Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Networked Communications Capabilities

OSDRDT&EPartial Reconciliation0603662D8Z
What it is
Networked Communications Capabilities (0603662D8Z) is an OSD research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
-$3.10M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$3.12MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$23.0MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$19.9MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$3.10MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $3.12MFY25: $23.0MFY26: $19.9MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$3.12M
FY25$23.0M
FY26$19.9M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$0$5.45M$9.12M$12.4M$12.3M$2.77M$5.69M$2.92M$3.01M$3.12M
Enacted$5.97M$9.33M$12.7M$12.7M$2.86M$5.88M$2.98M$3.13M$11.2M$23.0M
Request$9.33M$12.7M$12.7M$2.86M$5.88M$2.98M$3.17M$11.2M$5.23M$19.9M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $11.2M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $3.12M as actual total obligation authority — $8.07M below the request. 3.111.2 = -8.1 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Networked Communications Capability

The Networked Communications Capability (NCC) plays a vital role in supporting the Department of Defense (DoD) and Defense Industrial Base (DIB) ecosystem. NCC focuses on maturing and demonstrating technologies that foster interoperable, resilient, and capable strategic and Joint Force communications capabilities. Given the critical reliance of DoD missions on command, control, and communications (C3) infrastructure, the NCC addresses challenges faced by the DoD's existing C3 infrastructure, including internal system-centric design approaches, as opposed to network- and data-centric ones, and external threats from aggressive adversary actions. The integration of both DoD and commercial embedded, virtualized, and cloud-hosted hybrid systems and networks underscores the increasing importance of the DoD's ability to rapidly reconfigure and reconstitute this infrastructure. The NCC strategy employs secure and rapidly reconfigurable software-defined/hardware-supported solutions across the layers of the DoD communications stack (physical, network, information, and application layers). The technology integrates these layers to establish a highly agile, adaptable, and resilient C3 infrastructure. This approach ensures the DoD's ability to maintain critical communications in diverse mission domains such as terrestrial, maritime, air, space, and cyberspace. Additionally, it operates effectively in degraded, contested, or denied environments, supporting both tactical edge and strategic contexts. Building upon previous work with Software Defined Radios (SDRs), the NCC utilizes adaptive methods to dynamically analyze the operating environment. This includes considering parameter changes within individual waveforms and switching between high-data rate, low probability of detection techniques, and leveraging tunable waveforms for C3 across various scenarios. The integration of Software Defined Network (SDN) protocols facilitates routing the right information to the right users at the optimal speed and quality, aligning with the requirements of diverse warfighting missions. These advancements will leverage commercially available software and hardware where possible. The NCC works in collaboration with the Joint Staff and Military Services in collaborative partnership to advocate for the proper testing, evaluation, verification and validation, and certification of all relevant solutions from DIB partners for the purpose of ensuring enduring interoperability / compatibility, resiliency, and capability advancement for the positive benefit of US DoD warfighters and as well those of Allied Nations.

Mission Networked Communications Analysis

Threats to communication systems emanate from a variety of sources, encompassing electromagnetic, cyber, and kinetic elements, among others. The central objective of research and development in network communications is to guide the Services, partners, and industry towards the creation of fully networked and integrated capabilities that exhibit interoperability, resilience, and security. This involves the strategic identification and acceleration of critical technologies, leading to their transition to both strategic and tactical forces. The ultimate goal is to ensure that C3 systems are trusted, accessible, and reliable anywhere, anytime, and under any conditions for tactical to strategic missions, thereby enhancing the lethality of the warfighting force. In the face of peer aggressors armed with advanced kinetic and non-kinetic threats, the imperative for trusted and reliable C3 becomes even more pronounced. This capability is viewed not only as a critical deterrence measure but also as essential for providing a decisive and lethal response when required, spanning tactical to strategic missions.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)

NCC

Modern nuclear threats from nuclear peer adversaries drastically shorten the U.S. decision-making timeline required to counter these threats, and specifically, threats that hinder timely execution of Presidential nuclear command and control. The NC3 Tech Accelerator aims to achieve technological advantage against these modern threats to assure Presidential nuclear command and control. Provides technical leadership and oversight, establishes strategic priorities, and issues guidance relating to the supervision of all NC3 Tech Accelerator related programs and activities across DoD. FY 2024 Accomplishments: Integrated Broadcast System (IBS) Operating over MUOS ULX Demonstration $0.000 million: Results of Deputy Secretary of Defense directed FY 2024 IBS Common Waveform demonstration and report to Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE). Demonstration and Project completion in FY 2024. Accelerated Networked C3 Technologies Research and Development. $3.319 million: Identify and accelerate rapidly reconfigurable software-defined and hardware-supported solutions across each of the layers of a given DoD communications stack (e.g. physical, network, information, and application layers) and technology that fuses the layers of the stack to provide a truly agile, adaptable, and resilient C3 infrastructure.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY24 Actuals$3.12M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Enacted$23.0M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Total$23.0M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Disc. Request$19.9M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Total$19.9M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$11.6M$3.12M$23.0M$19.9M$19.9M
663: Networked Communications Analysis$11.6M$3.12M$23.0M$19.9M$19.9M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Networked Communications Capabilities — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →