Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Requirements Analysis & Concept Maturation

Air ForceRDT&EReconciledPE0604609F
What it is
Requirements Analysis & Concept Maturation (0604609F) is an Air Force research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 3 projects.
What changed
+$10.1M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$0J-book detail · PB2026
FY25 Total
$12.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$22.8MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$10.1MR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $0FY25: $12.6MFY26: $22.8MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$0J-book detail · PB2026
FY25$12.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26$22.8MR-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

2 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2025–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line is too short to show a direction. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
2 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2025–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line is too short to show a direction. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY25FY26
Enacted$12.6M
Request$22.7M$22.8M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Requirements Analysis & Concept Maturation

Capability development provides the analytic, technical, and programmatic rigor necessary to address capability gaps and opportunities to refine and mature future programs of record, prioritizing and accelerating transition of capabilities in collaboration with operational stakeholders. The Capability Development Enterprise is focused on maturing and transitioning high-impact warfighting capabilities aligned to Air Force Future Force Design through robust capability development. The Requirements Analysis and Concept Maturation (RACM) program element performs concept refinement and acquisition activities for the Capability Development Enterprise (CDE) through Planning for Development. RACM achieves this through focus on the late-stage capability development, technology maturation and risk reduction, industry planning analysis, pre-program of record development, open system designs, and Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) support. This will include the development of contracting structures that prepare for a competitive industrial base environment. These activities provide the technical basis for acquisition planning, technology transition, and Program of Record (PoR) establishment or integration of a new capability into an existing PoR. RACM provides robust, mission- and threat-informed characterization of systems and capabilities at multiple security levels, working with various appropriate Services, Agencies, and Test organizations to fully define the military utility of, and enhancements to, the USAF Force Design. RACM provides timely, data-driven decision support to senior leaders, fostering effective, affordable, and supportable systems on a path to successful programs of record. RACM supports capability and requirements analysis in support of the CDE, such as Capability Based Assessments (CBA), capability gap analysis/decomposition, Integrated Development Campaigns (IDC), and other activities as needed. Stakeholder coordination as well as acquisition enterprise alignment and advocacy occur in these foundational activities, which are critical for technology advancement and transition. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver RACM capabilities. The use of such program funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program elements 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, and 0605898F. This requirement supports performance of a full financial audit as required by title 10 U.S.C. Chapter 9A, Sec 240-D. This effort is in Budget Activity 4, Advanced Component Development and Prototypes (ACD&P), because efforts are necessary to evaluate integrated technologies, representative modes or prototype systems in a high fidelity and realistic operating environment.

Mission — Architecture & Integration Core Ops and Gap Assessment

This BPAC focuses on Planning for Development activities including concept selection, risk reduction, and integration in preparation for transition to a Program of Record (PoR) prior to the establishment of a program management office. Capability Based Assessments (CBA), Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) and similar studies support these activities by providing an evaluation of stakeholder-focused warfighting capabilities via candidate concept technical descriptions. These technical descriptions include open systems and industrial base inputs and analysis to support and enable acquisition, test, and training for current and emerging capability concepts. This includes pre-Milestone A risk reduction, integration, and acquisition planning activities, such as initial product support planning, developing capability concepts, high-confidence initial designs, performance estimation, risk identification, and additional concept refinement in coordination with Department of the Air Force (DAF) priorities. These funds may be used for program management support costs, including, but not limited to, hardware, software, travel, contractor support services, civilian pay, supplies, facilities, and infrastructure. This effort falls under Budget Activity 4, ACD&P, because these efforts are necessary to evaluate integrated technologies, representative modes, or prototype systems in a high-fidelity and realistic operating environment. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver RACM capabilities. The use of such program funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program elements 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, and 0605898F.

Mission — Maturation and Modernization

This BPAC matures candidate concepts derived from the Force Design and CDEO priorities, accelerates acquisition timelines, reduces technology risks, demonstrates integration and delivers potential solutions to address warfighting needs. Utilizes modern digital tools and methodologies to render quality data-driven decision space. These activities inform or refine concepts that are not mature enough for acquisition decisions to determine operational viability and/or progress to pre-Program of Record type activities. The BPAC spans various security levels and encompass the later phases of capability development. This may include development of potential contracting structures that prepares a competitive industrial base environment. These funds may be used for program management support costs including but not limited to, hardware, software, travel, contractor support services, civilian pay, supplies, facilities, infrastructure. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver RACM capabilities. The use of such program's funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, 0605898F.

Mission — Hard and Deeply Buried Targets (HDBT)

This BPAC conducts an OSD-directed, Air Force-led effort addressing the Hard and Deeply Buried Targets (HDBT) problem set and recommendations in the National HDBT Strategy. A broad-scope weaponeering analysis and concept refinement effort to develop a threat-informed, technically rigorous, and disciplined understanding of how current and emerging strike capabilities can be combined effectively to engage sophisticated underground military complexes, as reported by the Intelligence Community. Informs DoD-wide intelligence, operational, and acquisition decision space to enable a full spectrum counter-HDBT kill chain, expanding the range of options to hold the most difficult HDBTs at risk. The data and analysis generated may be used in a future Analysis of Alternatives (AoA). Evaluation of the current inventory baseline as well as near-term acquisitions will also drive focused S&T demand signals for desired attributes that will be captured and distributed via appropriate channels. These funds may cover, but are not limited to, hardware, software, travel, personnel and other costs needed to accomplish the mission. This also includes program support and operational support costs necessary to further the program up until the standup of a PoR. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver HDBT capabilities. The use of such program's funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, or 0605898F.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (4)

Capability Development Core Ops

Encompasses capability development activities supporting Analysis of Alternatives and other pre-Milestone efforts. Multi-level security analysis, maturation and pre-program of record development, and digital infrastructure integration anchored on capability-based assessments or other demand signals from the Integrated Capabilities Command (ICC), Senior Acquisition Executive (SAE), or the Capability Development Executive Officer (CDEO). This includes project support and operational support costs.

Capability Development System Attribute Definition and Acquisition Planning

Provides Planning for Development activities aligned with emerging technology and the force design. This activity funds engineering and integration efforts to refine proposed systems. These activities inform development acquisition planning, to include contracting strategies and other products that substantiate an executable Program of Record (PoR). This core capability provides increased acquisition maturation and initiation of high-confidence PoRs in a multi-level security structure, supporting single- and multi-domain capabilities as well as system-of-systems solutions. This includes project support and operational support costs.

Maturation and Modernization

Provides the CDE with Concept Refinement and risk reduction efforts aligned to the Force Design and CDEO priorities. These activities are new initiatives that are conceived as potential solutions to identified gaps. This is where functional allocation meets physical allocation in concept refinement. As the concept designs begin to close, the planning to realize mature designs solidifies, allowing for a Planning for Development determination. This data informs potential acquisition pathways and decisions with the fidelity required. Open systems, government reference architectures, and family-of-systems are key drivers to development. Multiple technology transitions may be needed for a Concept Refinement candidate or realized system.

Hard and Deeply Buried Targets (HDBT)

This effort executes a broad-scope weaponeering analysis effort, "Ensemble Analysis”, of layered and sequenced weapons effects to inform, shape, and guide counter-HDBT employment and acquisition decisions, as well as any follow-on analysis efforts. The HDBT Ensemble Analysis effort includes program support, operational support costs, inputs to scenario development, assessment of existing systems versus new builds, survivability assessment, and coordination assessing technical maturation requirements. An Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) may follow the Ensemble Analysis following OSD direction.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$12.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Total$12.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$22.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Total$22.8M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$0$0$12.6M$22.8M$22.8M
640011: Architecture & Integration Core Ops and Gap Assessment$0$0$9.78M$9.87M$9.87M
640012: Maturation and Modernization$0$0$2.84M$2.87M$2.87M
646090: Hard and Deeply Buried Targets (HDBT)$0$0$0$10.0M$10.0M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Requirements Analysis & Concept Maturation. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.