Counter Weapons of Mass Destruction… (PE 0605000BR) · DTRA

What it is

Counter Weapons of Mass Destruction Systems Development (0605000BR) is a DTRA research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.

What changed

+$90.0K FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026

Who gets it

No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 2 linked award records are listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals

$14.0MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY25 Total

$14.8MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY26 Request

$14.9MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY25→26 Change

+$90.0KR-1 TOA · PB2026

Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.

Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal year	Amount
FY24	$14.0M
FY25	$14.8M
FY26	$14.9M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
Series	FY15	FY16	FY17	FY18	FY19	FY20	FY21	FY22	FY23	FY24	FY25	FY26
Actuals	$6.67M	$7.16M	$4.48M	$6.20M	$7.22M	$15.3M	$15.3M	$13.7M	$14.0M	$14.0M
Enacted		$7.16M	$4.57M	$6.24M	$6.16M	$13.1M	$15.7M	$14.1M	$14.4M	$14.4M	$14.8M
Request			$4.57M	$6.24M	$6.16M	$13.1M	$15.7M	$14.1M	$14.4M	$14.4M	$14.8M	$14.9M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2020 book requested $13.1M for FY2020; the PB2022 book reported $15.3M as actual total obligation authority — $2.23M above the request. 15.3 − 13.1 = 2.2 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — COUNTER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT

The Counter Weapons of Mass Destruction (CWMD) Systems Development program element supports the development and demonstration of technologies and systems for the CWMD mission, including modeling and simulation capabilities, verification and monitoring technologies, and decision support systems.

Mission — NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES AND CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT

This project supports the development of capabilities for the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) to counter proliferation and weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and to model the consequences of the use of nuclear weapons and integrate these capabilities for Combatant Command use. This project encompasses the following related areas. DTRA’s Enhanced Consequence Analysis (ECA) program performs research and development to improve the reliability and effectiveness of capabilities related to the consequence of execution of a nuclear weapon. This program delivers nuclear weapon effects (NWE) decision support tools for use during strategic and operational planning. The ECA program directly supports U.S. and allied warfighter planning requirements, including the Integrated Strategic Planning and Analysis Network Increment 5, an acquisition category 1A Major Automated Information System that supports developing nuclear and conventional force application plans. DTRA’s Nuclear Arms Control Technologies (NACT) program performs research and development to improve the sustainability, reliability, and effectiveness of capabilities related to its operational mission to install, operate, maintain, and sustain the waveform and radionuclide nuclear detonation detection stations and a radionuclide analysis laboratory comprising the majority of the U.S. portion of the International Monitoring System (IMS). This system delivers data continuously to the U.S. monitoring and verification community supporting warfighter and interagency nuclear-event response in support of the United States and Department of Defense (DoD). The NACT program directly supports U.S. and allied warfighter and national technical monitoring requirements and provides vital data used by the treaty monitoring community, warfighter planners, DoD, other U.S. Government agencies, and international agencies. The Nuclear Capabilities Services (NuCS) program performs RDT&E to improve capabilities to model nuclear weapon effects environments and simulate the response of systems and networks to these effects. Starting with NWE modeling and simulation (M&S) capabilities rooted in the DoD nuclear testing program, NuCS augments these legacy codes through integration of higher-fidelity reduced-order models built by DTRA applied research efforts that combine first-principle science & technology M&S and experimental research. Through technology updates to legacy codes and integration of new models, NuCS provide a standard source of NWE M&S capabilities for all DoD users. The ECA program integrates NuCS capabilities and these M&S capabilities with operational databases and systems and works with end-users to provide a user experience specifically designed for nuclear planning. Together, these programs support United States and allied planning and decision making in the event of nuclear weapon use.

Justification

No accomplishments or planned-program narratives in this line's J-book detail — some exhibits carry figures without per-project prose.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

Account	Org	Type	Amount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide	DTRA	FY24 Actuals	$14.0M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide	DTRA	FY25 Enacted	$14.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide	DTRA	FY25 Total	$14.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide	DTRA	FY26 Disc. Request	$14.9M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide	DTRA	FY26 Total	$14.9M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

Project	All Prior Years	FY24 Actuals	FY25 Total	FY26 Base	FY26 Request
Program Element	$52.9M	$14.0M	$14.8M	$14.9M	$14.9M
RD: NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES AND CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT	$52.9M	$14.0M	$14.8M	$14.9M	$14.9M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.

Recipient	PIID	Confidence
UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS	HDTRA117C0031	medium
UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS	HDTRA121C0030	medium

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

Showing 25 of 30 from the Senate LDA disclosure database.

GENERAL ATOMICSWeapons|Destruction2026matched 2+ title words

Budget and appropriations requests related to PFAS and hazardous waste destruction and weapons development.

Counter Weapons of Mass Destruction Systems Development

Budget figures

Budget trajectory

Decade view

Program lineage

Description

Mission — COUNTER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT source

Mission — NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES AND CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT source

Justification

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

Follow the dollar

Related awards

Contractor concentration

Lobbying mentions

Oversight

Program dossier

Primary sources

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

Mission — COUNTER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT

Mission — NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES AND CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT