Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Nuclear and Conventional Physical Security Equipment RDT&E SDD

OSDRDT&EPartial Reconciliation0604161D8Z
What it is
Nuclear and Conventional Physical Security Equipment RDT&E SDD (0604161D8Z) is an OSD research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 2 projects.
What changed
-$675.0K FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$6.12MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$13.5MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$12.9MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$675.0KR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $6.12MFY25: $13.5MFY26: $12.9MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$6.12M
FY25$13.5M
FY26$12.9M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$7.78M$8.59M$10.2M$12.3M$8.19M$7.81M$7.04M$5.48M$6.33M$6.12M
Enacted$8.78M$10.3M$12.5M$8.31M$11.3M$7.17M$5.65M$6.48M$6.23M$13.5M
Request$10.3M$12.5M$8.33M$11.3M$7.17M$5.68M$6.48M$6.23M$13.5M$12.9M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2020 book requested $11.3M for FY2020; the PB2022 book reported $7.81M as actual total obligation authority — $3.47M below the request. 7.811.3 = -3.5 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Nuclear Matters, System Development & Demonstration

This Program Element supports the Interim National Defense Strategic Guidance to counter the growing multi-domain threat posed by China; Deterring strategic attacks against the United States, Allies, and partners; Deterring aggression, while being prepared to prevail in conflict when necessary – prioritizing the China challenge in the Indo-Pacific region, then the Russia challenge in Europe, and; Building a resilient Joint Force and defense ecosystem. Nuclear Matters, System Development & Demonstration addresses the need to defend and deter against weapons of mass destruction threats and to safeguard personnel, prevent unauthorized access to equipment, installations, material, and documents, and to safeguard the foregoing against espionage, sabotage, damage, and theft. This program oversees advanced engineering development and rapid fielding throughout the DoD for an integrated and systemic approach to develop material solutions. The Physical Security Enterprise and Analysis Program (PSEAP) avoids duplication of effort, ensures systems integration, and promotes interoperability and sustainability. The material solutions either (a) lead to a Program of Record, (b) become technology insertions into existing programs; or (c) advance to being a certified Commercial/Government off-the-shelf product. The PSEAP advances enterprise-level physical security RDT&E solutions to reduce risk created by current and emerging threat by analyzing, researching, developing, demonstrating, and evaluating interoperable solutions to transition capability to warfighters. Collaboration with DoD Components, other government agencies, and the international community to prioritize and close capability gaps is a top priority of the PSEAP and the physical security community. National Technical Nuclear Forensics (NTNF) mission requirements and responsibilities derive from multiple source documents. Per National Security Presidential Memorandum 35 (NSPM 35), the DoD leads the U.S. Government (USG) post-detonation NTNF capability. NSPM 35 also directs that the US will maintain and advance a robust NTNF capability to detect, identify, locate, and characterize the attribution of the source of an actual or attempted nuclear or radiological attack in all environments, to include underground, underwater, in the atmosphere, and space. Per DoD Directive S-2060.04, the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition & Sustainment (OUSD(A&S)) is the office responsible for developing and leading the DoD’s NTNF capabilities. Per the 2022 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) Direction, greater investment in NTNF tools is required to ensure they remain responsive to the threat, and thus scientifically credible and internationally accepted to hold states facilitating acts of nuclear terrorism accountable. The FY 2022 – FY 2026 Nuclear Forensics and Attribution Strategic (NFAS) Plan requires an NTNF capability to collect, analyze, and evaluate both air and ground post-nuclear detonation samples at accelerated directed timelines. The DoD mission to collect, analyze, and evaluate post-detonation prompt signals and nuclear debris is critical to our national defense and security to ensuring the USG can identify the source of nuclear material and hold those involved or supporting an attack accountable. Internal and independent assessments indicate that new capabilities are needed to sustain an effective deterrent against an unattributed nuclear attack and meet the challenges of future threats. This PE is the only DoD research, development, and test and evaluation (RDT&E) program focused on System Development and Demonstration for post-detonation NTNF capabilities. Without fully supporting these requirements, the DoD’s ability to meet this critical deterrence need will be significantly degraded.

Mission National Technical Nuclear Forensics

Per NSPM 35, the DoD leads the USG post-detonation NTNF capability and directs the U.S. to maintain and advance NTNF capabilities leading to the attribution of the source of an actual or attempted nuclear attack in all environments. Per the 2022 NPR, greater investment in NTNF tools is required to ensure they remain responsive to the threat. Per DoDD S-2060.04, OUSD(A&S) is the DoD office responsible for DoD’s NTNF capabilities. Per the FY 2022 – FY 2026 NFAS Plan, accelerated timelines are required for the NTNF capability to collect, analyze, and evaluate both air and ground post-nuclear detonation samples. This Program Element is the only DoD RDT&E program focused on System Development & Demonstration for NTNF capabilities. Collecting, analyzing, and evaluating post-detonation prompt signals and nuclear debris is critical to ensure the USG can identify the source of nuclear material and holding those involved or supporting an attack accountable is critical to our national defense and security. Swift and accurate forensic and attribution capabilities are vital to supporting the President and Secretary of Defense in developing an appropriate, and timely, national response to a nuclear event and to prevent future attacks. An effective NTNF capability ensures potential adversaries, or those who support them, know that they will be held accountable if they use proxies or other non-traditional delivery (e.g., false-flag operations) of nuclear weapons against the U.S., U.S. interests, or allies. Both internal and independent studies indicate that continued improvement to the USG's NTNF capabilities is needed to sustain a credible deterrent against an attempted or actual nuclear attack. Additionally, this program sustains perishable U.S. technical expertise at the operational DoD laboratories required to respond to a post-detonation NTNF event. The DoD's laboratory capability in this area is limited by capacity and technical expertise. Increased support of the DoD’s NTNF mission is crucial to prevent attrition of current capabilities and knowledge base, ensure that this critical and unique deterrence capability is not lost, putting the security of the nation and the ability to deter specific kinds of nuclear attack at risk, and meeting a higher standard of timeliness and confidence as directed.

Mission Nuclear and Conventional Physical Security

The Physical Security Enterprise and Analysis Program (PSEAP) pursues the development of nuclear and conventional physical security materiel solutions in response to the stated needs and requirements of the Combatant Commands and Military Services. This program leverages commonalities in physical security requirements in order to closely balance and integrate the needs of users. The PSEAP is responsible for avoiding duplication of effort, ensuring systems integration, and promoting interoperability and sustainability. The materiel solutions either (a) lead to a Program of Record, (b) become technology insertions into existing programs; or (c) advance to being a certified Commercial/Government off-the-shelf product.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (2)

NTNF Capability Development

The development of capability to collect, analyze, and evaluate prompt signals and nuclear debris is critical to our national defense and security. Swift and accurate forensic analysis and contribution to USG attribution (identification) processes are vital to supporting the President and Secretary of Defense in developing an appropriate national response to a nuclear event and to prevent future attacks in a timely manner. Recent Russian nuclear threats related to Ukraine have sharpened the understanding of, and need for, robust nuclear forensics capabilities. NTNF investments support development and retention of technical nuclear forensics expertise and improvements in CONUS and OCONUS collection and fixed laboratory processes. Investments will also support legacy NTNF capabilities and the operationalization of new capabilities.

Physical Security System Capability Development

This program matures capability before transitioning to warfighter user community by developing physical security components and systems to support valid requirements while eliminating duplication of effort, pursuing the use of government and commercial off-the-shelf products, ensuring systems integration, and promoting interoperability and sustainability. Leverages RDT&E investments to achieve physical security enterprise-level solutions to deter, detect, delay, deny and defeat adversaries threatening nuclear and non-nuclear environments. Promotes government and appropriate industry standards for interoperability with existing programs of record to achieve cohesive system architectures. Improves transition of successful RDT&E innovations to DoD Acquisition agencies by using technology transition agreements and other tools to provide improved warfighter capabilities against asymmetrical, conventional and Weapons of Mass Destruction threats.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY24 Actuals$6.12M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Enacted$13.5M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Total$13.5M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Disc. Request$12.9M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Total$12.9M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$108.3M$6.12M$13.5M$12.9M$12.9M
042: National Technical Nuclear Forensics$16.1M$0$7.93M$8.02M$8.02M
163: Nuclear and Conventional Physical Security$92.3M$6.12M$5.62M$4.85M$4.85M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Nuclear and Conventional Physical Security Equipment RDT&E SDD — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →