Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Electronic Warfare Development

NavyRDT&EReconciledPE0604270N
What it is
Electronic Warfare Development (0604270N) is a Navy research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 6 projects.
What changed
-$544.0K FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 1 linked award record is listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$144.1MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$186.2MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$185.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$544.0KR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $144.1MFY25: $186.2MFY26: $185.6MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$144.1M
FY25$186.2M
FY26$185.6M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$27.3M$22.4M$44.9M$50.6M$86.7M$107.1M$123.4M$126.4M$124.1M$144.1M
Enacted$20.1M$92.8M$54.1M$83.6M$114.3M$127.7M$136.6M$144.5M$171.4M$186.2M
Request$48.8M$54.1M$89.8M$116.8M$134.2M$139.5M$141.1M$171.4M$189.8M$185.6M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $171.4M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $144.1M as actual total obligation authority — $27.3M below the request. 144.1 − 171.4 = -27.3 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Electronic Warfare (EW) Dev

This program element includes development of Electronic Warfare (EW) systems for the United States Navy (USN), United States Marine Corps (USMC), and United States Army tactical aircraft, USMC helicopters, surface combatants, data link vulnerability assessments, precision targeting, USN and USMC radio frequency jammers, and development and testing of EW devices for emerging threats and emergency contingencies. This element also includes: development of hardware (HW)/software (SW) solutions that link on-board integrated Aircraft Survivability Equipment (iASE) that are compatible with mission planning information and systems; studies, analysis and evaluations of current and future aircraft threats; modeling and simulation for improved countermeasure capabilities, and development and testing to address new and emerging threats. The projects in this element improve the ability of the Joint Force to strike diverse targets inside adversary air and missile defense networks to destroy mobile power-projection platforms and enhance close combat lethality in complex terrain. This program is funded under System Development and Demonstration because it includes those projects that have passed Milestone B approval and are conducting Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) tasks aimed at meeting validated requirements prior to Full-Rate Production (FRP) decision.

Mission — EW Counter Response

The Jammer Techniques Optimization (JATO) organization produces the jamming techniques and Electronic Attack (EA) optimization algorithms that are critical for current and future Airborne Electronic Attack (AEA) systems of the United States Navy (USN) and United States Marine Corps (USMC) to execute the evolving AEA mission. Through Modeling & Simulation (M&S), laboratory testing, and field testing, JATO optimizes parameters for AEA systems (such as AN/ALQ-99 Tactical Jamming System (TJS), AN/ALQ-249 Next Generation Jammer Mid-Band (NGJ-MB), Next Generation Jammer Low Band (NGJ-LB), and the AN/ALQ-231(V) Intrepid Tiger II Family of Systems) to best counter existing threats, and applies that knowledge to define the requirements for follow-on AEA systems. As commercial and military Radio Frequency (RF) threats evolve and proliferate, the JATO organization provides updated tactics, techniques, and procedures to maximize the potency of USN and USMC AEA in meeting the Combatant Command (COCOM) Commanders' Non Kinetic Effects (NKE) priorities, to include highly contested environments, Force Protection, Information Operations, and enhanced communications jamming. (Classified discussion available upon request). JATO's Advanced Techniques Group (ATG) focuses specifically on electronic countermeasures to advanced threat weapon systems and Command, Control, and Communications (C3) networks that are challenging existing EA approaches, and how to best apply advances in geolocation and unknown threat characterization to EA responses. Additional efforts include risk reduction activities to evaluate and minimize EA interference with US weapons systems, and research/technology studies in support of upgrades to existing AEA systems such as the AN/ALQ-99 TJS and AN/ALQ-249 NGJ-MB. The AEA Advanced Development project focuses on increasing the Department of the Navy's understanding and utilization of rapidly-evolving technologies that operate in the Electromagnetic spectrum. As commercial and military Radio Frequency (RF) threats evolve and proliferate, this project tracks the relevant technology, intelligence, and tactics to maximize the potency of USN and USMC AEA through the rapid insertion of emergent technologies (hardware and software) into existing AEA weapon systems and aircraft platforms. The Tactical Jamming Systems (TJS) follow-on development effort will develop and incorporate incremental capability upgrades to ensure TJS weapon systems, such as but not limited to AN/ALQ-99 TJS, AN/ALQ-249 (NGJ-MB) and AN/ALQ-266 (NGJ-LB) continues to address Airborne Electronic Attack (AEA) capability gaps against increasingly advanced and rapidly evolving enemy threats throughout the electromagnetic spectrum. TJS follow-on efforts include, but are not limited to, hardware and software development, integration and testing of the TJS capability on the EA-18G, as well as any potential future aircraft.

Mission — EW Technical Development and T&E

Provide for quick reaction prototyping of tactical information and electronic warfare systems to counter adversary platforms and Command and Control, Communications, Computers, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance, and Targeting (C5ISRT). Systems address various requirements across multiple platforms (air, surface, and subsurface), airborne and surface cryptologic operational requirements, and joint missions to research, assess, and develop information warfare and electronic warfare systems and capabilities. (Details held at a higher classification).

Mission — Tactical Air Electronic Warfare

The President's Budget 2026 control table locked including an error in the mapping FY25 Congressional reductions specific to Dual Band Decoy (DBD) to the associated project unit. Marks citing DBD ahead of need (-$2.950M) and DBD government support carryover (-$0.650M) were deducted from PE 0604270N PU 3308 but should have been deducted from PU 2175. The funds have been moved to the appropriate project unit for execution as intended. Integrated Defensive Electronic Countermeasures (IDECM) Block 4 (IB-4) is an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) to the ALQ-214 to render it suitable for operation on F/A-18C/D aircraft (replacing the ALQ-126B and significantly improving F/A-18C/D survivability) while retaining all IDECM suite functionality when installed on F/A-18E/F aircraft. The IB-4 acquisition, and contract strategy includes development of the Common On-Board Jammer for the F/A-18 C/D/E/F aircraft through sole source contract awards for modifications to the ALQ-214. IB-4, ALQ-214 ECP efforts include HW and SW design, development, integration and testing on the host aircraft. The F/A-18 EW suite includes the ALR-67 Radar Warning Receiver, the ALE-47 Countermeasures Dispensing Set, the mission computer and other avionics. F/A-18 E/F ALQ-214 ARC will provide the ALQ-214A(V)4 with improved RF threat detection algorithms and jamming against modern threat radars. Modifications to F/A-18E/F Block II and Block III aircraft avionics may be required in order to develop and integrate this capability. These other avionics may include, but are not limited to, the ALR-67(V)3, ALE-47, ALE-50 Advanced AED, ALE-55 Fiber Optic Towed Decoy (FOTD), mission computer and fire control radar. ARC capabilities may be integrated into other DoD platforms with radar warning receivers or countermeasures systems. The DBD will provide expanded RF capability against current and emerging modern RF threat radars, significantly improving the survivability of the F/A-18 E/F and may be further developed and integrated into other Naval platforms. DBD will leverage Science and Technology (S&T) advancements through the Dual Band Intelligent RF Expendable (DIRE) program to accelerate DBD capability development. DBD replaces the ALE-55 FOTD beginning in FY2027. Modifications to other F/A-18E/F Block II and Block III aircraft avionics may be required in order to develop and integrate this capability. These other avionics may include, but are not limited to, the ALR-67(V)2, ALR-67(V)3, ALE-47, mission computer and fire control radar. This Project also includes/enables iASE which improves situational awareness for own-ship, wingman, and distributed command and control.

Mission — Technology Development

The President's Budget 2026 control table locked including an error in the mapping FY25 Congressional reductions specific to Dual Band Decoy (DBD) to the associated project unit. Marks citing DBD ahead of need (-$2.950M) and DBD government support carryover (-$0.650M) were deducted from PE 0604270N PU 3308 but should have been deducted from PU 2175. The funds have been moved to the appropriate project unit for execution as intended. Project Unit 3308/Technology Development funds efforts that focus on the quick reaction prototyping and fielding of Tactical EW/countermeasures solutions for increased resilience and survivability, by improving the active electronic self-defense of tactical aircraft. This self-protection provides friendly forces the ability to deploy, survive, operate, maneuver, and regenerate in all domains while under attack as well as strike diverse targets inside adversary air and missile defense networks to destroy mobile power-projection platforms. This Project also includes/enables iASE which improves situational awareness for own-ship, wingman, and distributed command and control. Significant investments have been made in the modular HW and reprogrammable software resident in ASE capability which is fielded today. Technology Development makes specific investments towards: countermeasure/jammer/receiver algorithm development, Advanced EW Suite capability studies/investigation/analysis, threat data file and model updates as modern threats continue to evolve. These updated data files and algorithms are required to be deployed within hours of release by squadron maintenance personnel to aircraft while still on the ramp or flight deck. This program directly addresses the operational requirement of Strike Tactical Air platforms for optimization of EW/countermeasure solutions across the DoN.

Mission — Assault Survivability Optimization

FY2026 funding supports CC additional scope and schedule added to OTA for new system security and F/A-18E/F and EA-18G vibration requirements required to field CC and iASE to address modified cybersecurity requirements to reduce cybersecurity risk, the additional complexity of integration of the iASE Programmer with the CASS to maintain the I-Level maintenance capability, and additional requirements for F/A-18E/F and EA-18G integration of iASE Programmer including the MOB Hub. Funding also required to continue CC development, qualification and testing. The CC transition for F/A-18E/F, EA-18G, MH-60R/S, P-8, CMV-22, CH-53K, and MV-22 platforms will reduce expendable countermeasures logistics footprints, reduce future development and procurement costs, and improves industrial base performance through DOD wide common expendable square form factor. Project continues CC funding for aforementioned aircraft. Project continues funding required to implement MOB Hub and iASE capability for F/A-18E/F and EA-18G aircraft. MOB Hub iASE funding is for HW/SW design and qualification of the ALE-47 iASE Programmer. MOB Hub iASE replaces obsolete ALE-47 operational flight program and programmer HW, providing data to the gateway necessary for survivability in the current and future threat scenarios facing USN operational missions. This MOB Hub iASE upgraded programmer enables advanced expendable countermeasures to enhance countermeasure response, and provide additional battlespace awareness for own-ship, wingman and other mission participants. Project continues funding for Advanced RF Countermeasure development, testing and modeling and simulation capability to reduce future flight test cost. AED replaces existing GEN-X AED which is obsolete against modern RF threats. Passive RF Expendable Decoys (RR-203) leveraged advanced chaff technology used on the F-35 to provide improved Radar-Cross-Section performance capability to DoN platforms. Advanced Active and Passive RF expendable solutions offer standalone devices necessary for global naval operations for all DoN aircraft deployments for use against networked Integrated Air Defense Systems with coherent radars and provide aircrew with tailored response options of integrated on-board and off-board RF expendable solutions in a dense threat environment. Resources will be applied to the following areas: 1) Studies and evaluations to optimize employment of current countermeasures and iASE capabilities. 2) Development and demonstration of advanced expendable countermeasures and countermeasure techniques. 3) Testing and evaluation of IRCM and RF advanced countermeasures. 4) Development of system software enhancements and integration for the testing and deployment of advanced countermeasure techniques. 5) Development of and upgrades to modeling tools and specialized equipment required to conduct evaluation of advanced countermeasures against proliferating threats.

Mission — MAGTF EW Aviation Development

This project unit supports the United States Marine Corps (USMC) development of Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) Electronic Warfare (EW) and the various elements of its distributed System of Systems (SoS). The SoS addresses MAGTF EW sufficiency gaps in the areas of Electronic Attack (EA) and Electronic Warfare Support (ES) with a multitude of payloads designed for carriage on a variety of organic MAGTF air assets. Payload development plans follow an adaptable, modular and open architecture philosophy to combat the increasing capability gap and enable future growth at a reduced operational and sustainment cost. A key element to this capability is the AN/ALQ-231(V) Intrepid Tiger II program. The AN/ALQ-231(V)1 pod is the variant of the Intrepid Tiger II pod flown on the AV-8B, F/A-18A-D, and KC-130J platforms. The AN/ALQ-231(V)3 is the variant of the Intrepid Tiger II pod flown on the UH-1Y platform, with plans for integration on AH-1Z platforms. Plans include future integration of AN/ALQ-231(V) Block X advanced capability and counter-radar upgrades on USMC tilt rotor, fixed wing, rotary wing and unmanned aircraft. The AN/ALQ-231(V)4 is the first implementation of Block X upgrades on MV-22B aircraft and future (V)5 BLK X integration is planned to include payloads for KC-130J, MQ-9, CH-53K, and AH-1Z platforms. All payload variants are capable of conducting, supporting, and coordinating Electro-Magnetic Spectrum (EMS) operations in the form of EA and ES against Irregular Warfare threats. Additionally, all payloads are scalable and adaptable for emerging threats and are interoperable with the USMC's Electronic Warfare Services Architecture (EWSA). The Intrepid Tiger II capability is designed to be integrated for MAGTF tactical coordination of cyberspace and EW operations via the Cyber Electronic Warfare Coordination Cell (CEWCC).

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)

Intrepid Tiger II (AN/ALQ-231)

The program will develop, mature, and test Intrepid Tiger II (IT-II) based solutions to radar threats in support of the penetrating jammer mission with plans to release variants of the AN/ALQ-231(V) BLK X Radar Jammer for use on the MV-22 and KC-130J, as well as for future use on other USMC fixed wing, rotary wing, and unmanned aircraft.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY24 Actuals$144.1M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Enacted$186.2M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Total$186.2M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Disc. Request$185.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Total$185.6M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$1.59B$144.1M$186.2M$185.6M$185.6M
0556: EW Counter Response$644.1M$21.8M$20.4M$44.0M$44.0M
1742: EW Technical Development and T&E$13.6M$1.71M$1.77M$0$0
2175: Tactical Air Electronic Warfare$723.8M$25.9M$45.6M$50.4M$50.4M
3308: Technology Development$42.8M$19.9M$23.2M$12.4M$12.4M
3309: Assault Survivability Optimization$73.5M$60.2M$80.3M$65.2M$65.2M
3327: MAGTF EW Aviation Development$96.5M$14.5M$14.9M$13.6M$13.6M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.

RecipientPIIDConfidence
LEIDOS, INC.N0001919C0051medium

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

Showing 25 of 80 from the Senate LDA disclosure database.

BAE SYSTEMS INCElectronic|Warfare2026matched 2+ title words

National Defense Authorization Act, 2027 (HR 8800/S 4784); provisions regarding R&D - Navy, US Marine Corps, Air…

BAE SYSTEMS INCElectronic|Warfare2026matched 2+ title words

National Defense Authorization Act, 2027 (HR XXXX/S XXXX); provisions regarding R&D - Navy, US Marine Corps, Air…

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.Electronic|Warfare2026matched 2+ title words

FY27 National Defense Authorization Act (HR 8800 / S 4784) and FY27 Department of Defense Appropriations Bill (HR…

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.Electronic|Warfare2026matched 2+ title words

Department of Defense Appropriations Act and National Defense Authorization Act, provisions relating to electronic…

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES INCORPORATEDElectronic|Warfare2026matched 2+ title words

Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES INCORPORATEDElectronic|Warfare2026matched 2+ title words

Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES INCORPORATEDElectronic|Warfare2026matched 2+ title words

Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…

L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INCElectronic|Warfare2026matched 2+ title words

H.R. 9495 and Senate (bill number TBD) - Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2027, including programs related to…

L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INCElectronic|Warfare2026matched 2+ title words

H.R. 7148, Consolidated Appropriations Act, including Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026 (P.L. 119-75, Div.

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONElectronic|Warfare2026matched 2+ title words

S 2572/HR 4016 - Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026 including issues related to space, missile defense…

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONElectronic|Warfare2026matched 2+ title words

S 4874/HR 8800 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 including issues related to aircraft…

PARSONS CORPORATIONElectronic|Warfare2026matched 2+ title words

S. 4784/H.R. 8800, FY27 Defense Authorization Act: Issues pertaining to missile defense, program management and…

PARSONS CORPORATIONElectronic|Warfare2026matched 2+ title words

S. 2296/H.R. 3838, FY26 Defense Authorization Act: Issues pertaining to missile defense, program management and…

SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLCElectronic|Warfare2026matched 2+ title words

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 (H.R. 8800, S. 4784); Department of Defense Appropriations…

SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLCElectronic|Warfare2026matched 2+ title words

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 (P.L. 119-60); National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal…

SIERRA NEVADA CORPORATIONElectronic|Warfare2026matched 2+ title words

FY26 and FY27 Budget and Appropriations Process - FY26 Department of Defense Appropriations Act (H.R.4016/S.2572)…

SIERRA NEVADA CORPORATIONElectronic|Warfare2026matched 2+ title words

FY27 Budget and Appropriations Process - FY27 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R.8800/S.4784), FY27 Department of…

BAE SYSTEMS INCElectronic|Warfare2025matched 2+ title words

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 (HR 3838/S 2296); provisions regarding R&D - Navy, Air Force…

BAE SYSTEMS INCElectronic|Warfare2025matched 2+ title words

Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026 (HR 4016/S 2572); provisions regarding R&D - Navy, Air Force, Space…

BAE SYSTEMS INCElectronic|Warfare2025matched 2+ title words

Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026 (HR 4016/ S XXXX); provisions regarding R&D - Army, Navy/USMC, Air…

BAE SYSTEMS INCElectronic|Warfare2025matched 2+ title words

Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 (PL 119-4); provisions regarding R&D - Army, Navy/USMC…

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC.Electronic|Warfare2025matched 2+ title words

Issues related to photonics, energy storage, modeling and simulation, electronic warfare systems

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC.Electronic|Warfare2025matched 2+ title words

Issues related to photonics, energy storage, modeling and simulation, electronic warfare systems

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.Electronic|Warfare2025matched 2+ title words

National Defense Authorization Act, provisions relating to electronic warfare technology. Department of Defense…

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.Electronic|Warfare2025matched 2+ title words

Issues relating to electronic warfare technology.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Electronic Warfare Development. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.