Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

H-1 Upgrades

NavyRDT&EReconciledPE0604245M
What it is
H-1 Upgrades (0604245M) is a Navy research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
+$23.2M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 17 linked award records are listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$29.2MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$39.0MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$62.2MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$23.2MR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $29.2MFY25: $39.0MFY26: $62.2MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$29.2M
FY25$39.0M
FY26$62.2M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

10 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2017–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
10 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2017–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$0$0$53.1M$59.6M$55.9M$49.3M$42.7M$29.2M
Enacted–$0$54.3M$61.0M$57.1M$50.2M$43.8M$29.8M$39.0M
Request––$58.1M$65.4M$62.3M$50.2M$43.8M$29.8M$39.0M$62.2M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2021 book requested $62.3M for FY2021; the PB2023 book reported $55.9M as actual total obligation authority — $6.43M below the request. 55.9 − 62.3 = -6.4 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — H-1 UPGRADES

The mission of the AH-1 attack helicopter is to provide rotary wing close air support, counter unmanned aerial system (UAS), counter maritime, anti-armor, armed escort, armed/visual reconnaissance, survivability enhancements, and fire support coordination capabilities under day/night and adverse weather conditions. The mission of the UH-1 utility helicopter is to provide command and control and combat assault support under day/night and adverse weather conditions and special operations support; supporting arms coordination and aeromedical evacuation. Major modifications for both aircraft include 37 AH-1Ws converted to AH-1Zs, build 152 new AH-1Zs, remanufacture ten (10) H-1N helicopters and build 150 new UH-1Y models. AH-1Z and UH-1Y models include a 4-bladed, composite rotor system with semi-automatic bladefold, performance-matched transmissions, T700 Engine Digital Electronic Control Units, 4-bladed tail rotors and drive systems, more effective stabilizers, upgraded landing gear, and common, fully integrated cockpits and avionics systems. These upgrades add 10,000 flight hours to AH-1Z/UH-1Y airframes. The fully integrated cockpits reduce operator workload and improve situational awareness, thus increasing safety and reducing the rate of aircraft attrition. They provide considerable growth potential for future weapon systems and avionics to significantly increase mission effectiveness and survivability. The cockpits also include integration of onboard mission planning, communications, digital fire control, self-navigation, night navigation/targeting, air-to-ground missile and air-launched intercept missile weapon systems management in nearly identical crew stations, which significantly reduces training requirements. These upgrades maximize commonality between the two aircraft and provide needed improvements in crew and passenger survivability, payload, power available, endurance, range, airspeed, maneuverability and supportability. This budget is required for follow-on improvements to H-1 aircraft via integration of sensors and weapons, avionics, and air vehicle components that will address deficiencies, systems safety, obsolescence, readiness, reliability, supportability, and relevance in the battlespace. Improvements will include all associated System Configuration Set (SCS) updates and address hazard reports against air vehicle and engine, sensors and weapons, and avionics components, systems, and subsystems, training, and aircrew systems as well as integration and testing related to the aircraft platforms. This program is funded under SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION because it includes those projects that have passed Milestone B approval and are conducting engineering and manufacturing development tasks aimed at meeting validated requirement prior to full-rate production decision.

Mission — H-1 Improvements

The objective of H-1 Improvements is to provide follow-on Research, Development, Test and Evaluation efforts in support of all H-1 aircraft. Air Vehicle and Engine improvements include analysis of structural data to formulate Damage Limits and Tolerances for structural components in order to reduce life cycle costs and maintenance workload; development and test of structural components. These improvements include tail boom, fuselage, and airframe components, minimizing excessive and premature wear, increased reliability, decreased component fatigue and improve existing design deficiencies. Air Vehicle aircraft components will develop solutions to develop an auxiliary fuel cell capability and Rotocraft Station Control Unit (RSCU) Software development. RSCU efforts will encompass software development, testing, cybersecurity, and acquisition of test assets. All air vehicle and engine improvements include related Software Configuration Set (SCS) development updates and address hazard reports including software, test assets, cybersecurity, and testing. Avionics improvements target digital inter-operability, integrated avionics, safety and survivability, and situational awareness for both the pilot and aircrew safety. This includes Degraded Visual Environment (DVE), cockpit displays, precision and Global Positioning System (GPS) non-precision landing capability, collision avoidance, improved Embedded Global Positioning System (EGI), Radar Altimeter (RADALT), Inertial Navigation System (INS), Health and Monitoring System Upgrade (HMU), and mission computer software development. H-1 capability improvements include improved digital operations and transfer of data, digital interoperability, digital video recording, video and data networking, and information integration with aviation combat elements and Marine Air Ground Task Force elements. Mandated capability efforts include - Communications and COMSEC modernization to include Tactical Secure Voice/Second generation Anti-Jam Tactical Ultra-High frequency Radio for NATO (TSV/SATURN), Navigation and Surveillance system/Air Traffic Management (CNS/ ATM), Required Navigation Performance/ Area Navigation (RNP/RNAV), Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B), Crash Survivable Flight Incident Recorder and information technology/protection of the platform. Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) allows the H-1 to retain satellite communication capabilities. Efforts include the integration and test of Beyond Line of Sight (BLOS) satellite systems. Digital Interoperability (DI), the expansion of DI to include integration of Adaptive Network Wideband Waveform (ANW-2), Net enables weapons control, Integrated Aircraft Survivability Equipment (iASE), leveraging Proliferated Low Earth Orbit (pLEO) communications, advanced Flite Scene mapping and mission planning updates shortens the kill chain and improves information and intelligence sharing on the battlefield. DI incorporates a family of systems that includes ANW-2, Advanced Data Transfer System (ADTS), Full Motion Video (FMV), Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), Small Tactical Terminal (STT), and Cross Domain Solution (CDS). Improvements to address hazard reports against avionic platform systems which may include attitude trim performance, flight control systems performance, communication and navigation systems performance, data link and waveform systems performance, display and recorder systems performance, and aircraft health data system performance. All avionics improvements include related SCS development updates and address hazard reports including software, test assets, cybersecurity, and testing. Sensors, Weapons, Aircraft Survivability Equipment (ASE), and Helmet Mounted Display System improvements include manufacturing process improvements, hardware and software redesign to improve reliability, improve production methodologies, implement program security initiatives and increase the collective capability to address emerging battlefield threats. These improvements address reliability and obsolescence. The technical interfaces between the aircraft sensor, helmet, and weapons systems require extensive software and hardware upgrades to translate data into sensor fusion based solutions that provide both battlefield and situational awareness to the H-1 platform. The AN/AAQ-30 Target Sight System (TSS) will implement several obsolescence upgrade efforts with improvements to the Cameras as well as adding software driven capabilities such as increased field-of-views and auto-focus. The BRITE Star Block II Target Location Error correction will be completed. The Optimized TopOwl (OTO) reliability upgrades will increase reliability and readiness for components that are currently driving high repair costs. Aircraft Survivability Equipment systems including the APR-39D(V)2, Distributed Aperture Infrared Countermeasures (DAIRCM) and the AN/ALE-47 Common Carriage expendables, which require extensive integration and testing. Funds required for development, test, and integration efforts for Precision Attack Strike Munition (PASM), Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM), AGM-114 Hellfire, Advanced Precision Kill Weapons (APKWS), Modular Common Launcher, M299 Launcher improvements, Digital Rocket Launcher (DRL), AIM-9X, and AN/ALQ-231 (V) Intrepid Tiger II Electronic Warfare Pod. Improving and integrating weapon systems and expendables will align with these upgrades to improve the overall accuracy, lethality, and survivability of the H-1 platform. Improvements to address hazard reports against sensors and weapons platform systems which may include helmet and display systems performance, sensor systems performance, and weapon systems performance. All weapon and sensor improvements include related OFP development updates and address hazard reports including software, test assets, cybersecurity, and testing. These improvements will provide considerable growth potential for future weapon systems, air vehicle improvements, software improvements, and avionics upgrades, which will significantly increase mission effectiveness and survivability, while potentially reducing life cycle costs. The efforts will also include integration of onboard mission planning, communications, digital fire control, self-navigation, night navigation/targeting, precision guided munitions, and air-launched intercept missile weapon systems management in nearly identical crew stations, which significantly reduces training requirements. These upgrades maximize commonality between all H-1 Type/Model/Series aircraft and provide needed improvements in crew and passenger reliability, survivability, payload, power available, endurance, range, airspeed, maneuverability and supportability.

Justification

No accomplishments or planned-program narratives in this line's J-book detail — some exhibits carry figures without per-project prose.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY24 Actuals$29.2M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Enacted$39.0M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Total$39.0M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Disc. Request$62.2M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Total$62.2M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$260.6M$29.2M$39.0M$62.2M$62.2M
3359: H-1 Improvements$260.6M$29.2M$39.0M$62.2M$62.2M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.

RecipientPIIDConfidence
BELL TEXTRON INCN0001918F0065medium
BELL TEXTRON INCN0001918F2613medium
BELL TEXTRON INCN0001919F2520medium
BELL TEXTRON INCN0001919F2528medium
BELL TEXTRON INCN6893619F0393medium
BELL TEXTRON INCN6893620F0244medium
BOSTON FUSION CORPN6833520F0157medium
FPT INDUSTRIES LLCN0001915C0090medium
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONN6893617F0534medium
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONN6893618F0226medium
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONN6893618F0705medium
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONN6893619F0246medium
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONN6893620F0006medium
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONN6893620F0272medium
THALES AVS FRANCE SASN0001918F1606medium
THALES AVS FRANCE SASN0001919F2422medium
THALES AVS FRANCE SASN0001919F2504medium

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not H-1 Upgrades. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.