Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Ballistic Missile Defense Midcourse Segment Test

MDARDT&EPartial Reconciliation0604887C
What it is
Ballistic Missile Defense Midcourse Segment Test (0604887C) is a MDA research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 2 projects.
What changed
-$1.68M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$33.2MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$40.0MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$38.3MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$1.68MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $33.2MFY25: $40.0MFY26: $38.3MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$33.2M
FY25$40.0M
FY26$38.3M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$78.5M$54.6M$61.4M$85.0M$72.6M$96.7M$67.1M$61.4M$84.3M$33.2M
Enacted$64.6M$56.5M$76.8M$72.6M$98.1M$67.1M$61.4M$84.1M$41.8M$40.0M
Request$56.5M$76.8M$81.9M$98.1M$67.1M$61.4M$84.1M$41.8M$40.0M$38.3M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2019 book requested $81.9M for FY2019; the PB2021 book reported $72.6M as actual total obligation authority — $9.30M below the request. 72.681.9 = -9.3 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Ballistic Missile Defense Midcourse Defense Segment Test

Missile Defense Midcourse Defense Segment Test provides flight, ground, and cyber testing of hardware and software to demonstrate an integrated capability to counter the allocated threats. The hardware and software is tested in an integrated environment with Missile Defense System Sensors; Command and Control, Battle Management, and Communications; United States Northern Command Warfighters; and national collection assets to assess and demonstrate the ability to defend the United States against ballistic missile defense of the homeland. Primary activities include planning, design, and execution of flight tests, ground tests, cyber tests; test resources; and program operations. Flight tests provide the opportunity to test actual hardware and software and to demonstrate Missile Defense System interoperability under operationally realistic conditions. Ground-Based Midcourse Defense Program participates in integrated Missile Defense System ground tests executed in both the Hardware-in-the-Loop (HWIL) lab environment and with deployed operational assets providing integrated performance data supporting hardware and software fielding decisions. The Ground-Based Midcourse Defense Program conducts cyber tests and participates in integrated Missile Defense System level cyber tests executed both in the HWIL lab environment and using operational assets providing performance data supporting cyber, operational resilience, and survivability assessments. Test Resources provides the infrastructure and laboratories to support the test program as well as day-to-day operations of the test program to include support for test planning, execution, and post-event reconstruction. Program Operations provides technical and business management support of the test program.

Mission Program Wide Support

PWS contains non-headquarters management costs in support of Missile Defense Agency (MDA) functions and activities across the entire Missile Defense System. These functions include Government Civilians and Contract Support Services. This effort provides integrity and oversight of the Missile Defense System as well as supports MDA in the development and evaluation of technologies that will respond to the changing threat. Additionally, PWS includes personnel to support global deployments performing deployment site preparation and activation, and provides facility capabilities for MDA Executing Agent locations worldwide. Other MDA wide costs include: physical and technical security; civilian drug testing; audit readiness; the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) program; legal services and settlements; travel and agency training; office, equipment, vehicle, and warehouse leases; utilities and base operations across multiple geographic locations; commercial and ancillary facility services; management of all facility aspects regardless of lifecycle stage; supplies and maintenance; compliance with statutory environmental requirements; data and unified communications support; materiel and readiness and central property management of equipment; Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (FSRM) program (formerly Real Property Maintenance) to keep the Department's inventory of facilities in good working order; and similar operating expenses. PWS is allocated on a pro-rata basis across most Agency PEs; therefore, fluctuates per PE by FY based on the total Agency budget in that FY.

Mission Midcourse Test

Missile Defense Midcourse Defense Segment Test provides flight, ground, and cyber testing of hardware and software to demonstrate an integrated capability to counter the allocated threats. The hardware and software is tested in an integrated environment with Missile Defense System Sensors; Command and Control, Battle Management, and Communications; United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) Warfighters; and national collection assets to assess and demonstrate the ability to defend the United States Homeland. Primary activities include planning, design, and execution of flight tests, ground tests, cyber tests; test resources; and program operations. Flight tests provide the opportunity to test actual hardware and software and to demonstrate Missile Defense System interoperability under operationally realistic conditions. Ground-Based Midcourse Defense Program participates in integrated Missile Defense System ground tests executed in both the Hardware-in-the-Loop (HWIL) lab environment and with deployed operational assets providing integrated performance data supporting hardware and software fielding decisions. The Ground-Based Midcourse Defense Program conducts cyber tests and participates in integrated Missile Defense System level cyber tests executed both in the HWIL lab environment and using operational assets providing performance data supporting cyber, operational resilience, and system survivability assessments. Test resources provide the infrastructure and laboratories to support the Ground Missile Defense (GMD) test program as well as day-to-day operations of the GMD test program to include support for test planning, execution, and post-event reconstruction. Program operations provides for technical and business management support of the test program.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (5)

Program Wide Support

PWS contains non-headquarters management costs in support of MDA functions and activities across the entire Missile Defense System. These functions include Government Civilians and Contract Support Services. This effort provides integrity and oversight of the Missile Defense System as well as supports MDA in the development and evaluation of technologies that will respond to the changing threat. Additionally, PWS includes personnel to support global deployments performing deployment site preparation and activation, and provides facility capabilities for MDA Executing Agent locations worldwide. Other MDA wide costs include: physical and technical security; civilian drug testing; audit readiness; the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) program; legal services and settlements; travel and agency training; office, equipment, vehicle, and warehouse leases; utilities and base operations across multiple geographic locations; commercial and ancillary facility services; management of all facility aspects regardless of lifecycle stage; supplies and maintenance; compliance with statutory environmental requirements; data and unified communications support; materiel and readiness and central property management of equipment; the FSRM program to keep the Department's inventory of facilities in good working order; and similar operating expenses. PWS is allocated on a pro-rata basis across most Agency PEs and therefore fluctuates per PE by FY based on the total Agency budget in that FY. Specific and/or unique accomplishments to each FY are as follows:

Resources

Provides the infrastructure and laboratories to support the test program as well as the day-to-day operations of the test program to include support for test planning, execution, and post-event reconstruction. Recurring efforts include: - Provide laboratory environments to support hardware and software integration testing prior to entry into Missile Defense System flight, ground, and/or cyber level tests. - Provide laboratory environments to support execution of ground and/or cyber testing. - Provide operations and sustainment of laboratories in support of flight, ground, and/or cyber testing. - Provide infrastructure, hardware, and software upgrades to laboratories to represent the hardware and software under testing. - Provide testing infrastructure and test execution support requested by the Warfighter to enhance development of doctrine and Tactics, Techniques and Procedures. - Provide testing infrastructure and test execution support for tests of opportunity presented by real world events and Missile Defense System/external test activities. - Provide test infrastructure and coordination of flight test range support from Vandenberg Space Force Base (VSFB), California, for all range activities, test engineering, test operators, and test asset transportation. - Provide command, control, and situational awareness for test events at the Missile Defense Integration and Operations Center (MDIOC) in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and the Readiness and Control Facility in Fort Greely, Alaska (FGA). - Provide test communication plans, test communication control, satellite communication bandwidth for testing, test network certification, and accreditation for tests to integrate the range in VSFB, MDIOC, FGA, and Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) in Hawaii. - Provide test equipment upgrades at VSFB and MDIOC for test support systems. - Provide test equipment and infrastructure upgrades to support cyber defense upgrades to defend against current and future cybersecurity threats. Specific and/or unique accomplishments to each FY are as follows:

Ground Test Execution

Ground-Based Midcourse Defense Program participates in integrated Missile Defense System ground tests executed in both the HWIL lab environment and with deployed operational assets providing integrated performance data supporting GMD hardware and software fielding decisions. The Ground-Based Midcourse Defense Program conducts cyber tests and participates in integrated Missile Defense System cyber tests executed both in the HWIL lab environment and using operational assets providing data supporting cyber, operational resilience, and survivability assessments. Ground test execution provides the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense Program Government and Industry support personnel for planning, integration, execution, and analysis for ground and cyber tests. Recurring efforts include: - Conduct Integrated Ground Test sprint planning, pre-mission analysis, integration, execution, and post-mission analysis. - Conduct Distributed Ground Test planning, pre-mission analysis, integration, execution, and post-mission analysis. - Conduct Ground Test Readiness planning, pre-mission analysis, integration, execution, and post-mission analysis. - Conduct developmental Cooperative Vulnerability Identification (CVI) cyber test planning, integration, execution and analysis. - Conduct developmental Adversarial Cybersecurity DT&E (ACD) cyber test planning, integration, execution, and analysis. - Conduct Cooperative Vulnerability and Penetration Assessment (CVPA) cyber test planning, integration, execution, and analysis. - Conduct Adversarial Assessment (AA) cyber test planning, integration, execution, and analysis. Specific and/or unique accomplishments to each FY are as follows:

Flight Test Execution

Flight tests provide the opportunity to test actual hardware and software and demonstrate Missile Defense System interoperability under operationally realistic conditions. Flight test execution provides the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense Program Government and Industry support personnel for planning, integration, execution, and analysis for flight tests. Specific and/or unique accomplishments to each FY are as follows:

Program Operations

Program Operations provides: - Technical and business management support, financial management, cost and schedule performance analyses, cost estimation and analysis, configuration management, and programmatic integration activities to ensure the program meets cost, schedule, and performance goals. - Test program compliance with internal and external direction, policies, and regulations. - Mission assurance processes to include quality and safety. - Technical and testing support; cyber security support; hardware and software quality, safety, and mission assurance; and integrated logistics support. Specific and/or unique accomplishments to each FY are as follows:

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY24 Actuals$33.2M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY25 Enacted$40.0M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY25 Total$40.0M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY26 Disc. Request$38.3M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY26 Total$38.3M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$655.2M$33.2M$40.0M$38.3M$38.3M
MD40: Program Wide Support$17.7M$1.66M$1.54M$1.58M$1.58M
MT08: Midcourse Test$637.5M$31.6M$38.5M$36.7M$36.7M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

2 mentions from the Senate LDA disclosure database.

BAE SYSTEMS INCBallistic|Missile2026matched 2+ title words

National Defense Authorization Act, 2027 (HR XXXX/S XXXX); provisions regarding R&D - Navy, US Marine Corps, Air…

BAE SYSTEMS INCBallistic|Missile2024matched 2+ title words

Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2024 (HR 4365/S 2587; PL 118-47) and Further Consolidated Appropriations…

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Ballistic Missile Defense Midcourse Segment Test — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →