Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Air Crew Systems Development

NavyRDT&EReconciledPE0604264N
Watch this program

Published budget signals for this program, with links to receipts.

Updates appear after a data refresh and publication. No fixed update schedule is available.

Paste the RSS address into a feed reader. No Fiscal Receipts account is required.

RSSAtom

What it is
Air Crew Systems Development (0604264N) is a Navy research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 2 projects.
What changed
+$15.0M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 1 linked award record is listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$33.7MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$29.3MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$44.3MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$15.0MR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $33.7MFY25: $29.3MFY26: $44.3MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$33.7M
FY25$29.3M
FY26$44.3M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$14.5M$10.2M$8.75M$7.17M$30.0M$18.7M$20.7M$20.3M$41.1M$33.7M
Enacted$12.7M$13.6M$13.2M$31.0M$19.2M$21.4M$20.7M$50.3M$42.2M$29.3M
Request$13.6M$13.2M$21.0M$21.2M$21.4M$22.7M$43.3M$42.2M$29.3M$44.3M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2019 book requested $21.0M for FY2019; the PB2021 book reported $30.0M as actual total obligation authority — $9.03M above the request. 30.0 − 21.0 = 9.0 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Air Crew Systems Development

The Aircrew Systems Development program provides Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) of Aviation Life Support Systems to protect aircrew and flight deck personnel from current and future threats including: directed energy weapons, chemical/biological/radiological agents/fallout, ballistic projectiles, temperature extremes, heat/fire, low concentration oxygen environments, high dynamic forces during emergency egress, hearing loss, high "G" forces, and survivability during isolated personnel events. The program also provides development for the following capabilities: night vision, hearing and head protection, aircrew endurance, aircrew performance, man-mounted data display, communications, clothing, in-flight restraint and stability, emergency egress and descent, escape and evasion, survival and rescue, crash protection, and clothing/gear fitment for the entire range of anthropomorphic sizes. Acquisition strategies include: use of non-developmental items, the application of streamlining authorities, joint and tri-service developments, the pursuit of NATO/allied cooperative ventures, and open competition. These strategies expedite introduction of new products into Navy and Marine Corps fixed and rotary wing aircraft, reduce costs, and promote commonality. The Physiological Episodes program provides funding to assure pilot performance by developing and fielding systems that reduce physiological burden, monitor state of pilot health, warn of pending or actual performance degradation that may result in loss of consciousness, and improve overall aircrew resilience to assure the crew's ability to safely conduct flight. The Physiological Episodes Root Cause & Corrective Action (RCCA) team determined that an improved helmet, mask, and regulator system was required to mitigate physiological episodes. This program determines what improvements are needed and develops the material solutions required to minimize the likelihood of physiological episode occurrence. Department of the Navy received requirements for PSE (Parachute Survival Ensemble), CWAES (Cold Weather/Anti-Exposure Systems), and NGRWH (Next-Generation Rotary Wing Helmet). The PSE program will update the currently fielded ensemble to include modern technologies reducing size/weight and increasing accessibility for in-flight bladder relief. PSE modernization will reduce fatigue during normal missions and increase ease of egress during bailout situations. The CWAES program will design, test, and qualify improved cold weather/anti-exposure systems. System components will provide reduced thermal burden, increased mobility, and superior water intrusion resistance while maintaining protection levels. The improved system will reduce fatigue and dehydration, enable operating at optimum performance during extended missions, provide protection from exposure, and provide improved survivability during extended recoveries. The NGRWH program mitigates aircrew back and neck injury by providing a lighter-weight helmet solution with improved Center of Gravity (CG) and serves as the platform for future day/night digital HMD solutions. Funding provided for the PSE, CWAES, and NGRWH programs is intended to support the award of RDT&E contracts for these efforts in FY 2026. Additional FY 2026 funding has also been allocated to address funding wholeness deficiencies in the initial RDT&E allocation for the Recovery Locator Device (RLD) and Aircrew Hearing Protection (AHP) programs (both scheduled to commence development efforts in FY 2025). Based on refined requirements definition, this additional funding is required to fully fund these two programs. Additional FY 2026 funding has also been allocated to the Enhanced Visual Acuity (EVA) program as the initial EMD contract awarded in support of this program was terminated due to the inability of that prime vendor to resolve technical and affordability issues related to the display solution. FY 2026 funding for the EVA program is intended to support ongoing technical maturation efforts associated with the critical technologies that compose this system. Additional FY 2026 funding has also been allocated to Survival Vest Improvement (SVSI) program to support continued development efforts and Aircrew Safety Improvement Program (ASIP). Due to the large portfolio across all platforms, several Aviation Life Support Systems (ALSS) deficiencies are identified each year. JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION because it includes projects that have passed Milestone B approval and are conducting engineering and manufacturing development tasks aimed at meeting validated requirements prior to full-rate production decision. CONGRESSIONAL ADD PRIOR YEARS TOTAL: This Program Element (0604264N) has prior year Congressional Add funding in the amount of $6.758M that was provided in FY23 for Rotary Wing/Tilt Rotor (RW/TR) Survival Vest Systems Improvement (SVSI). This Prior Year funding is not included in the R-2 or R-3 of this budget because the Congressional Add Project Unit (9999) no longer exists.

Mission — Aircrew System Development

AIRCREW SYSTEMS: Aircrew Systems include Enhanced Visual Acuity (EVA), MH-60R/S Head and Neck Injury Mitigation (HNIM), Improved Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (IJHMCS), Next Generation Survival Radio (NGSR), Recovery Locator Device (RLD), Aircrew Hearing Protection (AHP), Rotary Wing/Tilt Rotor (RW/TR) Survival Vest Systems Improvement (SVSI), Parachute Survival Ensemble (PSE), Cold Weather/Anti-Exposure Systems (CWAES), and Next-Generation Rotary Wing Helmet (NGRWH). EVA provides advanced day/night vision/Helmet-Mounted Display (HMD) capability to address critical capability gaps in low and no light illumination levels (night vision). EVA will be integrated on current aircraft through a common interface allowing an incremental, modular approach to fielding full capability and future upgrades. HNIM will leverage work conducted during the Gunner Seat replacement program to reduce aircraft vibrations through incorporation of vibration damping into MH-60 R/S cockpit seats, reducing fatigue and enhancing mission endurance. Solutions will reduce short-term and long-term biomechanical injury due to vibration. IJHMCS will mitigate aircrew back and neck strain/fatigue and replace the JHMCS Helmet Mounted Day Display and Night Vision Cueing Device (NVCD) with a single day/night, digital color-capable helmet-mounted display. IJHMCS will integrate onto the helmet solution identified in the Helmet Mask Regulator (HMR) program. NGSR will address communication security (COMSEC) modernization directives and current obsolescence issues, providing a secure two-way Beyond Line-of-Sight (BLOS) communications capability between isolated personnel and rescue coordination and recovery forces. The RLD program will develop, qualify, procure, and field a small, precise signaling device to support personnel recovery. This device will transmit a secure, geo-locatable distress signal in a GPS-denied environment over existing US government and other communications architectures. The AHP program will leverage technology advancements in hearing conservation and speech intelligibility to mitigate aircrew hearing loss and clarity of mission-critical communication. The SVSI program provides for an improved RW/TR aircrew survival vest to address safety and performance issues with the currently fielded solution. Vest systems include, at a minimum, aircrew life support equipment and armor carrier, hoisting capability, mobile aircrew restraint, and life preserver. The PSE program will update the currently fielded ensemble to include modern technologies reducing size/weight and increasing accessibility for in-flight bladder relief. PSE modernization will reduce fatigue during normal missions and increase ease of egress during bailout situations. The CWAES program will design, test, and qualify improved cold weather/anti-exposure systems. System components will provide reduced thermal burden, increased mobility, and superior water intrusion resistance while maintaining protection levels. The improved system will reduce fatigue and dehydration, enable operating at optimum performance during extended missions, provide protection from exposure, and provide improved survivability during extended recoveries. NGRWH mitigates aircrew back and neck injury by providing a lighter-weight helmet solution with improved Center of Gravity (CG) and serves as the platform for future day/night digital HMD solutions. AIRCREW SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM: Aircrew Safety Improvement Program (ASIP) provides continuing development and qualification in response to high priority, emergent aircrew systems deficiencies, capability gaps, obsolescence, and readiness issues. ASIP addresses critical safety and performance issues while enhancing safety and survivability with solution improvements across the aircrew systems portfolio. Efforts are prioritized according to fleet demand signals.

Mission — Physiological Episodes

Physiological Episodes includes Physiological Monitoring (PhysMon) and Helmet Mask Regulator (HMR). PhysMon: This program provides funding to aircrew performance by developing and fielding a system that monitors aircrew physiological and cognitive parameters and warns of state of health or performance degradation that may result in loss of the ability to safely conduct flight. HMR: Improved helmets, masks, and regulators are required to mitigate physiological episodes. This program determines what improvements are needed and develops the material solution. The closeout of RCCA action items is paramount to the Naval Aviation Enterprise's efforts in mitigating physiological episodes, restoring confidence in the aircraft, and most importantly, keeping our USN and USMC aircrew safe.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)

Aircrew System Development

Aircrew Systems include Enhanced Visual Acuity (EVA), MH-60R/S Head and Neck Injury Mitigation (HNIM), Improved Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (IJHMCS), Next Generation Survival Radio (NGSR), Recovery Locator Device (RLD), Aircrew Hearing Protection (AHP), Rotary Wing/Tilt Rotor (RW/TR) Survival Vest Systems Improvement (SVSI), Parachute Survival Ensemble (PSE), Cold Weather/Anti-Exposure Systems (CWAES), and Next-Generation Rotary Wing Helmet (NGRWH).

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY24 Actuals$33.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Enacted$29.3M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Total$29.3M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Disc. Request$44.3M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Total$44.3M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$249.4M$33.7M$29.3M$44.3M$44.3M
0606: Aircrew System Development$237.3M$26.9M$19.3M$40.2M$40.2M
9099: Physiological Episodes$12.1M$6.74M$10.0M$4.06M$4.06M

Follow the dollar

Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.

Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →

The program's money traced left to right: the N appropriation, program element 0604264N (Air Crew Systems Development), its 1 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.
The program's money traced left to right: the N appropriation, program element 0604264N (Air Crew Systems Development), its 1 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.APPROPRIATIONPROGRAM ELEMENTTOP AWARDSRECIPIENT FAMILIESDISTRICTSNRDT&E appropriation0604264N44.3M FY26N0042119C0038ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC.36.8MRTX CorporationIA-02

The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.

The diagram as text: one row per congressional district in the diagram, the recipient families shown there, and that district's cited program obligations.
DistrictProgram obligations
IA-02$27.0M

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

RecipientPIIDConfidence
ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC.N0042119C0038high

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Air Crew Systems Development. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.