Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessment

MDARDT&EPartial Reconciliation0603176C
What it is
Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessment (0603176C) is a MDA research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 3 projects.
What changed
+$3.71M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$29.0MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$17.9MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$21.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$3.71MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $29.0MFY25: $17.9MFY26: $21.6MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$29.0M
FY25$17.9M
FY26$21.6M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$10.00M$11.9M$14.5M$17.7M$12.7M$45.9M$49.1M$39.7M$39.3M$29.0M
Enacted$12.1M$17.9M$13.0M$13.0M$46.2M$49.4M$40.0M$39.7M$17.8M$17.9M
Request$17.9M$13.0M$13.0M$14.2M$14.9M$15.8M$16.7M$17.8M$17.9M$21.6M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2021 book requested $14.9M for FY2021; the PB2023 book reported $49.1M as actual total obligation authority — $34.2M above the request. 49.114.9 = 34.2 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessment

The Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessment (ACPA) Program Element delivers a government concept that integrates concept definition, simulation, analysis, and testbed capability. ACPA's focus is on the exploration of novel and/or emerging capabilities that may have the potential to enhance the Missile Defense System. ACPA centralizes assessment of advanced missile defense technology and delivers insight into the performance of proposed concepts extending the Missile Defense Agency's (MDA) ability to address evolving threats for the Warfighter. Working with national laboratories and industry, MDA will invest in the analysis and assessment of directed energy system components to determine their effectiveness and capability for missile defense. Subject Matter Experts provide independent assessments of government, university, and industry technology concepts, used in concert with systems engineering requirements, to support acquisition strategy decisions and define technology focus areas. The innovative structured concept definition and assessment methodology enables MDA to quickly validate focus areas, verify contractor technology solutions, and evaluate promising concepts in future Missile Defense System architectures. This methodology significantly enhances MDA's ability to assess technology concepts while decreasing the cost of development by: - Delivering Independent model-based simulations of industry technology concepts to inform the systems engineering process. - Quantifying expectations through algorithms, digital simulation, hardware-in-the-loop, and/or demonstration events prior to expensive live fire test events. - Executing end-to-end testing of technology concepts integrated with weapon systems through Command and Control network architectures. - Maturing and conducting assessments of new technologies to evaluate their readiness for transition to the future Missile Defense System. - Supports early coordination with the program elements to promote efficient integration into the Missile Defense System and provide additional capability to meet the Warfighter needs. - Collaborate with partners across Industry, the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, Other Government Agencies, Service Partners, and the National Laboratories to transition advanced technologies into functional areas and programs of record. Performance assessment of advanced concepts is the key enabler for government evaluation of technology in the earliest stages of development and maximizes the efficiency of technology investments. Performance assessment is used to quantify capability expectations of innovative concepts to counter the expanding regional and homeland missile threats, including ballistic and cruise missiles, and hypersonic vehicles.

Mission Cyber Operations

This project supports the monitoring and tracking of Cybersecurity mitigations as required in the Department of Defense (DoD) Instruction Number 8510.01, as amended which establishes Risk Management Framework (RMF) requirements for DoD Information Technology (IT). Funds in this project implement and sustain DoD-required RMF and associated Controls Validation Testing activities, analysis of validation results, risk assessments and reviews of proposed Program Manager/Information Assurance System Security Manager Plans of Action and Milestones (POAMs) for enabling modeling and simulation mission systems. This project captures the RMF documentation (artifacts, validation results, Information Assurance (IA) risk assessment results, and the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Authorizing Official and Chief Information Officer accreditation decisions) into the Defense Information Systems Agency's Enterprise Mission Assurance Support Service system. Hardware and software upgrades required to meet DoD standards are supported by funding in this project. Independent verification and validation team actions ensure the availability, integrity, authentication, confidentiality and non-repudiation of the MDA mission, test and administrative systems. Activities in the project are necessary to comply with the Federal Information Security Management Act.

Mission Program-Wide Support

PWS contains non-headquarters management costs in support of the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) functions and activities across the entire Missile Defense System. These functions include Government Civilians and Contract Support Services. This effort provides integrity and oversight of the Missile Defense System as well as supports MDA in the development and evaluation of technologies that will respond to the changing threat. Additionally, PWS includes personnel to support global deployments performing deployment site preparation and activation, and provides facility capabilities for MDA Executing Agent locations worldwide. Other MDA wide costs include: physical and technical security; civilian drug testing; audit readiness; the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) program; legal services and settlements; travel and agency training; office, equipment, vehicle, and warehouse leases; utilities and base operations across multiple geographic locations; commercial and ancillary facility services; management of all facility aspects regardless of lifecycle stage; supplies and maintenance; compliance with statutory environmental requirements; data and unified communications support; materiel and readiness and central property management of equipment; Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (FSRM) program (formerly Real Property Maintenance) to keep the Department's inventory of facilities in good working order; and similar operating expenses. PWS is allocated on a pro-rata basis across most Agency PEs and therefore fluctuates per PE by FY based on the total Agency budget in that FY.

Mission Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessments

Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessments (ACPA) centralizes advanced technology concept modeling, simulation, software, and analysis. Integrating models of promising disruptive technical solutions into Missile Defense System system-level simulations enables leadership to make data driven acquisition and technology investment decisions. Assess concepts that improve or adapt existing systems, such as the addition of mobile sensors or interceptors that can be surged into areas of conflict. Examples of efforts required to quantify the contribution of disruptive technologies may include, but not limited to environmental experimentation and phenomenological characterization required for new sensor concepts, advanced weapon technologies, and emerging directed energy concepts. In addition, facilitate stakeholder collaboration on advanced concepts to ensure transition into functional areas and programs of record. Using a technology development testbed approach, ACPA enables assessment and characterization of disruptive and incremental technology improvements to inform requirements and evaluate missile defense elements, components, and/or sub-component technologies and to assess maturity as it relates to readiness for transition to the future Missile Defense System. ACPA promotes informed decision making early in the acquisition life-cycle to maximize investments and successful transition into the Missile Defense System. Coupled with characterization efforts, ACPA develops innovative left-through-right-of-launch modeling capabilities including physics-based representations in the areas of cyber, sensor technologies, lethality and survivability, communications, and sensor support. ACPA is focusing on Science and Technology initiatives which increase interoperability and leverages expertise with allied and service partners. ACPA capitalizes on the innovation of small businesses, universities, Federally Funded Research and Development Centers, and University Affiliated Research Centers to pursue a broad range of hardware, software, models, algorithms, trade studies, and analysis. These innovations bring together government developed models representing existing and future missile defense architectures, technology concepts, and advanced algorithms to provide detailed assessments of concept performance and inform investment decisions. These innovations, combined with a robust high performance computing infrastructure, provide a unique in-house government capability to demonstrate and assess technology concepts for emerging technology risk reduction, to mature concepts with laboratory, ground, and flight test data, and where possible, apply concepts in simulated exercises with weapon systems across representative communication architectures. Advanced Concepts for Disruptive Cyber assesses technology and techniques, which move beyond the incremental gains in power balance with a focus on expanding the domain and reach of Missile Defense Agency (MDA) capabilities as well as those with asymmetric countermeasures whether in cost, effect, or defensibility.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (3)

Information Assurance / Cyber Network Defense

Funds RMF, network defense, and information technology requirements including: - Conduct Cybersecurity and/or IA engineering and architecture planning. - Maintain hardware and/or software currency to meet DoD-mandated cybersecurity requirements. - Support monitoring and tracking of Cybersecurity mitigations detailed in IT security POAM. - Develop DoD RMF certification and accreditation packages. - Conduct controls validation testing of systems and to provide POAM to mitigate IA deficiencies. - Conduct annual IA reviews to assess compliance in implementing and maintaining IA controls. Specific and/or unique accomplishments to each FY are as follows:

Program Wide Support

PWS contains non-headquarters management costs in support of MDA functions and activities across the entire Missile Defense System. These functions include Government Civilians and Contract Support Services. This effort provides integrity and oversight of the Missile Defense System as well as supports MDA in the development and evaluation of technologies that will respond to the changing threat. Additionally, PWS includes personnel to support global deployments performing deployment site preparation and activation, and provides facility capabilities for MDA Executing Agent locations worldwide. Other MDA wide costs include: physical and technical security; civilian drug testing; audit readiness; the STEM program; legal services and settlements; travel and agency training; office, equipment, vehicle, and warehouse leases; utilities and base operations across multiple geographic locations; commercial and ancillary facility services; management of all facility aspects regardless of lifecycle stage; supplies and maintenance; compliance with statutory environmental requirements; data and unified communications support; materiel and readiness and central property management of equipment; the FSRM program to keep the Department's inventory of facilities in good working order; and similar operating expenses. PWS is allocated on a pro-rata basis across most Agency PEs and therefore fluctuates per PE by FY based on the total Agency budget in that FY. Specific and/or unique accomplishments to each FY are as follows:

Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessment

Provide quantitative assessments that define the benefits of technology investments and inform requirements using an integrated concept definition, simulation, and performance analysis capability. A staff of diverse Subject Matter Experts delivers independent government performance evaluations, which exercise kinetic and non-kinetic missile defense concept representations against the broad spectrum of evolving threats. - Assess electro-optical infrared and advanced sensor technologies and quantify impacts on Missile Defense System to address future threat capabilities. - Provide independent government assessments of industry sensor, directed energy and weapon system technology concepts, and the ability of these systems to be integrated for a more effective Missile Defense System. - Evaluate lethality impacts and weapons effectiveness of emerging concepts. - Examine pathfinder solutions and demonstrate the utility of directed energy for missile defense. - Study on-orbit satellite capabilities and contribution to defense against advanced threats. - Assess and identify promising intercept capabilities across all phases of flight. - Perform concept performance against emerging advanced threats including hypersonic threat testing scenarios. - Develop and extend modeling techniques to enhance Missile Defense System technologies. - Mature advanced technology concepts in a testbed environment and through lab, ground, and flight demonstrations. - Apply concepts in simulated exercises with weapon systems. - Work with the Missile Defense System Architect and MDA Systems Engineer to design concepts, build models and assess technology concepts' contributions to future Missile Defense System architectures. - Focus research and engineering activities from university and small business partners to identify suitable technology and concepts that improve Missile Defense System performance through a rapid innovation model based on an engineering test bed. - Assess multi-domain data fusion concept for current or future weapon systems.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY24 Actuals$29.0M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY25 Enacted$17.9M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY25 Total$17.9M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY26 Disc. Request$21.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY26 Total$21.6M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$243.9M$29.0M$17.9M$21.6M$21.6M
MC71: Cyber Operations$86.2M$3.70M$3.91M$3.98M$3.98M
MD40: Program-Wide Support$5.44M$634.0K$690.0K$749.0K$749.0K
MD71: Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessments$152.3M$24.7M$13.3M$16.9M$16.9M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessment — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →