Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Armament/Ordnance Development

Air ForceRDT&EReconciledPE0604602F
What it is
Armament/Ordnance Development (0604602F) is an Air Force research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 2 projects.
What changed
+$1.84M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$5.04MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$5.42MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$7.25MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$1.84MR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $5.04MFY25: $5.42MFY26: $7.25MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$5.04M
FY25$5.42M
FY26$7.25M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$28.7M$36.3M$21.5M$16.8M$44.8M$29.5M$20.2M$8.82M$6.12M$5.04M
Enacted$37.7M$20.3M$46.5M$49.6M$28.0M$23.0M$9.05M$5.28M$5.92M$5.42M
Request$20.3M$46.5M$58.6M$28.0M$23.1M$9.05M$5.28M$5.92M$7.16M$7.25M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2018 book requested $46.5M for FY2018; the PB2020 book reported $16.8M as actual total obligation authority — $29.8M below the request. 16.77 − 46.54 = -29.77 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Armament/Ordnance Development

The Armament Ordnance Development program funds open standards development and maturation for adoption by USAF, Joint, and Coalition weapon systems for rapid integration, support, and operational use of the full range of armament capabilities. Weapons and weapon systems implementation of open armament interface standards provides rapid integration of software-defined capabilities, reduces development timelines, lowers life-cycle cost, and ensures interoperability with emerging capabilities. This budget funds the Universal Armament Interface (UAI), a matured DAF-owned standard, that provides the continuous development, characterization, and improvements required to ensure integration for current, future, and legacy munitions, ammunitions, delivery systems, and subsystems. The UAI delivers the standards needed to integrate new weapon capabilities on platforms at the speed of software, independent of aircraft Operational Flight Program (OFPs) cycles; thus, reducing costly regression testing for flight safety critical aircraft software. Planned implementations include Joint Strike Fighter (JSF/F-35), F-15EX, F-16 F-47, CCA, B-21, B-1, B-2, B-52, MQ-9, Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile - Extended Range (AARGM-ER), Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM), Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM), SDB I & II, Stand-in Attack Weapon (SiAW), Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM), Grey Wolf, Select Precision Effects At Range Capability 3 (SPEAR3), Joint Strike Missile (JSM), and Next-Generation Open Mission Services (NOMS) for mission planning. Funding directly supports the development, enhancement, and sustainment of open armament standards to support the emerging needs of the above adopting platforms. That ensures technical currency, support to coalition/joint interoperability efforts for weapons-platform interface, certification tools, and implementation support to aircraft and weapons. Funding also supports innovation activities to include studies, analyses, requirements definition, and quick-reaction capability prototypes/demonstrations to accelerate planning for technology transition, technology insertion and future acquisition programs. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver weapon system capability. The use of such program funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, or 0605898F. The FY2026 request was reduced by $.061 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative. This program is in Budget Activity 5, System Development and Demonstration (SDD) because it has passed Milestone B approval and is conducting engineering and manufacturing development tasks aimed at meeting validated requirements prior to full rate production.

Mission — Bombs & Fuzes

The Bombs & Fuzes project improves conventional weapons/munitions (kinetic and non-kinetic), fuzes, and height-of-burst sensors (HOBS), and develops and integrates complementary common weapon components, data links, position, navigation, and timing (PNT) capabilities (i.e. GPS, non-GPS, optical, passive, active, etc.) using modern acquisition best practices, to include digital acquisition practices (e.g. government-owned open system architectures, Model Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) and agile software development). It also provides for the development and testing necessary for a suitable manufacturing base of conventional warheads, fuzes, HOBS, and munitions materiel handling equipment (MMHE). Bombs & Fuzes also provides research, development, testing, and guidance of conventional warheads, fuzing, HOBS modifications, and anti-personnel anti-materiel (APAM) weapons to improve lethality and survivability against area, mobile, hard and deeply buried, and fixed targets. Finally, this project provides an opportunity to quickly insert emerging technologies into existing and developing aircraft munitions and fuzes and supports strategic planning to achieve compliance of AF munitions with Department of Defense insensitive munitions (IM) standards. - Munitions Materiel Handling Equipment (MMHE): MMHE is a continuing project to develop and improve the standardization and commonality of munitions handling and armament equipment to preclude duplication. Efforts are primarily the study, design, and development of MMHE and armament control systems; however, support may be provided to other functional areas as requested. Procurement will be performed and funded by the applicable weapons system project. - Medium Caliber Ammunition project assesses, refines, and develops medium caliber ammunition, to include, but not limited to, conducting 25mm (F-35) qualification testing, comparative testing, and mitigating ammunition inventory health issues. - Insensitive Munitions (IM) and Emerging Technologies: IM projects support AF IM strategic planning to achieve IM compliance IAW U.S. Code, Title 10, Subtitle A, Part N, Chapter 141, Section 2389, ensuring safety regarding insensitive munitions. Develops and validates IM models against current munition performance, addresses IM explosive fill deficiencies and develops munition modifications to improve the response of conventional weapons to unplanned stimuli. This project also explores and develops Emerging Technology by analyzing and evaluating current systems to integrate new technologies for both future and existing munitions. New technologies include but are not limited to improve guidance kits, case materials, new weapon designs, energetics and fuze capabilities to improve lethality, survivability, penetration, accuracy, and reliability in accordance with the National Defense Strategy roadmap. - DSU-43/B Cockpit-selectable Height-Of-Burst Sensor (C-HOBS): The C-HOBS will be a replacement for the current DSU-33D/B proximity sensor. C-HOBS will replace the single factory height-of-burst setting with the addition of multiple height-of-burst options selectable via both manual switches and a cockpit interface. These selection options allow flexibility during flight to address a wide array of targets. The C-HOBS is intended to interface with Combat Air Forces (CAF) aircraft and provide proximity height-of-burst functionality to general and special purpose weapons (to include NGAAWs). Implements Digital Acquisition tenants of Open, Agile, and Digital; builds and establishes industrial base innovation around the program's enterprise for modularity and adaptability for the life cycle of the weapons system. Leverages common component development, in collaboration with other weapon systems, to reduce redundant costs between systems with similar subsystems requirements. Invests in analytical, information management, data management, digital environments, networks, facilities, and security infrastructure upgrades directly supporting development and sustainment of this program's capabilities, while leveraging DoD and DAF enterprise IT solutions. Expands program office staff, facilities, and security infrastructure to support the required classification levels for this program's activities. Engages with DoD, DAF, and industry stakeholders to refine threat analysis, refine inventory requirements, and plan upgrade requirements. Capitalizes on and incorporates successful laboratory research and development efforts applicable to this program's capability. This effort includes design, development, test, integration, and implementation of appropriate modular open systems approach, related components, and efforts, such as, but not limited to electrical, logical, and physical interfaces defined in relevant Open System Architecture (OSA) standards. This approach allows modular and severable subsystems, to include those that are software-defined, at the appropriate level to be incrementally added, removed, or replaced throughout the life cycle. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver weapon system capability. The use of such programs funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605831F. In FY24 0.255M was expended for civilian pay expenses in this program element, and in FY25 0.406M is forecasted for civilian pay expenses in this program element.

Mission — Stores-Aircraft Interface

The Armament Ordnance Development program funds open standards development and maturation for adoption by USAF, Joint, and Coalition weapon systems for rapid integration, support, and operational use of the full range of armament capabilities. Weapons and weapon systems implementation of open armament interface standards provides rapid integration of software-defined capabilities, reduces development timelines, lowers life-cycle cost, and ensures interoperability with emerging capabilities. The Stores-Aircraft Interface project conducts stores-aircraft interface upgrades and standards development to include the Universal Armament Interface (UAI). This budget funds the Universal Armament Interface (UAI), a matured DAF-owned standard, that provides the continuous development, characterization, and improvements required to ensure integration for current, future, and legacy munitions, ammunitions, delivery systems, and subsystems. The UAI delivers the standards needed to integrate new weapon capabilities on platforms at the speed of software, independent of aircraft Operational Flight Program (OFPs) cycles; thus, reducing costly regression testing for flight safety critical aircraft software. Planned implementations include Joint Strike Fighter (JSF/F-35), F-15EX, F-16 F-47, CCA, B-21, B-1, B-2, B-52, MQ-9, Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile - Extended Range (AARGM-ER), Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM), Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM), SDB I & II, Stand-in Attack Weapon (SiAW), Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM), Grey Wolf, Select Precision Effects At Range Capability 3 (SPEAR3), Joint Strike Missile (JSM), and Next-Generation Open Mission Services (NOMS) for mission planning. Funding directly supports the development, enhancement, and sustainment of open armament standards to support the emerging needs of the above adopting platforms and more. That ensures technical currency, support to coalition/joint interoperability efforts for weapons-platform interface, certification tools, and implementation support to aircraft and weapons. Funding also supports the integration of the Common Flexible Weapon Interface (CFWI), providing a unified interface standard for air-to-air and air-to-ground weapons. Additionally, funding supports innovation activities to include studies, analyses, requirements definition, and quick-reaction capability prototypes/demonstrations to accelerate planning for technology transition, technology insertion and future acquisition programs. In October 2024, the Armament Ordnance Development program that managed this funding transitioned to the Architecture and Systems Engineering (ASE) group, Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC), Wright Patterson AFB. In addition to this PE, the ASE group will continue execution of these related activities under the following PEs: 0305206F / Airborne Reconnaissance Systems (672003 / Sensor Open Systems Architecture) 0605056F / Open Architecture Management (656060 / Standards Management) This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver weapon system capability. The use of such program funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, or 0605898F.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (4)

Munitions Materiel Handling Equipment (MMHE)

Armament Standardization/Control/Munitions Materiel Handling Equipment (MMHE) is a continuing project to develop and improve the standardization and commonality of munitions handling and armament equipment to preclude duplication. Efforts are primarily the study, design, and development of MMHE and armament control systems; however, support may be provided to other functional areas as requested. Procurement will be performed and funded by the applicable weapons system project.

Medium Caliber Ammunition

The Medium Caliber Ammunition efforts support the warfighter's medium caliber ammunition research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) requirements, DoN/USAF collaboration for the medium caliber family of ammunition, foreign comparative testing, inventory health challenges, procurement of ammunition, and other emerging technologies.

Insensitive Munitions (IM) and Emerging Technology

Model and validate current munition performance; explore and develop IM and Energetics technology; assess, analyze, and evaluate emerging and developed technologies for future and existing weapon and fuze capabilities to improve lethality, accuracy, and reliability in accordance with the National Defense Strategy roadmap.

Universal Armament Interface (UAI) Development

Funding directly supports the development, enhancement, and sustainment of open armament standards to support the emerging needs of the above adopting platforms. That ensures technical currency, support to coalition/joint interoperability efforts for weapons-platform interface, certification tools, and implementation support to aircraft and weapons. Funding also supports innovation activities to include studies, analyses, requirements definition, and quick-reaction capability prototypes/demonstrations to accelerate planning for technology transition, technology insertion and future acquisition programs.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY24 Actuals$5.04M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$5.42M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Total$5.42M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$7.25M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Total$7.25M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$0$5.04M$5.42M$7.25M$7.25M
653133: Bombs & Fuzes$0$800.0K$1.16M$1.57M$1.57M
655361: Stores-Aircraft Interface$0$4.24M$4.25M$5.68M$5.68M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Armament/Ordnance Development. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.