Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Deployment & Distribution Enterprise R&D

What it is
Deployment & Distribution Enterprise R&D (0604776F) is an Air Force research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 2 projects.
What changed
+$9.03M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$23.7MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$24.3MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$33.3MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$9.03MR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $23.7MFY25: $24.3MFY26: $33.3MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$23.7M
FY25$24.3M
FY26$33.3M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$0$0$25.9M$25.6M$27.6M$28.5M$26.0M$39.5M$27.7M$23.7M
Enacted$0$25.9M$26.2M$28.0M$28.9M$26.3M$40.1M$27.7M$31.8M$24.3M
Request$25.9M$26.2M$28.4M$28.9M$26.3M$40.1M$27.7M$31.8M$32.6M$33.3M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $31.8M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $23.7M as actual total obligation authority — $8.10M below the request. 23.7 − 31.8 = -8.1 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Deployment and Distribution Development & Proto

In partnership with Services, Combatant Commands, OSD, select Defense Agencies, industry, and academia, this program collaboratively pursues the development, integration, field demonstration and assessment of contested logistics Joint Deployment and Distribution Enterprise (JDDE) and Joint Petroleum (JPE) capabilities. Contested logistics challenges include innovative projection and sustainment capabilities, seaport and airfield improvements, inventory/cargo management, materiel handling, cargo/container security, secure collaboration with commercial/interagency/coalition partners, and distributed global mobility C4. Intent is to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of logistics operations in support of the joint warfighter. This program is in Budget Activity 3, Advanced Technology Development because this budget activity includes development of subsystems and components and efforts to integrate subsystems and components into system prototypes for field experiments and/or tests in a simulated environment.

Mission — Deployment and Distribution Innovation

In partnership with the Services, Combatant Commands, OSD, select Defense Agencies, industry and academia, this program collaboratively pursues the development, integration, field demonstration and assessment of contested logistics Joint Deployment and Distribution Enterprise (JDDE) and Joint Petroleum Enterprise (JPE) capabilities. Contested logistics challenges include innovative projection and sustainment capabilities, seaport and airfield improvements, inventory/cargo management, materiel handling, cargo/container security, secure collaboration with commercial/interagency/coalition partners, and distributed global mobility C4. Intent is to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of logistics operations in support of the joint warfighter. This effort is in Budget Activity 4, Advanced Component Development and Prototypes (ACD&P), because efforts are necessary to evaluate integrated technologies, representative modes or prototype systems in a high fidelity and realistic operating environment.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (62)

TRANSCOM Innovation

Annual investment in emerging technologies to enhance the ability to globally project and sustain the joint warfighter/address Joint Deployment and Distribution Enterprise (JDDE) and Joint Petroleum Enterprise (JPE) challenges. Includes contribution to Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) programs.

Aerial Delivery and Autonomous Deployment of Unmanned Vehicles Joint Aerial Delivery Demonstration Exhibition (JADDE)

This funding supports the demonstration of funded airdrop capabilities.

Distributed Littoral Ops Fuel Transfer

A system that is lightweight, compact, and readily deployable in expeditionary operations and enables the quick deployment of fuel hoses for ship-to-shore transfer of bulk petroleum in friendly or contested environments. Technical Lead Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock.

Airdrop Mission Planner Multiservice Interoperability

Develop Android Tactical Assault Kit (ATAK) and Windows Tactical Assault Kit (WINTAK) for United States Army (USA), Air Force (USAF), Marine Corps (USMC), Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) and other services or organizations conducting airdrop operations. Lead technical partner is U.S. Army Combat Development Command.

End-to-End Distribution Modeling

Developing USTRANSCOM's model of record for all programmatic analysis for transportation/distribution.

Autonomous Pallet Loader

A highly transportable, heavy-lift, autonomous material handling system. Technical Partner U.S. Army Combat Development Command.

Information Summarization for Complex Knowledge Management

Create succinct summaries of related information samples, facilitating improved information discovery and understanding.

Internal Sling-load Unit Airdrop

Capability to airdrop the Internal airlift/helicopter Slingable-Container Unit (ISU) from large, fixed-wing mobility aircraft. Technical Partner U.S. Army Combat Development Command.

Jet Augmented Glider

An autonomous long-range, low-cost, one-time use powered glider resupply vehicle which can be deployed from cargo aircraft, rotorcraft, ships, or from the ground. Technical Partner U.S. Army Combat Development Command.

Sustainment Support Network for Autonomous Aerial Resupply Vehicles

Integrated solution that automatically sources, processes, synthesizes, and distributes data to aerial resupply vehicles. Technical Partner U.S. Army Combat Development Command.

System for Expeditionary Port Assessment and Repair/Containerized Agile Expeditionary & Rapid Beach Prep (CONAER)

Joint capability to counter asymmetric A2/AD seaport degradation activities by building on a suite of demonstrated port assessment and pier repair tools. Technical Partner Engineering Research and Development Command.

Aerial Delivery - Low Cost Modular GPS Denied Kit

Demonstrate a low size, weight, power and cost kit that can provide GPS-denied navigation, aerial delivery platforms. Technical Partner U.S. Army Combat Development Command.

Contested Logistics Ops By Robots for Expeditionary Recon

A versatile, high speed, utilitarian craft with deployable bow ramp capable of delivering 14K / 20K of cargo over 400 nm to the littorals/ports at 20 kts in sea state 3. Technical Partner USCENTCOM.

Airdrop System - Precision Extended Glide

Demonstrate a long range powered parafoil system to reduce risk to delivery aircraft. Technical lead U.S. Army Combat Development Command.

Automatic Landing Zone

Aid selection of a Landing Zone/Drop Zone (LZ/DZ) by presenting the user with a map-based course of action decision tool, at point of need. Technical Partner U.S. Army Combat Developmnent Command.

Container Airdrop

Enable the airdrop of a standard 20ft ISO container from a C-17 utilizing standard low altitude airdrop methods. Technical Partner U.S. Army Combat Development Command.

Expeditionary Concrete Construction for Ports of Debarkation

Use indigenous materials for contingency construction while minimizing logistics required to enable the construction. Technical Partner Engineering Research and Development Command.

Global Reach

Tactical Situation, COP, mission planning, intelligence, communications resiliency, ship survivability capabilities. Technical Partner U.S. Navy Naval Service Warfare Center.

Scalable Autonomous Modular Propulsion Kits

Develop scalable modular propulsion kits with marine automation for installation on ocean/riverine commercial barges. Technical partner is U.S. Army Engineering Research and Development Center.

Enhanced Vision Navigation for Joint Precision Airdrop System

Funds contract support for Air Mobility Command to support the development of advanced technologies to improve airdrop, aerial refueling, patient evacuation and other global mission in support of the joint warfighter.

AI-Powered Sensitive Data Masking

Focus on masking structured data, building an organizational knowledge base, and masking unstructured data in USTRANSCOM systems.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lincoln Labs (MIT LL)

Partnership with MIT-LL to research efforts to improve enterprise operational architecture supporting high-end analytics, integrated information technology/data structures, understanding of cloud capabilities and multi-level cyber security defense. Algorithm and Artificial Intelligence (AI) innovations being spirally transitioned to numerous USTRANSCOM and Component systems/environments.

Modeling & Simulation Innovation

Funds Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) student research/faculty-assisted projects (e.g., Joint Transportation Asset Scheduling Kit, Next Generation Cargo Capability, Applying Post Modern Portfolio Theory to Mitigate Risk in International Shipping, Optimal CH-47/C-130 Workload Balance, Remotely Piloted Aircraft Performing Airdrop Mission). Focused on USTRANSCOM staff provided research needs that address Joint Deployment and Distribution Enterprise (JDDE) and Joint Petroleum Enterprise (JPE) challenges.

Integrated Communications and Mission Planning for Autonomous Resupply Systems

Develop command & control (C2) software front-end plug-ins that will be compatible with extended range aerial delivery vehicles, integrated Mission Planning (MP) support that is interoperable with selected C2 platform(s) to enable near real time evaluation of mission progress leveraging vehicle performance models, airdrop models, and route optimization algorithms, C2 communications hardware (non-developmental/commercial off the shelf) including ground stations, radios, and vehicle hardware, and payload tracking, and Joint Precision Airdrop long-range software and hardware updates to support C2 interoperability. Technical Partner: U.S. Army Capabilities Development Command.

Program Execution

Provide technical assistance and program management support to the USTRANSCOM RDT&E Program. Coordinate with Joint Deployment and Distribution Enterprise (JDDE) / Joint Petroleum Enterprise (JPE) partners on project execution, monitoring costs, scope, schedule, and performance. Fund Government travel in support of Program Management.

JDDE Mission Assurance Coordinator

Develop a JDDE-wide method for mission coordination. Technical partner Air Force Research Lab.

Cyber Mission Assurance Technologies

Near real-time understanding of the operational impact of cyber risks, threats, and disruptions. Technical partners are Air Force Research Lab and USCYBERCOM. Operational leads are USINDOPACOM and Air Mobility Command.

Integrating Space Transportation for USTRANSCOM Cargo Transport

Deliver mature prototypes of designs and system-level procedures for commercial space transportation integration with the Joint Deployment and Distribution Enterprise (JDDE). The objectives both leverage and augment the science and technology (S&T) development of the Air Force Research Lab/U.S. Space Force Rocket Cargo Vanguard program by accelerating technology transition and process development for use of space transportation in Joint operations.

Rapid Aircraft Load Planner Handheld (RALPH)

Air distribution to remote, austere locations for small loads poorly suited to C-130 efficiency. Use of unmanned light aircraft for cargo movement to the tactical edge will call for non-aerial port personnel to perform basic aircraft loading and load planning. Employment of a customized tool supports system velocity. Project provides a unique, emerging Rapid Distribution Technology (a JDDE challenge), that directly supports the employment of uncrewed, optionally piloted aircraft for light cargo distribution and is particularly relevant to retrograde cargo operations. Technical partner United States Indo-Pacific Command (USINDOPACOM).

Small Unit Resupply Decision Dominance

An integrated and automated resupply planning and execution system that streamlines and accelerates the responsiveness of emergency aerial resupply by minimizing human in the loop decision making. Project facilitates rapid/accurate decision making, at the tactical edge. Technical partner U.S. Army Capabilities Development Command.

Synthetic Data Generation Engine

Developing a capability to rapidly generate unclassified data that has a similar structure to existing classified data sets within the command. This automatic data generation framework will allow for the creation of large, synthetic data sets that can be used for a variety of purposes, including training exercises, system testing, and other activities that require data that is not necessarily identical to current operational data.

Logistics Insights Networking and Collaboration (LINC)

Demonstrate a proof-of-concept architecture facilitating end-to-end bi-directional linkages between selected tactical and operational tools. This approach ensures end users retain access to tools tailored to their needs while benefitting from the cumulative wisdom of networked tools. Technical partner United States Marine Corps.

Component-level Operational Decision Advantage

Component-level Air Forces (AFFOR) Command and Control and processes for full-spectrum competition against high end adversaries. CODA will leverage prior AFRL research, organizational development techniques, and state of the art technologies to equip the AFFOR with capabilities which contribute to closing this performance gap and enabling USTRANSCOM's air component to meet anticipated and emerging maneuver requirements of the joint force. Develop detailed decision support tool that provides insight at the component level. Technical partner is U.S. Air Force Research Lab.

Transportation Innovation

Annual investment in emerging technologies to enhance the ability to globally project and sustain the joint warfighter/address Joint Deployment and Distribution Enterprise (JDDE) and Joint Petroleum Enterprise (JPE) challenges. Includes contribution to Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) program.

Distributed Littoral Ops Fuel Transfer

Develop ability to autonomously/discretely pull fuel lines ashore in Joint Logistics Over-the-Shore (JLOTS) events in a contested logistics scenario. Technical partner is Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock.

Theater Mitigation Alternatives at Military Entry Control Facilities

Research and physical testing needed to gather and analyze data for improving Entry Control Facilities (ECF) design and operations, improve road safety on installations and reduce overall costs.

Buoyant Roll On/Roll Off Interface Kit

Prototype consisting of the Roll-On/Roll-Off (RO/RO) ramp to interface to a commercial supply vessel and a section of floating causeway and ancillary equipment sufficient to conduct a limited operational assessment. Technical partner is Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock.

35 Thousand Foot Airdrop

Develop capabilities to airdrop from 35 thousand feet to increase aircraft standoff range from threat. Technical partner is U.S. Army Combat Development Command.

Enhanced Vision Navigation for Joint Precision Airdrop System

Funds contract support for Air Mobility Command to support the development of advanced technologies to improve airdrop, aerial refueling, patient evacuation and other global mission in support of the joint warfighter.

Aerial Delivery Platform

Platform for air dropping multiple vehicles. Utilize existing airdrop platform paradigm to generate a 40-ft platform and demo example payloads through flight testing as proof of concept. Technical partner U.S. Army Combat Development Command.

Modular Autonomous Ready Dynamic Positioning System

Positioning system for sealift lighterage assets to enhance operational safety and maximize efficiency. Leverages autonomous software developments made by Navy program offices. Technical partner is Naval Surface Warfare Center, Philadelphia Division.

AI-Powered Sensitive Data Masking

Focus on masking structured data, building an organizational knowledge base, and masking unstructured data.

Iron Spider

Capability to effectively secure mission and operational data over non-classified internet protocols while communicate with commercial partners/vendors for defense-related mission needs and sustainment support for USTRANSCOM operations in support of other CCMDs. Technical partner is Air Force Research Lab.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lincoln Labs (MIT-LL)

Partnership with MIT-LL to research efforts to improve enterprise operational architecture supporting high-end analytics, integrated information technology/data structures, understanding of cloud capabilities and multi-level cyber security defense. Algorithm and AI innovations being spirally transitioned to numerous USTRANSCOM and Component systems/environments.

Modeling & Simulation Innovation

Funds Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) student research/faculty-assisted projects (e.g., Joint Transportation Asset Scheduling Kit, Next Generation Cargo Capability, Applying Post Modern Portfolio Theory to Mitigate Risk in International Shipping, Optimal CH-47/C-130 Workload Balance, Remotely Piloted Aircraft Performing Airdrop Mission). Focused on USTRANSCOM staff provided research needs that address Joint Deployment and Distribution Enterprise (JDDE) and Joint Petroleum Enterprise (JPE) challenges.

Data Lakes

Initiative seeks to improve data quality, detect anomalies, and enhance decision support.

Aerial Delivery and Autonomous Deployment of Unmanned Vehicles

Ability to deliver and deploy unmanned systems without personnel on the ground will significantly enhance the ability to employ autonomous vehicles and provide greater flexibility to commanders while keeping ground forces out of harms way. Technical partner is U.S. Army Development Command.

Program Execution

Provide technical assistance and program management support to the USTRANSCOM RDT&E Program. Coordinate with Joint Deployment and distribution partners on project execution, monitoring costs, scope, schedule, and performance. Fund Government travel in support of Program Management.

Analyzer Driven Data Integrity

Provide a deeper understanding of the risk anomalous data can pose on mission operations via machine learning, rule-based analytics and statistical models to address unknown anomalies.

Strategic Theater Orchestration and Resource Management

Provide ability more effectively and efficiently manage theater lift assets. Technical partner was U.S. Army Combat Development Command Ground Vehicles.

Risk Assessment and Vetting for the Enterprise

Effort will provide the ability to assess deployment distribution risk factors. Vetting of foreign vendors serving as prime or subcontractors on US contracts. Operational lead is USCENTCOM.

Component Level Operational Decision Advantage

Component-level Air Forces (AFFOR) Command and Control and processes for full-spectrum competition against high end adversaries. CODA will leverage prior AFRL research, organizational development techniques, and state of the art technologies to equip the AFFOR with capabilities which contribute to closing this performance gap and enabling USTRANSCOM's air component to meet anticipated and emerging maneuver requirements of the joint force. Develop detailed decision support tool that provides insight at the component level. Technical partner is U.S. Air Force Research Lab.

Oversight

Enable continuous tracking of adversary cyber groups and campaigns targeting USTRANSCOM and USINDOPACOM enterprise and their partners. Technical partners are USCYBERCOM and Air Force Research Lab. Operational lead is USINDOPACOM.

Cyber Mission Assurance Technologies

Near real-time understanding of the operational impact of cyber risks, threats, and disruptions. Technical partners are Air Force Research Lab and USCYBERCOM. Operational leads are USINDOPACOM and Air Mobility Command.

KC-135 Drone Delivery Mechanism

Onboard defensive/ISR capability for operations in contested environment. A drone delivery mechanism capable of launching unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) from a KC-135 in flight to provide an onboard defensive capability. A prototype integrating a common launch tube (CLT) with a modified KC-135 aft hatch door to produce and determine the viability of this concept.

Airdrop Mission Planner Multiservice Interoperability

Develop Android Tactical Assault Kit (ATAK) and Windows Tactical Assault Kit (WINTAK) for United States Army (USA), Air Force (USAF), Marine Corps (USMC), United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) and other services or organizations conducting airdrop operations. Lead technical partner is U.S. Army Combat Development Command.

Aerial Delivery - Low Cost Modular GPS Denied Kit

Demonstrate a low size, weight, power and cost kit that can provide Global Positioning System (GPS) denied navigation, aerial delivery platforms. Technical Partner U.S. Army Combat Development Command.

Drone Supported Service Deployment

Use of drones to monitor and optimize deployment and distribution operations. Drone mapping technology for capturing data for input to systems such as the Integrated Computerized Deployment System (ICODES) and the Transportation Geospatial Information System (TGIS).

Petroleum Undersea Sustainment Hose

Provide an agile, submersible over-the-shore conduit that can be pre-positioned or immediately employed from vessels of opportunity such as a commercial offshore supply vessel (OSV). Technical partner is Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock.

Airdrop System - Precision Extended Glide

Demonstrate a long range powered parafoil system to reduce risk to delivery aircraft. Technical partner is U.S. Army Combat Development Command.

Container Airdrop

3-year project to enable the airdrop of a standard 20ft International Standard Organization (ISO) container from a C-17 utilizing standard low altitude airdrop methods. Technical partner is U.S. Army Combat Development Command.

Scalable Autonomous Modular Propulsion Kits

Develop scalable modular propulsion kits with marine automation for installation on ocean/riverine commercial barges. Technical partner is U.S. Army Engineering Research and Development Center.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY24 Actuals$23.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$19.4M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$4.84M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Total$19.4M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Total$4.84M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$28.3M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$5.00M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Total$28.3M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Total$5.00M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element — line 1$0$0$19.4M$28.3M$28.3M
630004: Deployment and Distribution Development & Proto$0$0$19.4M$28.3M$28.3M
640216: Deployment and Distribution Innovation$0$23.7M$4.84M$5.00M$5.00M
Program Element — line 2—$23.7M$4.84M$5.00M$5.00M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Deployment & Distribution Enterprise R&D. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.