Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0603725N/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Facilities Improvement
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $11.9M |
| FY25 | $9.07M |
| FY26 | $10.9M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $2.59M | $3.73M | $4.21M | $2.79M | $5.18M | $3.61M | $4.53M | $6.31M | $5.60M | $11.9M | ||
| Enacted | $3.73M | $5.46M | $2.84M | $5.30M | $3.44M | $4.64M | $6.33M | $5.66M | $10.1M | $9.07M | ||
| Request | $5.46M | $2.84M | $5.30M | $3.44M | $4.66M | $6.33M | $5.66M | $10.1M | $9.07M | $10.9M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $10.1M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $11.9M as actual total obligation authority — $1.80M above the request. 11.9 − 10.1 = 1.8 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Facilities Improvement
This program provides capabilities to: a) overcome performance limitations and reduce the life cycle cost of shore facilities and, b) provide protection against terrorist attacks for shore installations and their operations. The program focuses on technical and operational issues of specific Navy interest, where there are no unbiased test validated Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS) solutions available, and where timely capabilities may not materialize without specific demonstration or validation by the Navy. Additionally, the program completes the development of technologies originating from Navy, DOD and other sources of Science and Technology programs, including the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and Department of Energy (DOE). Validated technologies are implemented in the Navy's Military Construction (MILCON) and Facilities, Sustainment Restoration and Modernization (FSRM) program, and Antiterrorism and Force Protection (ATFP) Other Procurement, Navy (OPN) program. Naval Facilities System Project 0995 addresses Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization for reducing the total ownership cost (TOC) of future and existing Facilities and addressing natural and catastrophic risk of critical Naval Waterfront Facilities. Facilities Related Controls Systems (FRCS) Cybersecurity RDTEN Project 3018 funds the Cyber Vulnerability Assessments and Evaluations program of critical shore infrastructure. Funding will be used for prioritized critical shore infrastructure. Funded vulnerability assessments will build upon existing mission assurance, blue team, and red team capabilities and will utilize DoE and DoD national laboratory partnerships. Assessments will end with the submission of a final report to Congress detailing strategies and procedures for mitigating the risk of cyber vulnerabilities and should be identified during the course of evaluation vulnerability. Force Protection Ashore Project 3155 addresses selective topics in modeling, and material technologies to reduce the vulnerability of installations; and reduce the acquisition and operating costs of protective technologies. The demonstrations and validations provide the independent, technical and operational test data for the development of competitive performance specifications to acquire the required capabilities. This project is coordinated with other DOD programs.
Mission — Naval Facilities System
Project 0995 addresses research, development, testing and evaluation of technologies related to 1) waterfront facilities (such as dry docks, piers, etc.) 2)Facilities sustainment, restoration and modernization (such as runways, magazines, etc.) to include the performance of alternative materials, and surfacing concepts and methods, and corrosion technologies to improve performance and reduce lifecycle cost. Waterfront facilities, repair, upgrade and service life extension: Improved availability and adaptability of our installations enables readiness and fleet lethality. Research focus areas include: 1) Design and analysis to adapt to extreme weather risks at Naval Facilities, especially nuclear capable waterfront facilities. 2) New design, retrofit and material methods to extend service life and/or improve capability. Approximately 75% of the Navy's waterfront facilities are over 45 years old, designed for a service life of 25 years, and need to support different, larger platforms. Critical Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM): Technologies that improve capability and/or reduce the cost of SRM for critical facilities (such as runways, magazines, etc.) including material reduction, strength increase, corrosion reduction, etc. The Navy's portion of corrosion deficiencies at DoD shore facilities is estimated to be $433M (DOD Annual Cost of Corrosion for the Department of Defense Facilities and Infrastructure July 2010).
Mission — Facilities Related Controls Systems (FRCS) Cybersecurity RDTE
The Cyber Vulnerability Assessments and Evaluations program funds cyber vulnerability assessments of critical shore infrastructure. Funding will be used for assessments of prioritized critical shore infrastructure and will build upon existing mission assurance, blue team, and red team capabilities. As instructed by the Congressional language, the assessments will utilize DoE and DoD national laboratory partnerships. Assessments will end with the submission of a final report to Congress. Strategies and procedures for mitigating the risk of cyber vulnerabilities should be identified during the course of evaluation vulnerability.
Mission — Force Protection Ashore
In accordance with Navy Shore Strategic Guidance 2024-2029 Protection of Navy installations against evolving threats in a peer competition environment requires deployment of advanced technology for force protection capabilities. This Force Protection ashore project will develop, demonstrate and validate technologies for the following: access control and integrated perimeter security surveillance sensors and intelligent electronic security systems for automated counter intrusion detection (Installation Protection); perimeter security; waterside protection against craft and swimmer intrusion; secure and efficient operations centers and emergency management centers including human and information support systems (Command and Control).Programs currently being evaluated are, standard-based enterprise physical security system integration and automation; Command, Control, and Communications (C3) capabilities for emergency operations; integrated and networked mass notification systems (MNS); Waterside intelligent video security systems; integrated over-the-water sensors and analytics for automated course of action planning; identifying and interdicting malevolent threats - watercraft, swimmers, divers, and unmanned underwater vessels (UUVs) to reduce injury and death to the warfighter and damage to high value units (HVUs)(Waterside Protection). Through demonstration and validation of risk modeling and simulation models, the potential of emerging technologies will be evaluated and installation security strategies that reduce manpower and other costs will be formulated. Multiple systems with sensors and cameras are being deployed on Navy installations to be used for threat assessment. These systems are not integrated and there is not a centralized location or system that all the data can be analyzed. The Installation Defense Operations Center aggregates all these sensor feeds into one location and the Sensor Management System (SMS) software provides an integrated picture so that an intelligent assessment can be made. Current Force Protection systems to be integrated include Airfield Enclave Electronic Security Systems (AE-ESS), Blue Robotic and Autonomous Systems (RAS), Counter Unmanned Systems (C-UxS) (Air, land, sea) and the Electronic Harbor Security System and leverages personnel specifically trained to operate in in the RAS environment. These demonstrations and validations derive advanced technology from science and technology programs of government academia and industry. The technology evaluation and validation produces data for performance specifications used for competitive procurement. Utilizing agile management methods, each FY intentionally develops in sequence to iteratively advance the IDOC, C-UxS and Blue Robotics into operational environments. Testing in operational environments enables the Navy shore to gather valuable feedback and make necessary adjustments. All work will be coordinated with other programs and through industry forums as appropriate.
Mission — Congressional Adds
C999: Groundwater storage analysis
Justification
No accomplishments or planned-program narratives in this line's J-book detail — some exhibits carry figures without per-project prose.
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY24 Actuals | $11.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Enacted | $9.07M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Total | $9.07M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Disc. Request | $10.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Total | $10.9M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $41.1M | $11.9M | $9.07M | $10.9M | $10.9M |
| 0995: Naval Facilities System | $23.4M | $2.16M | $2.53M | $2.42M | $2.42M |
| 3018: Facilities Related Controls Systems (FRCS) Cybersecurity RDTE | $7.28M | $6.37M | $5.05M | $6.49M | $6.49M |
| 3155: Force Protection Ashore | $10.4M | $1.49M | $1.48M | $2.02M | $2.02M |
| 9999: Congressional Adds | $0 | $1.93M | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Follow the dollar
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying mentions
13 mentions from the Senate LDA disclosure database.
Issues Related to US Air Force Facilities Construction
Issues related to Rolls-Royce North America U.S. facilities and footprint (no bill).
S 1939 - FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024 including issues related to reauthorizing the Federal Aviation Administration…
S 1939/HR 3935 - FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024 including issues related to reauthorizing the Federal Aviation…
H.R. 4470, Protecting and Security Chemical Facilities from Terrorist Attacks Act of 2023; S. 2178, Protecting and…
H.R. 4470, Protecting and Security Chemical Facilities from Terrorist Attacks Act of 2023; S. 2178, Protecting and…
H.R. 4470, Protecting and Security Chemical Facilities from Terrorist Attacks Act of 2023; S. 2178, Protecting and…
H.R. 4470, Protecting and Security Chemical Facilities from Terrorist Attacks Act of 2023; S. 2178, Protecting and…
Issues related to Rolls-Royce North America U.S. facilities and footprint (no bill).
Issues related to Rolls-Royce North America U.S. facilities and footprint (no bill).
Inflation Reduction Act (H.R.5376) implementation, Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, Secure And Fair…
Inflation Reduction Act (H.R.5376) implementation, Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, Secure And Fair…
Inflation Reduction Act (H.R.5376) implementation, Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, Secure And Fair…
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Facilities Improvement. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J304
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2017 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J273
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2017_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2018 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J300
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2018_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2019 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J301
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2019_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2020 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J316
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2020_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2021 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J329
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2021_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J300
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J291
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J289
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J290
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
RDTEN BA1-3 Book · www.secnav.navy.mil