.5M | $633.5M | $900.9M | $469.8M | |
| Request | – | – | $111.5M | $633.5M | $900.9M | $538.0M | $513.0M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $900.9M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $772.2M as actual total obligation authority — $128.7M below the request. 772.2 − 900.9 = -128.7 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Hypersonics EMD
This funding supports the fielding of critical enabling technologies and capabilities that address near-term and mid-term threats. It is directly aligned to the Army Long Range Precision Fires modernization priority. This Program Element includes the development and fielding of the LRHW to defeat Anti Access/Area Denial (A2/AD) capabilities, suppress adversary Long Range Fires, and engage other high payoff/time critical targets. The Army is working collaboratively with the Navy in the development of the LRHW and conducting Joint Flight Campaign (JFC) tests to evaluate overall system performance with added focus on missile body and payload performance. The LRHW system consists of the All Up Rounds (AUR) plus Canister (AUR+C) which includes the Common Hypersonic Glide Body (CHGB) with the Navy 34.5 inch booster, the Battery Operations Center (BOC) for command and control (C2), and the Transporter Erector Launcher (TEL). An LRHW Battery contains eight AUR+Cs, one BOC, and four TELs each carrying two AUR+Cs. Additionally, the LRHW will use a modified version of an existing C2 network, the Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System (AFATDS). Continued RDT&E investment is required beyond the initial prototype Battery to meet objective requirements and to maintain overmatch against evolving threats. Through implementation of planned Technology Insertions (TIs), the program will increase capability, upgrade the system to address obsolescence, and upgrade platform, launcher, and weapon control systems with mature technologies from Science and Technology (S&T). Qualification testing is also required to validate these developmental changes. Soldier operational testing of new capability is also required. The FY 2026 cost of the Long Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW) Ground Support Equipment (GSE) Middle Tier of Acquisition effort is $17.9 million, including RDT&E and procurement of prototype units. The Department will certify FYDP funding in a future budget submission. The FY 2026 request was reduced by $1 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative."
Mission — Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW)
This funding supports the fielding of critical enabling technologies and capabilities that address near-term and mid-term threats. It is directly aligned to the Army Long Range Precision Fires modernization priority. The LRHW system consists of the All Up Rounds (AUR) plus Canister (AUR+C) which includes the Common Hypersonic Glide Body (CHGB) with the Navy 34.5 inch booster, the Battery Operations Center (BOC) for command and control (C2), and the Transporter Erector Launcher (TEL). An LRHW Battery contains eight AUR+Cs, one BOC, and four TELs each carrying two AUR+Cs. Additionally, the LRHW will use a modified version of an existing C2 network, the Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System (AFATDS). This Program Element includes the development and fielding of the LRHW to defeat Anti Access/Area Denial (A2/AD) capabilities, suppress adversary Long Range Fires, and engage other high payoff/time critical targets. The Army is working collaboratively with the Navy in the development of the LRHW and conducting Joint Flight Campaign (JFC) tests to evaluate overall system performance, with added focus on missile body and payload performance as well as incorporate capability improvements. Continued RDT&E investment is required beyond the initial prototype Battery to meet objective requirements and to maintain overmatch against evolving threats. Through implementation of planned Technology Insertions (TIs), the program will increase capability, upgrade the system to address obsolescence, and upgrade platform, launcher, and weapon control systems with mature technologies from Science and Technology (S&T). Qualification testing is required to validate these developmental changes. Soldier operational testing of new capability is also required. The FY 2026 cost of the Long Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW) Ground Support Equipment (GSE) Middle Tier of Acquisition effort is $17.9 million, including RDT&E and procurement of prototype units. The Department will certify FYDP funding in a future budget submission. FY 2026 funding provides for incremental funding of AUR+C test assets and AUR+C tactical loads and reloads, developmental engineering for GSE TI integration, funding for test activities and events, and systems engineering and program management.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (5)
All Up Round and Canister (AUR+C)
All Up Round plus Canister (AUR+C) Technology development, purchase of hardware, integration, assembly, test and delivery of the AUR+C.
Common Hypersonic Glide Body (CHGB)
Common Hypersonic Glide Body (CHGB) with Thermal Protection System (TPS) Development, purchase of hardware, integration, assembly, test and delivery of the CHGB system for the AUR+C. Remain technologically capable to support CHGB production for requiring services.
Ground Support Equipment (GSE)
Provides for planning and integration efforts for LRHW GSE, LRHW technology development and deployment, and additional training development (enhances existing and incorporates detailed operator and maintainer skills). Designs training aid devices, simulations, and simulator in accordance with the system training plan. Develops the overall Systems Integration and training for the AUR+C and the TI-22 AURTA (LTL-1) capability in the LRHW System Integration Laboratory (LSIL) in supports of JFC-5C mission execution for the LRHW program.
Test and Evaluation
Test and Evaluation Test and evaluation includes test planning, execution and analysis of Joint Flight Campaigns (JFC) and Army operational and developmental tests.
System Engineering/Program Management
Includes the Government PM's office (civilian, SETA, and matrix personnel), OGAs, and software licenses/maintenance to support RDT&E efforts
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY24 Actuals | $772.2M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY25 Enacted | $469.8M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY25 Total | $469.8M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY26 Disc. Request | $513.0M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY26 Total | $513.0M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $772.2M | $469.8M | $513.0M | $513.0M |
| HX2: Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW) | $772.2M | $469.8M | $513.0M | $513.0M |
Follow the dollar
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Hypersonics EMD. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J154
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J150
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J148
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J149
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J145
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
RDTE - Vol 3 - Budget Activity 5A · www.asafm.army.mil