Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Submunitions

FRDT&EPartial Reconciliation0604604F
What it is
Submunitions — a research & development program run by Air Force.
What changed
+$75.0K FY25→26
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$3.35M
FY25 Total
$3.43M
FY26 Request
$3.50M
FY25→26 Change
$75.0K

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
FY24: $3.35MFY25: $3.43MFY26: $3.50MFY24FY25FY26
FY24
$3.35M
FY25
$3.43M
FY26
$3.50M
Decade view — each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY26

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$2.54M$2.42M$2.50M$2.70M$2.99M$3.04M$3.08M$2.95M$3.27M$3.35M
Enacted$2.51M$2.50M$2.71M$2.99M$3.04M$3.08M$2.95M$3.27M$3.35M$3.43M
Request$2.50M$2.71M$2.99M$3.04M$3.09M$2.95M$3.27M$3.35M$3.43M$3.50M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2018 book requested $2.71M for FY2018; the PB2020 book reports $2.70M actually spent — $8.00K below the request.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Joint Smart Munitions Test and Evaluation

Project Chicken Little (PCL) continues providing superior rapid reaction signature exploitation capabilities for use on both the traditional and the asymmetrical battlefield. PCL delivers vital one-of-a-kind research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) expertise directly to the warfighter, capability developer, and allied/coalition forces. From its inception in 1985, PCL constantly advances the state-of-the-art for developmental smart munitions, seekers/sensors, and their platforms. PCL also focuses its capability against today's networked weapons, emerging weapon concepts, and assists development of innovative targeting technologies to be employed against a wide variety of vehicle targets, theater air defense units, and an extensive array of associated equipment. Combat systems and support equipment exhibit physical characteristics (i.e. signatures) and present certain vulnerabilities, which can be exploited by various targeting technologies leading to the elimination or incapacitation of the threat through the application of force (e.g. smart munitions or directed energy) or application of intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance (ISR) methods. PCL collects physical, functional, and signature attributes of real foreign threat systems and related equipment; this data feeds high-fidelity models used to predict detection, classification, vulnerability, and effectiveness performance for ISR sensor and weapon system design. PCL collects high resolution signature data using a variety of ground, air, and space-based sensors against both new and existing (obtained, sustained, and maintained to be signature representative) foreign targets; with and without the presence of camouflage, concealment, and deception materials; and operated using enemy tactics/Concept of Operations (CONOPS). The resulting highly reliable, realistic data directly support munitions/targeting development programs and helps mitigate overall acquisition risk. PCL serves as a major focal point for joint signature exploitation, collection, and dissemination within the DoD. PCL is a prime contributor in the time critical process to rapidly exploit, assess, and determine US and allied weapon/targeting performance against high value targets. Customers include: the major Defense and Service Intelligence Centers, all Services, the Joint Technical Coordinating Group (JTCG) who develop the Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manuals (JMEMs), Combatant Commands, AF Major Commands, US Air Force Weapons School curriculum support, and others. Current projects include, but are not limited to: target signature exploitation, target geometric modeling (for identifying vulnerabilities), improving air capabilities against protected structures (specifically hard and deeply buried targets), and the testing of multiple seekers, sensors, and targeting technologies in representative environments against Combatant Command/Major Command/Intelligence Community high value targets. This program is in Budget Activity 5, System Development and Demonstration (SDD) because it has passed Milestone B approval and is conducting engineering and manufacturing development tasks aimed at meeting validated requirements prior to full rate production.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)

Project Chicken Little (PCL)

Provide the DoD community accurate multi-spectral signatures obtained from high-value, signature representative modern threat systems using advanced collection technologies. Exploitations typically occur CONUS; however, PCL is postured to support OCONUS collections as dictated by mission requirements. A critical underpinning of the System Exploitation major thrust area, Sensor Week, occurs every two years and provides a unique air and ground demonstration/validation of candidate Seeker/Sensor/Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) technologies. Plan and conduct captive carry flight tests and signature collection for seeker/sensor technology evaluations. Develop, validate, and accredit improved models for target vulnerability and weapons effectiveness in support of Combatant Commands' (COCOMs) requirements.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY24 Actuals$3.35M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$3.43M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Total$3.43M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$3.50M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Total$3.50M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$0$3.35M$3.43M$3.50M$3.50M
653166: Joint Smart Munitions Test and Evaluation$0$3.35M$3.43M$3.50M$3.50M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →