Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Space Programs and Technology

DARPARDT&EPartial Reconciliation0603287E
What it is
Space Programs and Technology (0603287E) is a DARPA research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
No FY25→26 comparison — endpoints unavailable or on different bases.
Who gets it
RTX leads 160 contractor families sharing $3.55B in matched awards.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$119.1MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$181.5MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$0P-40 detail · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
No comparison: endpoints unavailable or on different bases

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $119.1MFY25: $181.5MFY26: $0FY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$119.1MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25$181.5MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26$0P-40 detail · PB2026
Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
11 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2025): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
11 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2025): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY15FY17FY19FY21FY23FY25

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25
Actuals$172.5M$120.6M$162.6M$227.0M$256.2M$173.8M$144.5M$173.6M$76.9M$119.1M
Enacted$126.7M$175.2M$247.4M$254.7M$190.3M$151.4M$181.5M$74.4M$134.8M$181.5M
Request$175.2M$247.4M$254.7M$202.6M$158.4M$101.5M$81.9M$134.8M$225.5M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2022 book requested $101.5M for FY2022; the PB2024 book reported $173.6M as actual total obligation authority — $72.1M above the request. 173.6101.5 = 72.1 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY

The efforts described in this Program Element (PE) address the Advanced Technology Development associated with the Space Programs and Technology Program that addresses high payoff opportunities to dramatically reduce costs associated with advanced space systems and provides revolutionary new system capabilities for satisfying current and projected military missions. A space force structure that is robust against attack represents a stabilizing deterrent against adversary attacks on space assets. This program element will examine concepts and architectures that move the U.S. away from a dependence on monolithic, ultra-capable, vulnerable, and unsustainably costly assets; replacing them with disaggregated assets that are agile, affordable, and easily replaced. Ready access to space requires the delivery of capabilities, replenishment of supplies into orbit, and rapid manufacturing of affordable space capabilities. In addition, developing space access and spacecraft servicing technologies will lead to reduced ownership costs of space systems and new opportunities for introducing technologies for the exploitation of space. Systems development is also required to increase the interactivity and functionality of space systems, space-derived information, and services with terrestrial users. Studies under this program element include technologies and systems that will enable satellites and microsatellites to operate more effectively by increasing maneuverability, survivability, and situational awareness, and precision control of multi-payload systems. Studies will actively seek to take advantage of new commercial developments which may enable both rapid constitution/reconstitution of assets, and agility/functionality not previously available for military systems. Beginning in FY 2026, efforts in this PE will be funded in PE 0603468E, Advanced Complex Systems.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (5)

Otter

The Otter program will develop and demonstrate air breathing propulsion technologies that enable operations in very low earth orbital domains that are currently inaccessible. Propulsion capabilities demonstrated will provide increased mission duration and ability to maneuver without regret. Key efforts include the development of new propulsion systems, improved ground test capabilities, and analysis tools to support system development. Otter will progress through development of analysis and test tools, design of candidate propulsion systems, ground testing, build of a demonstrator satellite, and culminate in a long duration (> 1 year) spaceflight demonstration. The anticipated transition partner is the U.S. Space Force. Beginning in FY 2026, this program will be funded in PE 0603468E, Project ACX-01.

Demonstration Rocket for Agile Cislunar Operations (DRACO)

Maintaining U.S. interests in cislunar space requires significant advances in propulsion technology. Current space propulsion includes electric (high efficiency but low thrust) and chemical (high thrust but low efficiency) systems. The Demonstration Rocket for Agile Cislunar Operations (DRACO) program will develop and demonstrate a High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU) nuclear thermal rocket (NTR) system on orbit and is targeting an FY 2027 launch. The NTR technology demonstrated by DRACO will achieve thrust similar to chemical rockets, but with 2-5 times the efficiency. The enhanced performance afforded by NTR will allow the U.S. to lead operations in the cislunar volume, in particular for missions that require flexible mission planning and agile maneuverability. Beginning in FY 2026, this program will be funded in PE 0603468E, Project ACX-01.

Robotic Servicing of Geosynchronous Satellites (RSGS)

A large number of national security and commercial space systems operate at geosynchronous earth orbit (GEO), providing persistence and enabling ground station antennas to point in a fixed direction. Technologies for servicing of GEO spacecraft would involve a mix of highly automated and remotely operated (from Earth) robotic systems. The Robotic Servicing of Geosynchronous Satellites (RSGS) program is establishing the capability to provide robotic services in GEO suitable for a variety of potential servicing tasks, in full collaboration and cooperation with existing satellite owners and national security space operators, and with sufficient propellant for several years of follow-on capability. Key RSGS challenges include robotic tool/end effector requirements, efficient orbital maneuvering of a servicing vehicle, robotic arm systems, automation of certain spacecraft operations, and development of the infrastructure for coordinated control between the servicer and client spacecraft operations teams. The transition agreement is with a commercial partner who will provide the satellite to carry the robotic payload and who will operate the robotic servicer. To support the development of a broadly accepted satellite servicing capability, DARPA is using the Consortium for Execution of Rendezvous and Servicing (CONFERS) operations approach to bring together experts from the private sector and Government to research, develop and publish nonbinding, consensus-based standards for safe operational approaches to on-orbit servicing. Beginning in FY 2026, this program will be funded in PE 0603468E, Project ACX-01.

Advanced Space Technology Concepts

Studies conducted under this program will examine and evaluate emerging technologies and concepts with the potential to provide substantial improvement in efficiency, effectiveness, and resilience of operations in space. This includes the degree and scope of potential impact and improvements to military operations, mission utility, and warfighter capability. Studies are also conducted to analyze emerging threats along with possible methods and technologies for countermeasures. The feasibility of achieving potential improvements, in terms of resources, schedule, and technological risk, is also evaluated. The results from these studies are used, in part, to formulate future programs or refocus ongoing work. Topics of consideration include applying artificial intelligence to low earth orbit (LEO) constellation operations to enable collaboration between space, air, maritime, and ground platforms in anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) theaters; robust architectures for precision navigation and timing; enabling operations in Cislunar space; novel approaches to space domain awareness; integration of commercial capabilities into military operations; and on-orbit software environments.

Blackjack

The Blackjack program developed space technologies demonstrating a proliferated smallsat constellation capability in Low Earth Orbit (LEO). Capabilities demonstrated will provide constant custody of very large numbers of concurrent targets; target identification, tracking, and characterization; tactical communications; architectural resilience via massive proliferation; and rapid on-orbit technology refresh and experimentation. Blackjack leveraged commercial industry plans to build constellations in LEO to provide global commercial broadband internet service. Key efforts included low size, weight, power, and cost (SWaP-C) multi-modality smallsat sensor payloads, algorithms for autonomous payload and architecture command and control, algorithms for satellite on-board processing and data fusion, and advanced manufacturing for military payload mass production. The transition partners are the U.S. Space Force, Air Force and Space Development Agency.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDARPAFY24 Actuals$119.1M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDARPAFY25 Enacted$181.5M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDARPAFY25 Total$181.5M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$0$119.1M$181.5M$0$0
SPC-01: SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY$0$119.1M$181.5M$0$0

Follow the dollar

Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.

Follow-the-dollar covers 17 of 1,741 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →

The program's money traced left to right: the DARPA appropriation, program element 0603287E (Space Programs and Technology), its 1 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.
The program's money traced left to right: the DARPA appropriation, program element 0603287E (Space Programs and Technology), its 1 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.APPROPRIATIONPROGRAM ELEMENTTOP AWARDSRECIPIENT FAMILIESDISTRICTSDARPARDT&E appropriation0603287ESpace Programs and TechnologyHQ014718F0027UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY SPACE…1.86MUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY SPA…UT-01

The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.

The diagram as text: one row per congressional district in the diagram, the recipient families shown there, and that district's cited program obligations.
DistrictProgram obligations
UT-01$1.82M

Related Awards

Award linkage is shown for 20 of 200 profiled companies — only high-confidence USASpending matches are included. why partial award coverage? →

Showing 25 of 408 award records (R&D performer crosswalk — see methodology)

RecipientPIIDConfidence
RAYTHEON COMPANYW900KK16D0001high
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY SPACE DYNAMICS LABORATORYHQ014718F0027high
AARNO LABS LLCHR001118C0059medium
ACCELINT AI, LLCHR001119C0058medium
ACCELINT AI, LLCHR001119C0119medium
ADELPHI TECHNOLOGY INCHR001117C0020medium
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONALHR001118C0037medium
ADVENTIUM ENTERPRISES, LLCHR001118C0027medium
AEROJET ROCKETDYNE INCHR001118C0139medium
AEROVIRONMENT, INC.HR001118C0093medium
AGILE DEFENSE, LLCHR001115F0002medium
AIR & SPACE FORCES ASSOCIATIONHR001119C0080medium
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES INCHR001117C0030medium
ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS OPERATIONS LLCHR001117C0100medium
ANALOG PHOTONICS LLCHR001116C0108medium
APOGEE RESEARCH LLCHR001117C0129medium
APPEN BUTLER HILL INC.HR001115C0116medium
APPLIED PHYSICAL SCIENCES CORPHR001118C0008medium
APPLIED PHYSICAL SCIENCES CORPHR001118C0010medium
APPLIED PHYSICAL SCIENCES CORPHR001118C0028medium
APPLIED SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA CORPHR001119C0111medium
APTIMA INCHR001119C0130medium
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITYHR001118C0060medium
BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION & ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INCHR001115C0103medium
BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION & ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INCHR001117C0005medium

Contractor Concentration

HHI Index
558
Competitive
Top Contractor
RTX
Contractor Families
160
Program Obligations
$3.55B

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Space Programs and Technology — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →