Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0604270N/ — data as of July 28, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Electronic Warfare Development
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
- FY24
- $144.1M
- FY25
- $186.2M
- FY26
- $185.6M
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $27.3M | $22.4M | $44.9M | $50.6M | $86.7M | $107.1M | $123.4M | $126.4M | $124.1M | $144.1M | ||
| Enacted | $20.1M | $92.8M | $54.1M | $83.6M | $114.3M | $127.7M | $136.6M | $144.5M | $171.4M | $186.2M | ||
| Request | $48.8M | $54.1M | $89.8M | $116.8M | $134.2M | $139.5M | $141.1M | $171.4M | $189.8M | $185.6M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $171.4M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reports $144.1M actually spent — $27.3M below the request.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Electronic Warfare (EW) Dev
This program element includes development of Electronic Warfare (EW) systems for the United States Navy (USN), United States Marine Corps (USMC), and United States Army tactical aircraft, USMC helicopters, surface combatants, data link vulnerability assessments, precision targeting, USN and USMC radio frequency jammers, and development and testing of EW devices for emerging threats and emergency contingencies. This element also includes: development of hardware (HW)/software (SW) solutions that link on-board integrated Aircraft Survivability Equipment (iASE) that are compatible with mission planning information and systems; studies, analysis and evaluations of current and future aircraft threats; modeling and simulation for improved countermeasure capabilities, and development and testing to address new and emerging threats. The projects in this element improve the ability of the Joint Force to strike diverse targets inside adversary air and missile defense networks to destroy mobile power-projection platforms and enhance close combat lethality in complex terrain. This program is funded under System Development and Demonstration because it includes those projects that have passed Milestone B approval and are conducting Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) tasks aimed at meeting validated requirements prior to Full-Rate Production (FRP) decision.
Mission — Technology Development
The President's Budget 2026 control table locked including an error in the mapping FY25 Congressional reductions specific to Dual Band Decoy (DBD) to the associated project unit. Marks citing DBD ahead of need (-$2.950M) and DBD government support carryover (-$0.650M) were deducted from PE 0604270N PU 3308 but should have been deducted from PU 2175. The funds have been moved to the appropriate project unit for execution as intended. Project Unit 3308/Technology Development funds efforts that focus on the quick reaction prototyping and fielding of Tactical EW/countermeasures solutions for increased resilience and survivability, by improving the active electronic self-defense of tactical aircraft. This self-protection provides friendly forces the ability to deploy, survive, operate, maneuver, and regenerate in all domains while under attack as well as strike diverse targets inside adversary air and missile defense networks to destroy mobile power-projection platforms. This Project also includes/enables iASE which improves situational awareness for own-ship, wingman, and distributed command and control. Significant investments have been made in the modular HW and reprogrammable software resident in ASE capability which is fielded today. Technology Development makes specific investments towards: countermeasure/jammer/receiver algorithm development, Advanced EW Suite capability studies/investigation/analysis, threat data file and model updates as modern threats continue to evolve. These updated data files and algorithms are required to be deployed within hours of release by squadron maintenance personnel to aircraft while still on the ramp or flight deck. This program directly addresses the operational requirement of Strike Tactical Air platforms for optimization of EW/countermeasure solutions across the DoN.
Mission — MAGTF EW Aviation Development
This project unit supports the United States Marine Corps (USMC) development of Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) Electronic Warfare (EW) and the various elements of its distributed System of Systems (SoS). The SoS addresses MAGTF EW sufficiency gaps in the areas of Electronic Attack (EA) and Electronic Warfare Support (ES) with a multitude of payloads designed for carriage on a variety of organic MAGTF air assets. Payload development plans follow an adaptable, modular and open architecture philosophy to combat the increasing capability gap and enable future growth at a reduced operational and sustainment cost. A key element to this capability is the AN/ALQ-231(V) Intrepid Tiger II program. The AN/ALQ-231(V)1 pod is the variant of the Intrepid Tiger II pod flown on the AV-8B, F/A-18A-D, and KC-130J platforms. The AN/ALQ-231(V)3 is the variant of the Intrepid Tiger II pod flown on the UH-1Y platform, with plans for integration on AH-1Z platforms. Plans include future integration of AN/ALQ-231(V) Block X advanced capability and counter-radar upgrades on USMC tilt rotor, fixed wing, rotary wing and unmanned aircraft. The AN/ALQ-231(V)4 is the first implementation of Block X upgrades on MV-22B aircraft and future (V)5 BLK X integration is planned to include payloads for KC-130J, MQ-9, CH-53K, and AH-1Z platforms. All payload variants are capable of conducting, supporting, and coordinating Electro-Magnetic Spectrum (EMS) operations in the form of EA and ES against Irregular Warfare threats. Additionally, all payloads are scalable and adaptable for emerging threats and are interoperable with the USMC's Electronic Warfare Services Architecture (EWSA). The Intrepid Tiger II capability is designed to be integrated for MAGTF tactical coordination of cyberspace and EW operations via the Cyber Electronic Warfare Coordination Cell (CEWCC).
Mission — Tactical Air Electronic Warfare
The President's Budget 2026 control table locked including an error in the mapping FY25 Congressional reductions specific to Dual Band Decoy (DBD) to the associated project unit. Marks citing DBD ahead of need (-$2.950M) and DBD government support carryover (-$0.650M) were deducted from PE 0604270N PU 3308 but should have been deducted from PU 2175. The funds have been moved to the appropriate project unit for execution as intended. Integrated Defensive Electronic Countermeasures (IDECM) Block 4 (IB-4) is an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) to the ALQ-214 to render it suitable for operation on F/A-18C/D aircraft (replacing the ALQ-126B and significantly improving F/A-18C/D survivability) while retaining all IDECM suite functionality when installed on F/A-18E/F aircraft. The IB-4 acquisition, and contract strategy includes development of the Common On-Board Jammer for the F/A-18 C/D/E/F aircraft through sole source contract awards for modifications to the ALQ-214. IB-4, ALQ-214 ECP efforts include HW and SW design, development, integration and testing on the host aircraft. The F/A-18 EW suite includes the ALR-67 Radar Warning Receiver, the ALE-47 Countermeasures Dispensing Set, the mission computer and other avionics. F/A-18 E/F ALQ-214 ARC will provide the ALQ-214A(V)4 with improved RF threat detection algorithms and jamming against modern threat radars. Modifications to F/A-18E/F Block II and Block III aircraft avionics may be required in order to develop and integrate this capability. These other avionics may include, but are not limited to, the ALR-67(V)3, ALE-47, ALE-50 Advanced AED, ALE-55 Fiber Optic Towed Decoy (FOTD), mission computer and fire control radar. ARC capabilities may be integrated into other DoD platforms with radar warning receivers or countermeasures systems. The DBD will provide expanded RF capability against current and emerging modern RF threat radars, significantly improving the survivability of the F/A-18 E/F and may be further developed and integrated into other Naval platforms. DBD will leverage Science and Technology (S&T) advancements through the Dual Band Intelligent RF Expendable (DIRE) program to accelerate DBD capability development. DBD replaces the ALE-55 FOTD beginning in FY2027. Modifications to other F/A-18E/F Block II and Block III aircraft avionics may be required in order to develop and integrate this capability. These other avionics may include, but are not limited to, the ALR-67(V)2, ALR-67(V)3, ALE-47, mission computer and fire control radar. This Project also includes/enables iASE which improves situational awareness for own-ship, wingman, and distributed command and control.
Mission — EW Technical Development and T&E
Provide for quick reaction prototyping of tactical information and electronic warfare systems to counter adversary platforms and Command and Control, Communications, Computers, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance, and Targeting (C5ISRT). Systems address various requirements across multiple platforms (air, surface, and subsurface), airborne and surface cryptologic operational requirements, and joint missions to research, assess, and develop information warfare and electronic warfare systems and capabilities. (Details held at a higher classification).
Mission — Assault Survivability Optimization
FY2026 funding supports CC additional scope and schedule added to OTA for new system security and F/A-18E/F and EA-18G vibration requirements required to field CC and iASE to address modified cybersecurity requirements to reduce cybersecurity risk, the additional complexity of integration of the iASE Programmer with the CASS to maintain the I-Level maintenance capability, and additional requirements for F/A-18E/F and EA-18G integration of iASE Programmer including the MOB Hub. Funding also required to continue CC development, qualification and testing. The CC transition for F/A-18E/F, EA-18G, MH-60R/S, P-8, CMV-22, CH-53K, and MV-22 platforms will reduce expendable countermeasures logistics footprints, reduce future development and procurement costs, and improves industrial base performance through DOD wide common expendable square form factor. Project continues CC funding for aforementioned aircraft. Project continues funding required to implement MOB Hub and iASE capability for F/A-18E/F and EA-18G aircraft. MOB Hub iASE funding is for HW/SW design and qualification of the ALE-47 iASE Programmer. MOB Hub iASE replaces obsolete ALE-47 operational flight program and programmer HW, providing data to the gateway necessary for survivability in the current and future threat scenarios facing USN operational missions. This MOB Hub iASE upgraded programmer enables advanced expendable countermeasures to enhance countermeasure response, and provide additional battlespace awareness for own-ship, wingman and other mission participants. Project continues funding for Advanced RF Countermeasure development, testing and modeling and simulation capability to reduce future flight test cost. AED replaces existing GEN-X AED which is obsolete against modern RF threats. Passive RF Expendable Decoys (RR-203) leveraged advanced chaff technology used on the F-35 to provide improved Radar-Cross-Section performance capability to DoN platforms. Advanced Active and Passive RF expendable solutions offer standalone devices necessary for global naval operations for all DoN aircraft deployments for use against networked Integrated Air Defense Systems with coherent radars and provide aircrew with tailored response options of integrated on-board and off-board RF expendable solutions in a dense threat environment. Resources will be applied to the following areas: 1) Studies and evaluations to optimize employment of current countermeasures and iASE capabilities. 2) Development and demonstration of advanced expendable countermeasures and countermeasure techniques. 3) Testing and evaluation of IRCM and RF advanced countermeasures. 4) Development of system software enhancements and integration for the testing and deployment of advanced countermeasure techniques. 5) Development of and upgrades to modeling tools and specialized equipment required to conduct evaluation of advanced countermeasures against proliferating threats.
Mission — EW Counter Response
The Jammer Techniques Optimization (JATO) organization produces the jamming techniques and Electronic Attack (EA) optimization algorithms that are critical for current and future Airborne Electronic Attack (AEA) systems of the United States Navy (USN) and United States Marine Corps (USMC) to execute the evolving AEA mission. Through Modeling & Simulation (M&S), laboratory testing, and field testing, JATO optimizes parameters for AEA systems (such as AN/ALQ-99 Tactical Jamming System (TJS), AN/ALQ-249 Next Generation Jammer Mid-Band (NGJ-MB), Next Generation Jammer Low Band (NGJ-LB), and the AN/ALQ-231(V) Intrepid Tiger II Family of Systems) to best counter existing threats, and applies that knowledge to define the requirements for follow-on AEA systems. As commercial and military Radio Frequency (RF) threats evolve and proliferate, the JATO organization provides updated tactics, techniques, and procedures to maximize the potency of USN and USMC AEA in meeting the Combatant Command (COCOM) Commanders' Non Kinetic Effects (NKE) priorities, to include highly contested environments, Force Protection, Information Operations, and enhanced communications jamming. (Classified discussion available upon request). JATO's Advanced Techniques Group (ATG) focuses specifically on electronic countermeasures to advanced threat weapon systems and Command, Control, and Communications (C3) networks that are challenging existing EA approaches, and how to best apply advances in geolocation and unknown threat characterization to EA responses. Additional efforts include risk reduction activities to evaluate and minimize EA interference with US weapons systems, and research/technology studies in support of upgrades to existing AEA systems such as the AN/ALQ-99 TJS and AN/ALQ-249 NGJ-MB. The AEA Advanced Development project focuses on increasing the Department of the Navy's understanding and utilization of rapidly-evolving technologies that operate in the Electromagnetic spectrum. As commercial and military Radio Frequency (RF) threats evolve and proliferate, this project tracks the relevant technology, intelligence, and tactics to maximize the potency of USN and USMC AEA through the rapid insertion of emergent technologies (hardware and software) into existing AEA weapon systems and aircraft platforms. The Tactical Jamming Systems (TJS) follow-on development effort will develop and incorporate incremental capability upgrades to ensure TJS weapon systems, such as but not limited to AN/ALQ-99 TJS, AN/ALQ-249 (NGJ-MB) and AN/ALQ-266 (NGJ-LB) continues to address Airborne Electronic Attack (AEA) capability gaps against increasingly advanced and rapidly evolving enemy threats throughout the electromagnetic spectrum. TJS follow-on efforts include, but are not limited to, hardware and software development, integration and testing of the TJS capability on the EA-18G, as well as any potential future aircraft.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)
Intrepid Tiger II (AN/ALQ-231)
The program will develop, mature, and test Intrepid Tiger II (IT-II) based solutions to radar threats in support of the penetrating jammer mission with plans to release variants of the AN/ALQ-231(V) BLK X Radar Jammer for use on the MV-22 and KC-130J, as well as for future use on other USMC fixed wing, rotary wing, and unmanned aircraft.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY24 Actuals | $144.1M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Enacted | $186.2M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Total | $186.2M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Disc. Request | $185.6M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Total | $185.6M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1742: EW Technical Development and T&E | $13.6M | $1.71M | $1.77M | $0 | $0 |
| 3308: Technology Development | $42.8M | $19.9M | $23.2M | $12.4M | $12.4M |
| 3309: Assault Survivability Optimization | $73.5M | $60.2M | $80.3M | $65.2M | $65.2M |
| 3327: MAGTF EW Aviation Development | $96.5M | $14.5M | $14.9M | $13.6M | $13.6M |
| 0556: EW Counter Response | $644.1M | $21.8M | $20.4M | $44.0M | $44.0M |
| 2175: Tactical Air Electronic Warfare | $723.8M | $25.9M | $45.6M | $50.4M | $50.4M |
| Program Element | $1.59B | $144.1M | $186.2M | $185.6M | $185.6M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →