Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Science & Technology for Nuclear Re-entry Systems

NavyRDT&EReconciledPE0603273N
What it is
Science & Technology for Nuclear Re-entry Systems (0603273N) is a Navy research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
+$2.99M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$109.2MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$118.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$121.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$2.99MR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $109.2MFY25: $118.6MFY26: $121.6MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$109.2M
FY25$118.6M
FY26$121.6M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

6 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2021–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
6 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2021–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$0$0$64.1M$109.2M
Enacted–$0$65.7M$112.3M$118.6M
Request––$65.7M$112.3M$118.6M$121.6M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $112.3M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $109.2M as actual total obligation authority — $3.10M below the request. 109.2 − 112.3 = -3.1 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Science & Technology for Nuclear Re-entry Systems

This Program Element supports Department of Defense (DoD) priorities for enduring science and technology (S&T) for nuclear re-entry systems. For several decades, foundational nuclear R&D investments outside of major acquisition programs have been significantly reduced. This historical trend contrasts with the DoD's recent recognition of the need to invest in advanced nuclear-related components and technologies in support of the nuclear enterprise, nuclear deterrence operations, and integrated deterrence operations. This effort will provide pre-program of record advanced technology development that will effectively address evolving threats and maintain operational effectiveness while also aligning with the highest-level guidance for nuclear forces identified in the 2022 Nuclear Posture Review and National Defense Strategy. This effort will contribute to preserving the viability of the nuclear deterrent in a cost-effective manner by reducing technical and programmatic risk associated with execution of the overall nuclear modernization program. These ends will be reached by developing technologies to inform future system requirements, establishing interagency partnerships for re-entry system test platform development, and coordinating with existing programs for next generation strategic system development. In conjunction with U.S. Strategic Command (STRATCOM) Priorities and collaboration with Air Force, the Nuclear Delivery Systems (NDS) funding will identify and mature technologies from Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 3 to TRL 6 via relevant ground and flight test environments.

Mission — Nuclear Delivery Systems

This project will fund advanced development of nuclear delivery technologies, subsystems, and components for reentry systems in alignment with the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (USD(R&E)) guidance on relevant technology categories: Aeroshell, Fuzing, Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC), Advanced Capability, and Testing. These activities will reduce the operational, programmatic and technological risk facing modernization of Navy reentry systems. To achieve its objectives, the NDS S&T program will undertake several initiatives, including: * Developing and maturing advanced technologies through a series of experiments designated as Griffin and Peregrine. The experiments will include three Government Reference Designs (GRD) experimental reentry bodies, designated Griffin 2.0, Griffin 2.1, and Peregrine 2.0. These experimental reentry bodies will have increasing capability and will be used to evaluate and demonstrate new technologies and concepts for nuclear delivery systems. * Developing nuclear delivery system technologies through the use of a series of ground and flight tests of components and subsystems. These test will be informed by modeling and simulation and will utilize existing and new capabilities that enable a better understanding of how systems will perform in a realistic and operationally relevant environment. * Partnering with other organizations, as appropriate, to leverage their investments in relevant technology maturation that aligns with the USD(R&E) technology areas for NDS S&T. This may include investments in advanced materials, and other technologies that can be used to improve the performance and survivability of nuclear delivery systems. *Allocating resources to support GRD development and demonstration over the period of performance will ensure that the NDS S&T program has the necessary resources and funding to achieve its objectives and support the development of new nuclear delivery systems. Overall, the NDS S&T program is a critical component of the DoD's efforts to modernize its nuclear delivery systems and ensure the continued viability of the nuclear deterrent. By investing in advanced technologies and concepts, the program will help to reduce the operational, programmatic, and technological risk associated with nuclear modernization, and ensure that the United States remains a leader in nuclear deterrence. Further information can be provided at a higher classification level.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (5)

Aeroshell

Program advancements include significant improvements to the aeroshell, specifically the development of advanced materials and designs crucial for protecting the re-entry vehicle during atmospheric re-entry. These advancements are paramount to enhancing the survivability and effectiveness of the re-entry vehicle. The upgraded materials are designed to withstand extreme temperatures and pressures encountered during hypersonic flight, ensuring the payload reaches its intended target.

Fuzing

Advancements in fuzing technology have enabled the development of highly accurate and reliable systems for detonating nuclear warheads at optimal times and locations. These advancements are critical for maintaining a credible and effective nuclear deterrent. By ensuring detonation at the precise moment and location, these systems maximize the weapon's intended effects while minimizing unintended consequences.

Guidance Navigation and Control (GNC)

Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) systems are advanced technologies designed to provide highly accurate and robust performance for re-entry vehicles. These systems ensure precise target delivery, even when facing sophisticated defensive measures intended to disrupt or intercept the vehicle.

Testing

Rigorous testing is conducted throughout the development lifecycle of these classified programs. This comprehensive testing regime is absolutely critical for ensuring the reliability, security, and effectiveness of these highly sensitive systems.

Advanced Capability

Classified advancements have enhanced the re-entry vehicle's ability to overcome sophisticated defensive systems, such as missile defenses. This enhanced penetration capability is of paramount importance for maintaining a credible deterrent and ensuring national security. The ability to reliably defeat advanced missile defenses guarantees the re-entry vehicle's capacity to reach its intended target, even in the face of layered and technologically advanced interception attempts.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY24 Actuals$109.2M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Enacted$118.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Total$118.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Disc. Request$121.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Total$121.6M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$0$109.2M$118.6M$121.6M$121.6M
3095: Nuclear Delivery Systems$0$109.2M$118.6M$121.6M$121.6M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Science & Technology for Nuclear Re-entry Systems. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.