Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0603609N/ — data as of July 28, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Conventional Munitions
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
- FY24
- $9.00M
- FY25
- $8.95M
- FY26
- $10.9M
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $7.60M | $7.68M | $8.34M | $13.7M | $8.94M | $8.92M | $9.51M | $7.25M | $9.25M | $9.00M | ||
| Enacted | $7.68M | $8.34M | $8.91M | $9.31M | $9.99M | $9.88M | $7.30M | $9.29M | $9.03M | $8.95M | ||
| Request | $8.34M | $8.91M | $9.31M | $9.99M | $9.92M | $7.30M | $9.29M | $9.03M | $8.95M | $10.9M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2018 book requested $8.91M for FY2018; the PB2020 book reports $13.7M actually spent — $4.79M above the request.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Explosives Safety and Weapons Assessment
Reduce risk introduced by new weapons systems and technologies that have potential to interfere with ordnance safety and Fleet operations. Emerging radars for all classes of ships introduce a heightened electromagnetic environment (EME) with the likelihood of exceeding the maximum allowable environment (MAE) currently in place. The MAE provides the safety barrier in identifying the electrostatic safety threshold for ordnance items. Exceeding MAE introduces increased risk of inadvertent detonation of electrically primed explosives.
Mission — Insensitive Munitions Adv. Development
Energetic materials producibility is demonstrated to assure national capability to produce and load munitions systems. The program leverages are being closely coordinated with other military departments, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and allied countries to eliminate redundant efforts and maximize efficiency. A joint service IM requirement has been developed and through the IM strategic planning process, all Program Executive Offices (PEO) are implementing IM in their priority munitions. IM are identified as a Department of Defense (DoD) critical technology requirement and considered as part of a weapon design. The IMAD program matures the technology developed by a variety of Science and Technology (S&T) sources for program management integration into weapons systems to meet the IM technical deficiencies documented in the PEO IM Strategic Plans. IMAD provides the link between S&T programs and the program managers (PM) by optimizing IM technologies to meet Navy requirements. IMAD offers risk mitigation for the PMs in terms of IM technical knowledge, expertise and manpower with the state of the art expertise across IM products. Each technology area is divided into subtasks addressing specific munition and munition class IM deficiencies.
Mission — Conventional Munitions
Most Navy munitions react violently when exposed to unplanned stimuli such as fire, shock, and bullet or fragment impact, thus presenting a great hazard to ships, aircraft, and personnel. The Insensitive Munitions Advanced Development (IMAD) program will provide, validate, and transition technology to all new weapon developments and priority weapon systems and enable production of munitions insensitive to these stimuli with no reduction in combat performance. Insensitive Munitions (IM) is the Navy's focused effort on propellants, propulsion units, explosives, warheads, fuses, and pyrotechnics to reduce the severity of cook-off and bullet/fragment impact reactions, minimizing the probability for sympathetic detonation, both in normal storage and in use, increasing ship and platform survivability and satisfying performance and readiness requirements.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (3)
Ordnance Safety of Lithium Batteries
Research and creation of related required standards will respond to the emerging usage of lithium batteries in and around ordnance.
Emerging Radar Modeling and Simulation Development
Advancements in emerging radar technology, development of directed energy weapons, and the proliferation of wireless/AIT devices is significantly increasing the fleet operational EME. Evaluating this complex EME requires the development of modeling and simulation (M&S), alternative instrumentation technology, new measuring techniques/equipment, and mm-wave region spectrum research.
Insensitive Munitions Adv. Development
Validate and assess weapon systems plan of action and milestones for IM compliance. Review Insensitive Munitions Strategic Plan (IMSP) for Navy compile and analyze weapon system, energetic material and generic technology IM test data. Perform Threat Hazard Assessments (THAs). Perform analysis of energetic material properties logistic process. Review IM certification and waivers. Support Insensitive Munitions Council (IMC), Insensitive Munitions Coordination Group (IMCG), and IMC Working Group. Support and develop Insensitive Munitions Technology Tool (IMT2). Support North Atlantic Treaty Organization Standardization Agreement (NATO STANAG) and Advanced Operations (AOP) development. Support IMAD program briefs. Support all Navy Joint Services Insensitive Munitions Technical Panel (JSIMTP) meetings. Support Explosive Safety Working Group (ESWG) meetings. Provide task management support for financial management, review of programmatic deliverables and overall task coordination.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY24 Actuals | $9.00M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Enacted | $8.95M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Total | $8.95M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Disc. Request | $10.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Total | $10.9M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0364: Explosives Safety and Weapons Assessment | $0 | $0 | $3.20M | $3.84M | $3.84M |
| Program Element | $287.1M | $9.00M | $8.95M | $10.9M | $10.9M |
| 0363: Insensitive Munitions Adv. Development | $287.1M | $9.00M | $5.75M | $7.04M | $7.04M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →