Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Requirements Analysis & Concept Maturation

FRDT&EPartial Reconciliation0604609F
What it is
Requirements Analysis & Concept Maturation — a research & development program run by Air Force.
What changed
+$10.1M FY25→26
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$0
FY25 Total
$12.6M
FY26 Request
$22.8M
FY25→26 Change
$10.1M

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
FY25: $12.6MFY26: $22.8MFY25FY26
FY25
$12.6M
FY26
$22.8M
Decade view — each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
FY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY25FY26

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

SeriesFY25FY26
Enacted$12.6M
Request$22.7M$22.8M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Maturation and Modernization

This BPAC matures candidate concepts derived from the Force Design and CDEO priorities, accelerates acquisition timelines, reduces technology risks, demonstrates integration and delivers potential solutions to address warfighting needs. Utilizes modern digital tools and methodologies to render quality data-driven decision space. These activities inform or refine concepts that are not mature enough for acquisition decisions to determine operational viability and/or progress to pre-Program of Record type activities. The BPAC spans various security levels and encompass the later phases of capability development. This may include development of potential contracting structures that prepares a competitive industrial base environment. These funds may be used for program management support costs including but not limited to, hardware, software, travel, contractor support services, civilian pay, supplies, facilities, infrastructure. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver RACM capabilities. The use of such program's funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, 0605898F.

Mission Hard and Deeply Buried Targets (HDBT)

This BPAC conducts an OSD-directed, Air Force-led effort addressing the Hard and Deeply Buried Targets (HDBT) problem set and recommendations in the National HDBT Strategy. A broad-scope weaponeering analysis and concept refinement effort to develop a threat-informed, technically rigorous, and disciplined understanding of how current and emerging strike capabilities can be combined effectively to engage sophisticated underground military complexes, as reported by the Intelligence Community. Informs DoD-wide intelligence, operational, and acquisition decision space to enable a full spectrum counter-HDBT kill chain, expanding the range of options to hold the most difficult HDBTs at risk. The data and analysis generated may be used in a future Analysis of Alternatives (AoA). Evaluation of the current inventory baseline as well as near-term acquisitions will also drive focused S&T demand signals for desired attributes that will be captured and distributed via appropriate channels. These funds may cover, but are not limited to, hardware, software, travel, personnel and other costs needed to accomplish the mission. This also includes program support and operational support costs necessary to further the program up until the standup of a PoR. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver HDBT capabilities. The use of such program's funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, or 0605898F.

Mission Requirements Analysis & Concept Maturation

Capability development provides the analytic, technical, and programmatic rigor necessary to address capability gaps and opportunities to refine and mature future programs of record, prioritizing and accelerating transition of capabilities in collaboration with operational stakeholders. The Capability Development Enterprise is focused on maturing and transitioning high-impact warfighting capabilities aligned to Air Force Future Force Design through robust capability development. The Requirements Analysis and Concept Maturation (RACM) program element performs concept refinement and acquisition activities for the Capability Development Enterprise (CDE) through Planning for Development. RACM achieves this through focus on the late-stage capability development, technology maturation and risk reduction, industry planning analysis, pre-program of record development, open system designs, and Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) support. This will include the development of contracting structures that prepare for a competitive industrial base environment. These activities provide the technical basis for acquisition planning, technology transition, and Program of Record (PoR) establishment or integration of a new capability into an existing PoR. RACM provides robust, mission- and threat-informed characterization of systems and capabilities at multiple security levels, working with various appropriate Services, Agencies, and Test organizations to fully define the military utility of, and enhancements to, the USAF Force Design. RACM provides timely, data-driven decision support to senior leaders, fostering effective, affordable, and supportable systems on a path to successful programs of record. RACM supports capability and requirements analysis in support of the CDE, such as Capability Based Assessments (CBA), capability gap analysis/decomposition, Integrated Development Campaigns (IDC), and other activities as needed. Stakeholder coordination as well as acquisition enterprise alignment and advocacy occur in these foundational activities, which are critical for technology advancement and transition. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver RACM capabilities. The use of such program funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program elements 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, and 0605898F. This requirement supports performance of a full financial audit as required by title 10 U.S.C. Chapter 9A, Sec 240-D. This effort is in Budget Activity 4, Advanced Component Development and Prototypes (ACD&P), because efforts are necessary to evaluate integrated technologies, representative modes or prototype systems in a high fidelity and realistic operating environment.

Mission Architecture & Integration Core Ops and Gap Assessment

This BPAC focuses on Planning for Development activities including concept selection, risk reduction, and integration in preparation for transition to a Program of Record (PoR) prior to the establishment of a program management office. Capability Based Assessments (CBA), Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) and similar studies support these activities by providing an evaluation of stakeholder-focused warfighting capabilities via candidate concept technical descriptions. These technical descriptions include open systems and industrial base inputs and analysis to support and enable acquisition, test, and training for current and emerging capability concepts. This includes pre-Milestone A risk reduction, integration, and acquisition planning activities, such as initial product support planning, developing capability concepts, high-confidence initial designs, performance estimation, risk identification, and additional concept refinement in coordination with Department of the Air Force (DAF) priorities. These funds may be used for program management support costs, including, but not limited to, hardware, software, travel, contractor support services, civilian pay, supplies, facilities, and infrastructure. This effort falls under Budget Activity 4, ACD&P, because these efforts are necessary to evaluate integrated technologies, representative modes, or prototype systems in a high-fidelity and realistic operating environment. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver RACM capabilities. The use of such program funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program elements 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, and 0605898F.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (4)

Capability Development System Attribute Definition and Acquisition Planning

Provides Planning for Development activities aligned with emerging technology and the force design. This activity funds engineering and integration efforts to refine proposed systems. These activities inform development acquisition planning, to include contracting strategies and other products that substantiate an executable Program of Record (PoR). This core capability provides increased acquisition maturation and initiation of high-confidence PoRs in a multi-level security structure, supporting single- and multi-domain capabilities as well as system-of-systems solutions. This includes project support and operational support costs.

Maturation and Modernization

Provides the CDE with Concept Refinement and risk reduction efforts aligned to the Force Design and CDEO priorities. These activities are new initiatives that are conceived as potential solutions to identified gaps. This is where functional allocation meets physical allocation in concept refinement. As the concept designs begin to close, the planning to realize mature designs solidifies, allowing for a Planning for Development determination. This data informs potential acquisition pathways and decisions with the fidelity required. Open systems, government reference architectures, and family-of-systems are key drivers to development. Multiple technology transitions may be needed for a Concept Refinement candidate or realized system.

Hard and Deeply Buried Targets (HDBT)

This effort executes a broad-scope weaponeering analysis effort, "Ensemble Analysis”, of layered and sequenced weapons effects to inform, shape, and guide counter-HDBT employment and acquisition decisions, as well as any follow-on analysis efforts. The HDBT Ensemble Analysis effort includes program support, operational support costs, inputs to scenario development, assessment of existing systems versus new builds, survivability assessment, and coordination assessing technical maturation requirements. An Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) may follow the Ensemble Analysis following OSD direction.

Capability Development Core Ops

Encompasses capability development activities supporting Analysis of Alternatives and other pre-Milestone efforts. Multi-level security analysis, maturation and pre-program of record development, and digital infrastructure integration anchored on capability-based assessments or other demand signals from the Integrated Capabilities Command (ICC), Senior Acquisition Executive (SAE), or the Capability Development Executive Officer (CDEO). This includes project support and operational support costs.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$12.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Total$12.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$22.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Total$22.8M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
640011: Architecture & Integration Core Ops and Gap Assessment$0$0$9.78M$9.87M$9.87M
Program Element$0$0$12.6M$22.8M$22.8M
640012: Maturation and Modernization$0$0$2.84M$2.87M$2.87M
646090: Hard and Deeply Buried Targets (HDBT)$0$0$0$10.0M$10.0M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →