Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

OUSD(C) IT Development Initiatives

OSDRDT&EPartial Reconciliation0605027D8Z
What it is
OUSD(C) IT Development Initiatives (0605027D8Z) is an OSD research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
+$2.20M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$5.26MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$7.56MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$9.77MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$2.20MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $5.26MFY25: $7.56MFY26: $9.77MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$5.26M
FY25$7.56M
FY26$9.77M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$6.30M$13.5M$16.1M$21.3M$9.22M$9.24M$9.88M$46.6M$5.61M$5.26M
Enacted$4.96M$16.5M$21.4M$9.57M$9.59M$10.3M$16.9M$5.94M$5.46M$7.56M
Request$0$21.4M$9.59M$15.7M$10.3M$16.9M$5.94M$5.46M$7.56M$9.77M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2022 book requested $16.9M for FY2022; the PB2024 book reported $46.6M as actual total obligation authority — $29.7M above the request. 46.616.9 = 29.7 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission OUSD(C) IT Development Initiative

As the Department of Defense's strategic, operational, and tactical plans and objectives transform the war fighter with new capabilities and doctrine, the budgeting and accountability of funds used to pursue the Department's objectives will become more complicated and detailed allowing senior leaders to make decisions with supporting rationale for the taxpayer. Incorporating information technology towards current and emerging business processes manifesting into a state-of-the art system of systems will result in increasing efficiencies, timely diagnostics, and reducing lifecycle costs to maintain, sustain, and repair. This initiative exploits emerging technology, processes, trends, capabilities, and techniques to incorporate state-of-the-art information technology enabling the ability, agility, and level of fidelity to collect, process, administrate, and report resource management data and to automate business processes within a more robust analytical environment within the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) (OUSD(C)). Next Generation Resource Management Systems (NGRMS): The OUSD(C) is responsible for advising the Secretary of Defense on all Defense budgetary and fiscal matters, for Defense budget development and execution, and for overseeing financial management across the Department. The OUSD(C) has a broad set of responsibilities in supporting the Planning, Programming, Budget, and Execution (PPBE) process. The Office of the Director, Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE), provides independent analytic advice to the Secretary of Defense on all aspects of the Defense program, including alternative weapon systems and force structures, the development and evaluation of program and defense program alternatives, and the cost-effectiveness of defense systems. There is a critical need for the development of a state-of-the-art information technology system to modernize and replace multiple, antiquated legacy systems and processes used to formulate, justify, present, and defend the entire Department of Defense budget in the OUSD(C) to meet Title 10 and Title 31 mission and reporting requirements. NGRMS is critical in formulating the DoD Budget and thereby providing the necessary fund requests to defend the homeland, deter strategic attacks against the United States, our Allies and partners. By formulating and presenting the DoD budget, NGRMS, through our Services, is helping to deter aggression, yet ensuring that we are prepared to prevail in conflicts with a prioritization to the Chinese challenge in the Indo-Pacific and the Russian challenge in Europe. Through a strong DoD Budget, NGRMS is a major factor in building a resilient Joint Force and Defense ecosystem. The Comptroller’s plan for mitigating the deficiencies and capability gaps associated with current systems is the development of the NGRMS. The OUSD(C) and CAPE use multiple systems to formulate, justify, distribute, and execute the DoD budgets. The information managed by the budget formulation and programming systems is redundant, and reconciliation of information is difficult and inefficient. These systems require extensive manpower investments to provide executives the information needed to make timely key financial decisions. The OUSD(C) and CAPE require a more efficient and effective Defense budget environment that optimizes the budget cycle to ensure users are processing and reporting efficiently, and DoD Senior Leadership has the information to make informed, critical decisions. The OUSD(C) requires capabilities to provide for the effective formulation, and justification of the Defense budget to be adaptable and modern. The requirement is for: • Automated exchange and reconciliation of budget data • Improved efficiency through the utilization of a unified budgetary model • Instantaneous ability to generate data for management reviews and decisions • Capability to accommodate emerging business practices • Agile methods to launch and terminate new development efforts more quickly • Seamlessly combine the out puts of multiple efforts at various levels of maturity for organizational responsiveness and alternative resource allocation for innovation adoption As of the 3rd Quarter FY 2022, NGRMS has been developed and has deployed Initial Operational Capability (IOC) to all Department of Defense Services and agencies. The system has been designed as a single system with a unified data source for OUSD(C) and CAPE, which supports the reforming and modernizing of the PPBE process. It provides a single, integrated system that employs the latest technologies to fulfill the Department’s financial management responsibilities in an effective, efficient, and adaptable manner. The new system’s agile development approach compliments the continuous and ongoing studies and changes to the PPBE and appropriation processes to prevent stagnant complexities. It also provides twenty-first century information technology that allows users to view information from multiple fully integrated modules simultaneously, e.g., current year budget submission, decision documents from previous years, and budget execution information.

Mission Next Generation Resource Management System

The Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) (OUSD(C)) is responsible for advising the Secretary of Defense on all Defense budgetary and fiscal matters, for Defense budget development and execution, and for overseeing financial management across the Department. The OUSD(C) has a broad set of responsibilities in supporting the Planning, Programming, Budget and Execution (PPBE) process. The Office of the Director, Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE), provides independent analytic advice to the Secretary of Defense on all aspects of the Defense program, including alternative weapon systems and force structures, the development and evaluation of programs and defense program alternatives, and the cost-effectiveness of defense systems. OUSD(C) and CAPE use multiple systems to formulate, justify, distribute, and execute DoD budgets. The information managed by the budget formulation and programming systems is redundant, and reconciliation of information is difficult and inefficient. These systems require extensive manpower investments to provide executives the information needed to make timely key financial decisions. The OUSD(C) and CAPE require a more efficient and effective Defense budget environment that optimizes the budget cycle to ensure users are processing and reporting efficiently and DoD Senior Leadership has the information to make informed, critical decisions. The OUSD(C) requires capabilities to provide for the effective formulation, and justification of the Defense budget to be adaptable and modern. This includes the following: • Automated exchange and reconciliation of budget data • Improved efficiency through the utilization of a unified budgetary model • Instantaneous ability to generate data for management reviews and decisions • Capability to accommodate emerging business practices • Agile methods to launch and terminate new development efforts more quickly • Seamlessly combine the outputs of multiple efforts at various levels of maturity for organizational responsiveness and alternative resource allocation for innovation adoption As of the 3rd Quarter FY 2022, NGRMS has been developed and has deployed Initial Operating Capability (IOC) to all Department of Defense Services and agencies. The system has been designed as a single system with a unified data source for OUSD(C) and CAPE, which supports the reforming and modernizing of the PPBE process. It provides a single, integrated system that employs the latest technologies to fulfill the Department’s financial management responsibilities in an effective, efficient, and adaptable manner. The new system’s agile development approach compliments the continuous and ongoing studies and changes to the PPBE and appropriation processes to prevent stagnant complexities. It also provides twenty-first century information technology that allows users to view information from multiple fully integrated modules simultaneously, e.g., current year budget submission, decision documents from previous years, and budget execution information.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)

Next Generation Resource Management System

Plan, develop, test and evaluate the system components (i.e. unified database, expert system, cross domain security, enterprise service bus, applications, services) and supportability requirements in modernizing the budget formulation, programming execution, and reporting capabilities for the Department of Defense. Activities will include, but not be limited to, the preparation of all documentation required for Clinger-Cohen Compliance and acquisition regulations, developing requests for proposals, and oversight and management of contracts and deliverables.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY24 Actuals$5.26M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Enacted$7.56M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Total$7.56M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Disc. Request$9.77M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Total$9.77M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$59.1M$5.26M$7.56M$9.77M$9.77M
927: Next Generation Resource Management System$59.1M$5.26M$7.56M$9.77M$9.77M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not OUSD(C) IT Development Initiatives — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →