Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

FSRM Modelling

OSDRDT&EPartial Reconciliation0602891D8Z
What it is
FSRM Modelling (0602891D8Z) is an OSD research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
+$4.10M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$2.00MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$1.90MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$5.99MR-1 TOA · PB2026
83.4% reconciliation

$994.0K discretionary + $5.00M one-time reconciliation. Discretionary change vs FY2025 enacted: -47.6%.

FY25→26 Change
+$4.10MR-1 TOA · PB2026

Two official figures, one label— reconciled below

Fiscal Receipts uses P-1/R-1 workbook total obligation authority (TOA) as the headline figure sitewide. The workbook TOA includes budget rows (such as advance procurement) that the R-2/P-40 J-book program line excludes. How the two bases relate →

FY26 Request · $5.99M TOA − $994.0K J-book line = 5.00M (6.01.0 = 5.0)

Figures in the sentence are rounded for reading; the parenthesised arithmetic is the same subtraction in USD millions, at the precision where it closes.

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $2.00MFY25: $1.90MFY26: $5.99MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$2.00M
FY25$1.90M
FY26$5.99M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span, and 1 year is a break in the line rather than a low value: an edition the program is absent from, never interpolated. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span, and 1 year is a break in the line rather than a low value: an edition the program is absent from, never interpolated. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$0$2.00M
Enacted$0$2.00M$1.90M
Request$2.00M$1.90M$5.99M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission FSRM Modeling

The FY 2026 request for FSRM Modeling PE includes $0.994 million of discretionary and $5.000 million of mandatory (reconciliation) for a total of $5.994 million. The mandatory funds Golden Dome Cyber Resilience and Readiness Exercises . Further information for this reconciliation request is provided in Section 20003 Missile Defense of the Reconciliation Exhibit. FSRM Mission Description and Budget Justification: The Facilities Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization (FSRM) Modeling requirement is inclusive of the development of a computer system, development of software, development of standards for the FSRM prioritization. This will aid in the establishment metrics for adjudicating FSRM funding sufficiency for use in future program and budget reviews. Golden Dome Mission Description and Budget Justification: Golden Dome Cyber Resilience and Readiness Exercises funding of $5.000 million supports the assessment of the control systems which allow for the Golden Dome mission execution. The allocated $5.000 million will be used to develop "live fire" cyber resilience exercises to assess the readiness and resilience of the control systems at Golden Dome installations. These live exercises will afford the system owners and operators hands on experience in detecting and providing defense against APT- actor cyber-attacks and the physical disruptions that can result.

Mission FSRM

The FY 2026 request for FSRM Modeling includes $994 thousands of discretionary and $5,000 thousand of mandatory (reconciliation) for a total of $5,994 thousands. The mandatory funds Golden Dome Cyber Resilience and Readiness Exercises. Further information for this reconciliation request is provided in Section 20003 Missile Defense of the Reconciliation Exhibit. The FSRM Modeling requirement is inclusive of the development of a computer system, development of software, development of standards for the FSRM prioritization. This will aid in the establishment metrics for adjudicating FSRM funding sufficiency for use in future program and budget reviews. Golden Dome Cyber Resilience and Readiness Exercises funding ($5M) supports the assessment of the control systems which allow for the Golden Dome mission execution. The funding will be used to develop "live fire" cyber resilience exercises to assess the readiness and resilience of the control systems at Golden Dome installations. These live exercises will afford the system owners and operators hands on experience in detecting and providing defense against APT- actor cyber-attacks and the physical disruptions that can result.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)

FSRM Modeling

Develop a multi-faceted optimization model that provides transparent investment requirements at the asset level that can be consistently implemented by DoD components

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY24 Actuals$2.00M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Enacted$1.90M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Total$1.90M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Disc. Request$994.0K
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Reconciliation$5.00M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Total$5.99M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$0$2.00M$1.90M$994.0K$994.0K
360: FSRM$0$2.00M$1.90M$994.0K$994.0K

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not FSRM Modelling — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →