Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0605024F/ — data as of July 28, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Anti-Tamper Technology Executive Agency
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
- FY24
- $49.3M
- FY25
- $65.8M
- FY26
- $63.0M
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $33.8M | $25.9M | $32.6M | $37.3M | $32.2M | $46.9M | $46.8M | $50.7M | $49.9M | $49.3M | ||
| Enacted | $26.7M | $32.0M | $33.1M | $32.8M | $47.2M | $47.1M | $51.5M | $50.1M | $49.6M | $65.8M | ||
| Request | $32.0M | $33.1M | $32.8M | $47.2M | $50.5M | $51.5M | $50.1M | $49.6M | $65.8M | $63.0M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2018 book requested $33.1M for FY2018; the PB2020 book reports $37.3M actually spent — $4.15M above the request.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Anti-Tamper Technology Executive Agent
The Anti-Tamper (AT) Technology Executive Agency budget funds activities related to the DoD Executive Agent for AT (ATEA) responsibilities required by DoD Directive 5200.47E, "Anti-Tamper (AT).” These responsibilities are unique to the DoD ATEA and the Air Force Component Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) for AT. The DoD ATEA is responsible for developing and enforcing AT policy and guidance, assessing AT technologies (hardware and software), maintaining and developing new AT technology products and assessment capabilities, maintaining and maturing AT laboratory equipment and infrastructure, establishing and maintaining a library of AT technologies, providing security guidance and support mechanisms, providing outreach and education to the DoD AT community, providing intelligence support, and evaluating AT implementations across all DoD acquisition programs, foreign military sales (FMS), and direct commercial sales (DCS). The AF OPR for AT evaluates AT on applicable AF acquisition programs, FMS, and DCS as well as manages AF AT technology development. AT directly enables CPI resilience. AT protects critical program information (CPI), in U.S. weapon systems that are no longer under U.S. control (e.g., lost/left on the battlefield or sold to a foreign government) from hands-on, reverse engineering (RE) attacks. AT protections enable the U.S. to preserve its technological advantage and the combat capabilities of critical weapons systems while supporting the warfighters' mission requirements. Furthermore, AT adds longevity to DoD weapon systems by deterring or delaying RE attacks, and thus reducing an adversaries' ability to obtain the CPI and/or develop weapon countermeasures against the system. All DoD acquisition programs, FMS, and DCS with CPI require a validated AT Plan. The AT program includes resources required for subject matter experts (SMEs) to evaluate AT Plans and conduct AT validation on all DoD Weapon Systems. Additionally, the AT program provides resources for SMEs to perform AT assessments of both commercial off the shelf (COTS), contractor funded government only use (CFGO) and government off the shelf (GOTS) products. As the COTS, CFGO and GOTS technologies advance, the AT program includes the resources required to mature AT hardware/software assessment capabilities. These capabilities include the acquisition of specialized equipment, maintenance and/or renovations to support the integration of this equipment, and modifications to new and/or existing laboratory facilities to meet equipment and security requirements. The DoD ATEA coordinates technology development among the DoD Services/Agencies, National Laboratories, and Industry. These technology development efforts fund development of new AT technology, as well as enhance existing AT technology efforts to increase the technology readiness level (TRL) and facilitate transition for programs to implement. The AT technology development and enhancement efforts include: advanced AT sensor hardware, secure processing, crypto-analysis, tamper penalties, modifying and developing technology to address vulnerability and susceptibility of fielded parts, and other AT enablers. The Air Force AT OPR conducts AT technology and product development to meet Air Force service needs to mature promising AT technologies to transition to Air Force weapons systems. Technology and product development priorities are given to those technologies/products that most benefit AF acquisition programs while aligning to the overall DoD ATEA technology and product development strategy. These activities are coordinated through the ATEA as a part of the ATEA technology and product development roadmap and to coordinate with Navy and Army AT technology development efforts. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver weapon system capability. The use of such programs funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, 0605898F. In FY24 $2.906M was expended for civilian pay expenses in this program element, and in FY25 $4.544M is forecast for civilian pay expenses in this program element. This program is in Budget Activity 7, Operational System Development because this budget activity includes development efforts to upgrade systems that have been fielded or have received approval for full rate production and anticipate production funding in the current or subsequent fiscal year.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (3)
DoD Anti-Tamper Technology Executive Agent (DoD ATEA)
AT technology and product development/coordination, roadmaps, MBSE, and evaluations, hardware/software vulnerability assessments, capability development, laboratory equipment and infrastructure improvements; outreach and education to the AT Community, AT implementation validation and evaluation, as well as AT policy development.
DoD ATEA Program Management Support
Includes civilian pay, A&AS, outreach and education, travel, supplies, and ATEA Field Program Office support.
Air Force Anti-Tamper Technology and Product Development
Conduct Anti-Tamper technology and product development to meet Air Force (AF) service needs to mature promising AT technologies to transition to AF weapon systems. Fund and manage new technology development efforts, to include studies and requirements generation, all targeted to protect AF CPI. These new AT technology requirements will be obtained from AF programs and these new AT technologies will then transition to Air Force and DoD programs. The AT technology and product development and enhancement efforts include (but not limited to): advanced AT sensor hardware, secure processing, crypto-analysis, tamper penalties, and other AT enablers.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY24 Actuals | $49.3M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY25 Enacted | $65.8M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY25 Total | $65.8M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY26 Disc. Request | $63.0M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY26 Total | $63.0M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $0 | $49.3M | $65.8M | $63.0M | $63.0M |
| 675066: Anti-Tamper Technology Executive Agent | $0 | $49.3M | $65.8M | $63.0M | $63.0M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →