Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Joint Systems Architecture Development

OSDRDT&EPartial Reconciliation0604875D8Z
What it is
Joint Systems Architecture Development (0604875D8Z) is an OSD research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 2 projects.
What changed
-$1.06M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$8.15MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$9.69MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$8.63MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$1.06MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $8.15MFY25: $9.69MFY26: $8.63MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$8.15M
FY25$9.69M
FY26$8.63M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$2.99M$3.01M$2.95M$4.70M$3.93M$8.97M$8.18M$7.53M$6.28M$8.15M
Enacted$3.08M$4.50M$4.85M$4.08M$9.59M$8.49M$7.82M$6.61M$8.43M$9.69M
Request$4.50M$4.85M$4.09M$9.59M$8.50M$7.86M$6.61M$8.43M$9.69M$8.63M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2017 book requested $4.50M for FY2017; the PB2019 book reported $2.95M as actual total obligation authority — $1.55M below the request. 2.94.5 = -1.6 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Joint Systems Architecture Development

The Joint Systems Architecture Development (JSAD) program element supports the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, Acquisition and Sustainment (OUSD A&S), Office of the Deputy Under Secretary Defense Platform Weapons and Portfolio Management (DASD PWPM) mission to use Capability Portfolio Management (CPM) to analyze, manage, and inform acquisition and resourcing decisions in platform and weapon portfolios, to include air, surface, electronic, and cyber warfare systems. The program is broken up into two focus areas: Portfolio Systems Acquisition (PSA), supporting air, land, sea, and undersea warfare programs and munitions; and Electromagnetic Warfare (EW), supporting the statutory responsibilities of the EXCOM. All efforts DASD PWPM strive to deliver the warfighter the best equipment and systems, and to do so by performing top down, national security strategy-driven, capabilities-based planning by fully leveraging Department and acquisition reform initiatives. The JSAD program enables collaborative efforts to achieve these goals with a focus on Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPs) and integrated acquisition portfolio management. These efforts entail integrated roadmaps to support acquisition investment decisions, and assessments of MDAPs and other linchpin acquisition efforts in a capability area context. Activities in the JSAD project are focused on three areas:(1) integrated acquisition portfolio analysis; (2) acquisition roadmaps; and (3) acquisition decision support. These efforts guide the development and fielding of integrated acquisition systems in order to achieve Joint mission capabilities across the operational domain to defend against any global threats. The Department uses enterprise-wide approaches which include:(1) horizontal integration within the Department and unity of effort through greater interagency collaboration; (2) engaging in a coordinated and portfolio-based approach to planning, programming, budgeting and execution; and (3) significant reforms at the governance, management and execution levels. To accomplish this intent, there needs to be a focused goal and concerted emphasis on shifting from systems acquisition to portfolio systems acquisition.

Mission Electromagnetic Warfare

The FY 2026 request for Electromagnetic Warfare (EW) includes $2.461 thousand of discretionary funds which supports EMSO capability recommendations for Departments priorities to include Golden Dome Homeland defense and Strategic Deterrence within the Indo Pacific region. The EW project funds capability advancements that focus on transitioning programs to the warfighter. The EW line also aligns Department efforts with key allies under the AUKUS Pillar II EW working group, to institutionalize cooperative acquisition and ultimately increase warfighter lethality.

Mission Portfolio Systems Acquisition (PSA)

The FY 2026 request for Portfolio Systems Acquisition (PSA) includes $6.166 thousand of discretionary funds which supports air, land, sea, and undersea warfare programs and munitions with a focus on MDAPs and integrated acquisition portfolio management. These efforts entail integrated roadmaps to support acquisition investment decisions, and assessments of MDAPs and other linchpin acquisition efforts in a capability area context. PSA funds provide support in the areas of (1) integrated acquisition portfolio analysis; (2) acquisition roadmaps; and (3) acquisition decision support. These efforts guide the development and fielding of integrated acquisition systems in order to achieve Joint mission capabilities across the operational domain to defend against any global threats.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (2)

Electromagnetic Warfare

FY 2024 Accomplishments: - Completed EW EXCOM analysis of EW Counter-C5ISR capabilities and Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Operational Assessment. - Continued cross-Service collaboration on and demonstrations of EW materiel solutions in Army and Navy. - Continued mission analysis of Airborne Electromagnetic Attack capabilities to support EW missions, including Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses. - Completed DoD Directed Energy (DE) capabilities analysis and DoD DE management processes review. - Continued to develop international partnerships in EW capabilities with key allies, including Australia and the UK. - Continued to analyze Department EW capability gaps to inform future DoD EW investment in programs and systems.

Portfolio Systems Acquisition (PSA)

FY 2024 Accomplishments: - Continued efforts to further develop Capability Portfolio Management (CPM) practices. Led and completed two Integrated Area Portfolio Assessments (IAPRs) focused Defense of Guam Scene Setter, Maritime Mining, - Led Integrated Portfolio Reviews and DABs for Guam Defense System (GDS), Army’s Integrated Air and Missile Defense (AIAMD), Columbia Build II Construction, Columbia SSGN 827 Full Funding Approval, Columbia Independent Schedule Assessment, F-35, B-21, Joint Advanced Tactical Missile, and Survivable Air Operations Center ACAT 1D programs. - Conducted Mid-Tier Acquisition (MTA) Advisory Board reviews in support of CPS, FLRAA, IVAS, Mid-Range Capability (MRC) initiation, and F-22 Sensor Enhancement Rapid Fielding program. ‒ Developed/updated the following DoD Directives and other Charters: Counter Unmanned Systems (C-UxS) Governance, DoD Executive Agent for Counter Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems for Unmanned Aircraft Groups 1,2 and 3, and Munitions Requirements Process (MRP) Implementation Guide. Critical Energetic Materials Working Group (CEMWG) Charter - Provided Senior Level recommendations in support of PB26 Budget Reviews by leading 3 Focus Areas (Critical Kill Webs, Air Superiority, Kinetic and Non-Kinetic Weapons) consisting of 12 Program Review Teams (PRTs) - Led the National Armaments Director (NAD) Working Groups in support of Ukraine in the Areas of Integrated Air Defense and Air to Ground Weapons. Provided expertise in acquisition, production, and industrial based recommendations in support of Ukraine. - Provided Senior Level recommendations to the Ukraine Senior Integration Group established to evaluate Ukraine needs and source capability either through current stock or development of capability to address Russian aggression. Supported the development and implementation of 62 Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA) packages ($25.9B) and 20 Ukraine Security Assistance Tranches ($24.9B). Also responsible for the review and approval of 22 Replenishment Tranches ($50.8B) in support of the U.S. - Provided Senior Level recommendation to Taiwan Senior Integration Group in support of $1B in PDA consisting of 2 PDA packages. - Continued efforts to further develop CPM practices; supported development of CPM MOA and IAPR guide. - Provided support to the Israel Capability Development Working Group to facilitate weapon sales and donations to Israel in support of the war against Hamas. - Lead for ASD(A) in support of Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Tiger Team established to evaluate timelines associated with timely execution of FMS process. Identified and tracked fifteen (15) action items and provided multiple recommendations to implement changes to FMS process that will reduce the timeline to contract award. FY 2025 Accomplishments: - Co-led the Air Superiority Kill Webs and Nuclear Integrated Acquisition Portfolio Reviews in support of Capability Portfolio Management - Led In-Progress Reviews for F-35, B-21, VC-25B, Survivable Air Operations Center, and Joint Advanced Tactical Missile ACAT 1D programs - Provided senior-level recommendations in support of the PB26 budget review re-look by leading the Air Superiority and Air Force Program Balance review teams - Co-led the Missile Co-Production Working Group for the Defense Industrial base Cooperation Acquisition and Sustainment (DICAS) forum with Japan to pursue co-production opportunities for high-demand missile programs - Led Major Defense Acquisition Program Reviews with the Deputy Secretary of Defense for F-35, B-52, VC-25B, KC-46, MQ-25A, and Tomahawk

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY24 Actuals$8.15M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Enacted$9.69M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Total$9.69M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Disc. Request$8.63M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Total$8.63M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$58.7M$8.15M$9.69M$8.63M$8.63M
220: Electromagnetic Warfare$17.3M$3.26M$3.34M$2.46M$2.46M
875: Portfolio Systems Acquisition (PSA)$41.4M$4.89M$6.35M$6.17M$6.17M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Joint Systems Architecture Development — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →