Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Cyber Resiliency of Weapon Systems-ACS

Air ForceRDT&EReconciledPE0604414F
What it is
Cyber Resiliency of Weapon Systems-ACS (0604414F) is an Air Force research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 3 projects.
What changed
+$593.0K FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$35.7MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$45.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$46.1MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$593.0KR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $35.7MFY25: $45.6MFY26: $46.1MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$35.7M
FY25$45.6M
FY26$46.1M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

11 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2016–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
11 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2016–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY16FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$0$0$41.1M$57.7M$54.7M$67.6M$69.1M$42.1M$35.7M
Enacted–$40.0M$32.3M$62.6M$56.3M$69.7M$71.2M$43.4M$37.1M$45.6M
Request–$32.3M$62.6M$56.3M$69.8M$71.2M$44.5M$37.1M$59.5M$46.1M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2018 book requested $32.3M for FY2018; the PB2020 book reported $41.1M as actual total obligation authority — $8.80M above the request. 41.1 − 32.3 = 8.8 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Cyber Resiliency of Weapon Systems-ACS

This program funds activities at the Cyber Resiliency Office for Weapon Systems (CROWS). The CROWS is the sole organization tasked to enhance and enable Department of the Air Force (DAF) Program Executive Office (PEOs) and Program Management Offices (PMOs) to understand, engineer, and integrate cyber resiliency into emerging and fielded weapon systems to mitigate critical cyber-based vulnerabilities and preserve mission effectiveness in contested environments. The CROWS' mission directly aligns with the National Defense Strategy (NDS).The NDS specifically emphasizes integrated deterrence as vital to safeguarding U.S. national interests from aggression and strategic attacks by building a resilient, survivable Joint Force in the cyber domain, which requires the Department of Defense to prioritize investments in cyber defense, resilience, and the continued integration of cyber capabilities into the full spectrum of military operations. This program addresses weapon system cyber resiliency through two primary activities. The first activity is to develop systems security engineering tools, techniques, and procedures, with associated training and education, to integrate cyber expertise into the acquisition workforce. Notably this includes embedding knowledgeable personnel - aka Cyber Focus Teams - within DAF PEOs and PMOs,and equipping them with expertise and resources to enhance the cyber posture of DAF weapon systems. This activity also includes funding capabilities to enable effective sharing of classified cyber intelligence and vulnerability information across multiple acquisition programs, identifying technologies, tactics, and policies for further development, prototyping, and operational exercises to posture DAF weapon systems to counter emerging threats. Furthermore, this activity includes organization and analysis of the DAF's cyber risk and mitigations landscape to inform senior leaders and investment strategies. The second activity enables the CROWS to centralize and consolidate DAF and Department of Defense acquisition cyber needs and conduct threat-informed weapon systems solution analysis, identify and prioritize vulnerabilities, and deliver courses of action to mature the material and non-material solutions for mitigated vulnerabilities. This effort is in Budget Activity 4, Advanced Component Development and Prototypes (ACD&P), because efforts are necessary to evaluate integrated technologies, representative modes or prototype systems in a high fidelity and realistic operating environment.

Mission — Acquisition/System Security Engineering

The Acquisition/System Security Engineering (SSE) activity encompasses several continuous efforts to support the Department of the Air Force (DAF) and Department of Defense acquisition community. First, it produces and distributes standard system security engineering and acquisition security processes, policies, and contracting language to ensure cyber requirements are properly addressed in fielded and emerging weapon systems. Second, it bolsters intelligence collection and intelligence community engagement to provide consistent and current knowledge of cyber threats to enable the acquisition community to calculate weapon system risks. Third, it develops and hones personnel cyber resiliency training, manning strategies, and integrates Cyber Focus Teams into Program Executive Offices (PEOs) to bridge the lack of cyber acquisition expertise in PEOs. Fourth, it explores and evaluates the DAF's dynamic cyber landscape to uncover vulnerabilities and prioritize cyber techniques, products, and technologies for further development and prototyping to counter evolving threats. Fifth, it resources common secure environments to enable Program Offices to share sensitive cyber intelligence, threats, and vulnerabilities, and other critical program information. Sixth, it develops software to enable digital engineering transformation of risk identification and tracking for weapon systems. Seventh, it enables the Cyber Resiliency Office for Weapon Systems (CROWS) to research, publish, and deliver government-owned guidance, roadmaps, and references to enable weapon system program offices and industry partners to effectively implement and adapt DAF strategic cyber requirements (example: Zero Trust and Defense Cyber Operations). The centralized and consolidated nature of the CROWS saves the acquisition community millions annually by eliminating the need for each weapon system program and industry partner to fund individual cyber technical exploration efforts. Finally, it resources Defense Industrial Base data protection efforts and DAF program offices with program protection resources to include hardware assurance, software assurance, supply chain risk management, and other weapon system cybersecurity/resiliency activities, as required.

Mission — Mitigations

The Mitigations activity encompasses continuous efforts to support the Department of the Air Force (DAF) and Department of Defense acquisition community. It enables the Cyber Resiliency Office for Weapon Systems (CROWS) to be the DAF's focal point for enterprise cyber mitigations to critical cyber vulnerabilities for fielded weapon systems, subsystems, and support systems.

Mission — Mission Risk Analysis

The Mission Risk Analysis project encompasses one continuous effort to support the Department of the Air Force (DAF) and Department of Defense acquisition community. It enables the Cyber Resiliency Office for Weapon Systems (CROWS) to be the sole-organization to collect and analyze weapon system data from multiple sources (ex. Program Executive Office portfolios and test and evaluation efforts) to understand the DAF's cyber vulnerability landscape and mitigation initiatives to inform senior leader resource investment strategies. Additionally, this effort informs efforts in the other CROWS projects to prioritize research and investments to solve enterprise cyber vulnerability and mitigation needs.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (3)

Acquisition/System Security Engineering

Evaluates, transitions, and applies cyber resiliency activities into policy, processes, and products to enhance weapon system cybersecurity.

Cyber Mitigation Prototyping

Support and evaluate weapon systems' cyber risk assessments to identify, validate, and prioritize mitigations required for cyber vulnerabilities. Partner with system owners and acquisition Program Offices to develop and transition prototype mitigations.

Cyber Mission Risk Analysis

Discovers, analyzes, and coordinates information sharing of mission risk and risk discovery activities for DAF weapon systems.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY24 Actuals$35.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$45.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Total$45.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$46.1M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Total$46.1M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$0$35.7M$45.6M$46.1M$46.1M
642812: Acquisition/System Security Engineering$0$15.7M$17.8M$40.2M$40.2M
642834: Mitigations$0$14.3M$20.7M$5.98M$5.98M
642836: Mission Risk Analysis$0$5.72M$7.00M$0$0

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Cyber Resiliency of Weapon Systems-ACS. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.