Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0604604F/ — data as of July 28, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Submunitions
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
- FY24
- $3.35M
- FY25
- $3.43M
- FY26
- $3.50M
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $2.54M | $2.42M | $2.50M | $2.70M | $2.99M | $3.04M | $3.08M | $2.95M | $3.27M | $3.35M | ||
| Enacted | $2.51M | $2.50M | $2.71M | $2.99M | $3.04M | $3.08M | $2.95M | $3.27M | $3.35M | $3.43M | ||
| Request | $2.50M | $2.71M | $2.99M | $3.04M | $3.09M | $2.95M | $3.27M | $3.35M | $3.43M | $3.50M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2018 book requested $2.71M for FY2018; the PB2020 book reports $2.70M actually spent — $8.00K below the request.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Joint Smart Munitions Test and Evaluation
Project Chicken Little (PCL) continues providing superior rapid reaction signature exploitation capabilities for use on both the traditional and the asymmetrical battlefield. PCL delivers vital one-of-a-kind research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) expertise directly to the warfighter, capability developer, and allied/coalition forces. From its inception in 1985, PCL constantly advances the state-of-the-art for developmental smart munitions, seekers/sensors, and their platforms. PCL also focuses its capability against today's networked weapons, emerging weapon concepts, and assists development of innovative targeting technologies to be employed against a wide variety of vehicle targets, theater air defense units, and an extensive array of associated equipment. Combat systems and support equipment exhibit physical characteristics (i.e. signatures) and present certain vulnerabilities, which can be exploited by various targeting technologies leading to the elimination or incapacitation of the threat through the application of force (e.g. smart munitions or directed energy) or application of intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance (ISR) methods. PCL collects physical, functional, and signature attributes of real foreign threat systems and related equipment; this data feeds high-fidelity models used to predict detection, classification, vulnerability, and effectiveness performance for ISR sensor and weapon system design. PCL collects high resolution signature data using a variety of ground, air, and space-based sensors against both new and existing (obtained, sustained, and maintained to be signature representative) foreign targets; with and without the presence of camouflage, concealment, and deception materials; and operated using enemy tactics/Concept of Operations (CONOPS). The resulting highly reliable, realistic data directly support munitions/targeting development programs and helps mitigate overall acquisition risk. PCL serves as a major focal point for joint signature exploitation, collection, and dissemination within the DoD. PCL is a prime contributor in the time critical process to rapidly exploit, assess, and determine US and allied weapon/targeting performance against high value targets. Customers include: the major Defense and Service Intelligence Centers, all Services, the Joint Technical Coordinating Group (JTCG) who develop the Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manuals (JMEMs), Combatant Commands, AF Major Commands, US Air Force Weapons School curriculum support, and others. Current projects include, but are not limited to: target signature exploitation, target geometric modeling (for identifying vulnerabilities), improving air capabilities against protected structures (specifically hard and deeply buried targets), and the testing of multiple seekers, sensors, and targeting technologies in representative environments against Combatant Command/Major Command/Intelligence Community high value targets. This program is in Budget Activity 5, System Development and Demonstration (SDD) because it has passed Milestone B approval and is conducting engineering and manufacturing development tasks aimed at meeting validated requirements prior to full rate production.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)
Project Chicken Little (PCL)
Provide the DoD community accurate multi-spectral signatures obtained from high-value, signature representative modern threat systems using advanced collection technologies. Exploitations typically occur CONUS; however, PCL is postured to support OCONUS collections as dictated by mission requirements. A critical underpinning of the System Exploitation major thrust area, Sensor Week, occurs every two years and provides a unique air and ground demonstration/validation of candidate Seeker/Sensor/Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) technologies. Plan and conduct captive carry flight tests and signature collection for seeker/sensor technology evaluations. Develop, validate, and accredit improved models for target vulnerability and weapons effectiveness in support of Combatant Commands' (COCOMs) requirements.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY24 Actuals | $3.35M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY25 Enacted | $3.43M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY25 Total | $3.43M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY26 Disc. Request | $3.50M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY26 Total | $3.50M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $0 | $3.35M | $3.43M | $3.50M | $3.50M |
| 653166: Joint Smart Munitions Test and Evaluation | $0 | $3.35M | $3.43M | $3.50M | $3.50M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →