Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0604798A/ — data as of July 28, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Brigade Analysis, Integration and Evaluation
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
- FY24
- $21.8M
- FY25
- $26.4M
- FY26
- $24.3M
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $83.0M | $96.3M | $101.9M | $139.4M | $48.0M | $29.9M | $18.7M | $21.0M | $22.2M | $21.8M | ||
| Enacted | $99.2M | $146.7M | $145.4M | $49.3M | $38.3M | $18.7M | $21.4M | $21.1M | $20.8M | $26.4M | ||
| Request | $89.7M | $145.4M | $49.3M | $42.6M | $19.3M | $21.5M | $21.2M | $20.8M | $26.4M | $24.3M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2020 book requested $42.6M for FY2020; the PB2022 book reports $29.9M actually spent — $12.8M below the request.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Brigade Analysis, Integration and Evaluation
This program element is comprised of four initiatives: Technology Accelerators, Acquisition Reform, Commercial Innovation, and Digital Engineering Initiatives. These efforts directly support the SECDEF Memorandum, "Directing Modern Software Acquisition to Maximize Lethality", DoD Software Modernization Implementation Plan, and the Army's strategic priorities for emerging technology insertion. These initiatives are foundational to achieving the Army's digital transformation goals and ensuring operational superiority in an increasingly complex and contested environment. Project DY7: Provides the Army's leadership and materiel developers with essential tools and methodologies to modernize software acquisition and engineering processes. This project delivers comprehensive capabilities including,, System of Systems (SoS) engineering and analysis, technical risk analysis, architectural frameworks, critical path analysis, cybersecurity and interoperability risk analysis; all designed to optimize the Army's materiel portfolio and accelerate modernization. Aligned with the DoD and Army digital transformation and modernization goals, this project emphasizes the implementation of Continuous Integration/ Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) pipelines to streamline and modernize the software acquisition process. By leveraging CI/CD, the Army can rapidly field minimal viable products (MVPs) that address mission-critical needs while maintaining flexibility to adapt to evolving threats. This approach integrates continuous Soldier feedback into a unified engineering construct, ensuring that capabilities are both operationally relevant and responsive to the dynamic needs of the force. Key focus areas include: * Implementing open architecture frameworks. Establishing cohesive data, software, hardware open architecture frameworks to enable decision dominance and enhance interoperability, interchangeability, and integrateability across the Army's digital and physical ecosystem. * Adaptable Systems and Digital Engineering: Developing flexible engineering processes that integrate SoS risk analysis, architectural products, and mitigation planning to deliver MVPs for rapid fielding. * Modern Software Practices: Removing institutional barriers to CI/CD adoption and delivering secure, resilient software solutions designed to meet the Army's mission requirements. * Portfolio Optimization: Conducting engineering analysis, portfolio assessments, and systems security evaluations to ensure alignment with the Army's modernization priorities. Additionally, this project supports the Army Futures Command by streamlining processes through broad Capability Needs Statements (CNS). This enables agile development of concepts, requirements generation, resource allocation, experimentation, acquisition, logistics, and technology integration. Key deliverables include the development of integrated architecture products to drive modernization, engineering analysis and design to enhance system performance and interoperability, and independent technical risk assessments to address vulnerabilities. Additionally, the project ensures cybersecurity compliance and policy alignment for secure operations while coordinating ASA(ALT) data stewardship and governance activities to enable data-driven decision-making across the Army's modernization efforts. The FY 2026 request was reduced by $1.338 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative."
Mission — Army Systems Engineering, Architecture & Analysis
This project is advancing its modernization efforts by digitally transforming across the Program Executive Offices (PEOs) in support of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology)'s (ASA(ALT)) Mission. This project focuses on integrating data, engineering, and software practices to transform modernization planning and accelerate the delivery of mission-critical capabilities. By implementing CI/ CD models, adaptable System of Systems (SoS) engineering, interoperability and technical risk analysis, ASA(ALT) is ensuring the rapid fielding of minimal viable products (MVPs) that meet the evolving needs of the force. Key digital transformation efforts include the development of flexible engineering processes, integrated SoS architecture products, and risk mitigation planning to optimize the Army's materiel portfolio. These efforts are enabled by the establishment of modern engineering policies, requirements aligned to CI/CD models, and synchronization of resources and acquisitions to address cross-portfolio challenges. A key focus is placed on cyber security and interoperability to ensure that all systems are secure by design, resilient against cyber threats, and seamlessly integrated across the Army's digital ecosystem. ASA(ALT)'s digital transformation initiatives are revolutionizing how capabilities are developed, delivered, and integrated to meet the demands of modern warfare. data reference architectures are enabling decision dominance by providing commanders with timely, actionable data while eliminating institutional barriers to Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) adoption. Modern software practices, such as secure coding principles and Development, Security, and Operations (DevSecOps) methodologies, ensure the delivery of adaptable, cyber-resilient capabilities that are secure by design. Interoperability assessments and compliance frameworks are embedded into the engineering process to guarantee seamless operation across joint and coalition environments, enhancing mission effectiveness and operational cohesion. As the Army embraces digital transformation, data-centricity becomes the backbone of battlefield communication, enabling faster and more informed decision-making. Modernized software practices streamline operational capabilities, while digital engineering ensures seamless integration and adaptability across systems as requirements and technologies evolve. Leading this transformation is the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Data, Engineering, and Software (DASA(DES)), formerly the Office of the Chief Systems Engineer (OCSE). DASA(DES) is spearheading the development of unified, government-owned data architectures that prevent vendor lock-in, govern the acquisition of data-centric capabilities, and empower commanders with the information they need, when they need it. DASA(DES) is spearheading the implementation of modern software techniques, such as agile development and Development, Security, and Operations (DevSecOps), to deliver faster, more secure, and more effective capabilities. Additionally, ASA(ALT) is driving Digital Engineering as a holistic approach to complex system design that leverages models, data, and modern software practices-to revolutionize how the Army approaches software, data architecture, and product development. Cybersecurity is embedded throughout these efforts, ensuring that systems are protected against adversarial threats while maintaining operational integrity. This project catalyzes, coordinates, and integrates data, engineering, software, and cybersecurity practices throughout the acquisition lifecycle. By prioritizing these practices across ASA(ALT) Programs of Record, the Army ensures rapid, secure, interoperable, and optimal delivery of capabilities to the warfighter. Leveraging open systems architecture concepts, this initiative accelerates modernization, enhances interoperability, and positions the Army to maintain technological superiority against any adversary.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (5)
Strategic Engineering Guidance
This Project will continue in the development of MOSA policy and implementation guidance, in accordance with NDAA FY 2017 2466a/ b/c, that leads to the certification of MOSA in MDAPs. Other responsibilities include confirming that Army programs proceeding to Milestone B have incorporated clearly defined major subsystem interfaces between the major system platform and major system components, between major system components, and between major system platforms, and that these major system interfaces are consistent with the widely supported and consensus-based standards. This Project will continue to provide overarching governance, promulgation, and integration of the programs of record through a cross functional IPT that emphasizes lessons learned and best practices for RAM. Assist programs in the research for root causes of reliability issues and provide detailed assessment along with recommendation to senior leadership. This Project will supervise the major RAM program elements to ensure that operationally focused, achievable, affordable, and testable RAM requirements are included in the requirements documentation and the Department of the Army (DA) decision-making process. Assist in Army staff evaluation of proposed changes to operational systems' RAM characteristics in product improvement programs. As the Army implements the Army's People Strategy, this Project supports the functional lead for Engineering by identifying skills gaps and recommending the needed training. This Project will also promote workforce development efforts to improve the level of systems engineering competency through credentials that provide focused enhanced skills in Digital, Data and Systems engineering, modern agile software development, and Cybersecurity, by developing persona based curriculum that will focus on providing PEOs the ability to effectively manage digitally transformed programs. This Project will include engineering support to OSD and the Army to oversee the growth of civilian talent to support ASA(ALT) Systems Engineering requirements. This includes recommending improvements in Training, Education, Rotational Assignments, and Mentoring for a Systems Engineering (SE) work force across the Army. This office will support ASA(ALT) in the development of the Human Capital Strategic Plan (HCSP) and refinement of the System Engineering Functions with OSD. This Project will lead, plan, integrate and synchronize information cybersecurity efforts across ASA(ALT) including PEOs and headquarters. Identify crosscutting issues and opportunities from across the PEOs requiring ASA(ALT) senior leader attention. Represent ASA(ALT) cybersecurity equities in external stakeholder forums (e.g. Army Cyberspace Council, CIO Executive Board). Review and shape all cyberspace related strategies, policies, and orders affecting ASA(ALT) from OSD, HQDA, and ARCYBER; and elevate issues to the Chief Systems Engineer as needed. Synchronize architectures between enterprise and acquisition systems. Support critical modernization of unsupported software for secure operations. Assist and respond with data call requests, synchronization efforts, and IPRs with DoD CIO and the HQDA G-6, ARCYBER, and the VCSA. Leverage cybersecurity policy as a technology enabler. Fulfill cybersecurity functions mandated by public law, federal directives, and DoD/Army policy. Coordinate, optimize, and monitor Risk Management Framework (RMF) execution among PEOs, assist with common issues requiring senior leader attention, and liaise with CIO and the HQDA G-6. Ensure appropriate transfer of Enterprise Mission Assurance Support Service (eMASS) records for systems that transitioned to sustainment. Serve as approval authority for ASA(ALT) HQ eMASS accounts and Army Training & Certification Tracking System (ATCTS) records, as well as for reviewing and approving system transfers to sustainment in the Army Program Management System (APMS). ASA(ALT) staff point of contact for acquisition concerns related to cyberspace through the Chief Cyber Acquisition Officer. This Project provides ASA(ALT) response to major cyberspace incidents requiring ASA(ALT) Principal leader awareness. This includes but is not limited to coordinating with PEO staffs at all levels in order to analyze requirements/orders, facilitate guidance, present findings/status, and interface with Army Cyber Command (ARCYBER) and/or other HQDA organizations. In accordance with AR 70-75, coordinate Army survivability policy and guidance in Army acquisition efforts related to cyberspace. Represent HQDA on boards and committees concerning materiel survivability matters related to cyberspace. Coordinate and lead an assessment of the ASA(ALT) portfolio to apply a rigorous, systems engineering approach to consider cyber resilience within the Acquisition trade-space (e.g. performance attribute). Identify systemic vulnerabilities and coordinate the development and implementation of enterprise solutions to mitigate those vulnerabilities. Develop and implement a risk-based process to assess the impact of vulnerabilities and assist with prioritization of funding for corrective actions for high risk vulnerabilities. Coordinate with PEO Simulation, Training and Instrumentation (STRI) regarding the certification and implementation of cyber acquisition assessment teams in order to facilitate the reduction of risk across the ASA(ALT) portfolio. Coordinate with PEO staffs on the integration of traditional cybersecurity (risk management framework) and cyber resilience survivability. Coordinate the Cyber Acquisition Task Force to unify strategy and execution of cyber resilience efforts across Army. Synchronize ASA(ALT) cyber resilience strategies with OSD, United States Cyber Command (USCYBERCOM), and joint Service counterparts. NDAA Sec 807 Responsible for the conduct and execution of Post-PDR/CDR and ITRA for all Army ACAT 1/2 programs where the AAE serves as the Milestone Decision Authority (MDA). The reviews will provide recommendations on Technical Risk and PDR/CDR sufficiency, and both will be included in the MDA package for the Milestone Review, approval, and certification. This Project will establish strategic engineering guidance for cyberspace by developing and overseeing the implementation of technical processes and tools. Develop objective architecture (e.g. data structures, warehouses, interactions, products) and drive implementation of Information Security Architectures from a SoS perspective. As needed, coordinate engineering change request to federate existing Army business processes and systems. Synchronize with Army policy/strategy and with mission system owners. As needed, conduct engineering-assessments of crosscutting cyber focused architectures, solutions, and capabilities proposed by Programs of Record, Cross Functional Teams, and Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office. Increase engineering rigor though policies, processes, tools, and technical oversight across systems and systems-of-systems in order to maximize the cyberspace survivability of the Army Acquisition portfolio. Define, publish, and revise as needed a standardized Cyber Acquisition Discipline Artifact for PMs to demonstrate the repeatable implementation of cyber survivability attributes during decision point reviews. Develop and maintain an Implementation Guidebook to improve awareness and consistency of related planning and execution. Support the AAE in reviewing the Cyber Acquisition Discipline Implementation Assessment during decision reviews for all Acquisition Category 1 and 2 programs, as well as MDAs/DAs for other systems as requested. Lead the development of cyberspace contract language requirements and templates, and publish in policy for the acquisition workforce. IAW AR-70-75, represent HQDA on boards and committees concerning materiel survivability matters related to cyberspace resilience. Serve as HQDA lead responsible for tracking and monitoring cyberspace remediation (find-fix-verify) as recommended by the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General (DODIG). Provide engineering governance for emerging cyberspace related capabilities and advances to include artificial intelligence, cloud-computing governance, Development, Security and Operations (DevSecOps), supply chain risk management, zero trust, etc. Ensure ASA(ALT)'s cyber-related roadmaps align with Army/DoD CIO regarding data, cloud migration, data centers, etc. Analyze requirements and opportunities as well as publish ASA(ALT) internal Technical Bulletins and other information papers to inform PMs. Coordinate with capability developers to establish systems engineering criteria in order to ensure new requirements documents address cyber resilience. Coordinate with Army Materiel Command to establish policy and processes that shall maintain cybersecurity and survivability for programs transitioning to sustainment. Lead, in coordination with HQDA G-3/5/7, the establishment of the materiel component of the cyber readiness framework as an interface between systems and operations, which requires authoritative and accessible data from the acquisition and sustainment communities to reduce operational risk. This Project will serve as the ASA(ALT) lead for System Security Engineering (SSE). Army requires a professional and effective SSE workforce, which is separate from information system security management (ISSM) or network defense functions. SSE contributes to a broad-based, holistic security perspective and focus within the systems engineering (SE) discipline. SSE ensures stakeholder protection needs and security concerns are properly identified and addressed in all engineering stages of the system life cycle. Coordinate with OUSD to define the DoD body of knowledge for SSE. Ensure duties align with prescribed training, experience, and certification. Coordinate appointment and implementation and facilitate collaboration across PEOs through meetings and publications.
Engineering Governance
This Project leads critical resources, tools, and solutions for ASA(ALT) to modernize software acquisition, lead digital engineering, provide oversight of Title X systems engineering functions, and implement software, data, cyber, and engineering frameworks, guidance, and governance to improve product delivery and cyber operational readiness for fielded systems. Additionally, this project has influence over program budgets for acquisition programs of record. General Officer (GO) / SES collaboration is required with key stakeholders across the Army, OSD, and other services, including the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC); U.S. Army Futures Command (AFC); Chief Information Officer (CIO); U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC); Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3; Deputy Chief of Staff, G-6; Deputy Chief of Staff, G-2; Army Cyber Command; and U.S. Army Program Executive Officers. The execution of these duties will ultimately change the way the Army delivers capabilities to Soldiers. This Project has full line authority from the ASA(ALT). This Project also provides for engineering efforts that enable the Army's leadership and materiel developers with the necessary modernization planning, System of Systems (SoS) engineering and analysis, technical risk analysis, architectural products, critical path analysis, cybersecurity and interoperability risk analysis and the associated mitigation planning for the Army's materiel portfolio. This Project develops process, products, and policies that ensure a solid Army Systems Engineering construct across Army Program Executive and Management Offices.
Facilities and IT Support
Provides funding for infrastructure/facilities and IT support.
Cyber Resiliency Mitigations
The Cyber Remediation Contingency Fund (CRCF) is a strategic enabler to accelerate the remediation of emerging cyber vulnerabilities in Army weapon and business systems. Its purpose is to provide resource agility, enabling program offices to address critical vulnerabilities that exceed planned resources and expertise. By moving beyond compliance-based cybersecurity, the CRCF supports both materiel and non-materiel solutions, ensuring the Army can outpace sophisticated threats from malicious actors and nation-state competitors. This capability empowers program offices to jumpstart remediation efforts and enhance resilience across critical modernization investments. This effort is vital to maintaining operational readiness and reducing lifecycle costs associated with delayed vulnerability remediation.
Engineering Support & Services
This initiative supports the ASA(ALT) Data Steward and performs the duties as the Functional Data Manager in Army Data Environment. Governance Forums including the Army Data Board (ADB), Army Analytics Board (AAB) and JADC2 Working Groups. In addition to representing the ASA(ALT) in Army data forums improving the ASA(ALT) data environment through the establishment of governance forums, standards, policies and implementation guides in order to facilitate rapid and relevant acquisition, logistics and technology decisions. Continuous maturation of Acquisition, Logistics and Technology Domain data ensures that data is available for successful integration and support of product and program life-cycle requirements, additive and advanced manufacturing, DE, product/technical data, intellectual property management, modular open systems approach and other DoD and Army initiatives.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY24 Actuals | $21.8M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY25 Enacted | $26.4M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY25 Total | $26.4M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY26 Disc. Request | $24.3M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY26 Total | $24.3M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
| Project | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DY7: Army Systems Engineering, Architecture & Analysis | $21.8M | $26.4M | $24.3M | $24.3M |
| Program Element | $21.8M | $26.4M | $24.3M | $24.3M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →