Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0605200D8Z/ — data as of August 12, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
General Support to OUSD(Intelligence and Security)
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $7.98M |
| FY25 | $6.16M |
| FY26 | $3.47M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $2.85M | $1.69M | $1.87M | $165.1M | $8.14M | $20.2M | $7.90M | $10.5M | $16.1M | $7.98M | ||
| Enacted | $1.69M | $10.4M | $61.5M | $5.69M | $20.2M | $7.90M | $10.5M | $11.1M | $2.98M | $6.16M | ||
| Request | $1.87M | $31.5M | $1.69M | $1.70M | $1.94M | $1.95M | $6.11M | $2.98M | $3.15M | $3.47M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2018 book requested $31.5M for FY2018; the PB2020 book reported $165.1M as actual total obligation authority — $133.6M above the request. 165.1 − 31.5 = 133.6 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — General Support to OUSD(Intelligence and Security)
This RDT&E program supports the Department's initiatives to Defend the Homeland, Build Sustainable and Long-Term Advantage, and Taking Care of People. Funding enables oversight and advances intelligence and security innovation, develops Artificial Intelligence (AI), and enables technical analysis & assessments. Some initiatives span multiple fiscal years, whereas some are one-year initiatives. The interim National Defense Strategy (NDS) describes an efficient and effective Department with an ability meet U.S. policy goals and objectives. It supports the NDS line of effort to build a more lethal force by conducting research and evaluation of global Defense Intelligence & Security Enterprise (DISE) topics to modernize key capabilities and develop AI. This innovation effort is closely coordinated with other Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) organizations, enabling efficiency and reformation of outdated business processes, sustaining security “best practices”, and minimizing risk. This PE provides guidance, counsel, and options to national leaders on improving the near-term efficiency and effectiveness of Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities by spearheading the expedited delivery of ISR systems, technologies, policies, and processes in support of warfighter operations around the globe. Funding promotes technology research and development across the DISE. Intelligence research activities support ISR efficiency, advance AI, and proliferate the usage of intelligence data. Activities also include proof of concept and application development related to enabling process improvement, efficiencies, and innovation. Funding also supports activities that support testing and evaluation across the DISE. Intelligence research activities support ISR efficiency, advance AI, and proliferate the usage of intelligence data. Activities also include proof of concept and application development related to enabling process improvement, efficiencies, and innovation. Funding also supports activities that support testing and evaluation across the DISE.
Mission — General Support to USD(I&S)
Intelligence Activities require expert engineering and technical assessments on a wide range of classified ISR operational capabilities that directly support NDS priorities. Further, senior-level education is provided for a better understanding to make informed decisions on ISR operations related initiatives, platforms, sensors, and force structure. This PE: 1) Establishes and assesses oversight of the DoD ISR enterprise; 2) Evaluates ISR enterprise performance and effectiveness in terms of strategic sufficiency and alignment to the NDS and monitor allied and partner ISR contributions; 3) Provides expertise on matters of technical collection and operational employment; 4) Provides ISR guidance, counsel, and options to national leaders on improving the near-term efficiency and effectiveness of ISR capabilities by spearheading the expedited delivery of ISR systems, technologies, policies, and processes in support of warfighter operations around the globe; and 5) Conducts research and evaluation of global ISR topics to modernize key capabilities. Security Activities require coordinated, technology advancements to Personnel Vetting, Physical Security, Industrial Security, Critical Technology Protection, and Law Enforcement that secure the Department and Defense Industrial Base. Activities within this PE include proof of concept and application development related to enabling process improvement, efficiencies, and innovation.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)
General Spt to USD(I&S)
OUSD(I&S) developed an AI technology to expedite the release of information to foreign partners. Machine Assisted Disclosure (MAD) integrates within a Combatant Commands workflow to proliferate a robust, coalition Common Operating Picture (COP), while maintaining operational security by leveraging existing Foreign Disclosure Officers. OUSD(I&S) initiated the Reimagining Polygraph project to identify, develop, and enhance technologies in support of credibility assessments (CA); design tradecraft for the effective and objective use of these technologies; and provide a viable path forward to integrate and deploy these technologies in support of the DoD mission. OUSD(I&S) promoted studies that realized the efficiencies of a wide range of classified ISR operational capabilities that directly support NDS priorities.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY24 Actuals | $7.98M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY25 Enacted | $6.16M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY25 Total | $6.16M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY26 Disc. Request | $3.47M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY26 Total | $3.47M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $16.1M | $7.98M | $6.16M | $3.47M | $3.47M |
| 200: General Support to USD(I&S) | $16.1M | $7.98M | $6.16M | $3.47M | $3.47M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not General Support to OUSD(Intelligence and Security) — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →