Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Environmental Protection

NavyRDT&EReconciledPE0603721N
What it is
Environmental Protection (0603721N) is a Navy research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 3 projects.
What changed
-$429.0K FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$24.2MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$23.3MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$22.8MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$429.0KR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $24.2MFY25: $23.3MFY26: $22.8MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$24.2M
FY25$23.3M
FY26$22.8M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$13.2M$19.3M$19.1M$23.2M$19.6M$20.2M$20.0M$28.1M$23.8M$24.2M
Enacted$19.3M$20.3M$20.2M$19.8M$20.6M$20.5M$20.7M$21.6M$24.5M$23.3M
Request$20.3M$20.2M$19.8M$20.6M$20.6M$20.7M$21.6M$24.5M$23.3M$22.8M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2022 book requested $20.7M for FY2022; the PB2024 book reported $28.1M as actual total obligation authority — $7.47M above the request. 28.2 − 20.7 = 7.5 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Environmental Protection

This program develops and evaluates processes, hardware, systems, operational procedures, scientific methods, and environmental studies that will allow the Navy to operate in U.S., foreign, and international waters, air, space, and land areas while complying with environmental laws, regulations, Executive Orders, policies and international agreements. Many environmental laws, regulations, and policies impose restrictions on Navy training and testing, vessels, aircraft, and facilities that interfere with operations and/or increase the cost of operations. The Navy must be able to conduct its national security mission in compliance with applicable environmental requirements in the U.S. and abroad without compromising performance, safety, or health, while simultaneously minimizing the cost of compliance. The projects for this Program Element (PE) support the Navy's compliance with the (a) Clean Water Act; (b) Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships; (c) International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships; (d) DoD Manual 4715.06, "Regulations on Vessels Owned or Operated by the Department of Defense," Vol 1-4; (e) Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990; (f) National Invasive Species Act of 1996; (g) Ballast Water Management for Control of Nonindigenous Species in Waters of the United States; (h) Clean Air Act; (i) Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act; (j) Marine Mammal Protection Act; (k) Endangered Species Act; (l) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; (m) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; and (n) American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act. References (a) through (n) establish Level I environmental protection requirements. The Shipboard Waste Management Program (Project 0401) supports efforts that enable Navy ships and submarines to comply with laws, regulations, and policies in six major areas: (1) Technical Authority, (2) Liquid Wastes, (3) Ballast Water Management. (4) Solid Waste Management, (5) Hazardous Material Control and Management Solid Waste Management, and (6) Copper-Free and Low Copper Antifouling Environmental Sustainability Development (NESDI) identifies pervasive Navy shore side environmental requirements and develops and validates information, new processes, and technologies that address requirements that pose significant impact on Naval shore activities in complying with environmental laws, regulations, orders, and policies. The goal of the program is to maximize opportunities for significant cost savings while minimizing personnel liabilities, operational costs, and regulatory oversight and preserving or enhancing the ability of Naval shore activities to accomplish their required missions and functions in support of the Navy's transformational strategy. The Marine Mammal Research (MMR) program is responsible for applied research and works to address the Navy's key research needs and transition the results and technologies for use within the Navy's at-sea environmental compliance and permitting processes in compliance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act and the Endangered Species Act, with the goals of improving marine species impact analysis (including marine mammal take estimates), mitigation measures and monitoring capabilities. Key points of the MMR mission are: (1) Improve the best available science regarding the potential impacts to marine species from Navy activities, (2) Expand the technology and methods available to the U.S. Navy marine species monitoring program (3) Preserve core Navy readiness capabilities. This funding allows the Navy to avoid or reduce the chances of costly litigation for non-compliance.

Mission — Shipboard Waste Mgmt

Navy ships and submarines operate and visit U.S. and international waters and ports where shipboard waste management restrictions impact the movements and operations of Navy vessels. The Navy must be able to conduct its national security mission in compliance with applicable waste management requirements in U.S. and international waters without compromising performance, safety, or health, while simultaneously minimizing the cost of compliance. PE 0603721N Project 0401, Shipboard Waste Management, supports efforts that enable Navy ships and submarines to comply with laws, regulations, and policies in six major areas: (1) Technical Authority, (2) Liquid Wastes, (3) Hazardous Material Control and Management, (4) Ballast Water Management, (5) Solid Waste Management, and (6) Copper-Free and Low Copper Antifouling. The Shipboard Waste Management Program supports two designated Technical Warrant Holders for Waste Systems & Materials Engineering, with responsibility and accountability for ensuring that ships and submarines are designed and upgraded, and can be operated, in compliance with existing and anticipated environmental requirements while minimizing total ownership cost and manning. This responsibility encompasses legacy platforms and new vessel designs, as well as fleet operations exercises, and training. Major performers are Naval Surface Warfare Centers at Carderock, MD, and Philadelphia, PA, where engineering agents execute research and development responsibilities for Navy surface ship and submarine environmental engineering, which includes reviewing/updating various military specifications, ship specifications, DoD and Chief of Naval Operations documentations, and maintaining the technology identification and assessment process.

Mission — Environmental Sustainability Development (NESDI)

The vision outlined in "A Design for Maintaining Maritime Superiority, Version 2.0" (December 2017) and "2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America" is for our Navy to become more lethal, resilient and a rapidly innovating joint force. We must maintain a fleet that is trained ready to operate and fight decisively. Today's reality requires training and operating within environmental constraints (national and international laws and agreements) and searching for alternatives to comply with and alleviate those constraints. Moreover, as we develop new systems and technologies in support of the National Defense Strategy, the Navy must anticipate and address potential environmental constraints which could in the future adversely impact our ability to protect and sustain our forces at home and abroad. This program identifies pervasive Navy shore side environmental requirements and develops and validates information, new processes, and technologies that address requirements that pose significant impact on Naval shore activities in complying with environmental laws, regulations, orders, and policies. The goal of the program is to maximize opportunities for significant cost savings while minimizing personnel liabilities, operational costs, and regulatory oversight and preserving or enhancing the ability of Naval shore activities to accomplish their required missions and functions in support of the Navy's transformational strategy. Environmental Enabling Capabilities -2 (EEC-2) MAXIMIZE TRAINING AND TESTING RANGE REQUIREMENTS WITHIN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS: This capability addresses environmental impacts and restrictions at Navy land and sea ranges, including munitions testing and manufacturing, to ensure Navy ranges are available to conduct required training and testing operations for the Fleet. Investments in EEC-2 provide validated knowledge, models, and processes to mitigate environmental impacts, restrictions, and costs at Navy training and test ranges to maximize the availability and utilization of the ranges. The results support operational readiness by providing the tools and technologies necessary for sustaining and managing Navy land and sea ranges related to unexploded ordnance (UXO) and munitions, encroachment, air quality, airborne noise, water quality, and wetlands. Capabilities gained include the ability to assess and determine the risks from underwater UXO, the evaluation and prioritization of ordnance contaminated sites for evaluation in environmental programs and the implementation of range specific best management practices by evaluating and modeling available process, procedures, and technologies. Environmental Enabling Capabilities-3 (EEC-3) PLATFORM MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR WITH MINIMAL ENVIRONMENTAL FOOTPRINT: This capability focuses on minimizing or eliminating environmental impact related to Navy and Marine Corps weapon system repair and maintenance operations. Investments in EEC-3 provide valid knowledge, models, processes, and technologies to minimize regulated emissions, discharges and hazardous material usage during the repair and maintenance of ships, submarines, and surface/sub-surface vehicles and aircraft and air vehicles. The program supports Fleet operational readiness and Navy acquisition communities by investing in information to understand emerging environmental requirements and to develop innovative processes and technologies that result in savings while reducing the fleet environmental constraints related to platform maintenance. Capabilities and benefits gained include, but are not limited to, the reduction in the usage of heavy metals used in metal finishing (chromium and cadmium), the development of best management practices and tools to minimize the use of hazardous materials, and the generation of hazardous wastes associated with maintaining and repairing ships, submarines, aircraft, and unmanned vehicles. Results of program investments will be leveraged across weapon system and platform acquisition to ensure continued reduction in lifecycle costs and long-term environmental compliance burdens to the Fleet. Environmental Enabling Capabilities-4 (EEC-4). SUPPORT SHORE READINESS WITHIN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS: This capability supports the continued operation of Navy shore infrastructure including airfields, ports, and maintenance facilities within regulatory limits. NESDI investments under EEC-4 deliver cost-effective solutions to reduce the use of regulated materials and limit discharges from shore-based activities. Focus areas include improvements to water management Environmental Enabling Capabilities-5 (EEC-5). COST-EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS: The environmental compliance regulations require base managers to permit, monitor and report on many processes associated with weapon system and platform operations. Naval shore environmental managers require the capability to efficiently and cost effectively manage these compliance requirements. Under EEC-5, the program invests in improved data collection, methods, and models to assess environmental impacts and ecological risk assessments of Naval Operations on harbors, U.S. waterways, and surrounding communities. Benefits include gaining standardized technical environmental management improvements/techniques related to source control, assessment, and monitoring. EEC-5 also provides validated knowledge, models, processes and technologies to improve environmental monitoring and reporting, and to reduce the cost of compliance with regulations applicable to coastal contamination and contaminated sediments.

Mission — Marine Mammal Research

The Navy has been and will continue to be subject to litigation with regard to the potential injuring, killing or biologically significant disturbance of marine animals by the use of intense underwater sound. Since Fleet operation and training areas coincide with known or probable habitats, migration routes, or breeding areas of marine mammals and other protected marine species, the possibility exists that such incidents are likely to continue in the future. The increasing public interest and pressure has resulted in escalating Fleet costs. For example, Fleet and SYSCOM development activities have been interrupted; modified, or altogether cancelled and environmental regulations have, among other things, required new ship construction shock trials to obtain Federal permits and conduct extensive environmental planning that can take several years to complete. The incorporation of mitigation measures in Fleet training operations to minimize the potential adverse effects on protected marine animals can significantly reduce the realism of these operations. In addition, the testing, evaluation, and deployment of new sonar detection and monitoring systems that use active acoustics are under intense public scrutiny for their potential adverse effects on whales and other marine mammals. Navy needs scientific evidence to substantiate its claims of limited or inconsequential adverse effects to marine life from operations. This project primarily focuses on the development of planning, monitoring, and mitigating tools to aid the Fleet in minimizing contact with and the potential harassment of protected marine animals during operations, exercises, training, and undersea surveillance and weapons testing. These new capabilities will encompass historical and newly acquired data and analytical models that together can predict marine animal habitats (where they are likely to be), and their natural and expected behavior (diving patterns, prey localization, calling activity, etc.). This project consists of three major areas that will help ensure Navy compliance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) and Endangered Species Act (ESA). These areas are (1) Marine Ecology and Population Dynamics - determine the likelihood of the presence of marine mammals or other protected species by developing habitat and ecological models. Refine marine animal survey techniques to optimize the accuracy of abundance estimates in small ocean regions of Navy interest. (2) Criteria, Thresholds, and Mitigation - Establish criteria and thresholds from which to measure potential impact on marine mammals and other marine species from Navy training operations. Determine the effectiveness and usefulness of various mitigation measures in relation to the potential impact of Navy operations on marine mammals; and (3) Mitigation Methodologies - Determine the observation, detection and classification measures required to develop effective monitoring and mitigation procedures for Fleet and SYSCOM use. Focus on improving marine animal monitoring capabilities over current methods by developing new technologies or improving existing technologies that improve monitoring and mitigation effectiveness, reduce cost and minimize impacts on readiness activities.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (9)

Technical Authority

Funding in support of Technical Authority is utilized to develop waste stream design criteria and guidance. This includes system/technology selection, processing capacity, interfaces, shipboard integration, test and qualification protocols, processes and practices, performance specifications, and development of ship requirement packages for various waste streams.

Liquid Wastes

This effort addresses liquid wastes in two major areas: Oil Pollution Abatement (OPA) and Non-Oily Waste (NOW). Funding will be utilized to assess new commercial off-the-shelf (COTS), modified off-the-shelf (MOTS), and developmental products and technologies for application to Navy ships and submarines. The funding will also be utilized to develop and demonstrate detailed system and performance specifications and design guidance for the acquisition of cost effective shipboard liquid waste management solutions that meet existing and anticipated environmental requirements within the constraints of shipboard performance, reliability, and warship-unique requirements. In addition, the effort will seek common solutions across platforms, and where possible, across the fleet to provide lifecycle cost savings, logistical efficiency, and improved fleet familiarity.

Ballast Water Management

The National Invasive Species Act of 1996 requires the Secretary of Defense to implement a Ballast Water Management program to minimize the risk of introduction of non-indigenous species and pathogens from releases of ballast water from seagoing vessels of the DoD.

Solid Waste Management

Solid Waste Management supports the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships, which regulates all garbage discharges from ships at sea.

Hazardous Material Control and Management

A wide variety of Hazardous Materials (HM) are used to construct, operate and maintain Navy ships and submarines. These HMs include cleaning compounds, solvents, adhesives, sealants, corrosion preventive compounds, acids, alkalis, oxidizers, lubricants, functional fluids, and many other products. Hazardous Material Control and Management addresses environmental, safety, and health risks to ship construction workers, Ship's Force, and shipyard workers.

Copper-Free and Low Copper Antifouling

The copper discharges from underwater hull coatings remain a regulatory concern. This effort focuses on characterizing advanced coating systems (copper-containing, copper-free, and low copper) and their suitability for Navy-unique operational factors such as speed time profiles, drydocking intervals, and maintenance practices. The biofouling pressure at Navy homeports is also being characterized in order to inform hull and, especially, propeller cleaning scheduling.

Marine Ecology and Population Dynamics

Within the area of 'Marine Ecology and Population Dynamics', ongoing work covers topics such as density estimation from passive acoustic data, standards/metrics development and development of an automated sonar detector to standardize analysis of acoustic data.

Criteria and Thresholds, Physiology and Behavior, and Effects of Sound

Within the area of 'Criteria and Thresholds, Physiology and Behavior, and Effects of Sound', ongoing work covers topics such as hearing, temporary threshold shift, behavioral response studies, and effects from underwater explosions.

Mitigation Methodologies: Monitoring, New Technology, and Risk Assess

Within the area of 'Mitigation Methodologies', ongoing work covers demonstration and validation of new technologies for monitoring and mitigation.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY24 Actuals$24.2M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Enacted$23.3M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Total$23.3M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Disc. Request$22.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Total$22.8M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$517.8M$24.2M$23.3M$22.8M$22.8M
0401: Shipboard Waste Mgmt$384.7M$11.6M$11.3M$10.3M$10.3M
0817: Environmental Sustainability Development (NESDI)$79.4M$5.92M$5.16M$5.88M$5.88M
9204: Marine Mammal Research$53.7M$6.63M$6.84M$6.61M$6.61M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

25 mentions from the Senate LDA disclosure database.

PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRICEnvironmental|Protection2026matched 2+ title words

H.R. 471/S. 1462, the Fix Our Forest Act; H.R. 4776, SPEED Act H.R. 161, New Source Review Permitting Improvement Act H.

PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRICEnvironmental|Protection2026matched 2+ title words

H.R. 471/S. 1462, the Fix Our Forest Act; H.R. 4776, SPEED Act H.R. 161, New Source Review Permitting Improvement Act H.

PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRICEnvironmental|Protection2026matched 2+ title words

H.R. 471/S. 1462, the Fix Our Forest Act; H.R. 4776, SPEED Act H.R. 161, New Source Review Permitting Improvement Act H.

PHILLIPS 66Environmental|Protection2025matched 2+ title words

S. 996, Preserving Choice in Vehicle Purchases Act of 2025; H.R. 1346, S. 593, Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer…

PHILLIPS 66Environmental|Protection2025matched 2+ title words

S. 996, Preserving Choice in Vehicle Purchases Act of 2025; SA #3397 to S. 2296, the National Defense Authorization FY…

PHILLIPS 66Environmental|Protection2025matched 2+ title words

S. 996, Preserving Choice in Vehicle Purchases Act of 2025; H.R. 1346, S. 593, Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer…

PHILLIPS 66 COMPANYEnvironmental|Protection2025matched 2+ title words

Issues related to electric vehicles and fuel efficiency standards. H.J.Res.89 - Providing congressional disapproval…

PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRICEnvironmental|Protection2025matched 2+ title words

H.R. 471/S. 1462, the Fix Our Forest Act; H.R. 4776, SPEED Act H.R. 161, New Source Review Permitting Improvement Act H.

UNITED AUTOMOBILE AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERSEnvironmental|Protection2025matched 2+ title words

Inflation Reduction Act (H.R.5376) implementation. Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act. Infrastructure…

UNITED AUTOMOBILE AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERSEnvironmental|Protection2025matched 2+ title words

Inflation Reduction Act (H.R.5376) implementation. Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act. Infrastructure…

UNITED AUTOMOBILE AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERSEnvironmental|Protection2025matched 2+ title words

Inflation Reduction Act (H.R.5376) implementation. Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act. Infrastructure…

UNITED AUTOMOBILE AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERSEnvironmental|Protection2025matched 2+ title words

Inflation Reduction Act (H.R.5376) implementation. Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act. Infrastructure…

VALERO ENERGY CORPORATIONEnvironmental|Protection2025matched 2+ title words

Renewable Fuel Standard, H.R.1 - One Big Beautiful Bill Act, issues related to sustainable aviation fuel, H.J.Res. 88…

VALERO ENERGY CORPORATIONEnvironmental|Protection2025matched 2+ title words

Issues related to fuel efficiency standards. H.J. Res 88, Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title…

BP AMERICA, INCEnvironmental|Protection2024matched 2+ title words

S. 3038 - American Offshore Worker Fairness Act; H.R. 6814 - Marine Fisheries Habitat Protection Act - issues related…

BP AMERICA, INCEnvironmental|Protection2024matched 2+ title words

S. 3038 - American Offshore Worker Fairness Act; H.R.6814 - Marine Fisheries Habitat Protection Act - issues related…

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONALEnvironmental|Protection2024matched 2+ title words

General issues related to existing trade policies Miscellaneous Tariff Bills Issues related to Sec. 301 tariffs on…

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONALEnvironmental|Protection2024matched 2+ title words

General issues related to existing trade policies Miscellaneous Tariff Bills Issues related to Sec. 301 tariffs on…

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONEnvironmental|Protection2024matched 2+ title words

S 4921/HR 8774 - Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2025 including issues related to aircraft, labor, economic…

PHILLIPS 66Environmental|Protection2024matched 2+ title words

Renewable Fuels Standard RVO Annual Rule 2023, 2024, and 2025; Proposed Rule; Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for…

PHILLIPS 66Environmental|Protection2024matched 2+ title words

Renewable Fuels Standard RVO Annual Rule 2023, 2024, and 2025; Proposed Rule; Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for…

PHILLIPS 66Environmental|Protection2024matched 2+ title words

Renewable Fuels Standard RVO Annual Rule 2023, 2024, and 2025; Proposed Rule; Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for…

PHILLIPS 66Environmental|Protection2024matched 2+ title words

Renewable Fuels Standard RVO Annual Rule 2023, 2024, and 2025; Proposed Rule; Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for…

SHELL USA, INC. (FKA SHELL OIL COMPANY)Environmental|Protection2024matched 2+ title words

Environmental Protection Agency Tailpipe Rule.

SHELL USA, INC. (FKA SHELL OIL COMPANY)Environmental|Protection2024matched 2+ title words

Environmental Protection Agency Tailpipe Rule; National Defense Authorization Act, Section 804 Implementation; the…

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Environmental Protection. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.