Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Threat Simulator Development

NavyRDT&EReconciledPE0604256N
What it is
Threat Simulator Development (0604256N) is a Navy research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 2 projects.
What changed
-$690.0K FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$22.1MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$25.8MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$25.1MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$690.0KR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $22.1MFY25: $25.8MFY26: $25.1MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$22.1M
FY25$25.8M
FY26$25.1M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$40.2M$30.3M$16.6M$89.5M$91.9M$61.0M$21.7M$56.3M$28.8M$22.1M
Enacted$30.8M$16.6M$91.8M$94.6M$62.7M$22.0M$58.0M$29.4M$22.9M$25.8M
Request$16.6M$91.8M$94.6M$66.7M$22.1M$20.9M$29.4M$22.9M$25.8M$25.1M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2022 book requested $20.9M for FY2022; the PB2024 book reported $56.3M as actual total obligation authority — $35.4M above the request. 56.3 − 20.9 = 35.4 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Threat Simulator Development

This is a continuing program that consolidates the design, fabrication and integration of Naval Electronic Warfare (EW) threat simulators for increased managerial emphasis and coordination. These simulator development efforts provide realistic Developmental and Operational Test and Evaluation environments to test EW systems and defensive tactics. These projects develop threat Anti-Air and Anti-Ship weapon system simulators in accordance with the Services' requirements. The 0602 Project, Electronic Warfare Environment Simulation, directly supports the Test and Evaluation resource requirements for all Naval Air EW development programs to include radio frequency situational awareness and countermeasures. Programs in development and future programs include: Joint Strike Fighter, EA-18G, Low Band Transmitter, Next Generation Jammer, Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM), Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM). The 0672 Project, Effectiveness of Naval Electronic Warfare Systems (ENEWS), directly supports the Test and Evaluation resource requirements for Surface Ship Electronic Warfare Systems. ENEWS provides anti-ship cruise missile seeker simulators, modeling and simulation and state of the art test facilities. Current and future Programs of Record include: Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program (SEWIP), Advanced Off-Board Electronic Warfare (AOEW), Nulka, Long Endurance Electronic Decoy (LEED) and advanced IR Decoys. JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST and EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SUPPORT because it supports efforts directed toward sustaining or modernizing installations or operations required for general research, development, test and evaluation.

Mission — Electronics W/F Env Simulation (ECHO)

The objective of this project is development of necessary simulation facilities and approaches to allow determination of the effectiveness of Electronic Warfare (EW) in real world engagement situations and to support the introduction of modern, effective EW systems into Naval Aviation platforms. The heavy use of test resources by all Services demonstrates the importance of these assets. The Electronic Warfare Environment Simulation project is unique because it is the only program within the Department of Defense which develops and provides Naval anti-air warfare threat assets for Test and Evaluation (T&E). This project directly supports the T&E resource requirements for all Naval Air EW development programs, to include radio frequency situational awareness and countermeasures. Programs in development and future programs include: Joint Strike Fighter, EA-18G, Low Band Transmitter, Next Generation Jammer, Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM), Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM). This project provides for the development of an Integrated Air Defense T&E capability to be fielded at each of the three sites comprising the Navy's Tri-Center complex: Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, China Lake and Point Mugu in CA, and Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, Patuxent River, MD.

Mission — Effect Nav E/W (ENEWS)

The objective of the Effectiveness of Naval Electronic Warfare (EW) Systems (ENEWS) project is the development, maintenance, upgrade and application of critical simulation assets to determine the effectiveness of Electronic Warfare (EW) for the surface Navy in simulated real-world engagement scenarios. ENEWS provides the Surface Navy with Anti-Ship Missile (ASM) simulators, Modeling and Simulation (M&S) and state-of-the-art evaluation facilities to support the introduction of modern, effective shipboard and off-board EW systems and tactics for EW Programs of Record (POR). ENEWS develops, maintains, and operates hardware simulators, digital simulations (M&S) of legacy, modern, and advanced threat ASMs that provide EW PORs an integrated simulation capability through at-sea captive carry field trials with flyable simulators, digital ASM models, and the Central Target Simulator (CTS) hardware-in-the-loop evaluation facility. The reliance of ENEWS assets by the Naval Sea Systems Command, Commander, Operational Test and Evaluation Force (COMOPTEVFOR), Office of Naval Research (ONR), and other EW Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (T&E) agencies speaks to the overall importance of this project. The project provides support and effectiveness evaluations for EW system designs, Engineering Test (ET), Development Test (DT), Operational Test (OT) events including the development and utilization of techniques and tactics. In the past, ENEWS quick reaction capabilities have provided significant support and solutions in crisis situations such as the Libyan crises, Iran threat, Persian Gulf crisis, Operation Desert Shield/Storm, the ongoing Ukrainian Crisis in the Black Sea, and the crisis in the Red Sea. Simulation Display (SIMDIS) is a modeling tool developed under the ENEWS project to support visualization of test events. SIMDIS has been adopted by most Department of Defense (DoD) T&E ranges as an effective tool that provides two and three dimensional graphical and video displays of live and post-test event data for EW T&E. One of the primary threats to surface ships is ASM systems. The ENEWS project is unique in that it is the only project within DoD dedicated to developing and providing realistic ASM assets to test and evaluate the effectiveness of shipboard EW systems and tactics against these types of threats. The ENEWS project is a critical part of the Office of the Secretary of Defense Test Resource Master Plan. This plan employs many ENEWS assets for planning, analysis, testing, and verification of shipboard and off-board EW techniques and tactics. As part of its normal activities, ENEWS provides Development Test and Evaluation (DT&E), Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E), and Follow-on Operational Test and Evaluation (FOT&E) support to the surface Navy for all ship classes. ENEWS provides support to multiple surface Navy programs including Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program (SEWIP), Advanced-Offboard Electronic Warfare (AOEW), Nulka, Long Endurance Electronic Decoy (LEED), Scaled Onboard Electronic Attack (SOEA), advanced Infrared (IR) decoys, decoy placement, ship Infrared signature and radar cross section measurements for surface combatants and other ship self-defense initiatives, including the Future Naval Capability process. In addition, ENEWS assets support effectiveness evaluations for North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) ships' EW systems in joint allied exercises and joint EW exercises such as Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) and Northern Edge test events.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (6)

Requirements and Validation

Validate and track intel updates of the threat systems necessary for the operation and continuous improvement of Navy laboratories and ranges which provide engineering support, testing and analysis to the developers, integrators, testers and users of systems and technologies that counter or penetrate air defenses.

Acquisition and Measurement Capabilities

Provide the test community with modern threat target acquisition systems and effective measurement systems necessary for Test and Evaluation of airborne early warning, situational awareness, detection and targeting systems and airborne response systems.

Engagement Capabilities

Provide the test community with the modern threat engagement systems necessary for Test and Evaluation of airborne alert, Situation Awareness, targeting systems and airborne response systems.

Hardware Simulation Systems

Maintain and perform hardware and software upgrades to the Effectiveness of Naval Electronic Warfare (EW) Systems (ENEWS) inventory of flyable and shore based Anti-Ship Missile (ASM) Electro-Optic/Infrared (EO/IR), Visible and Radio Frequency (RF) simulators and simulation systems. Perform periodic evaluation of IR and RF simulators to assess simulation operational performance and collect data for comparison with previously recorded data. Also includes development and maintenance of all simulator control consoles, captive-carry pods and power supplies.

Simulation Characterization, Verification and Requirements

Provides for the generation of formal documentation of hardware-based Anti-Ship Missile (ASM) threat simulators. Develop reports that contain detailed descriptions and parametric data of the ASM threat simulators and compares the simulator's data to the actual threat's parametric data. Provide technical management functions in support of the ENEWS project; engineering and technical support requirements for the ASM simulators and upgrades to meet Development Test (DT)/Operational Test (OT) testing requirements, development of detailed test resource requirements and provides an interface between the Office of the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Information Warfare (OPNAV N2/N6), Office of Naval Research, and ENEWS oversight activities.

Support and Computers Simulation Systems

Perform upgrades and preventative maintenance to Electro-Optic/Infrared, Digital, and Radio Frequency Laboratory Simulation Testing facilities including flight support equipment based on existing and emerging complex threat systems. Employ these simulation tools and assets into a total EW effectiveness methodology to evaluate EW systems effectiveness. Development of testing & evaluation scenarios and environmental modeling to support Electronic Support (ES) and Electronic Attack (EA) testing and modify Anti-Ship Missile (ASM) threat simulators based on the latest data.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY24 Actuals$22.1M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Enacted$25.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Total$25.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Disc. Request$25.1M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Total$25.1M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$0$22.1M$25.8M$25.1M$25.1M
0602: Electronics W/F Env Simulation (ECHO)$0$15.7M$19.2M$17.0M$17.0M
0672: Effect Nav E/W (ENEWS)$0$6.37M$6.67M$8.11M$8.11M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Threat Simulator Development. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.