Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0603287E/ — data as of August 12, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Space Programs and Technology
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $119.1MR-1 TOA · PB2026 |
| FY25 | $181.5MR-1 TOA · PB2026 |
| FY26 | $0P-40 detail · PB2026 |
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $172.5M | $120.6M | $162.6M | $227.0M | $256.2M | $173.8M | $144.5M | $173.6M | $76.9M | $119.1M | |
| Enacted | $126.7M | $175.2M | $247.4M | $254.7M | $190.3M | $151.4M | $181.5M | $74.4M | $134.8M | $181.5M | |
| Request | $175.2M | $247.4M | $254.7M | $202.6M | $158.4M | $101.5M | $81.9M | $134.8M | $225.5M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2022 book requested $101.5M for FY2022; the PB2024 book reported $173.6M as actual total obligation authority — $72.1M above the request. 173.6 − 101.5 = 72.1 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY
The efforts described in this Program Element (PE) address the Advanced Technology Development associated with the Space Programs and Technology Program that addresses high payoff opportunities to dramatically reduce costs associated with advanced space systems and provides revolutionary new system capabilities for satisfying current and projected military missions. A space force structure that is robust against attack represents a stabilizing deterrent against adversary attacks on space assets. This program element will examine concepts and architectures that move the U.S. away from a dependence on monolithic, ultra-capable, vulnerable, and unsustainably costly assets; replacing them with disaggregated assets that are agile, affordable, and easily replaced. Ready access to space requires the delivery of capabilities, replenishment of supplies into orbit, and rapid manufacturing of affordable space capabilities. In addition, developing space access and spacecraft servicing technologies will lead to reduced ownership costs of space systems and new opportunities for introducing technologies for the exploitation of space. Systems development is also required to increase the interactivity and functionality of space systems, space-derived information, and services with terrestrial users. Studies under this program element include technologies and systems that will enable satellites and microsatellites to operate more effectively by increasing maneuverability, survivability, and situational awareness, and precision control of multi-payload systems. Studies will actively seek to take advantage of new commercial developments which may enable both rapid constitution/reconstitution of assets, and agility/functionality not previously available for military systems. Beginning in FY 2026, efforts in this PE will be funded in PE 0603468E, Advanced Complex Systems.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (5)
Otter
The Otter program will develop and demonstrate air breathing propulsion technologies that enable operations in very low earth orbital domains that are currently inaccessible. Propulsion capabilities demonstrated will provide increased mission duration and ability to maneuver without regret. Key efforts include the development of new propulsion systems, improved ground test capabilities, and analysis tools to support system development. Otter will progress through development of analysis and test tools, design of candidate propulsion systems, ground testing, build of a demonstrator satellite, and culminate in a long duration (> 1 year) spaceflight demonstration. The anticipated transition partner is the U.S. Space Force. Beginning in FY 2026, this program will be funded in PE 0603468E, Project ACX-01.
Demonstration Rocket for Agile Cislunar Operations (DRACO)
Maintaining U.S. interests in cislunar space requires significant advances in propulsion technology. Current space propulsion includes electric (high efficiency but low thrust) and chemical (high thrust but low efficiency) systems. The Demonstration Rocket for Agile Cislunar Operations (DRACO) program will develop and demonstrate a High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU) nuclear thermal rocket (NTR) system on orbit and is targeting an FY 2027 launch. The NTR technology demonstrated by DRACO will achieve thrust similar to chemical rockets, but with 2-5 times the efficiency. The enhanced performance afforded by NTR will allow the U.S. to lead operations in the cislunar volume, in particular for missions that require flexible mission planning and agile maneuverability. Beginning in FY 2026, this program will be funded in PE 0603468E, Project ACX-01.
Robotic Servicing of Geosynchronous Satellites (RSGS)
A large number of national security and commercial space systems operate at geosynchronous earth orbit (GEO), providing persistence and enabling ground station antennas to point in a fixed direction. Technologies for servicing of GEO spacecraft would involve a mix of highly automated and remotely operated (from Earth) robotic systems. The Robotic Servicing of Geosynchronous Satellites (RSGS) program is establishing the capability to provide robotic services in GEO suitable for a variety of potential servicing tasks, in full collaboration and cooperation with existing satellite owners and national security space operators, and with sufficient propellant for several years of follow-on capability. Key RSGS challenges include robotic tool/end effector requirements, efficient orbital maneuvering of a servicing vehicle, robotic arm systems, automation of certain spacecraft operations, and development of the infrastructure for coordinated control between the servicer and client spacecraft operations teams. The transition agreement is with a commercial partner who will provide the satellite to carry the robotic payload and who will operate the robotic servicer. To support the development of a broadly accepted satellite servicing capability, DARPA is using the Consortium for Execution of Rendezvous and Servicing (CONFERS) operations approach to bring together experts from the private sector and Government to research, develop and publish nonbinding, consensus-based standards for safe operational approaches to on-orbit servicing. Beginning in FY 2026, this program will be funded in PE 0603468E, Project ACX-01.
Advanced Space Technology Concepts
Studies conducted under this program will examine and evaluate emerging technologies and concepts with the potential to provide substantial improvement in efficiency, effectiveness, and resilience of operations in space. This includes the degree and scope of potential impact and improvements to military operations, mission utility, and warfighter capability. Studies are also conducted to analyze emerging threats along with possible methods and technologies for countermeasures. The feasibility of achieving potential improvements, in terms of resources, schedule, and technological risk, is also evaluated. The results from these studies are used, in part, to formulate future programs or refocus ongoing work. Topics of consideration include applying artificial intelligence to low earth orbit (LEO) constellation operations to enable collaboration between space, air, maritime, and ground platforms in anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) theaters; robust architectures for precision navigation and timing; enabling operations in Cislunar space; novel approaches to space domain awareness; integration of commercial capabilities into military operations; and on-orbit software environments.
Blackjack
The Blackjack program developed space technologies demonstrating a proliferated smallsat constellation capability in Low Earth Orbit (LEO). Capabilities demonstrated will provide constant custody of very large numbers of concurrent targets; target identification, tracking, and characterization; tactical communications; architectural resilience via massive proliferation; and rapid on-orbit technology refresh and experimentation. Blackjack leveraged commercial industry plans to build constellations in LEO to provide global commercial broadband internet service. Key efforts included low size, weight, power, and cost (SWaP-C) multi-modality smallsat sensor payloads, algorithms for autonomous payload and architecture command and control, algorithms for satellite on-board processing and data fusion, and advanced manufacturing for military payload mass production. The transition partners are the U.S. Space Force, Air Force and Space Development Agency.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | DARPA | FY24 Actuals | $119.1M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | DARPA | FY25 Enacted | $181.5M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | DARPA | FY25 Total | $181.5M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $0 | $119.1M | $181.5M | $0 | $0 |
| SPC-01: SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY | $0 | $119.1M | $181.5M | $0 | $0 |
Follow the dollar
Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.
Follow-the-dollar covers 17 of 1,741 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →
The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.
| District | Program obligations |
|---|---|
| UT-01 | $1.82M |
Related Awards
Award linkage is shown for 20 of 200 profiled companies — only high-confidence USASpending matches are included. why partial award coverage? →
Showing 25 of 408 award records (R&D performer crosswalk — see methodology)
| Recipient | PIID | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| RAYTHEON COMPANY | W900KK16D0001 | high |
| UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY SPACE DYNAMICS LABORATORY | HQ014718F0027 | high |
| AARNO LABS LLC | HR001118C0059 | medium |
| ACCELINT AI, LLC | HR001119C0058 | medium |
| ACCELINT AI, LLC | HR001119C0119 | medium |
| ADELPHI TECHNOLOGY INC | HR001117C0020 | medium |
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL | HR001118C0037 | medium |
| ADVENTIUM ENTERPRISES, LLC | HR001118C0027 | medium |
| AEROJET ROCKETDYNE INC | HR001118C0139 | medium |
| AEROVIRONMENT, INC. | HR001118C0093 | medium |
| AGILE DEFENSE, LLC | HR001115F0002 | medium |
| AIR & SPACE FORCES ASSOCIATION | HR001119C0080 | medium |
| AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES INC | HR001117C0030 | medium |
| ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS OPERATIONS LLC | HR001117C0100 | medium |
| ANALOG PHOTONICS LLC | HR001116C0108 | medium |
| APOGEE RESEARCH LLC | HR001117C0129 | medium |
| APPEN BUTLER HILL INC. | HR001115C0116 | medium |
| APPLIED PHYSICAL SCIENCES CORP | HR001118C0008 | medium |
| APPLIED PHYSICAL SCIENCES CORP | HR001118C0010 | medium |
| APPLIED PHYSICAL SCIENCES CORP | HR001118C0028 | medium |
| APPLIED SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA CORP | HR001119C0111 | medium |
| APTIMA INC | HR001119C0130 | medium |
| ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY | HR001118C0060 | medium |
| BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION & ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC | HR001115C0103 | medium |
| BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION & ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC | HR001117C0005 | medium |
Contractor Concentration
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Space Programs and Technology — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →