Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0603851D8Z/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Environmental Security Technical Certification Program
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $140.0M |
| FY25 | $149.7M |
| FY26 | $124.0M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $62.4M | $51.4M | $46.4M | $53.3M | $41.1M | $65.0M | $72.1M | $120.1M | $120.0M | $140.0M | ||
| Enacted | $52.7M | $52.5M | $54.6M | $41.9M | $68.6M | $73.3M | $122.7M | $122.6M | $117.2M | $149.7M | ||
| Request | $52.5M | $54.6M | $40.0M | $66.6M | $61.3M | $71.4M | $84.6M | $117.2M | $136.5M | $124.0M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2022 book requested $71.4M for FY2022; the PB2024 book reported $120.1M as actual total obligation authority — $48.7M above the request. 120.1 − 71.4 = 48.7 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP)
The Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP) demonstrates and validates innovative technologies for military installations, while its sister program, the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP), invests in applied research to develop these solutions. ESTCP tests promising technologies in relevant operational environments across DoD installations, providing decision-makers with reliable performance and cost data before widespread implementation. By validating solutions under real-world conditions, ESTCP reduces adoption risks and accelerates technology transfer to end users. The program has an excellent track record of return on investment, with many solutions deployed directly to installations without further development. ESTCP conducts formal demonstrations at DoD facilities in operational settings to document and validate improved performance and cost savings. To ensure real impact, ESTCP collaborates with end users and regulators throughout the development and execution of each demonstration. Transition challenges are overcome with rigorous and well-documented demonstrations that provide the information needed by all DoD partners for technology adoption. The program employs a competitive selection process to ensure high-quality demonstrations, issuing solicitations for proposals from government, academia, and industry. Each project develops a formal test and evaluation plan, and demonstration results undergo rigorous technical reviews to ensure conclusions are accurate and supported by data. This process ensures installations receive solutions that address current operational needs and deliver measurable benefits to the Department of Defense.
Mission — Environmental Security Technology Certification Program
The Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP) demonstrates and validates innovative technologies for military installations, while its sister program, the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP), invests in applied research to develop these solutions. ESTCP tests promising technologies in relevant operational environments across DoD installations, providing decision-makers with reliable performance and cost data before widespread implementation. By validating solutions under real-world conditions, ESTCP reduces adoption risks and accelerates technology transfer to end users. The program has an excellent track record of return on investment, with many solutions deployed directly to installations without further development. ESTCP conducts formal demonstrations at DoD facilities in operational settings to document and validate improved performance and cost savings. To ensure real impact, ESTCP collaborates with end users and regulators throughout the development and execution of each demonstration. Transition challenges are overcome with rigorous and well-documented demonstrations that provide the information needed by all DoD partners for technology adoption. The program employs a competitive selection process to ensure high-quality demonstrations, issuing solicitations for proposals from government, academia, and industry. Each project develops a formal test and evaluation plan, and demonstration results undergo rigorous technical reviews to ensure conclusions are accurate and supported by data. This process ensures installations receive solutions that address current operational needs and deliver measurable benefits to the Department of Defense.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (4)
Environmental Technology Demonstration/Validation
Funds are programmed to develop cutting-edge technologies that enable the Department of Defense to deploy its most critical modernization initiatives on DoD-controlled installations. These innovations create the foundation for nuclear deterrence, missile defense, Indo-Pacific posture, and industrial base readiness across DoD's 28 million acres. Funding drives the most innovative solutions from industry, academia, and federal government partners addressing key priorities: tackling emerging and persistent land impact challenges, particularly from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS); addressing live-site unexploded ordnance (UXO) in underwater environments; advancing conservation and range sustainment technologies; and minimizing DoD weapons systems' lifecycle costs through hazardous materials elimination. These solutions ensure DoD maintains the contiguous, unencumbered spaces needed to effectively deploy, test, and operate new capabilities. By maximizing available training days, reducing regulatory burden, and enhancing land management, these technologies create the conditions necessary for DoD to install and operate next-generation systems on its installations while ensuring military readiness for multiple training units over time. FY 2024 Accomplishments: Initiated large-scale PFAS treatment and destruction field testing at military installations. Demonstrated underwater munitions response technologies and tested autonomous Remotely Operated Vehicles for underwater geophysical classification. Demonstrated cultural resource survey capabilities to reduce compliance costs. Deployed advanced laser-based forest and fire monitoring technologies to installations. Developed chemical-free water mist fire suppression for hangars. Validated non-toxic plating alternatives to eliminate cadmium and corrosion-resistant primers to reduce hexavalent chromium use. Demonstrated sustainable alternatives for F-16 emergency power units and heavy metal-free fuzes for grenades.
Energy Technology Demonstration/Validation
Funds are programmed to evaluate and deploy advanced energy and water technologies across DoD installations. This program directly supports Executive Order 14154 (Unleashing American Energy) and Executive Order 14156 (Declaring a National Energy Emergency) by enhancing the security and resilience of military installation infrastructure while improving operational efficiency and reducing costs. Military installations remain largely dependent on commercial power grids vulnerable to disruption from cyber-attacks, aging infrastructure, severe weather events, and potential direct attacks. As electricity outage frequency and duration increase, these investments enable DoD to withstand and rapidly recover from energy disruptions while ensuring mission continuity, addressing key vulnerabilities identified in Executive Order 14262 (Strengthening the Reliability and Security of the United States Electric Grid). The program leverages DoD's diverse built infrastructure to evaluate promising commercial technologies under varied environmental conditions and building types. By conducting demonstrations at actual installations, the program provides technology developers low-risk opportunities to validate performance when integrated with legacy systems under real-world conditions. This approach accelerates technology adoption by generating critical cost and performance data while giving installation managers hands-on experience with innovative solutions without the financial risk of full procurement. FY 2024 Accomplishments: Completed a successful demonstration of an on-site atmospheric water generation system resulting in a follow-on project to integrate the system at a live training site to supply military training exercises. Demonstrated and validated three microgrid design tools to support a more consistent and repeatable microgrid design approach to establish a basis from which to measure microgrid performance and process improvement. Completed electrical vehicle integration studies used to inform the Services charging infrastructure planning and follow-on projects to demonstrate applications for mobile energy storage to supply emergency backup power to critical facilities. Created and posted training materials for advanced lighting and controls technologies for DoD designers, acquisition professionals and energy managers. Completed demonstrations of advanced heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) controls resulting in over $100k annual energy cost savings and approximately 15% reduction in peak electrical demand.
Sustainable Technologies Evaluation and Demonstration Program
The Sustainable Technologies Evaluation and Demonstration (STED) Program evaluates and demonstrates innovative technologies that meet current mission requirements while enhancing operational readiness, resilience, and security. STED validates cost-effective alternatives to widely implemented technologies across the Department and federal agencies, focusing on domestic solutions that reduce supply chain vulnerabilities. The program identifies, evaluates, and demonstrates technologies in operational environments to verify their ability to enhance mission performance, protect human health, and cost-effectively support DoD priorities.
Natural Hazards and Installation Resilience Technology Demonstration/Validation
Funds are programmed to develop and demonstrate hardened infrastructure, physical systems, and decision support tools that protect DoD installations from natural hazards and enhance mission resilience. The program delivers technologies that strengthen critical infrastructure, harden facilities, and improve operational capabilities during extreme weather events. These investments directly impact EO 14153 (Unleashing Alaska's Extraordinary Resource Potential) as it relates to infrastructure, permafrost, critical minerals, and potential subsidence. Natural disasters hinder DoD mission readiness and have proven costly to installation infrastructure with billions in damage repair in recent years. As natural hazards increase in frequency and severity, SERDP and ESTCP investments provide tangible solutions to enhance installation resilience and protect mission-critical operations. FY 2024 Accomplishments: Established the highly successful Innovation Landscape Network (ILN) to efficiently transition research and technology to installation end-user communities. The Arctic Innovation Landscape Network (AILN) provided direct mission support to NORTHCOM by extending R&D advances in linear infrastructure construction on degraded permafrost throughout Alaska. The program selected projects to advance near-term (1-10 years) weather predictions to enhance environmental security assessments, particularly wildfire risk and tropical cyclone predictions.
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY24 Actuals | $140.0M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY25 Enacted | $149.7M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY25 Total | $149.7M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY26 Disc. Request | $124.0M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY26 Total | $124.0M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $838.5M | $140.0M | $149.7M | $124.0M | $124.0M |
| 514: Environmental Security Technology Certification Program | $838.5M | $140.0M | $149.7M | $124.0M | $124.0M |
Follow the dollar
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Related awards
Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →
Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.
| Recipient | PIID | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| NOBLIS, INC. | W912HQ19F0018 | medium |
Contractor concentration
No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.
Lobbying mentions
13 mentions from the Senate LDA disclosure database.
Issues related to TCJA including R&D tax expensing Issues related to temporary expiring tax provisions Clean Energy…
Issues related to tax treatment of innovation, R&D, and competitiveness Issues related to temporary expiring tax…
Issues related to Export/Import Bank General issues related to existing trade policies Miscellaneous Tariff Bills…
Issues related to Export/Import Bank General issues related to existing trade policies Miscellaneous Tariff Bills…
Issues related to Export/Import Bank General issues related to existing trade policies Miscellaneous Tariff Bills…
Issues related to Export/Import Bank General issues related to existing trade policies Miscellaneous Tariff Bills…
Issues related to electric vehicles and fuel efficiency standards. H.J.Res.89 - Providing congressional disapproval…
General issues related to existing trade policies Miscellaneous Tariff Bills Issues related to Sec. 301 tariffs on…
Issues related to Export/Import Bank General issues related to existing trade policies Miscellaneous Tariff Bills…
Issues related to Export/Import Bank General issues related to existing trade policies Miscellaneous Tariff Bills…
General issues related to existing trade policies Miscellaneous Tariff Bills Issues related to Sec. 301 tariffs on…
Renewable Fuels Standard RVO Annual Rule 2023, 2024, and 2025; Proposed Rule; Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for…
Renewable Fuels Standard RVO Annual Rule 2023, 2024, and 2025; Proposed Rule; Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for…
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Environmental Security Technical Certification Program. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J933
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2017 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J749
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2017_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2018 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J858
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2018_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2019 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J883
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2019_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2020 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J878
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2020_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2021 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J943
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2021_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J920
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J893
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J888
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J910
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.