Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Live Fire Test and Evaluation

OTERDT&EPartial Reconciliation0605131OTE

Watch this program: RSS · Atom

What it is
Live Fire Test and Evaluation (0605131OTE) is an OTE research & development line funded in the Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
+$96.5M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$105.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$109.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$206.1MR-1 TOA · PB2026
47.5% reconciliation

$108.1M discretionary + $98.0M one-time reconciliation. Discretionary change vs FY2025 enacted: -1.3%.

FY25→26 Change
+$96.5MR-1 TOA · PB2026

Two official figures, one label— reconciled below

Fiscal Receipts uses P-1/R-1 workbook total obligation authority (TOA) as the headline figure sitewide. The workbook TOA includes budget rows (such as advance procurement) that the R-2/P-40 J-book program line excludes. How the two bases relate →

FY26 Request · $206.1M TOA − $108.1M J-book line = 98.0M (206.1108.1 = 98.0)

Figures in the sentence are rounded for reading; the parenthesised arithmetic is the same subtraction in USD millions, at the precision where it closes.

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $105.6MFY25: $109.6MFY26: $206.1MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$105.6M
FY25$109.6M
FY26$206.1M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$45.1M$46.9M$48.3M$59.0M$64.3M$69.2M$74.0M$103.5M$168.0M$105.6M
Enacted$46.9M$48.3M$59.5M$64.3M$69.2M$70.9M$103.5M$168.0M$103.3M$109.6M
Request$48.3M$59.5M$64.3M$69.2M$70.9M$68.5M$99.9M$103.3M$109.6M$206.1M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2023 book requested $99.9M for FY2023; the PB2025 book reported $168.0M as actual total obligation authority — $68.0M above the request. 167.95399.947 = 68.006 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Live Fire Test and Evaluation (LFT&E)

This Program Element consists of three programs: Joint Live Fire (JLF), Joint Aircraft Survivability Program (JASP), and Joint Technical Coordinating Group for Munitions Effectiveness (JTCG/ME). This Program Element directly supports the Congressional statutory requirements for oversight of LFT&E. The primary objective of LFT&E is to assure that the vulnerability and survivability of Department of Defense (DoD) crew-carrying platforms and the lethality of our conventional munitions are known and acceptable before entering full-rate production. LFT&E encompasses realistic tests involving actual U.S. and foreign threat hardware or, if not available, acceptable surrogate threat hardware. The objective is to identify and correct design deficiencies early in the development process. A completed LFT&E program and test report is required before programs proceed beyond low-rate initial production (BLRIP). LFT&E also includes realistic modeling and simulation (M&S) to examine survivability and lethality attributes not assessed during testing. This Program Element supports the DoD’s JLF Program, initiated in 1984 under an Office of the Secretary of Defense charter to test fielded front-line combat aircraft and armor systems for their vulnerabilities as well as fielded weapons, both U.S. and foreign, for their lethality against their respective targets. Funds are also used to support other initiatives related to quick reaction requests from theater and other areas of personnel survivability. Through its evolution, the JLF program also facilitates the development of adequate LFT&E tools, methods, and infrastructure required for credible development of both, Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manuals (JMEM) weaponeering tools and LFT&E programs. JASP is the DoD’s focal point for joint service enhancement of military aircraft non-nuclear survivability. The JASP is chartered by the Commander of the U.S. Navy Naval Air Systems Command, the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology), and the Commander of the U.S. Air Force Life Cycle Management Center to increase the affordability, readiness, and effectiveness of tri-Service aircraft through joint coordination and development of survivability technologies, design tools, and assessment methodologies. The JASP coordinates and conducts RDT&E to improve military aircraft survivability, develop and standardize aircraft survivability M&S, facilitate information exchange on aircraft survivability, and support aircraft survivability education for the DoD and U.S. aircraft community. Each chartering command provides a senior aircraft survivability expert for the JASP Principal Members Steering Group, which guides the program and approves projects for funding. The JASP assesses and reports on combat damage incidents through the Joint Combat Assessment Team (JCAT). JTCG/ME was chartered to serve as DoD’s focal point for munitions effectiveness information. The JTCG/ME produces Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manuals (JMEMs) that are the sole source for all joint Service authenticated non-nuclear weapons effectiveness data and methodology for the DoD. The JMEMs are the “how to” manuals for putting ordnance on target and as such, directly impacts combat readiness, effectiveness, and survivability. JMEMs are used by the warfighters in operational weaponeering and collateral damage estimation (CDE) calls in direct support of operations, mission planning, and training; by the DoD, joint, and Service planners in force-on-force M&S, mission area analysis, requirements studies, and weapon procurement planning; and by the Service acquisition community in performance assessment, analysis of alternatives, and survivability enhancement studies. The JTCG/ME continually evolves weapons effectiveness and target vulnerability data, standards, methodologies, and processes based on the strategic environment for better munitions effectiveness evaluation and support to a more lethal force. JTCG/ME also increases efficiency by leveraging ongoing DoD efforts and supporting the DoD's intent to complement U.S. interest and capabilities by providing weaponeering and targeting capability to coalition partners. The JMEM requirements and development processes are driven by operational lessons learned (e.g., Inherent Resolve, Resolute Support, and Freedom Sentinel); Joint Staff data calls, and the needs of combatant commands (CCMDs), the Services, the Military Targeting Committee (MTC) guided by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction (CJCSI) 5140.01, Munitions Requirements Process - DoD Instruction 3000.04 and Operational Users Working Groups (OUWGs) input for specific weapon-target pairings and methodologies. Considerable effort goes into these user forums to establish warfighter requirements for current and future JTCG/ME products, as well as continued training events and day-to-day support - all with the goal of enabling greater force lethality, strengthened partner capabilities, and optimal use of resources. This Program Element also includes funds to obtain Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) expertise in performing analyses in support of described LFT&E tasks, as well as travel funds to carry out the JLF, JASP, and JTCG/ME programs.

Mission LFT&E

This Program Element consists of three programs: Joint Live Fire (JLF), Joint Aircraft Survivability Program (JASP), and Joint Technical Coordinating Group for Munitions Effectiveness (JTCG/ME). This Program Element directly supports the Congressional statutory requirements for oversight of LFT&E. The primary objective of LFT&E is to assure that the vulnerability and survivability of Department of Defense (DoD) crew-carrying platforms and the lethality of our conventional munitions are known and acceptable before entering full-rate production. LFT&E encompasses realistic tests involving actual U.S. and foreign threat hardware or, if not available, acceptable surrogate threat hardware. The objective is to identify and correct design deficiencies early in the development process. A completed LFT&E program and test report is required before programs proceed beyond low-rate initial production (BLRIP). LFT&E also includes realistic modeling and simulation (M&S) to examine survivability and lethality attributes not assessed during testing. This Program Element supports the DoD’s JLF Program, initiated in 1984 under an Office of the Secretary of Defense charter to test fielded front-line combat aircraft and armor systems for their vulnerabilities as well as fielded weapons, both U.S. and foreign, for their lethality against their respective targets. Funds are also used to support other initiatives related to quick reaction requests from theater and other areas of personnel survivability. Through its evolution, the JLF program also facilitates the development of adequate LFT&E tools, methods, and infrastructure required for credible development of both, Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manuals (JMEM) weaponeering tools and LFT&E programs. JASP is the DoD’s focal point for joint service enhancement of military aircraft non-nuclear survivability. The JASP is chartered by the Commander of the U.S. Navy Naval Air Systems Command, the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology), and the Commander of the U.S. Air Force Life Cycle Management Center to increase the affordability, readiness, and effectiveness of tri-Service aircraft through joint coordination and development of survivability technologies, design tools, and assessment methodologies. The JASP coordinates and conducts RDT&E to improve military aircraft survivability, develop and standardize aircraft survivability M&S, facilitate information exchange on aircraft survivability, and support aircraft survivability education for the DoD and U.S. aircraft community. Each chartering command provides a senior aircraft survivability expert for the JASP Principal Members Steering Group, which guides the program and approves projects for funding. The JASP assesses and reports on combat damage incidents through the Joint Combat Assessment Team (JCAT). JTCG/ME was chartered to serve as DoD’s focal point for munitions effectiveness information. The JTCG/ME produces Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manuals (JMEMs) that are the sole source for all joint Service authenticated non-nuclear weapons effectiveness data and methodology for the DoD. The JMEMs are the “how to” manuals for putting ordnance on target and as such, directly impacts combat readiness, effectiveness, and survivability. JMEMs are used by the warfighters in operational weaponeering and collateral damage estimation (CDE) calls in direct support of operations, mission planning, and training; by the DoD, joint, and Service planners in force-on-force M&S, mission area analysis, requirements studies, and weapon procurement planning; and by the Service acquisition community in performance assessment, analysis of alternatives, and survivability enhancement studies. The JTCG/ME continually evolves weapons effectiveness and target vulnerability data, standards, methodologies, and processes based on the strategic environment for better munitions effectiveness evaluation and support to a more lethal force. JTCG/ME also increases efficiency by leveraging ongoing DoD efforts and supporting the DoD's intent to complement U.S. interest and capabilities by providing weaponeering and targeting capability to coalition partners. The JMEM requirements and development processes are driven by operational lessons learned (e.g., Inherent Resolve, Resolute Support, and Freedom Sentinel); Joint Staff data calls, and the needs of combatant commands (CCMDs), the Services, the Military Targeting Committee (MTC) guided by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction (CJCSI) 5140.01, Munitions Requirements Process - DoD Instruction 3000.04 and Operational Users Working Groups (OUWGs) input for specific weapon-target pairings and methodologies. Considerable effort goes into these user forums to establish warfighter requirements for current and future JTCG/ME products, as well as continued training events and day-to-day support - all with the goal of enabling greater force lethality, strengthened partner capabilities, and optimal use of resources. This Program Element also includes funds to obtain Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) expertise in performing analyses in support of described LFT&E tasks, as well as travel funds to carry out the JLF, JASP, and JTCG/ME programs.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)

Live Fire Test and Evaluation

LFT&E of Major DoD Acquisition Programs The FY 2025 request will enable DOT&E to assess the adequacy of LFT&E strategies/plans and generate new LFT&E policies to support systems’ acquisitions and rapid fielding. The FY 2025 request will ensure adequate execution of the LFT&E plans and subsequent ability to conduct independent analysis of survivability and lethality tests, and M&S data in support of LFT&E reports to Congress.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Operational Test and Evaluation, DefenseOTEFY24 Actuals$105.6M
Operational Test and Evaluation, DefenseOTEFY25 Enacted$109.6M
Operational Test and Evaluation, DefenseOTEFY25 Total$109.6M
Operational Test and Evaluation, DefenseOTEFY26 Disc. Request$108.1M
Operational Test and Evaluation, DefenseOTEFY26 Reconciliation$98.0M
Operational Test and Evaluation, DefenseOTEFY26 Total$206.1M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$275.7M$105.6M$109.6M$108.1M$108.1M
000311: LFT&E$275.7M$105.6M$109.6M$108.1M$108.1M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Live Fire Test and Evaluation — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →