Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0603289D8Z/ — data as of August 12, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Advanced Innovative Analysis and Concepts
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $63.9M |
| FY25 | $56.4M |
| FY26 | $57.5M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $48.8M | $48.9M | $55.7M | $36.8M | $36.3M | $36.8M | $28.0M | $45.0M | $51.7M | $63.9M | ||
| Enacted | $50.0M | $57.0M | $37.7M | $37.2M | $37.6M | $28.5M | $46.4M | $53.2M | $55.6M | $56.4M | ||
| Request | $57.0M | $37.7M | $37.3M | $37.6M | $36.5M | $51.5M | $53.9M | $55.6M | $56.4M | $57.5M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2021 book requested $36.5M for FY2021; the PB2023 book reported $28.0M as actual total obligation authority — $8.52M below the request. 28.0 − 36.5 = -8.5 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Advanced Innovative Analysis and Concepts
This program supports the Department's initiatives to Deter Aggression and Prevail in Conflict, Defend the Homeland, Build Sustainable and Long-Term Advantage, and Build a Resilient Joint Force and Defense Ecosystem. The Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO) conducts analysis to identify and accelerate the development, demonstration, and transition of operationally impactful capabilities to shape and counter emerging threats and increase the lethality of the Joint Force in contested environments. In a partnership endeavor across the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), Joint Staff, Combatant Commands (CCMDs), the Services, the Intelligence Community (IC), and other U.S. Government agencies, the SCO combines capability innovation with new concepts for warfighting that leverage new technology areas, including autonomy, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. SCO conducts projects on accelerated timelines, in all warfighting domains, at any classification or access level. The Advanced Innovative Analysis and Concepts program supports development, study, and analysis of integrated concepts and prototypes, analysis in support of ongoing efforts to shape and counter emerging threats, cross-Service and cross-Defense/Intelligence concepts, and red-teaming. Projects focus on proving component and subsystem maturity prior to integration in major systems, and may involve risk reduction initiatives. This program also supports the development of concept proposals for assessment by the Technical and Transition Cross Functional Teams established in accordance with the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY 2020 for development under the Advanced Innovative Technologies Program Element. Due to the nature of these projects, specific applications and detailed plans are available at a higher classification level.
Mission — Advanced Innovative Analysis and Concepts
The Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO) conducts analysis in support of ongoing efforts to shape and counter emerging threats, with special emphasis on: innovative and architecture-level concepts, cross-Service and cross-Defense/Intelligence concepts, red-teaming, and on a case-by-case basis, research and development projects to demonstrate new concepts. SCO identifies, analyzes, and accelerates the development, demonstration, and transition of selected capabilities to shape and counter emerging threats, and to improve U.S. security posture. In a partnership endeavor across the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), Joint Staff, Combatant Commands (CCMDs), the Services, the Intelligence Community (IC), and other U.S. Government agencies, SCO combines capability innovation with concepts of operation to develop novel, high-leverage approaches to address pressing national security challenges. SCO conducts projects on accelerated timelines, at any classification or access level. The Advanced Innovative Analysis and Concepts program supports development, study, and analysis of integrated concepts and prototypes, analysis in support of ongoing efforts to shape and counter emerging threats, cross-Service and cross-Defense/Intelligence concepts, and red-teaming. Projects focus on proving component and subsystem maturity prior to integration in major systems, and may involve risk reduction initiatives. Due to the nature of these projects, specific applications and detailed plans are available at a higher classification level.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (3)
Innovative Analysis and Concept Generation
The Strategic Capabilities Office conducts analysis, studies, demonstrations of integrated concepts and prototypes, component and subsystem maturation, and risk-reduction demonstrations in support of ongoing efforts to shape and counter emerging threats, and develops project proposals for prototyping under the Advanced Innovative Technologies program. Due to the nature of these projects, specific applications and detailed plans are available at a higher classification level.
Formulation and Risk Reduction
Subsequent to review and recommendation of project concepts by the Technical and Transition Cross Functional Teams, the Strategic Capabilities Office performs engineering trade studies and conducts component tests to prepare selected projects to be ready to enter into full prototype development under the Advanced Innovative Technologies program. Activities, such as proving component and subsystem maturity prior to integration in major systems, are intended to finalize key requirements to reduce technical risk during prototype development. Due to the nature of these projects, specific applications and detailed plans are available at a higher classification level.
Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR)/Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR)
This project includes estimates of funds required for SBIR/STTR based upon planned extramural research and development spending. These funds are transferred to the SBIR/STTR programs in the year of execution.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY24 Actuals | $63.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY25 Enacted | $56.4M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY25 Total | $56.4M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY26 Disc. Request | $57.5M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY26 Total | $57.5M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $388.0M | $63.9M | $56.4M | $57.5M | $57.5M |
| 329: Advanced Innovative Analysis and Concepts | $388.0M | $63.9M | $56.4M | $57.5M | $57.5M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Advanced Innovative Analysis and Concepts — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →