Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Rapid Defense Experimentation Reserve (RDER)

OSDRDT&EPartial Reconciliation0604790D8Z
What it is
Rapid Defense Experimentation Reserve (RDER) — a research & development program run by OSD.
What changed
No FY25→26 comparison — trajectory data incomplete for this line.
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$22.8M
FY25 Total
$23.8M
FY26 Request
FY25→26 Change
Budget Trajectory
FY24: $22.8MFY25: $23.8MFY24FY25
FY24
$22.8M
FY25
$23.8M

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why →

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 326 programs, ranked by FY2026 requested dollars. why →

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY24 Actuals$22.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Enacted$23.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Total$23.8M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
790: Rapid Defense Experimentation Reserve (RDER)$24.0M$22.8M$23.8M$0$0
Program Element$24.0M$22.8M$23.8M$0$0

Program Narratives

MissionRapid Defense Experimentation Reserve (RDER)

The RDER program focuses on a campaign of joint experimentation on rapid capabilities that address our most complex military challenges. The Secretary of Defense established RDER in the Defense Planning Guidance to enable multi-component joint experimentation through a campaign of learning and to establish a body of evidence to support rapid adoption by the Services. RDER enables the Services, agencies, industry, and other organizations to identify “best of breed” capabilities to be prototyped in large-scale joint experiments and validate and/or refine the Joint Warfighting Concept (JWC). OUSD(R&E)’s process for incubating promising prototypes starts with a novel experimental design based on a web of interconnected systems addressing specific Defense Planning Scenarios. This approach is unique from other experimentation that focuses on determining individual system efficacy. Additionally, the experimental design is unique in using the web of systems to explore new warfighting concepts that capitalize on contributions of multiple Services as a true joint force. The experimentation yields live data that the OUSD(R&E) analyzes against the performance predicted in modelling and simulation. OUSD(R&E) manages the Department’s multiple RDER experimentation events and conducts integration activities with the Joint Force. OUSD(R&E) oversees an integrated selection process with the Joint Staff, Services, and Combatant Commands that incorporates the most promising innovative prototypes into existing exercise venues such as: Project Capstone, Northern Edge, Valiant Shield, Talisman Sabre, Grey Flag, Joint Battle Problem, and TREX. RDER utilizes funding to plan, integrate, and oversee joint experiments; provide assessments on project viability; and, deliver the results to the Deputy Secretary of Defense management action group to facilitate decisions on transitioning promising capabilities with the Services.

MissionRapid Defense Experimentation Reserve (RDER)

The Rapid Defense Experimentation Reserve (RDER) program supports core program management and integration activities necessary to plan and execute a multi-year campaign of experimentation. The RDER initiative is a whole of DoD effort focused on joint experimentation to provide rapid capabilities that address our most difficult military challenges. The Secretary of Defense established the RDER initiative in the Defense Planning Guidance for Fiscal Years 2024-2028, to enable multi-component experimentation through a campaign of learning that accelerates technology transition and scale-up with the Services through the Deputy’s Management Action Group. This experimentation is executed using validated mission vignettes to assess Measures of Effectiveness and Measures of Performance identified in Modeling and Simulation. Integrated Assessment plans are developed for each prototype in the experiment and the data is collected through a campaign of experimentation utilizing Service demonstration venues or Combatant Command Training Exercises. The final prototype assessment will consist of a body of evidence that consists of Modeling and Simulation data, range or exercise performance, and doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership and education, personnel, and facilities (DOTMPLF) issues. The assessment will drive a Department decision point for transition or acceleration of RDER projects. The Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering OUSD(R&E) process for incubating promising prototypes starts with a novel experimental design based on a web of interconnected systems addressing specific Defense Planning Scenarios. This approach is unique from other experimentation that focuses on determining individual system efficacy. Additionally, the experimental design is unique in using the web of systems to explore new warfighting concepts that capitalize on contributions of multiple Services as a true joint force. The experimentation yields live data which is evaluated to depict system operational analysis against the predicted performance from modeling and simulation. The Operational Utility Assessment establishes the body of evidence for the "best of breed" and the rapid adaptation of the capability by the Services. OUSD(R&E) manages the Department’s multiple RDER experimentation events and conducts integration activities with the Joint Force. OUSD(R&E) oversees an integrated selection process with the Joint Staff, Services, and Combatant Commands that incorporates the most promising innovative prototypes into existing exercise venues such as: Balikatan and Grey Flag. RDER utilizes funding to plan, integrate, and oversee joint experiments; provide assessments on project viability; and, deliver results to facilitate decisions on transitioning promising capabilities with the Services.

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (6)

Opposing Force (OPFOR) Threat Emulation

Opposing Force (OPFOR) threat emulation establishes a plausible, flexible military force representing a composite of varying capabilities of actual adversary forces within an experiment. Resources provide a threat informed and operationally relevant environment to conduct experiments. RDER employs OPFOR across geographically dispersed experiments which requires the procurement of Manpower to operate OPFOR capabilities, a deployable experimentation white cell to maintain command and control of RDER proposal external from the exercise, maritime threats, UAVs/Drones, UUVs, Small boats, Electromagnetic Spectrum emitters, mobile and fixed medium range BMs, and Decoys to establish a relevant environment for RDER capabilities.

Experiments Integration

RDER coordinates with the exercise planning cells at the Combatant Commands (CCMD) to conduct experiments. Technical readiness reviews evaluate system design requirements in order to define requirements for participation into multiple experimentation venues. RDER reviews prototype system requirements and maps each within the network architectures for data dissemination and collection. RDER identifies risks that would impede interoperability at multi-component experiment venues. This effort integrates the fully functional capabilities of RDER prototypes into joint operational kill webs to enable joint experimentation.

Experiment Design

Resources provide the analysis to support the Combatant Commands establishing the system-of-system level architecture for integrating multiple prototypes into a single experimentation event. For each experimentation event, RDER evaluates each system level design to establish a government reference architecture that seamlessly employs prototype technologies at multiple experimentations geolocated across multiple states. Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs) and Measures of Performance (MOPs) are established to be collected at each event. These Integrated assessment plans are developed for each individual technology.

Experimentation Execution

The execution phase consists of the collection of experimental system performance that is evaluated against the Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs) and Measures of Performance (MOPs) that have been previously established. RDER establishes a data collection command and control network architecture to monitor the behavioral analysis of prototypes during an experimental event. Data is collected and stored for post event analysis. RDER deploys an experimentation unit to provide onsite observation, oversight, and governance during a prototype experiment event. These evaluation teams are required at each data collection node or technology location involved in the experiment.

Data Collection and Assessment

This effort supports the manpower required for data collection teams. The collection teams record the joint operational data to assess the measurements of performance and measurements of effectiveness of a prototype in a multi-component experimentation venue. It resources personnel who are co-located at multiple experimentation locations to include experiment venues, UARC/FFRDC's in the Continental United States, as well as at the CCMD headquarters. Data collection teams are required for each individual technology being evaluated at each event.

Rapid Defense Experimentation Reserve (RDER) Program Management

Program Management includes the oversight of the execution of prototypes resourced with the Services to address required capabilities. This effort includes the evaluation of service candidates through the technical maturation phase prior to executing an experiment. Activities include monitoring new technologies through the innovation stakeholder community, which includes the Service laboratories, industry, academia, and federally funded research and development centers and assess “best of breed” prototypes integrated in joint experimentation venues.

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 326 programs). why →

Lobbying Mentions

Showing 25 of 65 from the Senate LDA disclosure database.

BOEING COMPANYExperimentation2024

Corporate and aviation industry tax issues. Research & development audit procedures, enhancements, and experimentation e

BOEING COMPANYExperimentation2024

Corporate and aviation industry tax issues. Research & development audit procedures, enhancements, and experimentation e

BOEING COMPANYExperimentation2024

Corporate and aviation industry tax issues. Research & development audit procedures, enhancements, and experimentation e

BOEING COMPANYExperimentation2024

H.R.7024 - Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024. Corporate and aviation industry tax issues. Researc

BOEING COMPANYExperimentation2025

H.Con.Res.14 & S.Con.Res.7 - Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2025. Corporate and aviation industry t

BOEING COMPANYExperimentation2025

H.R.1 - One Big Beautiful Bill Act. H.Con.Res.14 & S.Con.Res.7 - Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 202

BOEING COMPANYExperimentation2025

H.R.1 - One Big Beautiful Bill Act and implementation (P.L.119-21). H.R.1062 - Growing and Preserving Innovation in Amer

BOEING COMPANYExperimentation2025

H.R.1 - One Big Beautiful Bill Act and implementation (P.L.119-21). H.R.1062 - Growing and Preserving Innovation in Amer

BOEING COMPANYExperimentation2026

H.R.1062 - Growing and Preserving Innovation in America Act of 2025. S.1605 - International Competition for American Job

Issues and funding related to Fiscal Year 2024 (FY24) Defense Appropriations (HR 4365 / S 2587); FY24 Homeland Security

Issues and funding related to Fiscal Year 2025 (FY25) Defense Appropriations (HR 8774 / Senate bill number not yet assig

Issues and funding related to Fiscal Year 2025 (FY25) Defense Appropriations (HR 8774 / S 4921); FY25 Homeland Security

FY25 Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development issues related to FAA communications, FY25 Transportation, Housing,

Issues and funding related to Fiscal Year 2025 (FY25) Defense Appropriations (HR 8774 / S 4921); FY25 Homeland Security

Issues and funding related to Fiscal Year 2025 (FY25) Defense Appropriations (HR 8774 / S 4921); FY25 Homeland Security

Issues and funding related to Fiscal Year 2026 (FY26) Defense Appropriations (HR 4016 / S 2572); FY26 Homeland Security

Issues and funding related to Fiscal Year 2026 (FY26) Defense Appropriations (HR 4016 / S 2572); FY26 Homeland Security

Issues and funding related to Fiscal Year 2027 (FY27) Defense Appropriations (bill numbers not yet assigned); FY27 Homel

GENERAL DYNAMICSReserve2024

House (no bill number) and Senate (no bill number) Fiscal Year 2025 Department of Defense Appropriations Bill - issues a

GENERAL DYNAMICSReserve2024

Issues related to the Maritime Administration and Ready Reserve Sealift recapitalization

GENERAL DYNAMICSReserve2024

Issues related to the Maritime Administration and Ready Reserve Sealift recapitalization

GENERAL DYNAMICSReserve2025

Monitored issues related to the Maritime Administration and Ready Reserve Sealift recapitalization.

GENERAL DYNAMICSReserve2025

Monitored issues related to the Maritime Administration and Ready Reserve Sealift recapitalization.

GENERAL DYNAMICSReserve2025

Monitored issues related to the Maritime Administration and Ready Reserve Sealift recapitalization.

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATIONExperimentation2024

Amortization of Research and Experimentation Expenses; American Innovation and Jobs Act (S. 866); American Innovation an

Primary Sources