Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Anti-Tamper Technology Executive Agency

Air ForceRDT&EReconciledPE0605024F
What it is
Anti-Tamper Technology Executive Agency (0605024F) is an Air Force research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
-$2.83M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$49.3MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$65.8MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$63.0MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$2.83MR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $49.3MFY25: $65.8MFY26: $63.0MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$49.3M
FY25$65.8M
FY26$63.0M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$33.8M$25.9M$32.6M$37.3M$32.2M$46.9M$46.8M$50.7M$49.9M$49.3M
Enacted$26.7M$32.0M$33.1M$32.8M$47.2M$47.1M$51.5M$50.1M$49.6M$65.8M
Request$32.0M$33.1M$32.8M$47.2M$50.5M$51.5M$50.1M$49.6M$65.8M$63.0M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2018 book requested $33.1M for FY2018; the PB2020 book reported $37.3M as actual total obligation authority — $4.15M above the request. 37.3 − 33.1 = 4.2 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Anti-Tamper Technology Executive Agent

The Anti-Tamper (AT) Technology Executive Agency budget funds activities related to the DoD Executive Agent for AT (ATEA) responsibilities required by DoD Directive 5200.47E, "Anti-Tamper (AT).” These responsibilities are unique to the DoD ATEA and the Air Force Component Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) for AT. The DoD ATEA is responsible for developing and enforcing AT policy and guidance, assessing AT technologies (hardware and software), maintaining and developing new AT technology products and assessment capabilities, maintaining and maturing AT laboratory equipment and infrastructure, establishing and maintaining a library of AT technologies, providing security guidance and support mechanisms, providing outreach and education to the DoD AT community, providing intelligence support, and evaluating AT implementations across all DoD acquisition programs, foreign military sales (FMS), and direct commercial sales (DCS). The AF OPR for AT evaluates AT on applicable AF acquisition programs, FMS, and DCS as well as manages AF AT technology development. AT directly enables CPI resilience. AT protects critical program information (CPI), in U.S. weapon systems that are no longer under U.S. control (e.g., lost/left on the battlefield or sold to a foreign government) from hands-on, reverse engineering (RE) attacks. AT protections enable the U.S. to preserve its technological advantage and the combat capabilities of critical weapons systems while supporting the warfighters' mission requirements. Furthermore, AT adds longevity to DoD weapon systems by deterring or delaying RE attacks, and thus reducing an adversaries' ability to obtain the CPI and/or develop weapon countermeasures against the system. All DoD acquisition programs, FMS, and DCS with CPI require a validated AT Plan. The AT program includes resources required for subject matter experts (SMEs) to evaluate AT Plans and conduct AT validation on all DoD Weapon Systems. Additionally, the AT program provides resources for SMEs to perform AT assessments of both commercial off the shelf (COTS), contractor funded government only use (CFGO) and government off the shelf (GOTS) products. As the COTS, CFGO and GOTS technologies advance, the AT program includes the resources required to mature AT hardware/software assessment capabilities. These capabilities include the acquisition of specialized equipment, maintenance and/or renovations to support the integration of this equipment, and modifications to new and/or existing laboratory facilities to meet equipment and security requirements. The DoD ATEA coordinates technology development among the DoD Services/Agencies, National Laboratories, and Industry. These technology development efforts fund development of new AT technology, as well as enhance existing AT technology efforts to increase the technology readiness level (TRL) and facilitate transition for programs to implement. The AT technology development and enhancement efforts include: advanced AT sensor hardware, secure processing, crypto-analysis, tamper penalties, modifying and developing technology to address vulnerability and susceptibility of fielded parts, and other AT enablers. The Air Force AT OPR conducts AT technology and product development to meet Air Force service needs to mature promising AT technologies to transition to Air Force weapons systems. Technology and product development priorities are given to those technologies/products that most benefit AF acquisition programs while aligning to the overall DoD ATEA technology and product development strategy. These activities are coordinated through the ATEA as a part of the ATEA technology and product development roadmap and to coordinate with Navy and Army AT technology development efforts. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver weapon system capability. The use of such programs funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, 0605898F. In FY24 $2.906M was expended for civilian pay expenses in this program element, and in FY25 $4.544M is forecast for civilian pay expenses in this program element. This program is in Budget Activity 7, Operational System Development because this budget activity includes development efforts to upgrade systems that have been fielded or have received approval for full rate production and anticipate production funding in the current or subsequent fiscal year.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (3)

DoD Anti-Tamper Technology Executive Agent (DoD ATEA)

AT technology and product development/coordination, roadmaps, MBSE, and evaluations, hardware/software vulnerability assessments, capability development, laboratory equipment and infrastructure improvements; outreach and education to the AT Community, AT implementation validation and evaluation, as well as AT policy development.

DoD ATEA Program Management Support

Includes civilian pay, A&AS, outreach and education, travel, supplies, and ATEA Field Program Office support.

Air Force Anti-Tamper Technology and Product Development

Conduct Anti-Tamper technology and product development to meet Air Force (AF) service needs to mature promising AT technologies to transition to AF weapon systems. Fund and manage new technology development efforts, to include studies and requirements generation, all targeted to protect AF CPI. These new AT technology requirements will be obtained from AF programs and these new AT technologies will then transition to Air Force and DoD programs. The AT technology and product development and enhancement efforts include (but not limited to): advanced AT sensor hardware, secure processing, crypto-analysis, tamper penalties, and other AT enablers.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY24 Actuals$49.3M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$65.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Total$65.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$63.0M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Total$63.0M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$0$49.3M$65.8M$63.0M$63.0M
675066: Anti-Tamper Technology Executive Agent$0$49.3M$65.8M$63.0M$63.0M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

19 mentions from the Senate LDA disclosure database.

AECOMExecutive|Agency2026matched 2+ title words

Issues relating to PFAS and Digital Milcon Tools, relationships with new executive, Defense Logistics Agency

PFIZER INC.Executive|Agency2026matched 2+ title words

Vaccine Coverage and Coverage Executive Order 14297 - Delivering Most-Favored-Nation Prescription Drug Pricing to…

RTX CORPORATION AND AFFILIATESTamper|Agency2026matched 2+ title words

P.L. 119-60 - National Defense Authorization Act FY26, National Defense Authorization Act FY27 (bills pending)…

RTX CORPORATION AND AFFILIATESTamper|Agency2026matched 2+ title words

H.R. 8800/S. 4784 - National Defense Authorization Act FY27, H.R. 9495 - Department of Defense Appropriations Act FY27…

AECOMExecutive|Agency2025matched 2+ title words

Issues relating to PFAS and Digital Milcon Tools, relationships with new executive, Defense Logistics Agency

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION (IBM)Executive|Agency2025matched 2+ title words

Legislative & Regulatory Issues Related to Domestic and International Tax, including Tax Treaties: Tax proposals…

PHILLIPS 66Executive|Agency2025matched 2+ title words

Executive actions pertaining to potential tariffs affecting imports from Canada, Mexico, and China, plus reciprocal…

PHILLIPS 66Executive|Agency2025matched 2+ title words

Executive actions pertaining to potential tariffs affecting imports from Canada, Mexico, and China, plus reciprocal…

PHILLIPS 66Executive|Agency2025matched 2+ title words

Executive actions pertaining to potential tariffs affecting imports from Canada, Mexico, and China, plus reciprocal…

RTX CORPORATION AND AFFILIATESTamper|Agency2025matched 2+ title words

National Defense Authorization Act FY26, Department of Defense Appropriations Act FY26, Intelligence Authorization Act…

RTX CORPORATION AND AFFILIATESTamper|Agency2025matched 2+ title words

H.R. 3838/S. 2296 - National Defense Authorization Act FY26, H.R. 4016/S. 2572 - Department of Defense Appropriations…

RTX CORPORATION AND AFFILIATESTamper|Agency2025matched 2+ title words

P.L. 119-60 - National Defense Authorization Act FY26, H.R. 4016/S. 2572 - Department of Defense Appropriations Act…

RTX CORPORATION AND AFFILIATESTamper|Agency2025matched 2+ title words

H.R. 3838 - National Defense Authorization Act FY26 (Senate bill pending), H.R. 4016 - Department of Defense…

RTX CORPORATION AND AFFILIATESTamper|Agency2025matched 2+ title words

P.L. 119-60 - National Defense Authorization Act FY26, H.R. 4016/S. 2572 - Department of Defense Appropriations Act…

FEDEX CORPORATIONExecutive|Agency2024matched 2+ title words

Monitor policies related to the Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence (AI).

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION (IBM)Executive|Agency2024matched 2+ title words

Legislative & Regulatory Issues Related to Technology Policy, including R&D, Cybersecurity, Privacy, Health IT…

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION (IBM)Executive|Agency2024matched 2+ title words

Legislative & Regulatory Issues Related to Technology Policy, including R&D, Cybersecurity, Privacy, Health IT…

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION (IBM)Executive|Agency2024matched 2+ title words

Legislative & Regulatory Issues Related to Technology Policy, including R&D, Cybersecurity, Privacy, Health IT…

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYExecutive|Agency2024matched 2+ title words

Advised on fiscal year 2024 appropriations; Medicare outpatient reimbursement; Graduate Medical Education; Childrens…

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Anti-Tamper Technology Executive Agency. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.