Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Conventional Munitions

NavyRDT&EReconciledPE0603609N
What it is
Conventional Munitions (0603609N) is a Navy research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 2 projects.
What changed
+$1.93M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$9.00MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$8.95MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$10.9MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$1.93MR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $9.00MFY25: $8.95MFY26: $10.9MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$9.00M
FY25$8.95M
FY26$10.9M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$7.60M$7.68M$8.34M$13.7M$8.94M$8.92M$9.51M$7.25M$9.25M$9.00M
Enacted$7.68M$8.34M$8.91M$9.31M$9.99M$9.88M$7.30M$9.29M$9.03M$8.95M
Request$8.34M$8.91M$9.31M$9.99M$9.92M$7.30M$9.29M$9.03M$8.95M$10.9M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2018 book requested $8.91M for FY2018; the PB2020 book reported $13.7M as actual total obligation authority — $4.79M above the request. 13.7 − 8.9 = 4.8 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Conventional Munitions

Most Navy munitions react violently when exposed to unplanned stimuli such as fire, shock, and bullet or fragment impact, thus presenting a great hazard to ships, aircraft, and personnel. The Insensitive Munitions Advanced Development (IMAD) program will provide, validate, and transition technology to all new weapon developments and priority weapon systems and enable production of munitions insensitive to these stimuli with no reduction in combat performance. Insensitive Munitions (IM) is the Navy's focused effort on propellants, propulsion units, explosives, warheads, fuses, and pyrotechnics to reduce the severity of cook-off and bullet/fragment impact reactions, minimizing the probability for sympathetic detonation, both in normal storage and in use, increasing ship and platform survivability and satisfying performance and readiness requirements.

Mission — Insensitive Munitions Adv. Development

Energetic materials producibility is demonstrated to assure national capability to produce and load munitions systems. The program leverages are being closely coordinated with other military departments, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and allied countries to eliminate redundant efforts and maximize efficiency. A joint service IM requirement has been developed and through the IM strategic planning process, all Program Executive Offices (PEO) are implementing IM in their priority munitions. IM are identified as a Department of Defense (DoD) critical technology requirement and considered as part of a weapon design. The IMAD program matures the technology developed by a variety of Science and Technology (S&T) sources for program management integration into weapons systems to meet the IM technical deficiencies documented in the PEO IM Strategic Plans. IMAD provides the link between S&T programs and the program managers (PM) by optimizing IM technologies to meet Navy requirements. IMAD offers risk mitigation for the PMs in terms of IM technical knowledge, expertise and manpower with the state of the art expertise across IM products. Each technology area is divided into subtasks addressing specific munition and munition class IM deficiencies.

Mission — Explosives Safety and Weapons Assessment

Reduce risk introduced by new weapons systems and technologies that have potential to interfere with ordnance safety and Fleet operations. Emerging radars for all classes of ships introduce a heightened electromagnetic environment (EME) with the likelihood of exceeding the maximum allowable environment (MAE) currently in place. The MAE provides the safety barrier in identifying the electrostatic safety threshold for ordnance items. Exceeding MAE introduces increased risk of inadvertent detonation of electrically primed explosives.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (3)

Insensitive Munitions Adv. Development

Validate and assess weapon systems plan of action and milestones for IM compliance. Review Insensitive Munitions Strategic Plan (IMSP) for Navy compile and analyze weapon system, energetic material and generic technology IM test data. Perform Threat Hazard Assessments (THAs). Perform analysis of energetic material properties logistic process. Review IM certification and waivers. Support Insensitive Munitions Council (IMC), Insensitive Munitions Coordination Group (IMCG), and IMC Working Group. Support and develop Insensitive Munitions Technology Tool (IMT2). Support North Atlantic Treaty Organization Standardization Agreement (NATO STANAG) and Advanced Operations (AOP) development. Support IMAD program briefs. Support all Navy Joint Services Insensitive Munitions Technical Panel (JSIMTP) meetings. Support Explosive Safety Working Group (ESWG) meetings. Provide task management support for financial management, review of programmatic deliverables and overall task coordination.

Emerging Radar Modeling and Simulation Development

Advancements in emerging radar technology, development of directed energy weapons, and the proliferation of wireless/AIT devices is significantly increasing the fleet operational EME. Evaluating this complex EME requires the development of modeling and simulation (M&S), alternative instrumentation technology, new measuring techniques/equipment, and mm-wave region spectrum research.

Ordnance Safety of Lithium Batteries

Research and creation of related required standards will respond to the emerging usage of lithium batteries in and around ordnance.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY24 Actuals$9.00M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Enacted$8.95M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Total$8.95M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Disc. Request$10.9M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Total$10.9M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$287.1M$9.00M$8.95M$10.9M$10.9M
0363: Insensitive Munitions Adv. Development$287.1M$9.00M$5.75M$7.04M$7.04M
0364: Explosives Safety and Weapons Assessment$0$0$3.20M$3.84M$3.84M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Conventional Munitions. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.