Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Combat System Integration

NRDT&EPartial Reconciliation0603582N
What it is
Combat System Integration — a research & development program run by Navy.
What changed
-$492.0K FY25→26
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$18.5M
FY25 Total
$20.1M
FY26 Request
$19.6M
FY25→26 Change
-$492.0K

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
FY24: $18.5MFY25: $20.1MFY26: $19.6MFY24FY25FY26
FY24
$18.5M
FY25
$20.1M
FY26
$19.6M
Decade view — each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY26

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$20.7M$32.0M$23.8M$15.5M$15.7M$16.7M$17.3M$16.9M$17.8M$18.5M
Enacted$32.6M$26.5M$24.7M$16.4M$17.3M$17.8M$17.3M$18.2M$18.6M$20.1M
Request$23.5M$24.7M$16.4M$17.3M$17.8M$17.3M$18.2M$18.6M$20.1M$19.6M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2018 book requested $24.7M for FY2018; the PB2020 book reports $15.5M actually spent — $9.20M below the request.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Combat System Integration

Project 0164: Combat System Integration: This project consists of four key Pillars executed within the Strike Force Interoperability (SFI) Program: (1) Command, Control, Communications, Computer, Combat Systems, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C5ISR) Modernization Process (C5IMP). The C5IMP validates the introduction of new systems and upgrades to existing systems into the fleet and ensures systems' maturity prior to shipboard installation thereby reducing risk and enhancing readiness and effectiveness of deploying ships and strike groups. (2) Warfare Systems Certification (WSCERT), which is essential to validating the maturity and operational performance of warfare systems prior to Fleet delivery and deployment. (3) The integrated Navigation System Certification (NAVCERT) program certifies the shipboard integrated navigation suite for safe navigation using the Electronic Charting and Display Information System Navy (ECDIS-N) as the primary plot. To support Strike Force Interoperability and ship's mission requirements, it ensures that the installed integration navigation suite provides accurate and timely navigation information (position, velocity, speed, heading, roll, and pitch) to all navigation data consumers (Warfare/Weapons Systems, Control Systems, and precision approach and landing systems) to enable the safe maneuver of naval forces to execute missions throughout the full spectrum of conflict. (4) Interoperability Certification and Assessment (IOP C&A) is the critical independent assessment of strike group warfare systems operational performance. Interoperability assessment examines force level engagement threads, aircraft control, air battle management, and operational displays to ensure the warfighter is being provided the most interoperable systems available. Assessments of deploying ships in strike force configurations are accomplished through the use of the Navy's Distributed Integration and Interoperability Assessment Capability (DIIAC) which supports the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy (DASN) "shift to the left" policy by providing early interoperability testing in the acquisition lifecycle. Interoperability characterization results are used to develop fleet tactical tools (Strike Group Interoperability Capabilities & Limitations (SGI C&L) documentation and Tactical Information Coordinator Technical Aids (TIC TECHAIDS)) that ensure that systems' operators understand the interoperability capabilities and limitations of their combat systems, as well as all units within the networked architecture, and have the watch station tools necessary for the execution of their tactical responsibilities. The Fleet operators require these products to ensure warfighter awareness of Strike Force Interoperability.

Mission Combat System Integration

Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) created the Navy's Strike Force Interoperability (SFI) program in 1998 in response to critical shortfalls in the introduction of integrated and interoperable System of Systems (SoS) to deploying Strike Forces. Interoperability concerns still exist today as new systems are introduced to the Fleet, interoperating with older systems, and the complexity of the SoS integration has continued to increase. The SFI program mitigates SoS integration and interoperability issues by identifying critical shortfalls before the systems are released to the Fleet. Warfighters depend on the SFI program on a daily basis to remove or reduce the interoperability risk associated with the systems they are tasked to operate. Commander, Naval Sea Systems Command (COMNAVSEA) acts as management lead for Joint System Command (SYSCOM) system certification policy and guidance and certifies platforms for interoperability within the platform and throughout the enterprise, in accordance with Commander, US Fleet Forces Command/Commander, Pacific Fleet COMUSFLTFORCOM/COMPACFLT) Ins. 4720.3C dated 18 SEP 2017 (C5ISR Modernization Policy). COMUSFLTFORCOM/COMPACFLT INST. 4720.3C also requires that COMNAVSEA act as administrative agent for Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Combat Systems, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Modernization Process (C5IMP), and execution agent for Navy Command and Control, Communications, Computers, Combat Systems, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Modernization Council (NCMC). This program conducts Interoperability Assessments that are required to certify Aircraft Carriers, Amphibious Assault Ships, and Surface Combatants in accordance with the Naval Warfare System Certification Policy (NWSCP) NAVSEAINST 9410.2B, NAVAIR 5230.20, AND SPAWAR 5234.1. The SFI program ensures overall Strike Force Interoperability is characterized and assessed. COMNAVSEA is assigned central United States Navy (USN) responsibility for interoperability, directing the development of policy and architecture for Strike Force Warfare Systems engineering and implementation of common warfare systems engineering processes. There are three priorities within the Strike Force Interoperability Program: (1) Support Fleet "as-is" state which includes Navigation System Certification (NAVCERT), Strike Group Interoperability (SGI) Capabilities & Limitations (CAPS&LIMS), and Interoperability Tactical Information Coordinator Technical Aids (TIC TECHAIDs). These functions provide the critical review, assessment and documentation to properly inform the warfighter of the status of the interoperability for the systems they operate. (2) Support Ship's system modernization (non-HME) including warfighting capability & other C5I upgrades including C5IMP Baseline Management. These functions ensure the warfighter is provided integrated and interoperable fielded systems to fulfill mission success. (3) Support Ship Warfare System Certification & Force Level Assessments. This includes Warfare Systems Certification, Interoperability Certification, Force Level Interoperability Analysis, & Assessments, and recommendations for improvements to the program offices for implementation at the systems' level. This critical function provides the confidence to the warfighter they are getting the best possible systems and that through the certification process the systems have been properly tested and assessed to ensure the best possible interoperability. Project 0164 Combat System Integration: This project consists of four key Pillars executed within the Strike Force Interoperability (SFI) Program: (1) Command, Control, Communications, Computer, Combat Systems, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C5ISR) Modernization Process (C5IMP). The C5IMP validates the introduction of new systems and upgrades to existing systems into the fleet and ensures systems' maturity prior to shipboard installation thereby reducing risk and enhancing readiness and effectiveness of deploying ships and strike groups. (2) Warfare Systems Certification (WSCERT), which is essential to validating the maturity and operational performance of warfare systems prior to Fleet delivery and deployment. (3) The integrated Navigation System Certification (NAVCERT) program certifies the shipboard integrated navigation suite for safe navigation using the Electronic Charting and Display Information System Navy (ECDIS-N) as the primary plot. To support Strike Force Interoperability and ship's mission requirements, it ensures that the installed integration navigation suite provides accurate and timely navigation information (position, velocity, speed, heading, roll, and pitch) to all navigation data consumers (Warfare/Weapons Systems, Control Systems, and precision approach and landing systems) to enable the safe maneuver of naval forces to execute missions throughout the full spectrum of conflict. (4) Interoperability Certification and Assessment (IOP C&A) is the critical independent assessment of strike group warfare systems operational performance. Interoperability assessment examines force level engagement threads, aircraft control, air battle management, and operational displays to ensure the warfighter is being provided the most interoperable systems available. Assessments of deploying ships in strike force configurations are accomplished through the use of the Navy's Distributed Integration and Interoperability Assessment Capability (DIIAC) which supports the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy (DASN) "shift to the left" policy by providing early interoperability testing in the acquisition lifecycle. Interoperability characterization results are used to develop fleet tactical tools (Strike Group Interoperability Capabilities & Limitations (SGI C&L) documentation and Tactical Information Coordinator Technical Aids (TIC TECHAIDS)) that ensure that systems' operators understand the interoperability capabilities and limitations of their combat systems, as well as all units within the networked architecture, and have the watch station tools necessary for the execution of their tactical responsibilities. The Fleet operators require these products to ensure warfighter awareness of Strike Force Interoperability.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (4)

Command , Control, Communications, Computers, Combat Systems, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C5ISR) Modernization Process (C5IMP)

Achieving and maintaining Strike Force Interoperability (SFI) requires disciplined engineering, system integration, and configuration management at both the platform (ship or shore station) and strike force level (Carrier Strike Group/ Amphibious Readiness Group). The Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Combat Systems, Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance (C5ISR) Modernization Program (C5IMP) pillar of SFI ensures that deploying strike force ships receive modernized and interoperable warfighting capabilities in order to meet theater operational requirements. This project funds engineering assessments of proposed C5I capability improvements to determine maturity for installation as well as technical and schedule risks associated with proposed hardware and software changes. This project directly supports the requirements of the Fleet C5I Modernization Policy (per COMUSFLTFORCOM/COMPACFLT Inst. 4720.3) which assigns responsibilities to NAVSEA 05H to assess operational risks associated with C5ISR modernization in both afloat and ashore units in support of the Optimized Fleet Response Plan (OFRP). The deliverables of this project are created by determining the maturity, through engineering analysis, of the critical linchpins needed to achieve interoperability for each proposed C5IMP capability improvement item to be installed in a ship's baseline, developing installation recommendations of C5I system upgrades for the Fleet Commanders, and researching and analyzing installation or operating problems. This includes a review of Warfare System Ship Change Documents (SCDs). SFI coordinates closely with the FLTCDRs and TYCOMs as well as other members of the C5IMP community to address, coordinate, and resolve C5IMP modernization issues, thereby reducing risk and enhancing readiness and effectiveness of deploying ships and strike groups. The SFI C5IMP pillar focuses on key milestones such as Baseline Locking Events (BLEs), Planned Not Authorized (PNA) reviews, and Strike Group (SG)/Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) Analysis Reports which are Fleet required events. The BLEs, PNA Reviews, and SG/ARG Analysis Reports are the primary work products for C5IMP. Emerging warfighting requirements and the development of required hardware and software changes between CNO Availability periods require SFI to administer an electronic change control board (eCCB) to facilitate the request, review, and approval of proposed Baseline changes. SFI maintains the Afloat Master Planning System (AMPS) data for the approximately 285 active Battle Force ships, in addition to initial configuration of the New Construction ships entering the Fleet each year. SFI maintains and continuously updates C5ISR Configuration Control for every ship based on projection of ships' operating/maintenance schedules at SG deployment. Due to changing operational needs, these schedules frequently change causing availability extensions, deferrals, cancellations, or delays. SFI extracts and formats the data in AMPS to develop the BLE and PNA Review presentations which enables the Fleet commanders and TYCOMs to make informed modernization decisions. CUSFFC/CPF Instruction 4720.3C designates NAVSEA 05 as the executing agent for the two NCMCs held each year where Fleet Commanders, TYCOMs, SYSCOMs and supporting personnel gather to discuss advance plans, coordinate near term modernization plans, and coordinate shore and shipboard installations to ensure support prior to deployments, resolve schedule issues and establish priorities. Major issues identified at each NCMC are reported to a joint FFC/CPF flag/SES panel. .

Interoperability Certification and Assessment

Description: This SFI pillar provides: interoperability assessments via the Distributed Integration & Interoperability Assessment Capability (DIIAC), the technical assessment of interoperable systems to meet mission requirements, Strike Group Interoperability Capabilities and Limitations (SGI C&L), and Tactical Information Coordinator Technical Aid (TIC TECHAID) updates. Strike Force Interoperability certification and assessments inform NAVSEA/PEOs the extent of interoperable warfare systems at the platform and Strike Group levels, as well as new systems and platforms under development. The DIIAC provides the only opportunity for comprehensive interoperability testing of combat system and C5I configuration items prior to shipboard delivery for operational use in surface combatant platforms and Strike Groups. The DIIAC is comprised of 23 land-based test sites from multiple Navy bases connected via classified network, and provides operational configurations for all naval combat systems. SFI funds the full interoperability characterization testing to include the requisite warfare system interoperability analysis and risk assessments needed to support the Warfare Systems Certification Decision (WSCD). SFI can support the warfare system's acquisition community by testing their developmental items for interoperability using the DIIAC. However, it is the cognizant acquisition program's responsibility to fund subsequent data analysis and risk assessment. The DIIAC infrastructure is available, but not funded, to support the surface Navy's participation in the Joint Testing Environments as well as the Maritime Theater Missile Defense (MTMD) Coalition Forces interoperability testing. SFI maintains and updates the Strike Group Interoperability Capabilities & Limitations (SGI C&L) database to accurately reflect the "state of the TDL/COP" (tactical data links/common operational picture) in every operational theater. SGI C&Ls for all Strike Groups, Independent Deployers, and (when funded) the applicable Coalition and Joint partners, are maintained on a secure internet protocol routing network (SIPRNET) website for operational forces, trainers and the technical community. SGI C&L addresses known strike group compositions and provides a fleet modifiable force SGI C&L "tool" that allows users to generate SGI C&L documents for their specific force compositions. The TIC TECHAID is a single, cohesive set of operation checklists for the sailor that supports current operational use of these systems to meet tactical Information Exchange Requirements (IERs). TIC TECHAIDS are prepared for deploying Carrier Strike Groups (CSG's), Amphibious Ready Group (ARG's) and Independent Deployers. SGI C&L and TIC TECHAIDS readily inform Fleet operators and warfighters of the acquisition community's efforts to improve C5I capabilities and any interoperability issues or limitations that exist.

Warfare Systems Certification

Strike Force Interoperability (SFI) begins with properly engineered warfare systems installed in US Navy Ships. The Warfare Systems Certification (WSCERT) pillar of SFI certifies that modernized warfare systems are ready for installation, properly installed, and meet warfighting mission area requirements, to include the systems' interoperability and functional integration within the Strike Force that enables successful mission accomplishment. It funds the collection and independent technical assessment of interoperability and integration using empirically derived Objective Quality Evidence (OQE) that installed warfare systems meet required performance specifications. Using established evaluation criteria, the project assesses the maturity of proposed warfare system modernizations prior to installation and certifies readiness of modernized warfare systems for operational deployment in ships, either independently or as components of Carrier/Expeditionary Strike Groups. When evaluation criteria are not met, the program funds the development of operational risk assessments. This includes conducting an analysis of all work-arounds documented in Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs), Capabilities & Limitations (C&L), and Trouble Reports (TR) to ensure that aggregate deficiencies and work-arounds do not render the warfare system, to include the operator, ineffective. NAVSEA accomplishes these efforts through a sequential series of technical reviews that begin 12-24 months prior to a scheduled modernization of a ship's warfare system.

Navigation System Certification (NAVCERT)

Modern warfare systems installed in US Navy ships require accurate position and time to achieve required effects. At the strike force level, accurate position and time are required to enable interoperability of warfighting systems of systems. The Integrated Navigation Suite Certification (NAVCERT) pillar of SFI certifies the accuracy of ship's position information and verifies that it is properly distributed to sensors and weapons systems installed in US Navy ships. Certification is required at five-year intervals, following Chief of Naval Operations Availabilities greater than six months, in support of Precision Approach and Landing System (PALS) certification, at the conclusion of Post Shakedown Availabilities, or following configuration changes that have been made to the ship's baseline integrated navigation suite. Certification testing verifies the accuracy of sensors that determine heading, velocity, attitude, and position; and validates receipt of navigation data by all- consuming systems including Integrated Warfare (or Mission) Systems, Aircraft Inertial Alignment System, and Control Systems. The scope of the certification includes all inertial navigation system equipment as well as the Electronic Chart Display and Information System - Navy (ECDIS- N). Forecasting out year NAVCERT requirements is based on the projection of expiring certifications, scheduled maintenance availabilities, and modernization of installed integrated navigation systems. Wherever possible, the program leverages integrated navigation suite modernization efforts to reduce overall program costs.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY24 Actuals$18.5M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Enacted$20.1M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Total$20.1M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Disc. Request$19.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Total$19.6M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$507.2M$18.5M$20.1M$19.6M$19.6M
0164: Combat System Integration$507.2M$18.5M$20.1M$19.6M$19.6M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →