Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Aegis BMD Test

MDARDT&EPartial Reconciliation0604878C
What it is
Aegis BMD Test (0604878C) is a MDA research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 2 projects.
What changed
+$38.1M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$186.4MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$115.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$153.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$38.1MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $186.4MFY25: $115.6MFY26: $153.6MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$186.4M
FY25$115.6M
FY26$153.6M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$88.0M$78.5M$131.0M$128.8M$92.2M$167.4M$71.5M$111.2M$165.6M$186.4M
Enacted$78.5M$95.0M$137.8M$92.2M$169.8M$71.5M$111.2M$175.6M$193.5M$115.6M
Request$95.0M$134.5M$95.8M$169.8M$170.9M$117.1M$182.8M$193.5M$135.0M$153.6M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2021 book requested $170.9M for FY2021; the PB2023 book reported $71.5M as actual total obligation authority — $99.4M below the request. 71.5170.9 = -99.4 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Aegis BMD Test

The Aegis Based Defense mission is to deliver an enduring, operationally effective and supportable Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) capability to defend the nation, deployed forces, friends and allies, and to increase this capability by delivering evolutionary improvements as part of Missile Defense System upgrades. The Aegis Based Defense element of the Missile Defense System capitalizes upon and evolves from the existing United States (U.S.) Navy Aegis Weapon System and Standard Missile (SM) infrastructures. Aegis Based Defense provides a forward-deployable, mobile capability to detect and track Ballistic Missiles of all ranges, and the ability to destroy Short-Range Ballistic Missiles, Medium-Range Ballistic Missiles, and Intermediate-Range Ballistic Missiles in the midcourse phase of flight, and shorter range missiles in the terminal phase of flight. Aegis Based Defense also provides a Long Range Surveillance and Track capability to the Missile Defense System. Upgrades to both the Aegis BMD Weapon System and the SM-3 configuration enable Aegis Based Defense to provide effective, supportable defensive capability against longer range, threats and an enduring Aegis Ashore defensive capability. This Program Element works with all U.S. Armed Services that participate in the Missile Defense System level Operational Test Agency Team. With the support of the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) has developed a test program to improve confidence in missile defense capabilities under development and ensure the capabilities transferred to the warfighter are operationally effective, suitable, and survivable. As part of the MDA's rigorous test program, System Pre-Flight predictions provide confidence in test execution by predicting element performance and exercising element interfaces. System Post-Flight Reconstruction replicates the Missile Defense System configuration, actual environmental conditions, and target dynamics observed in flight to anchor Modeling and Simulation results. The IMTP is event-oriented and extends until the collection of all identified data is completed ensuring adequate test investments.

Mission Program Wide Support

PWS contains non-headquarters management costs in support of Missile Defense Agency (MDA) functions and activities across the entire Missile Defense System. These functions include Government Civilians and Contract Support Services. This effort provides integrity and oversight of the Missile Defense System as well as supports MDA in the development and evaluation of technologies that will respond to the changing threat. Additionally, PWS includes personnel to support global deployments performing deployment site preparation and activation, and provides facility capabilities for MDA Executing Agent locations worldwide. Other MDA wide costs include: physical and technical security; civilian drug testing; audit readiness; the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) program; legal services and settlements; travel and agency training; office, equipment, vehicle, and warehouse leases; utilities and base operations across multiple geographic locations; commercial and ancillary facility services; management of all facility aspects regardless of lifecycle stage; supplies and maintenance; compliance with statutory environmental requirements; data and unified communications support; materiel and readiness and central property management of equipment; Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (FSRM) program (formerly Real Property Maintenance) to keep the Department's inventory of facilities in good working order; and similar operating expenses. PWS is allocated on a pro-rata basis across most Agency PEs; therefore, fluctuates per PE by FY based on the total Agency budget in that FY.

Mission AEGIS BMD Test

The Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Test program element is responsible for the planning, design, and execution of developmental and operational flight, ground, and cybersecurity testing of Aegis Based Defense hardware and software to characterize and validate joint deployable Missile Defense and Navy Integrated Air and Missile Defense capability to counter the allocated threats and ensure that these capabilities are operationally effective, suitable, and survivable upon transfer to the warfighter. Aegis Based Defense hardware and software are integrated into existing Aegis Weapon System baselines, Standard Missile (SM)-3 interceptor, and Navy's SM-6 interceptor. The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) works with the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, the Navy's Operational Test and Evaluation Force, industry partners, and the Navy Warfare Centers in the designing, planning, safety, readiness, execution, data collection, pre-mission and post-mission analysis, and reporting. The system pre-flight predictions provide confidence in test execution by predicting element performance and exercising element interfaces. The system post-flight reconstruction replicates the Missile Defense System configuration, actual environmental conditions, and target dynamics observed in flight to anchor Modeling and Simulation (M&S) results. Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense participation in Hardware-in-the-Loop and integrated MDA level ground tests supports the operational capability fielding decisions.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (5)

Program Wide Support

PWS contains non-headquarters management costs in support of MDA functions and activities across the entire Missile Defense System. These functions include Government Civilians and Contract Support Services. This effort provides integrity and oversight of the Missile Defense System as well as supports MDA in the development and evaluation of technologies that will respond to the changing threat. Additionally, PWS includes personnel to support global deployments performing deployment site preparation and activation, and provides facility capabilities for MDA Executing Agent locations worldwide. Other MDA wide costs include: physical and technical security; civilian drug testing; audit readiness; the STEM program; legal services and settlements; travel and agency training; office, equipment, vehicle, and warehouse leases; utilities and base operations across multiple geographic locations; commercial and ancillary facility services; management of all facility aspects regardless of lifecycle stage; supplies and maintenance; compliance with statutory environmental requirements; data and unified communications support; materiel and readiness and central property management of equipment; the FSRM program to keep the Department's inventory of facilities in good working order; and similar operating expenses. PWS is allocated on a pro-rata basis across most Agency PEs; therefore, fluctuates per PE by fiscal year based on the total Agency budget in that fiscal year. Specific and/or unique accomplishments to each FY are as follows:

Aegis BMD Flight Test Execution

Aegis Based Defense Flight Test Program performs comprehensive testing of Aegis BMD components and their interoperability with the Missile Defense System using accredited M&S that provides the evidence required for MDA and Combatant Commanders to transition the capability to the Operational Capability Baseline. All flight testing is reflected in the R-4 schedule and the IMTP. Recurring Accomplishments include: - Prepare for and conduct Missile Defense System Flight Test events as reflected in the IMTP and the R-4 schedule. - Collect Aegis BMD data for M&S anchoring used in comprehensive flight testing. - Conduct Aegis BMD specific analysis during pre- and post-mission analysis phases to confirm pre-mission predictions of mission success and validate post-test results. - Conduct test milestone reviews to ensure readiness for test execution and accomplishment of test objectives. Specific and/or unique accomplishments to each FY are as follows:

Aegis BMD Ground Test Execution

Aegis Based Defense Ground Test Program performs comprehensive testing of Aegis BMD Components and their interoperability with the Missile Defense System using accredited M&S that provides the evidence required for the MDA and Combatant Commanders to transition the capability to the Operational Capability Baseline. More specifically, ground testing is used to collect data for Aegis BMD characterization and assessment, flight test risk reduction, and exploration of scenarios where flight testing is either impracticable or impossible. Recurring Accomplishments include: -Participate in BMD System Ground Test to include pre-mission analysis, mission execution, and post-mission analysis. -Conduct planning to ensure Aegis Ashore Missile Defense Test Complex, Missile Defense System Test Bed San Diego, and Lockheed Martin Rotary and Mission Systems Computer Program Test Site capabilities support Aegis BMD testing, exercises, flight tests, and demonstration requirements. This includes upgrades to the ground testing labs to ensure compliance with operational and test baselines. -Conduct testing of United States Navy Command, Control, Communications, Computers Intelligence Systems and Aegis BMD baselines to ensure Missile Defense System interoperability. -Participate in System Level Ground Testing as an element of the layered Missile Defense System to collect data for Aegis BMD characterization and assessment. -Perform operation support of Hardware in the loop M&S for Element ground testing. Specific and/or unique accomplishments to each FY are as follows:

Aegis BMD Test Resources

This effort provides resources to conduct ground and flight testing to improve confidence in missile defense capabilities under development and ensure the capabilities transferred to the warfighter are operationally effective, suitable, and survivable. Recurring Accomplishments include: - Provide Core Test and Evaluation support for Sea-Based Weapon Systems missions and laboratories, field activities, range support activities, analysis activities, and shipboard and land-based test site test teams. - Provide Test & Evaluation infrastructure support for Aegis Based Defense Test Missions as reflected in the IMTP to collect truth data for post-event analysis. - Exercise tactical communications during testing to ensure interoperability with the Missile Defense System and Combatant Command systems. - Conduct test planning to include assessment of target requirements, and preparation of the range to ensure all missions are executable and apply to the technical program objectives. - Develop and execute risk-reduction activities to minimize or mitigate shipboard and missile test and programs risks. - Develop and execute data collection plans and supporting instrumentation requirements. Specific and/or unique accomplishments to each FY are as follows:

Test Program Operations

This activity funds the Government and contractor workforce that manage the overall Aegis Based Defense test program and enables the program to develop, build, and test standard missiles and the associated Aegis Weapon Systems. This project includes all operations support for the Aegis program office related to Engineering and Testing. Specific and/or unique accomplishments to each FY are as follows:

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY24 Actuals$186.4M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY25 Enacted$115.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY25 Total$115.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY26 Disc. Request$153.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY26 Total$153.6M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$1.01B$186.4M$115.6M$153.6M$153.6M
MD40: Program Wide Support$14.3M$7.25M$5.58M$5.77M$5.77M
MT09: AEGIS BMD Test$991.0M$179.1M$110.0M$147.8M$147.8M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Aegis BMD Test — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →