Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Air Defense Command, Control and Intelligence - Eng Dev

ArmyRDT&EFully Reconciled0604741A

Watch this program: RSS · Atom

What it is
Air Defense Command, Control and Intelligence - Eng Dev (0604741A) is an Army research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 3 projects.
What changed
-$59.8M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$87.0MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$73.7MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$13.9MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$59.8MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $87.0MFY25: $73.7MFY26: $13.9MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$87.0M
FY25$73.7M
FY26$13.9M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$15.3M$33.6M$200.2M$190.4M$209.0M$70.3M$62.1M$58.6M$54.2M$87.0M
Enacted$34.6M$205.4M$28.7M$212.4M$33.5M$62.1M$59.5M$55.5M$74.7M$73.7M
Request$53.3M$28.7M$214.5M$43.5M$70.7M$59.5M$39.5M$74.7M$69.7M$13.9M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2018 book requested $28.7M for FY2018; the PB2020 book reported $190.4M as actual total obligation authority — $161.7M above the request. 190.428.7 = 161.7 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

This program
0604741A — Air Defense Command, Control and Intelligence - Eng Dev

Successors (funding flowed out)

  • realigned to · per FY2026 J-book · BA4
    show sentence
    Funding realigned from PE 0604741A / Air Defense Command Control and Intelligence - Eng Dev, Project 126 /PEO Electronic Protect for the design, development, integration, and test of ALPS.

Family Funding Line

Funding chain: 0604741A0604820AAir Defense Command, Control and Intelligence - Eng Dev

  • FY20170604741A$53.3M0604820A$16.0M
  • FY20180604741A$28.7M0604820A$33.0M
  • FY20190604741A$214.5M0604820A$39.3M
  • FY20200604741A$43.5M0604820A$105.2M
  • FY20210604741A$70.7M0604820A$109.3M
  • FY20220604741A$59.5M0604820A$127.9M
  • FY20230604741A$39.5M0604820A$71.3M
  • FY20240604741A$74.7M0604820A$94.9M
  • FY20250604741A$69.7M0604820A$76.1M
  • FY20260604741A$13.9M0604820A$71.2M

Description

Mission Air Defense Command, Control and Intelligence - Eng Dev

The Air Missile Defense Planning and Control System (AMDPCS) FY 2026 funding request of $13.892 million provides integration of air and missile defense operations at all echelons. Specifically, the Air and Missile Defense Work Station (AMDWS) provides a correlated air picture using local radars, allowing the Commander the visibility and situational understanding of the airspace; automated defense design and staff planning tools in AMDWS allow Soldiers horizontal and vertical collaborative planning with adjacent units. Common Data Link Interface-Module (CDLI-M) serves as a joint tactical datalink gateway/air picture, and when correlated by the Forward Area Air Defense (FAAD) and displayed on AMDWS, provides a near real-time, three-dimensional air picture for the Commander. Joint Tactical Terminal (JTT) provides soldiers Theater Ballistic Missile (TBM) early warning, allowing them to take appropriate actions. AMDPCS is fielded to Army Air and Missile Defense Commands (AAMDC), Air Defense Artillery Brigades (ADA BDE), Air and Missile Defense Battalions (AMD BN), and Terminal High Altitude Area Air Defense Batteries (THAAD BTRY). Air Defense Airspace Management (ADAM), a variant of AMDPCS with similar capabilities, is fielded to Corps, Divisions, Brigade Combat Teams (BCT), and multi-functional support brigades. As part of the capability and technology reuse, AMDWS external interfaces are being leveraged by Integrated Battle Command System (IBCS) to avoid redevelopment of existing capabilities. AMDWS and FAAD are core components of the Air and Missile Defense system-of-systems currently deployed in combat zones. Counter Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (C-sUAS) funding supports ongoing efforts to provide forces at all echelons with cross-domain capabilities to identify, classify, track, and defeat Groups 1-3 UAS threats, while supporting joint operational requirements. These combined arms solutions support the full kill-chain and result in solutions addressing fixed/semi-fixed, mounted/mobile, dismounted, and handheld missions. Development efforts are aligned with the C-sUAS Capability Development Document (CDD) and Annexes, which codify the threshold and objective capability requirements for C-sUAS development. C-sUAS is part of the Department of Defense Capability Based (Agile) Funding Pilot. Agile funding supports the Army Transformation Initiative, which provides enhanced force protection capabilities by fostering innovation and accelerated deployment of promising technology. Beginning FY 2026, C-sUAS RDTE funding has been realigned to new PE 0609135A/A33, Counter Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Agile Development. This funding supports the Army's Next Generation Command and Control (NGC2) initiative to modernize Command and Control (C2) systems.

Mission PEO Electronic Protect

Army Long-Range Persistent Surveillance (ALPS) is a passive sensor that provides long-range surveillance against Cruise Missile (CM), Fixed Wing (FW), Rotary Wing (RW), and Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) threats.

Mission Air & Msl Defense Planning Control Sys

This funding line is a key enabler of the Army Modernization Priorities in support of Air and Missile Defense. The Air Missile Defense Planning and Control System (AMDPCS) provides integration of air and missile defense operations at all echelons. AMDPCS is comprised of the following major subsystems: Air Missile Defense Work Station (AMDWS) ensures updated interfaces for interoperability between Air Defense and the rest of the force, allowing the Commander the visibility and situational understanding of the airspace; tools in AMDWS afford Soldiers horizontal and vertical collaborative planning with adjacent units. Common Data Link Interface-Module (CDLI-M) serves as a joint tactical datalink gateway/air picture. Forward Area Air Defense (FAAD), correlates the joint and local air picture and when displayed on AMDWS, provides a near real time, three-dimensional air picture for the Commander. Joint Tactical Terminal (JTT) provides Soldiers Theater Ballistic Missile (TBM) early warning allowing them to take appropriate actions. AMDPCS are currently fielded to Army Air and Missile Defense Commands (AAMDC), Air Defense Artillery Brigades, (ADA BDE), Air and Missile Defense Battalions (AMD BN) and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense Batteries (THAAD BTRY). Air Defense Airspace Management (ADAM), a variant of AMDPCS, are fielded to Corps, Divisions, Brigade Combat Teams (BCTs) and multi-functional support brigades. AMDPCS is being procured to support Maneuver Short Range Air Defense (M-SHORAD) growth. As part of the capability and technology reuse, AMDWS external interfaces are being leveraged by Integrated Battle Command System (IBCS) to avoid redevelopment of existing capabilities. AMDWS, CDLI-M, and FAAD are core components of the Air and Missile Defense system-of-systems currently deployed in combat zones. FY 2026 Base dollars in the amount of $13.892 million fund development, cyber security compliance, net-readiness and certification of AMDWS, CDLI-M and FAAD software, as well as accreditation of AMDPCS family-of-systems shelters and software.

Mission Counter Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)

Counter Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (C-sUAS) funding supports ongoing efforts to provide forces at all echelons with cross-domain capabilities to identify, classify, track, and defeat Groups 1-3 UAS threats, while supporting joint operational requirements. These combined arms solutions support the full kill-chain and result in solutions addressing fixed/semi-fixed, mounted/mobile, dismounted, and handheld missions. Development efforts are aligned with the C-sUAS Capability Development Document (CDD) and Annexes, which codify the threshold and objective capability requirements for C-sUAS development. Fixed/Mobile System Development: Funds rapid component prototyping, facilitates operational assessments, pursues development and integration of mature hardware, addresses obsolescence, and tests performance improvements of existing fixed and mobile systems against current and near-term threats. Initiates activities required to transition the current mobile C-sUAS solution to field level sustainment. Tech Refresh: Funds technology refreshes of C-sUAS capabilities supporting deployed systems, to keep pace with evolving threats in response to existing Joint Urgent Operational Need (JUON) CC-0558. C-sUAS CDD Pre-Planned Product Improvement (P3I): Funds prototyping, development, and integration of emerging technologies, and testing performance improvements against future threats for C-UAS programs. C-sUAS Emergent Requirements: Funds development, testing, integration, and continuous improvement to accelerate emerging C-sUAS capabilities, such as the Next Generation C-sUAS Missile (NGCM), C-UAS non-kinetic interceptor, and Unit Common and Soldier Common solutions.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (11)

ALPS Surveillance Assessment

Provide prototype fabrication, system support and operation for air surveillance assessments.

ALPS Development and Integration for Pacific Deterrence Initiative

Provide development and integration in support of the Pacific Deterrence Initiative.

AMDWS Software Development

AMDWS supports the Common Operating Environments (COE) architecture framework. AMDWS serves as a bridge between Command Post (CP) and Real Time/Safety Critical/Embedded (RTSCE) and Sensor Computing Environments. AMDWS provides Air and Missile Defense planning, situational awareness, and operational capabilities to the force. It also interfaces at the operational and strategic level with Missile Defense and Joint systems. AMDWS external interfaces are being leveraged by Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System (IBCS) to avoid duplicating existing capabilities. Interfaces and architectures evolve over time, requiring software development support to maintain capability.

Engineering, Development, Test and Evaluation

Ensures Interoperability Engineering System Suite Tool and Software Suitability and Supportability Service, testing and licenses, and interoperability and cyber compliance through engineering, development, test, and evaluation of the AMDPCS family-of-systems shelter objective configurations; execute evaluation and finalization of the AMDPCS tactical communications, data processing, and vehicle/shelter/power generation/environmental system block upgrade program for fielded systems.

Software System Certification Testing, Accreditation, and Approval of Authority-to-Operate (ATO)

Accomplish software system certification testing, accreditation, and approval of ATOs for the various software systems; BitLocker encryption and other authorized/approved software implementation; Army and joint integration interoperability assessments.

FAAD C2 Software Development and Modernization

Supports software lab, testing, interoperability, cyber compliance, Hardware Obsolescence and software configuration management of the FAAD software required to support program of record AMDPCS, Counter-Rocket, Artillery, Mortar (C-RAM), Counter-Unmanned Aerial Systems (C-UAS), and Short-Range Air Defense (SHORAD) Command and Control (C2) solutions.

IBCS/FAAD C2 Convergence; Ada to C++ Refactoring and Modernization

Convert the Forward Area Air Defense (FAAD) software capabilities and interfaces from Ada software language to C++ Software Language; modernize the software by modularizing the capabilities and developing a capabilities software product line (SPL) for Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System's (IBCS) to utilize.

SBIR/STTR Tranfer

Funding transferred in accordance with Title 15 USC §638.

Fixed/Mobile System Capabilities

Funds rapid component prototyping, facilitates operational assessments, pursues development and integration of mature hardware, addresses obsolescence, and tests performance improvements of existing systems against current and near-term threats.

Tech Refresh for Army JUON/JEON Efforts

Funds technology refreshes at Army priority fixed sites and continues technological development of C-UAS capabilities supporting deployed systems.

C-sUAS Capability Development Document (CDD) Pre-Planned Product Improvement (P3I)

The C-sUAS P3I program incorporates incremental improvements to address future C-sUAS capabilities, creating enduring next generation C-sUAS solutions. Funding supports prototyping, pursues development and integration of emerging technologies, and tests performance of system improvements against future threats. This effort was previously titled Next Generation Product Development.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY24 Actuals$87.0M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY25 Enacted$73.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY25 Total$73.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY26 Disc. Request$13.9M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY26 Total$13.9M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$87.0M$73.7M$13.9M$13.9M
146: Air & Msl Defense Planning Control Sys$25.4M$24.0M$13.9M$13.9M
FG5: Counter Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)$48.1M$49.7M
126: PEO Electronic Protect$13.5M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Air Defense Command, Control and Intelligence - Eng Dev — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →