Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0603884C/ — data as of August 12, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Ballistic Missile Defense Sensors
Watch this program: RSS · Atom
Budget Figures
$197.6M discretionary + $475.0M one-time reconciliation. Discretionary change vs FY2025 enacted: -5.4%.
Two official figures, one label— reconciled below
Fiscal Receipts uses P-1/R-1 workbook total obligation authority (TOA) as the headline figure sitewide. The workbook TOA includes budget rows (such as advance procurement) that the R-2/P-40 J-book program line excludes. How the two bases relate →
FY26 Request · $672.6M TOA − $197.6M J-book line = 475.0M (672.6 − 197.6 = 475.0)
Figures in the sentence are rounded for reading; the parenthesised arithmetic is the same subtraction in USD millions, at the precision where it closes.
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $239.6M |
| FY25 | $209.0M |
| FY26 | $672.6M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $260.3M | $233.0M | $252.7M | $290.3M | $382.8M | $348.4M | $259.6M | $250.1M | $228.8M | $239.6M | ||
| Enacted | $228.4M | $230.1M | $278.1M | $385.4M | $352.3M | $265.8M | $255.0M | $230.5M | $239.2M | $209.0M | ||
| Request | $230.1M | $247.3M | $220.9M | $283.5M | $282.0M | $224.8M | $231.1M | $239.2M | $209.0M | $672.6M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2019 book requested $220.9M for FY2019; the PB2021 book reported $382.8M as actual total obligation authority — $161.9M above the request. 382.8 − 220.9 = 161.9 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Ballistic Missile Defense Sensors
The Missile Defense System network of layered sensors provides essential situational awareness and fire control data for the command and control of Missile Defense System weapon systems, such as Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD), Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD), and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD). The suite of remote ground-based sensors provides early warning, midcourse, and terminal missile defense threat data. This data enables layered detection and tracking of missile targets, providing fire-control quality position, velocity, and discrimination data through GMD Fire Control, or Command and Control, Battle Management and Communications (C2BMC). Overlapping coverage of geographically diverse sensors provides improved threat track data, reduces the impact of the loss of any one sensor, and reduces the potential impact of countermeasures. The extended coverage and accuracy provided by a network of layered sensors increases the defensive footprint and reduces the number of target engagements required, thereby conserving interceptor inventory and maintaining a high probability of successful engagement. Networked forward-based sensors enable C2BMC to pair the best sensor coverage with the best available weapon system to provide the most effective defense against missile threats. Threat discrimination improvements will enhance Missile Defense System effectiveness against the evolving adversary threat. The Missile Defense System Sensors Program contributes to regional and homeland missile defense by developing, delivering, and deploying/redeploying Army Navy/Transportable Radar Surveillance and Control-2 (AN/TPY-2) radars for operations or tests. AN/TPY-2 radars can be configured to operate as either a THAAD Fire Unit Radar (terminal mode) or a Forward-Based Radar. These radars are transportable and add flexibility to respond to geographical changes in threats. Radars provide early warning tracking and discrimination data through all phases of missile flight. Through the Missile Defense System C2BMC and coalition data links, the AN/TPY-2 provides fire control data to enable remote Standard Missile-3 engagements by Aegis BMD and to cue deployed THAAD and United States (U.S.) and partner Phased Array Tracking Radar to Intercept on Target batteries. The Missile Defense System sensor network includes the U.S. Space Force (USSF) COBRA DANE (CD) Radar at Eareckson Air Station, AK, and the USSF Upgraded Early Warning Radars (UEWRs) at Beale Air Force Base, CA; Cape Cod Space Force Station (SFS), MA; Clear SFS, AK; Royal Air Force Fylingdales, United Kingdom; and Pituffik Space Base, Greenland, for defense of the homeland. This program element supports sensors Modeling and Simulation development of digital and hardware-in-the-loop models to support Integrated Master Test Plan events and testing for Missile Defense System assessments of the Long Range Discrimination Radar, AN/TPY-2, Sea-Based X-Band, UEWR, and CD radar. This program element also supports the planning and deployment of persistent radars. Cyber Operations sustain the Risk Management Framework (RMF) and Controls Validation Testing activities, analysis of validation results, risk assessments, reviews of plans of action and milestones, and alignment and integration to the Tier 2 Cybersecurity Service Provider for the Ground Sensors mission and support systems. Cyber Operations supports the execution of lab-based developmental cyber testing (Baseline Assessment Technical Testing, Cooperative Vulnerability Identification and Adversarial Cybersecurity Developmental Test and Evaluation) for all major mission system software version releases. These efforts position Ground Sensor assets to complete the transition to National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 requirements (e.g. RMF 2.0) and enhance software supply chain security by developing and maintaining the software bill of materials for all developed and delivered Ground Sensors mission and support software as directed in the President's Executive Order on Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity dated May 12, 2021. Rapidly evolving rogue and peer missile threats have led to a change in national defense policy. The President's January 27, 2025, Executive Order established a goal of protecting the U.S. citizens, safeguarding critical infrastructure, and securing second-strike capability against missile attack from any adversary. The Missile Defense Agency is responding with speed and intensity to deliver next-generation missile defenses to protect the U.S. against ballistic, hypersonic, cruise, and other advanced missile threats. This program submission reflects changes necessary to meet this evolving mission space.
Mission — Cyber Operations
Sustain the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 8510.01 Risk Management Framework (RMF) for Department of Defense (DoD) Information Technology (IT) requirement for the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) and conduct Security Control Assessments (SCA) activities, analysis of validation results, risk assessments, and reviews of proposed Program Manager/Information System Security Manager (PM/ISSM) Plans of Action and Milestones (POA&M) for MDA Ground Sensors mission and support systems. It also includes support for external cybersecurity assessments and penetration testing of the Ground Sensors mission systems, both in laboratory developmental testing and during ground test activities, in accordance with Director, Operational Test and Evaluation directives and the Integrated Master Test Plan. It maintains the Assessment and Authorization (A&A) data repository, capturing the RMF documentation (artifacts, validation results, Cybersecurity Risk Assessment results, cybersecurity scorecard, and Authorizing Official (AO) authorization decisions) and POA&M for all MDA information systems. It positions Ground Sensors assets to complete the transition to National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 requirements (i.e. RMF 2.0) once DoD requirements and timelines are finalized. This project supports aligning, developing, and implementing an integrated Tier 2 Cyber Security Service Provider (CSSP) capability on the Ground Sensors mission systems under the DoD Cybersecurity Discipline Implementation Plan and DoDI 8530.01 Cybersecurity Activities Support to DoD Information Network Operations. Provides the monitoring, prioritization, and tracking of Cybersecurity mitigation detailed in Information Technology security POA&Ms. The activities include preparation of A&A documentation and accreditation recommendations to the MDA Senior Information Security Officer/SCA and AO. Independent Verification and Validation team actions ensure the availability, integrity, authentication, confidentiality, and non-repudiation of the MDA mission, test, and administrative systems. These activities are necessary to comply with the Federal Information Security Management Act.
Mission — BMDS Radars
The Missile Defense System Radars project includes developing future Army Navy/Transportable Radar Surveillance and Control-2 (AN/TPY-2), U.S. Space Force (USSF) COBRA DANE (CD), Long Range Discrimination Radar (LRDR), Sea Based X-Band (SBX), and USSF Upgraded Early Warning Radars (UEWR) capabilities through system engineering, software development, and testing support. Modeling and Simulation (M&S) efforts include enhanced sensor models, development of Radio Frequency scene generators, integration of simulations into the Missile Defense System M&S architecture, and Verification, Validation, and Certification of radar models. This project also funds participation and support for Missile Defense System ground and flight test campaigns and Warfighter games and exercises. This project provides the development of discrimination advanced algorithms for Missile Defense System radars to counter evolving threats. The discrimination improvement effort will develop and field integrated element capabilities to improve the Missile Defense System's ability to identify lethal and non-lethal objects. This project will continue the development of discrimination improvement midterm design and test support for Missile Defense System radars and far-term trade analysis and planning.
Mission — Program-Wide Support
PWS contains non-headquarters management costs in support of Missile Defense Agency (MDA) functions and activities across the entire Missile Defense System. These functions include Government Civilians and Contract Support Services. This effort provides integrity and oversight of the Missile Defense System as well as supports MDA in the development and evaluation of technologies that will respond to the changing threat. Additionally, PWS includes personnel to support global deployments performing deployment site preparation and activation, and provides facility capabilities for MDA Executing Agent locations worldwide. Other MDA wide costs include: physical and technical security; civilian drug testing; audit readiness; the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) program; legal services and settlements; travel and agency training; office, equipment, vehicle, and warehouse leases; utilities and base operations across multiple geographic locations; commercial and ancillary facility services; management of all facility aspects regardless of lifecycle stage; supplies and maintenance; compliance with statutory environmental requirements; data and unified communications support; materiel and readiness and central property management of equipment; Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (FSRM) program (formerly Real Property Maintenance) to keep the Department's inventory of facilities in good working order; and similar operating expenses. PWS is allocated on a pro-rata basis across most Agency PEs; therefore, fluctuates per PE by FY based on the total Agency budget in that FY.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (6)
Network / System Certification and Accreditation (C&A)
Cyber Operations funds Information System Security Manager and Information System Security Officer civilian salaries and cybersecurity engineering and architecture planning for program information technology systems. This project plans and tests the cybersecurity controls for the Missile Defense System and maintains RMF authorizations for Ground Sensors managed information systems, conducts Controls Validation Testing/SCA of Ground Sensors mission and support systems, and provides and maintains POA&M to mitigate cybersecurity deficiencies. Cyber Operations conducts annual cybersecurity program reviews on the Sensors enclaves to assess compliance with implementing and maintaining controls. This effort supports the aligning, developing, and implementing an integrated Tier 2 CSSP capability on the Ground Sensors mission systems under the DoD Cybersecurity Discipline Implementation Plan and DoDI 8530.01 Cybersecurity Activities Support to DoD Information Network Operations. Develop and maintain the software bill of materials for all developed and delivered mission and mission support software as directed in the President's "Executive Order on Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity" dated May 12, 2021. Execution of developmental cybersecurity test events for Army Navy/Transportable Radar Surveillance and Control-2(AN/TPY-2), Sea-Based X-Band (SBX) radar, and Long Range Discrimination Radar (LRDR). Specific and/or unique accomplishments to each Fiscal Year (FY) are as follows:
Basic Development Program
The Basic Development Program includes developing and testing software maintenance updates to address software trouble reports identified on fielded software versions and flight/ground test events. Software improvement efforts also include optimizing increased processing capabilities. The Basic Development Program also analyzes software performance during flight and ground testing to support Materiel Release for software deliveries. The Materiel Release Closure Plan for the AN/TPY-2 ensures the Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability Program promotes reliability growth in the suite of AN/TPY-2 radars via product improvements. Specific and/or unique accomplishments to each Fiscal year (FY) are as follows:
BMDS Radars Modeling & Simulation (M&S)
Missile Defense System Radars M&S efforts include the development and maintenance of enhanced sensor models, development and maintenance of radio frequency scene generators, integration of simulations into the Missile Defense System M&S architecture, and Verification, Validation, and Certification (VV&C) of radar models, including high fidelity models used for performance assessment. This project also supports war games, Warfighter exercises and training, and element-level post-flight reconstructions. These activities include: - Develop and sustain Digital and Hardware-in-the-Loop representations of various simulations and models to include the tactical versions of AN/TPY-2, LRDR, SBX, UEWRs, and CD, to include the development of real-world capabilities in high-fidelity ground test and performance assessment models to keep pace with evolving threats and Missile Defense System, continuing LRDR and AN/TPY-2 modeling, along with increasing modeling efforts on the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) standalone radars. - Continue development of additional capabilities in high-fidelity digital models for LRDR. - Continue development of additional capabilities in medium-fidelity digital models for AN/TPY-2, SBX, LRDR, UEWR, and CD to support Warfighter Exercises and Training events. - Provide threat representations and integration support for test and evaluation activities. - Continue development of additional capabilities in high fidelity ground test models for AN/TPY-2, SBX, and LRDR to keep pace with evolving threats and Missile Defense System. - Perform VV&C of radar models, including electronic protection and objective debris mitigation, for use in performance assessments. - Support technical and performance assessments, including Ground Test using Open Systems Architecture Signal Injectors to include planning, execution, analysis, and reporting. - Conduct element-level and support system-level verification and validation activities. Specific and/or unique accomplishments to each FY are as follows:
Capability Development Program
The Capability Development Program provides engineering support to enable system compliance with Missile Defense System specification threat capabilities and addresses advanced threats. This task includes studying future sensor improvements and redesign of select components to address obsolescence and improve system reliability. Additional software development activities include Terminal High Altitude Area Defense Missile Segment Enhancement fielding and integration, X86 performance optimization to enhance processing speed, improvements to cybersecurity posture, additional development of sensor electronic protection for AN/TPY-2 and LRDR, and developmental information system enhancements. This effort includes threat updates and verification, core standards system engineering, improvements to cybersecurity posture, and required updates to models, simulation, and performance assessment updates. Specific and/or unique accomplishments to each FY are as follows:
Sensors Directorate Operations
Sensors Directorate Operations provides strategic planning, program integration, contracting, acquisition, engineering, financial management, internal reviews and audits, and program assessments for the Ground Sensors Directorate. Recurring activities include: - Provide technical and business management support activities to provide critical program status and decision-quality data. - Ensure Ground Sensors program compliance with internal and external direction, policies, and regulations to deliver critical capability within a consistent and disciplined process. - Conduct internal program reviews to measure program progress against the MDA-approved baseline. - Continue a Mission Assurance and Manufacturing Engineering Program to include Quality, Configuration Management, Manufacturing, Engineering, and Safety in all phases of the system life cycle, throughout the supply chain, and at all levels of assembly, emphasizing high yield rates that minimize test and rework costs. - Provide Quality Safety and Mission Assurance operations to ensure compliance with Agency requirements for design, test, manufacturing, quality, safety, and reliability to ensure high-quality products are delivered to the Warfighter. - Provide End User Support, Unified Communications, Computer Network Defense Services, Business Automation, and Portal and Data Services to support the Sensors Directorate. - Provide sustainment Integrated Product Support in accordance with the AN/TPY-2 Transition and Transfer Annex to the Missile Defense Agency/Army Overarching Memorandum Agreement and Army Regulation 700-127 regarding Integrated Logistics Support to ensure timely, structured transition and transfer of the Missile Defense System capability and associated components to the lead Service. Specific and/or unique accomplishments to each FY are as follows:
Program Wide Support
PWS contains non-headquarters management costs in support of MDA functions and activities across the entire Missile Defense System. These functions include Government Civilians and Contract Support Services. This effort provides integrity and oversight of the Missile Defense System as well as supports MDA in the development and evaluation of technologies that will respond to the changing threat. Additionally, PWS includes personnel to support global deployments performing deployment site preparation and activation, and provides facility capabilities for MDA Executing Agent locations worldwide. Other MDA wide costs include: physical and technical security; civilian drug testing; audit readiness; the STEM program; legal services and settlements; travel and agency training; office, equipment, vehicle, and warehouse leases; utilities and base operations across multiple geographic locations; commercial and ancillary facility services; management of all facility aspects regardless of lifecycle stage; supplies and maintenance; compliance with statutory environmental requirements; data and unified communications support; materiel and readiness and central property management of equipment; the FSRM program to keep the Department's inventory of facilities in good working order; and similar operating expenses. PWS is allocated on a pro-rata basis across most Agency PEs; therefore, fluctuates per PE by FY based on the total Agency budget in that FY. Specific and/or unique accomplishments to each FY are as follows:
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | MDA | FY24 Actuals | $239.6M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | MDA | FY25 Enacted | $209.0M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | MDA | FY25 Total | $209.0M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | MDA | FY26 Disc. Request | $197.6M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | MDA | FY26 Reconciliation | $475.0M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | MDA | FY26 Total | $672.6M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $3.05B | $239.6M | $209.0M | $197.6M | $197.6M |
| MC11: Cyber Operations | $94.6M | $17.9M | $19.1M | $19.9M | $19.9M |
| MD11: BMDS Radars | $2.80B | $213.3M | $182.0M | $156.1M | $156.1M |
| MD40: Program-Wide Support | $154.9M | $8.50M | $7.83M | $21.6M | $21.6M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
Showing 25 of 33 from the Senate LDA disclosure database.
National Defense Authorization Act, 2027 (HR XXXX/S XXXX); provisions regarding R&D - Navy, US Marine Corps, Air…
H.R. 7148, Consolidated Appropriations Act, including Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026 (P.L. 119-75, Div.
S 2572/HR 4016 - Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026 including issues related to space, missile defense…
P.L. 119-60 - National Defense Authorization Act FY26, National Defense Authorization Act FY27 (bills pending)…
Defense Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance Sensors Directed Energy Missile Defense Systems, Space/ Satellite…
House (H.R. 4016) & Senate (Bill number to be determined) Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026 - including…
H.R. 4552 and S. 2465, Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026…
FY25 and FY26 Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations; H.R.1968, Full-Year…
H.R. 4552 and S. 2465, Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026…
HR 1968 - Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025, P.L. 119-4 and S Con Res 7, including issues…
S 2572/HR 4016 - Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026 including issues related to tactical fixed wing…
HR 1 - One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Title II, including issues related to aircraft, space programs, intelligence…
S 2296/HR 3838 - Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act…
HR 1 - One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Title II, including issues related to aircraft, space programs, intelligence…
National Defense Authorization Act FY26, Department of Defense Appropriations Act FY26, Intelligence Authorization Act…
H.R. 3838/S. 2296 - National Defense Authorization Act FY26, H.R. 5342/S. 2354 - Commerce, Justice, Science and…
H.R. 3838 - National Defense Authorization Act FY26 (Senate bill pending), H.R. 4016 - Department of Defense…
P.L. 119-60 - National Defense Authorization Act FY26, H.R. 5342/S. 2354 - Commerce, Justice, Science and Related…
Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2024 (HR 4365/S 2587; PL 118-47) and Further Consolidated Appropriations…
H.R.10545 - Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other…
H.R.8771 - Making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the fiscal…
H.R.2882 - Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, and for other…
H.R.8771 - Making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the fiscal…
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025 including programs related to communications, communications…
H.R. 9028 & S. 4796 - Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025…
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Ballistic Missile Defense Sensors — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →