Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0604574N/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Navy Tactical Computer Resources
Watch this program
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $4.26M |
| FY25 | $3.92M |
| FY26 | $3.55M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $3.88M | $4.05M | $3.06M | $4.75M | $4.46M | $3.60M | $3.80M | $4.27M | $4.10M | $4.26M | ||
| Enacted | $4.10M | $3.10M | $4.82M | $4.64M | $3.69M | $3.84M | $4.29M | $4.18M | $4.28M | $3.92M | ||
| Request | $3.10M | $4.82M | $4.64M | $3.69M | $3.85M | $4.29M | $4.18M | $4.28M | $3.92M | $3.55M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2019 book requested $4.64M for FY2019; the PB2021 book reported $4.46M as actual total obligation authority — $182.0K below the request. 4.46 − 4.64 = -0.18 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Navy Tactical Computer Resources
Common Processing System (CPS) and Common Display System (CDS) programs support developing computing infrastructure in a competitively sourced environment. The Common Display System (CDS) and Common Processing System (CPS) provide technical replacements for obsolete display and processing equipment (such as AN/UYQ-70) for multiple warfare systems aboard Surface Combatants and Large Deck class ships. CPS equipment suite provides computer processing and memory, data storage and extraction, network systems, and Input/Output (I/O) interfaces to host software applications of Navy combat systems. These upgrades support AEGIS Modernization, AEGIS new construction, AEGIS Ashore, Ship Self Defense System (SSDS) MK2 modernization and new construction for all large deck platforms, Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program (SEWIP), and other Navy programs. Funding provides for technical management and Engineering Change Proposals (ECP) development for the common baseline. Funding also supports future tech refresh development efforts. Procurement and development funds provided by user programs support program unique requirements. CDS suite consists of the Technology Insertion (TI) 16 MOD 1 configuration, a follow-on to previous designs beginning with the TI 12 variant. The Navy's TI 16 MOD 1 display and peripheral solutions include Common Display System (CDS) consoles, Thin Client Displays (TCDs), Multi-Mission Displays (MMDs), and peripheral equipment. Upgrades that include these support AEGIS modernization, AEGIS new construction, AEGIS Ashore, DDG-1000, Ship Self Defense System (SSDS) MK 2, Gun Weapon System (GWS), SEWIP, and other Navy programs. Funding provides for technical management and Engineering Change Proposals (ECP) development for the common baseline along with future tech refresh development efforts. Procurement and development funds provided by user programs support program unique requirements.
Mission — Common Processing System (CPS)
CPS equipment suite provides computer processing and memory, data storage and extraction, network systems, and Input/Output (I/O) interfaces to host software applications of Navy combat systems. These upgrades support AEGIS Modernization, AEGIS new construction, AEGIS Ashore, Ship Self Defense System (SSDS) MK2 modernization and new construction for all large deck platforms, Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program (SEWIP), and other Navy programs. Funding provides for technical management and Engineering Change Proposals (ECP) development for the common baseline. Funding also supports future tech refresh development efforts. Procurement and development funds provided by user programs support program unique requirements.
Mission — Common Display System (CDS)
CDS suite consists of the Technology Insertion (TI) 16 MOD 1 configuration, a follow-on to previous designs beginning with the TI 12 variant. The Navy's TI 16 MOD 1 display and peripheral solutions include Common Display System (CDS) consoles, Thin Client Displays (TCDs), Multi-Mission Displays (MMDs), and peripheral equipment. Upgrades that include these support AEGIS modernization, AEGIS new construction, AEGIS Ashore, DDG-1000, Ship Self Defense System (SSDS) MK 2, Gun Weapon System (GWS), SEWIP, and other Navy programs. Funding provides for technical management and Engineering Change Proposals (ECP) development for the common baseline along with future tech refresh development efforts. Procurement and development funds provided by user programs support program unique requirements.
Justification
No accomplishments or planned-program narratives in this line's J-book detail — some exhibits carry figures without per-project prose.
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY24 Actuals | $4.26M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Enacted | $3.92M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Total | $3.92M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Disc. Request | $3.55M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Total | $3.55M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $36.0M | $4.26M | $3.92M | $3.55M | $3.55M |
| 3360: Common Processing System (CPS) | $12.6M | $1.57M | $1.40M | $1.26M | $1.26M |
| 3361: Common Display System (CDS) | $23.4M | $2.69M | $2.52M | $2.29M | $2.29M |
Follow the dollar
Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.
Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →
The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.
| District | Program obligations |
|---|---|
| PA-13 | $8.59M |
Related awards
Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →
| Recipient | PIID | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| LAUREL TECHNOLOGIES PARTNERSHIP | N0002419F5601 | high |
Contractor concentration
No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.
Lobbying mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Navy Tactical Computer Resources. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J387
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2017 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J337
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2017_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2018 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J367
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2018_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2019 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J378
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2019_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2020 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J390
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2020_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2021 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J402
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2021_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J376
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J367
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J366
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J368
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
RDTEN BA1-3 Book · www.secnav.navy.mil