Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0604234N/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Advanced Hawkeye
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $365.2M |
| FY25 | $288.3M |
| FY26 | $350.3M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $171.2M | $211.1M | $354.4M | $283.5M | $205.6M | $221.1M | $268.7M | $339.0M | $440.7M | $365.2M | ||
| Enacted | $217.6M | $363.8M | $292.5M | $210.6M | $226.6M | $275.8M | $348.4M | $487.3M | $399.9M | $288.3M | ||
| Request | $363.8M | $292.5M | $223.6M | $232.8M | $309.4M | $386.9M | $503.0M | $399.9M | $301.4M | $350.3M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2023 book requested $503.0M for FY2023; the PB2025 book reported $440.7M as actual total obligation authority — $62.2M below the request. 440.72 − 502.96 = -62.24 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Advanced Hawkeye
The E-2D Advanced Hawkeye (AHE) program provides the Navy with a carrier-based airborne command and control platform, which is equipped with the APY-9 radar system, multiple communications systems for data and voice, and additional sensor systems. All of these systems are integrated into the aircraft via a computing infrastructure that is highly automated, which enables a highly trained crew of just 5 aviators to conduct battle management that would otherwise require several dozen personnel at multiple locations. E-2D is a core pillar of theater and carrier strike group air defense and is a key enabler to Joint long-range fire kill webs necessary to defeat the threats of our peer adversaries. Work has begun on upgrading the 25-year-old computing architecture of the AHE that will allow the Navy to lead the Joint All Domain Command and Control (JADC2) efforts in any theater. As production of the airplane winds down (final airframe procurement is scheduled for FY26), the threat continues to increase in both capability and capacity. The E-2D Research, Development, Test and Evaluation budget reflects the Navy's investment into the E-2D to ensure that the US maintains a tactical advantage over any adversary. Efforts initiated in recent years ensure that the E-2D can outpace the threat, and include upgrades to the air vehicle, mission systems, datalinks, and sensors. The program integrates and tests these new capabilities and provides Fleet concurrent training equipment upgrades. Subsequent to successful testing, new capabilities are delivered on a regularly scheduled basis and are put together as a Delta System/Software Configuration (DSSC) package to ensure commonality and configuration control across the Fleet. Among the other E-2D mission systems R&D efforts, there are 2 major initiatives that will ensure that the E-2D is ready & relevant into the coming decades. First, obsolete and failing components of the 15-year-old cockpit design are being addressed by HECTR (Hawkeye Cockpit Technical Refresh), which ensures a higher safety margin for carrier landings after 8-12 hour sorties and will substantially decrease sustainment costs over the lifecycle of the aircraft. Second is TCID (Theater Combat Identification), which includes upgrades to the 25 year-old computing infrastructure mentioned above. TCID will bring Multi-Level Security and Cross-Domain solutions through an Open Mission System (OMS) Architecture. TCID is the key to establishing the CNO's vision for the Naval Operational Architecture and the Joint Chiefs' vision for JADC2. HECTR and TCID are planned for DSSC-6, FY30 delivery. JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION because it includes those projects that have passed Milestone B approval and are conducting engineering and manufacturing development tasks aimed at meeting validated requirement prior to full-rate production decision.
Mission — E-2D Adv Hawkeye
The DSSC build schedule is outlined below along with the capabilities that are planned to comprise each DSSC build. 1. DSSC-5.1 will provide a Counter Electronic Attack (CEA) capability which will allow the E-2D radar system to maintain performance in an advanced hostile intentional electromagnetic interference environment. CEA will ensure continuous E-2D effectiveness is maintained in an Electronic Attack environment supporting the Navy Integrated Fire Control (NIFC) capability and overall Navy and Joint Integrated Air and Missile Defense strategy. 2. DSSC-5.1 and 5.2 will provide phased E-2D Data Fusion Improvements for a fusion engine to blend on and off-board sensor derived track data (e.g. Electronic Surveillance, Satellite Receiver System data, Fighter to Fighter backlink data) with already blended radar, Identify Friend or Foe and Cooperative Engagement Capability track files, enhancing situational awareness and tactical decision making. Integrating Link-16 Network Participation Group 20 messages improves interoperability between E-2D and participating US Navy fighters, including 5th generation aircraft. This enhances the combat effectiveness of the E-2D, increases situational awareness and shortens kill-chain timeliness (including NIFC). Successful E-2D NIFC employment depends on a clear/unambiguous tactical picture. 3. DSSC-5.2 provides phased E-2D Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) Signal Data Processor (SDP) processing capacity and cryptographic upgrades required to implement the NIFC capabilities integrated into DSSC-5. CEC utilizes the SDP to encrypt tactical data and control the antenna during transmission of the data. This capability will correct obsolescence deficiencies based on processors, encryption, and capacity and establish the baseline architecture for expanded capability in CEC. The fully integrated E-2D Communication-as-a-Service (CaaS) will enhance CEC improvements to ensure resilient communication paths for tactical information throughout the battlespace. CEC Block II capabilities will ensure continued interoperability with the rest of the carrier strike groups and enable new CEC capabilities necessary to counter expected advances in threat capabilities. Initial integration of CEC Block II capabilities must be conducted on time to maintain interoperability and keep pace with expected threats. 4. DSSC-5.1 and 5.2 will provide phased E-2D Sensor Netting capabilities which provide fusion of data from off-board sources via a high bandwidth network that will allow E-2D to support NIFC increment 3 requirements. Additional details are classified. 1. E-2D Hawkeye Cockpit Technical Refresh (HECTR) involves a redesign of critical components of the current E-2D Integrated Navigation Control and Display System (INCDS) driven by component obsolescence and fleet identified deficiencies. The effort includes the integration of these components with remaining cockpit hardware, integration of new software applications, and integration with Theater Combat Identification (TCID) weapon system architecture. HECTR will bring a Required Navigation Performance Area Navigation (RNP RNAV) capability to the E-2D platform, to improve reliability, to address current human machine interface (HMI) deficiencies and to address obsolescence of the current cockpit. All current functions of the INCDS will be included in the HECTR cockpit, to include unique non-navigation functions such as landing gear and gross take-off weight, which are currently housed in the Avionics Flight Management Computer. 2. E-2D Theater Combat Identification (TCID) including Mission Computer Display re-architecture enables the E-2D to distribute longer range and more accurate Combat Identification data to the Carrier Strike Group (CSG). E-2D will receive National Technical Means (NTM) and tactical TCID data at all security levels and filter/distribute at the highest possible security levels to the tactical edge. Using the Open Mission Systems (OMS) design, the new mission computer architecture will provide multi-level security and cyber hardening provisions to support current and planned capabilities. The OMS design will allow faster integration of these capabilities required to pace the evolving threat. The fully integrated E-2D Communication-as-a-Service (CaaS) will enhance TCID improvements to ensure resilient communication paths for tactical information throughout the battlespace. Aerial Refueling (AR) Capability: AR capability allows the E-2D AHE to receive fuel from various organic and non-organic tanker aircraft. It provides Expanded Battle Space Surveillance and Targeting through significantly enhanced persistence and increased flexibility (range & endurance). AR enables the E-2D AHE to fully support current Carrier Strike Group /Joint 24/7 Theater Operations by providing more versatile stationing and/or forward basing options. Previous E-2D testing established operational envelopes for KC-10, KC-130, KC-135, KC-707, and F/A-18E/F aircraft under E-2 Squadrons, PE 0204152N. Future AR tanker testing will include qualification of KC46, F/A-18 tanker and MQ-25. ESM E-2D capabilities for the ALQ-217: E-2D AN/ALQ-217 Electronic Support Measures (ESM) integrates digital receiver and processing technology. The ALQ-217B digital Advanced Digital Receiver/Processor (ADRP) addresses all known and imminent obsolescence issues in ALQ-217B Receiver/Processor. The replacement incorporates technical solutions to meet current and future mandates to support mission needs against evolving threats. Counter Electronic Attack (CEA) capability: E-2D CEA capability will allow the E-2D radar system to maintain performance in an advanced hostile electromagnetic interference environment. The E-2D CEA program will ensure continuous E-2D effectiveness is maintained in an Electronic Attack environment supporting the NIFC and long-range fires capability and overall Navy and Joint Integrated Air and Missile Defense strategy. Software Support Activity: Software Support Activity provides system requirements and integration in software development environments and software integration labs to support the E-2D software and hardware configurations. This includes software development tools, test tools, and hardware benches. Details of this project are classified.
Mission — Congressional Adds
Congressional Add. The E-2D Advanced Hawkeye and associated APY-9 radar meet the requirements specified in the Capabilities Development Document (CDD), including detection ranges, detection velocities, and tracking accuracies, verified through extensive developmental and operational flight testing and deployed operations. Program increase for E-2D advanced radar development to stay ahead of the evolving threat.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (3)
Air Vehicle
E-2D Air Vehicle improvements include the development of solutions to improve safety, structural integrity, and systems reliability of the E-2D aircraft. Improvements include analysis and redesign of structural components and components to minimize excessive and premature wear, increase reliability, improve existing design deficiencies, and respond to Fleet urgent operational requirements. The improvements will address known, predicted, and emergent obsolescence equipment issues. These efforts include, but are not limited to Aerial Refueling (AR), airframe, engine, and electrical component improvements, full scale fatigue testing, and technology upgrades. Funding also includes the flight hours that are necessary for design, development, validation and verification.
Mission Systems
E-2D Mission Systems improvements include development, integration, and testing of aircraft Mission Systems hardware/software updates and capability expansions to support aircraft avionics, displays, navigation, communication, electronic sensors, battle management, data fusion, system-of-systems, and countermeasure efforts. Efforts include continuous improvement of Mission Systems equipment and software in order to maintain mission availability for safe and reliable operations. Funding also includes development tools, test tools, and hardware benches in support of software environments and integration labs. Advanced system development and testing activities will address replacement components to address obsolescence, incorporate technical solutions to meet current and future mandates and standards, and incorporate improved technology to support evolving mission needs. Integration of Communication-as-a-Service (CaaS) to support future interoperability efforts. Studies and analyses will evaluate future capability expansions. Mission Systems efforts include, but are not limited to, Hawkeye Cockpit Technical Refresh (HECTR), improvements to/development of Communication Navigation and Identification (CNI) Friend or Foe, Datalinks, Avionics, Mission System Software (MSS), Theater Combat Identification (TCID) mission computer, Naval Integrated Fire Control (NIFC), Data Fusion, Signal Data Processor (SDP) Upgrade, battle management, technology upgrades, and emergent tactical requirements as they arise. DSSC-5.1 and 5.2 accelerates the fleet release plan with agile development to fast-track fielding of capability in incremental drops vice the previous plan to fielding all DSSC capabilities in a single year.
Integration, Test, and Training
Funds the necessary E-2D integration, testing, and Fleet training equipment upgrades required to improve the E-2D weapon system capabilities to meet reliability and increase performance. Includes E-2D System Software Configuration (DSSC) integration, engineering risk reduction efforts, Developmental Test (DT), and Operational Test (OT). In order to improve E-2D resiliency in a cyber-warfare contested environment, concurrent program protection development and integration efforts for both cybersecurity and anti-tamper will be conducted to mitigate vulnerabilities in compliance with Risk Management Framework (RMF) processes, CyberSAFE certification and Authorities to Operate (ATO) for E-2D aircraft and labs. Efforts at the E-2D Systems Test and Evaluation Lab (ESTEL) include incorporating Live Virtual Construct (LVC) capabilities to support reducing test costs and schedule as well as to mitigate testing challenges with classified capabilities. Purchase support equipment necessary to meet reliability and increase performance requirements. Incorporate updated mission systems components into both E-2D test aircraft and ESTEL to ensure accurate testing of the E-2D weapons system. Update training devices concurrent with aircraft DSSC configurations which include development of E-2D Distributed Readiness Training (D-DRT) simulators that will allow training to incorporate the latest capabilities into the simulators as well as design, development and fielding of advanced training tactics.
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY24 Actuals | $365.2M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Enacted | $288.3M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Total | $288.3M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Disc. Request | $350.3M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Total | $350.3M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $6.53B | $365.2M | $288.3M | $350.3M | $350.3M |
| 3051: E-2D Adv Hawkeye | $6.53B | $345.9M | $273.3M | $350.3M | $350.3M |
| 9999: Congressional Adds | $0 | $19.3M | $15.0M | $0 | $0 |
Follow the dollar
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Related awards
Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →
Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.
| Recipient | PIID | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| ANSYS GOVERNMENT INITIATIVES, LLC | N0001920F0419 | medium |
| BAE SYSTEMS SPACE & MISSION SYSTEMS INC. | N0001919C0084 | medium |
| CURTISS-WRIGHT DS, INC. | N0001920C0017 | medium |
| LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION | N0001918C1066 | medium |
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION | N0001914C0036 | medium |
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION | N0001915C0091 | medium |
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION | N0001918F0297 | medium |
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION | N0001918F0517 | medium |
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION | N0001918F2580 | medium |
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION | N0001919F2667 | medium |
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION | N0001919F2718 | medium |
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION | N0001920F0047 | medium |
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION | N0001920F0088 | medium |
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION | N0001920F0517 | medium |
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION | N0001920F5008 | medium |
| ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION | N0001917F0206 | medium |
| ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION | N0001919F2943 | medium |
Contractor concentration
No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.
Lobbying mentions
11 mentions from the Senate LDA disclosure database.
HR 9495 - FY27 Defense Appropriations bill - B-21, Triton, Global Hawk, E-2D HR 8800 - FY27 DOD Authorization bill…
HR 4016/S 2572 - FY26 Defense Appropriations bill - B-21, Triton, Global Hawk, E-2D HR 3838/S 2296 - FY26 DOD…
HR 4016 - FY26 Defense Appropriations bill - B-21, Triton, Global Hawk, E-2D FY26 DOD Authorization bill - GBSD, B-21…
HR 4016/S 2572 - FY26 Defense Appropriations bill - B-21, Triton, Global Hawk, E-2D HR 3838/S 2296 - FY26 DOD…
HR 8774/S. 4921 - FY25 Defense Appropriations bill - B-21, Triton, Global Hawk, E-2D HR 8070/S 4638 - FY25 DOD…
HR 4016/S 2572 - FY26 Defense Appropriations bill - B-21, Triton, Global Hawk, E-2D HR 3838/S 2296 - FY26 DOD…
Issues related to NDAA Issues related to FY2026 funding for the E-2D aircraft platform
HR 8774 / S 4921 - FY25 Defense Appropriations bill - B-21, Triton, Global Hawk, E-2D HR 8070 / S 4638 - FY25 DOD…
HR 8774 - FY25 Defense Appropriations bill - B-21, Triton, Global Hawk, E-2D HR 8070/S 4638 - FY25 DOD Authorization…
HR 8774 / S 4921 - FY25 Defense Appropriations bill - B-21, Triton, Global Hawk, E-2D HR 8070 / S 4638 - FY25 DOD…
HR 4365/S 2587 - FY24 Defense Appropriations bill - B-21, Triton, Global Hawk, E-2D HR 2670/S 2226 - FY24 DOD…
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Advanced Hawkeye. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J359
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2017 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J309
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2017_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2018 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J339
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2018_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2019 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J349
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2019_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2020 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J361
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2020_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2021 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J374
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2021_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J348
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J339
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J338
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J341
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
RDTEN BA1-3 Book · www.secnav.navy.mil