Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0603724N/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Navy Energy Program
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $108.2M |
| FY25 | $65.6M |
| FY26 | $46.6M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $62.4M | $54.9M | $69.5M | $42.4M | $31.7M | $55.8M | $54.7M | $65.0M | $79.4M | $108.2M | ||
| Enacted | $56.4M | $27.5M | $25.6M | $32.7M | $58.0M | $56.4M | $66.8M | $75.3M | $72.2M | $65.6M | ||
| Request | $52.5M | $50.6M | $25.7M | $26.5M | $23.4M | $33.8M | $60.3M | $72.2M | $60.6M | $46.6M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $72.2M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $108.2M as actual total obligation authority — $36.0M above the request. 108.2 − 72.2 = 36.0 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Navy Energy Program
This program supports projects to evaluate, adapt, and demonstrate energy related technologies for Navy aircraft and ship operations to: (a) increase fuel-related weapons systems capabilities such as range and time on station; (b) reduce energy costs; (c) apply energy technologies that improve environmental compliance; (d) examine restrictive fuel specification requirements to reduce cost and increase availability worldwide; (e) provide guidance to fleet operators for the safe use of commercial grade or off-specification fuels; and (f) make needed periodic changes to fuel specifications to ensure fuel quality and avoid fleet operating problems. This program supports the achievement of legislated, White House, Department of Defense, and Navy energy management goals. JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES because it includes all efforts necessary to evaluate integrated technologies, representative models or prototype systems in a high fidelity and realistic operating environment.
Mission — Afloat Energy Technology
This project is designed to enhance lethality, resilience, reach, and sustainment of warfare systems through more effective generation, use and distribution of energy on existing and future surface fleet assets, including Unmanned Surface Vessels (USVs), by developing and transitioning energy and maintenance improvements. This project, managed through NAVSEA 05T, identifies, promising energy related technologies through involvement with Fleet representatives, Life-Cycle Managers (LCMs), NAVSEA Technical Warrant Holders, In-Service Engineering Agents (ISEAs), the Navy Shipbuilding Research Program (NSRP), PEOs, Industry, and Academia. The project directly supports Department of Navy goals for agility, resilient force posture, and innovation by maximizing energy to increase operational capability (e.g., extend range, increase time on station, reduce energy demand on fuel logistics forces, enable high power combat systems). Potential technology areas include Power Generation and Storage (PG&S), Hull Hydrodynamics (HH), Underwater Hull Husbandry (UHH), Heating, Ventilation & Air Conditioning (HVAC) Systems, Thermal Management (TM), Main Propulsion Systems (MP), Electrical Systems (EL), Auxiliary Systems (AUX) and Energy Monitoring, Planning, and Assessment (EMP&A). Promising energy related projects that improve the effective use, conversion, storage, distribution, and control of energy to enable the integration with future weapons and sensors onto platforms are proposed each FY for evaluation. Projects are selected based on technical review and business case analysis. Not all proposals are pursued, and funding changes between functional categories or fiscal years may occur based on fleet needs, technology maturity level, ship schedule changes, or other factors.
Mission — Mobility Fuels (ADV)
This program represents the Navy's only RDTE investment designed to maintain and enhance its capability to operate as a "smart" customer for aviation and ship tactical fuels that are an operationally critical, single point of failure, $4.0+ billion per year consumable requiring worldwide availability and interoperability. Recent field problems have demonstrated the adverse effects that fuel-related problems can have on ship and aircraft performance, durability, and readiness. The potential risk and adverse operational impacts from fuel-related problems over the next decade, given the evolving production technologies, changing feedstocks, more stringent environmental regulations and the introduction of new operational requirements and platforms will continue to increase. This program provides data and enables technology through laboratory, component, fuel system, engine, and platform tests. These evaluations relate the effects of changes in the Navy fuel properties and chemistry to the performance and durability of Naval ship, aircraft, ground and fuel distribution systems. The information is required by technical authorities and decision makers to: (a) assure interoperability with fuel procured from commercial/ international specifications, (b) determine the extent to which unnecessarily restrictive military specification requirements can be relaxed to reduce cost and increase availability worldwide, (c) provide guidance to fleet operators for the safe use of off-specification fuels or emerging CONOPS requiring the use of non-traditional fuels, (d) assure operational interoperability with evolving changes in fuel production technology, feedstocks, environmental regulations and tactical system demands, (e) improve the capability and reduce the cost of field fuel quality surveillance, and (f) facilitate rapid identification and resolution of field identified fuel deficiencies.
Mission — Shore Energy Technology
This Energy RDT&E Project will model, research, develop, test, evaluate, demonstrate and validate the technical and lifecycle cost viability of installation energy technologies with the goal of energy security, efficiency, surety, and reliability. Efforts will be coordinated across DOD and with other agencies as appropriate. Research areas include new and distributed energy resources, grid and microgrid management technologies including cyber security of controls, installation energy efficiency technologies (lighting, HVAC, building envelope, etc.), energy water nexus, all for use at Naval installations with potential for widespread applicability. Reducing installation energy demand, increasing efficiency and improved installation energy surety improves readiness and enables fleet lethality.
Mission — Aircraft Energy Technology
Naval aviation must operate independently worldwide often with limited logistics support. Additionally, legacy and emerging aircraft continually add capabilities to enhance their lethality and survivability. Improving an aircraft's utilization and management of energy has a direct relationship to enhanced combat capability to meet the challenges of emerging threats. This program engages technical experts from across Naval aviation, industry, and academia to identify best practices and technologies for development, testing and validation to determine technical viability and assess benefit to mission capability.
Mission — Battery Development and Safety
1) Provide an advanced battery database with standard battery families for program offices to use to allow for selection of batteries early in the design process increasing the likelihood of design and fielding success, 2) leverage the battery database to begin common battery design efforts to save cost, 3) establish common battery standards and design requirements (e.g., propagation resistant designs, standard battery monitoring and casualty detection systems, etc.) to make advanced batteries safer and therefore deployable, 4) develop and test standard battery storage/container systems that can safely house batteries and withstand catastrophic failure (thermal runaway) of the batteries within the container while minimizing damage to surrounding equipment and platforms, 5) streamline the battery safety certification process especially for high energy storage magazines and other large battery designs (lasers) to allow battery based weapon systems to be fielded in time to support strategic needs, 6) develop hazard mitigation technologies to support rapid safe deployment of advanced batteries to support weapon systems, 7) generate analytics that characterize the Department's current and projected energy/advanced battery needs, 8) establish the Navy's contribution to DoD and cross-service advanced battery supply chain efforts.
Mission — Sec. 2912 Operational Energy Savings
The Navy needs to extend operational reach of intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and target platforms to meet current and emerging threats. This program expands and demonstrates the capabilities of the path optimization software to enhance UAS operators' ability to find the energy optimal path through weather, terrain and airspace constraints to extend range and time on station.
Mission — Applied Biomedical Technology
The Navy needs to extend operational reach of intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and target platforms to meet current and emerging threats. This program expands and demonstrates the capabilities of the path optimization software to enhance UAS operators ability to find the energy optimal path through weather, terrain and airspace constraints to extend range and time on station.
Mission — Congressional Adds
Project C545: Marine energy systems for sensors and microgrids. Project C998: Wave energy converters for the Navy energy program. Project C391: Cargo drone advanced batteries. The Marine Energy Development (MED) program supports research, development, test and evaluation (RDT&E) of marine energy technologies for sustained investment and advancement of a variety of marine energy systems. This program, managed through the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, supports research, prototyping, and testing for future naval capabilities related to powering maritime security systems, at-sea persistent surveillance, communications systems, at-sea vehicle charging, and shore installations. The marine energy projects, within this program, are designed to accelerate the development and transition of novel energy technologies, such a marine energy converters, for autonomous systems, tactical ashore and at-sea energy solutions. The RDT&E marine energy projects are conducted through partnerships with research universities, industry, federal agencies and laboratories, and within the Department of Defense to advance the technical maturity of tactical marine energy components and associated systems and subsystems. The program directly supports the Department of the Navy by accelerating fleet unmanned systems forward presence at sea. The Naval Facilities Engineering Command directs and coordinates all aspects of the Wave Energy Test Site (WETS) via its contractor to provide maintenance and operations support of the WETS facility and at-sea testing. WETS has three mooring sites offshore MCB Hawaii to enable testing of Wave Energy Conversion (WEC) devices up to 1MW-rated, in 60m and 80m water depths; and < 40kW-rated WEC devices in 30m water depth. WETS provides support to WEC developers allowing for testing, improvement, and ultimate deployment of cost-effective wave energy production. WETS supports efforts to advance wave energy technology via in-situ testing/demonstration and to evaluate wave energy technology readiness. The Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division is responsible for the research, development and Test and Evaluation (RDTE) of Unmanned Air Systems and all the subsystems that are needed for them to operate successfully. Group 3 Logistics UAS's are a critical focus area and heavily dependent on lithium-Ion Battery packs currently manufactured outside the US. These battery solutions do not meet the quality, reliability and safety needed to meet emerging mission requirements safely in a maritime environment. Design, develop, fabricate, test and integrate ultra-high-capacity batteries into emerging logistics UAS platforms is a critical enabler to meeting emerging operational requirements in a contested environment. This program coordinates battery developers and fabricators, technical SMEs across the DON and UAS designers/builders to produce a cost and time effective common solution applicable to multiple systems to meet operational and safety requirements.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (12)
Power Generation and Storage Sub Project
This project area will accomplish prototype development, laboratory and Fleet testing to determine overall effectiveness of technologies focused on improving efficiency of current power generation & storage methodologies.
Underwater Hull Husbandry Sub Project
Project funds will be utilized to identify and evaluate new underwater hull/propeller coating systems and underwater hull cleaning and maintenance techniques to reduce hydrodynamic drag on the hull and thereby increase fuel efficiency.
Hull Hydrodynamic Sub Project
This project area will accomplish prototype development, modeling, laboratory and Fleet testing of ship modifications to propellers and/or hull appendages to determine overall mission, energy, and cost effectiveness of these improvements.
Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Sub Project
Project funds will be utilized to accomplish prototype development, land and shipboard testing of improvements aimed at more efficient climate control of shipboard spaces.
Thermal Management Sub Project
Project funds will be utilized to identify and evaluate potential uses for Thermal Management techniques designed to reduce overall shipboard heat generation as well as incorporating waste heat recovery techniques to reduce the shipboard electrical demand on HVAC and other systems.
Main Propulsion Systems Sub Project
Project funds will be utilized to identify requirements and perform land based and at sea testing of surface ship and Unmanned Surface Vessel (USV) propulsion system improvements on Gas Turbine, Steam, and Diesel Engine systems to reduce overall fuel consumption and lower maintenance costs.
Electrical Systems Sub Project
Project funds will be utilized to identify and perform land based and shipboard testing of ship electrical system improvements to optimize power and energy use.
Auxiliary Systems Sub Project
Project funds will be utilized to identify, test and evaluate new technologies for shipboard auxiliary systems aimed at reducing fuel consumption.
Energy Monitoring, Planning & Assessment
This project area will focus on methods of capturing and displaying energy related data to shipboard personnel as actionable information for ships forced to employ energy efficiency measures underway and in port as mission requirements permit. Through projects like GENISYS, it also supports Naval Operational Architecture/Joint All-Domain Command and Control.
Naval Tactical Fuels
Perform development, test and evaluation work on Naval tactical fuels to: a) assure interoperability with commercial/international fuel specifications, b) determine the extent to which unnecessarily restrictive military specification features can be relaxed to reduce cost and increase availability worldwide; c) provide guidance to fleet operators for the safe use of off-specification or non-primary fuels , d) validate periodic changes to the Navy tactical fuel specifications to ensure fuel quality and avoid fleet operating problems while accommodating evolutionary changes in the fuel supply industry and e) improve fleet methods to ensure fuel quality and performance.
Battery Development and Safety
Provide Program Management Support for Battery Development and Safety program.
NAVAIR Applied Biomedical Tech
This funding was moved to 3270. Sec 2912 operational energy savings in FY25
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY24 Actuals | $108.2M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Enacted | $65.6M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Total | $65.6M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Disc. Request | $46.6M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Total | $46.6M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $492.6M | $108.2M | $65.6M | $46.6M | $46.6M |
| 0829: Afloat Energy Technology | $67.9M | $20.6M | $16.8M | $11.4M | $11.4M |
| 0838: Mobility Fuels (ADV) | $139.1M | $6.39M | $8.42M | $8.04M | $8.04M |
| 0928: Shore Energy Technology | $62.9M | $5.54M | $2.13M | $2.10M | $2.10M |
| 0996: Aircraft Energy Technology | $206.3M | $26.6M | $21.6M | $16.9M | $16.9M |
| 2566: Battery Development and Safety | $16.5M | $14.6M | $11.7M | $8.07M | $8.07M |
| 3270: Sec. 2912 Operational Energy Savings | $0 | $12.3M | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| 3720: Applied Biomedical Technology | $0 | $44.0K | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| 9999: Congressional Adds | $0 | $22.2M | $5.00M | $0 | $0 |
Follow the dollar
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Related awards
Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →
Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.
| Recipient | PIID | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII | N0002418F8804 | medium |
| UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII | N0002419F8816 | medium |
| UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII | N0002420F8819 | medium |
| UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII | N0002421F8805 | medium |
| UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII | N0002422F8803 | medium |
Contractor concentration
No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.
Lobbying mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Navy Energy Program. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J303
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2017 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J272
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2017_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2018 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J299
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2018_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2019 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J300
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2019_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2020 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J315
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2020_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2021 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J328
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2021_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J299
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J290
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J288
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J289
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
RDTEN BA1-3 Book · www.secnav.navy.mil