Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0603581N/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Littoral Combat Ship (LCS)
Watch this program
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $20.8M |
| FY25 | $9.13M |
| FY26 | $10.2M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $80.2M | $109.4M | $50.8M | $49.3M | $36.9M | $16.4M | $40.7M | $80.3M | $64.2M | $20.8M | ||
| Enacted | $91.4M | $51.6M | $41.0M | $38.0M | $16.9M | $42.0M | $82.5M | $76.4M | $32.6M | $9.13M | ||
| Request | $51.6M | $41.0M | $28.0M | $9.93M | $32.2M | $84.9M | $96.4M | $32.6M | $9.13M | $10.2M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2023 book requested $96.4M for FY2023; the PB2025 book reported $64.2M as actual total obligation authority — $32.3M below the request. 64.168 − 96.444 = -32.276 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Littoral Combat Ship
The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Program Element (PE) provides funds for detailed design, development, construction, issue resolution, certification, integration, and testing of the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS). LCS operates with focused-Mission Packages that deploy manned and unmanned vehicles to execute a variety of missions, including, Surface Warfare (SUW) and Mine Countermeasures (MCM). LCS also possesses inherent capabilities, regardless of the Mission package installed, including intelligence/surveillance/reconnaissance (ISR), LCS SUW will also include Maritime Interdiction/interception Operations (MIO), Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP), air warfare self-defense, joint littoral mobility and logistic support for movement of personnel and supplies. This relatively small, shallow-draft, high-speed surface combatant complements the U.S. Navy's Surface Fleet by operating in environments where it is impossible or undesirable to employ larger, deeper-draft, multi-mission ships. LCS can deploy independently to overseas littoral regions or remain on station for extended periods of time either with a battle group or through a forward-basing arrangement. LCS will operate with Carrier Strike Groups, Surface Action Groups, or independently as dictated by the mission and environment. Additionally, LCS can operate cooperatively with the U.S. Coast Guard and Allies. This PE also provides funds for the design, development, engineering, implementation, and testing of the combat system modifications for Lethality and Survivability (L&S) for both LCS variants (Independence and Freedom). The L&S upgrades include the development of a common Combat Management System (CMS) and integration and testing of government furnished systems including the Gun Weapon System (GWS), Electronic Warfare (EW) system and Decoy Launching System (DLS) for both LCS Class Variant ships.
Mission — Littoral Combat Ship
The RDT&E portion of the LCS Program comprises design and development efforts required to field the LCS Class Ships, including integration with the Mission Packages (MCM and SUW) activities both pre- and post-delivery. It includes the design and development effort required to support the introduction and deployment of a Flight 0+ baseline (LCS 3/4 and Follow) with incorporation of lessons learned from the design and construction of USS FREEDOM (LCS 1) and USS INDEPENDENCE (LCS 2). Additionally, it includes design, development, issue resolution, certification and testing efforts required to support the design baseline for the six year block buy in FY10-15. This baseline includes lessons learned from the LCS 1 through LCS 4. The LCS design and development phases include platform design and development, experimentation, ship system design and integration, hull platform testing, development of Technical Data Packages (TDPs), total ship system engineering and integration, combat systems and warfare systems certification, and planning and conduct of system testing. These efforts include procurement of combat and warfare system elements and/or simulators to support production representative testing in support of design, development, and certification efforts and ordnance in support of testing. The RDT&E portion of LCS funding also comprises formal Developmental and Operational Assessment testing of the LCS Ships and Mission Packages. Test and Evaluation (T&E) will concentrate on verifying integration and interoperability of employed technologies and systems in the LCS seaframe designs and modular mission packages to achieve the mission capabilities and performance requirements as defined in the LCS program's Flight 0 and Flight 0+ Capabilities Development Documents (CDD). T&E functions will include the evaluation of Critical Technical Parameters (CTP), Measures of Effectiveness (MOE), Measures of Suitability (MOS), and Key Performance Parameters (KPP) for the core seaframe and the focused missions. This budget provides funds for the design, development, engineering, implementation, and testing of the combat system modifications for Lethality and Survivability (L&S) for both LCS variants (Independence and Freedom). The L&S upgrades include the development of a common Combat Management System (CMS) and integration and testing of government furnished systems including the Gun Weapon System (GWS), Electronic Warfare (EW) system, and Decoy Launching System (DLS) for both LCS Class Variants (Independence and Freedom) ships. Without funding for L&S trainer upgrades, sailors on ships with L&S configuration will not be trained on the L&S configuration in our trainers.
Mission — LCS Training
As a minimally-manned ship, the LCS uses a Train-to-Qualify (T2Q)/TYCOM Certification Training process in an off-ship/shore-based virtual ship trainer environment. These simulators and blended training solutions focus on tactical, equipment operations, and maintenance training. When completely developed and procured, the LCS shore-based training capability will satisfy individual, team, unit, and force training, with an objective of meeting Capability Development Document (CDD) T2Q/TYCOM Certification Training Key Performance Parameter (KPP) requirements. Funding will develop upgrades of the Surface Training Advanced Virtual Environment (STAVE) courseware and associated simulators to achieve the training objectives. Additionally, after fielding more of the systems and courseware, out-year funding will be utilized to upgrade training to maintain conformity with LCS configurations and approved operational technical manuals and procedures, as well as test and evaluate training devices to verify compliance with requirements.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)
LCS Lethality and Survivability
Provides engineering support to develop a common combat management system, leveraging a common source library, for installation on both LCS variants (Independence and Freedom). The Combat Systems baseline will be compatible with Program of Record (PoR) combat systems replacing Contractor Furnished Equipment (CFE) and integrate Over the Horizon (OTH) missile system. Funding includes logistic product development, Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs), ship structural analysis, development of an integrated test plan and cyber analysis to accomplish Risk Management Framework authorization.
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY24 Actuals | $20.8M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Enacted | $9.13M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Total | $9.13M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Disc. Request | $10.2M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Total | $10.2M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $1.59B | $20.8M | $9.13M | $10.2M | $10.2M |
| 3096: Littoral Combat Ship | $1.52B | $19.9M | $8.20M | $10.2M | $10.2M |
| 4506: LCS Training | $69.6M | $901.0K | $934.0K | $0 | $0 |
Follow the dollar
Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.
Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →
The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.
| District | Program obligations |
|---|---|
| NJ-03 | $39.8M |
Related awards
Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →
Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.
| Recipient | PIID | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION | N0002416C5136 | high |
| AUSTAL USA, LLC | N0002411C2301 | medium |
| AUSTAL USA, LLC | N0002417C2301 | medium |
| LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION | N0002411C2300 | medium |
| LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION | N0002418C2300 | medium |
| PACIFIC SHIP REPAIR & FABRICATION, INC. | N5523619F8097 | medium |
Contractor concentration
No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.
Lobbying mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Littoral Combat Ship (LCS). No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J291
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2017 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J259
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2017_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2018 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J286
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2018_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2019 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J288
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2019_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2020 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J304
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2020_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2021 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J317
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2021_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J288
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J279
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J277
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J278
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
RDTEN BA1-3 Book · www.secnav.navy.mil