Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0602131M/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Marine Corps Landing Force Technology
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $66.6M |
| FY25 | $58.5M |
| FY26 | $45.7M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $44.6M | $50.2M | $67.9M | $54.5M | $61.6M | $67.3M | $53.7M | $62.1M | $77.0M | $66.6M | ||
| Enacted | $51.6M | $51.6M | $53.9M | $63.2M | $69.1M | $55.4M | $64.1M | $79.5M | $59.2M | $58.5M | ||
| Request | $51.6M | $53.9M | $59.6M | $56.6M | $50.6M | $51.1M | $53.5M | $59.2M | $53.8M | $45.7M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2023 book requested $53.5M for FY2023; the PB2025 book reported $77.0M as actual total obligation authority — $23.5M above the request. 77.0 − 53.5 = 23.5 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Marine Corps Lndg Force Tech
The U.S. Navy/Marine Corps team is the most potent naval fighting force in the world. Fundamental to their success are the technologies necessary for effective distributed maritime operations. The Office of Naval Research (ONR) combines knowledge of the naval mission with researchers to select and explore solutions critical to expeditionary warfighting needs. This Program Element (PE) addresses requirements outlined in the Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations (EABO), which is a form of expeditionary warfare that involves the employment of mobile, reduced signature, operationally relevant, and relatively easy to maintain and sustain naval expeditionary forces from a series of austere, temporary locations ashore or inshore within a contested or potentially contested maritime area in order to conduct sea denial, support sea control, or enable fleet sustainment. Additionally, USMC forces must be ready for worldwide contingency operations, which frequently includes contested urban environments with complex physical and operational challenges. This can include physical compartmentalization and canalization, additional physical dimensions (subterranean and multi-story structures), crowded conditions and associated threat obscuration, communications challenges, informational and human aspects, and proliferation of observation and fires technologies. These operating environments require capabilities addressing all the activities within this PE and while it provides many challenges, unique opportunities are also presented and can further shape technology approaches. These future challenges and portents demand robust technologies for the Marine Corps, but the technology options are constrained. They must have a lightweight deployable character, and the ability to operate in austere conditions with little fixed infrastructure or support while retaining the agility and lethality of an integrated maneuver force. Technology must provide full spectrum capability against robust and complex peer and near-peer adversaries while meeting size, weight, power, cost limitations, and command and control systems that work within degraded, disconnected, intermittent and limited environments with reduced threat detectability. The approach within this PE encompasses ideas that support both revolutionary and evolutionary capabilities, and in this way considers and balances both "push" and "pull" aspects of technology projects. This Program Element (PE) funds Applied Research, which is the systematic study to understand the means to meet a recognized and specific need. Most of the work in this PE can be classified between Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 2 (technology concept and/or application formulation) and TRL 4 (component and/or breadboard validation in laboratory environments). Due to the number of efforts in this PE, the programs described herein are representative of the work included in this PE.
Mission — Cyberspace Activities
This Project activity provides freedom of maneuver and influence in the cyber-electronic warfare domain while simultaneously denying the same to the adversary and protecting critical command systems. Technologies are being developed using a multi-disciplinary approach that combines radio frequency electronics, digital signal processing, computer engineering, software engineering, machine learning and data science to support Naval Expeditionary Forces operating with size, weight, and power constrained equipment in denied, degraded, intermittent, or limited (DDIL) communications environments. Areas of applied research include distributed precision time, predictive software defined radio architectures, coordinated cyber and spectrum maneuver to mitigate detection and exploitation, tactical cyber visualization, discovering and mapping networks in dense urban environments, contextual awareness and blind channel characterization.
Mission — Marine Corps Landing Force Tech
This project funds applied research; technology assessment, road mapping, and concept development; and less technologically mature projects within the Future Naval Capability (FNC) process as means to inform, enhance, enable, and invent future concepts and capabilities with new Science and Technology (S&T). This project is organized into ten activities, the core of which is represented by the eight Expeditionary Warfighting Capability Areas.
Mission — Congressional Adds
Congressional add projects not included in other efforts.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (10)
Expeditionary Cyber
This activity provides freedom of maneuver and influence in the cyber-electronic warfare domain while simultaneously denying the same to the adversary and protecting critical command systems. Technologies are being developed using a multi-disciplinary approach that combines Radio Frequency electronics, digital signal processing, computer engineering, software engineering, machine learning and data science to support Naval Expeditionary warfighters operating with size, weight and power constrained equipment in denied, degraded, intermittent, or limited (DDIL) communications. Areas of applied research include distributed precision time, predictive software defined radio architectures, coordinated cyber and spectrum maneuver to mitigate detection and exploitation, tactical cyber visualization, discovering and mapping networks in dense urban environments, contextual awareness and blind channel characterization.
Command, Control, Communications, and Computers (C4)
This activity investigates robust, resilient, and secure networked communications pathways and capability that support an expeditionary force's distributed and disaggregated operations. Research supports both networked and local computation for communications that exploits the expeditionary forces close physical proximity to threats while mitigating shortfalls commiserate within denied, degraded, intermittent, or limited (DDIL) communications environments. Expeditionary forces must operate in the cyber domain and in addition to defending communications networks, vehicles, and weapons systems, are reliant on electronic controllers for basic operations and as such are susceptible to cyber attacks. Technologies addressed within this activity include secure, robust, self-forming, mobile communications networks; distributed computing to support information dissemination to all echelons; improved capabilities in over-the-horizon, beyond line-of-sight, and restricted environment communications and sensors; and software and data processing to support formation of an appropriate common picture. Other efforts include power management, low detectability, conforming to size, weight, power, cost constraints, and interoperability within the joint environment.
Firepower
The activity investigates a large variety of weapons technologies to enhance fires capabilities of Fleet Marine Forces as part of joint maritime campaigns to counter emerging threats and create new opportunities for the joint force to secure operational advantage. Research efforts increase range, lethality, and capacity, while maintaining mobility and tempo to operate inside actively contested maritime domains, to achieve overmatch fires capabilities when operating within the landward portions of the littorals, and to provide weapons system capabilities able to persist when operating within the adversary's intelligence, surveillance, collection, and weapons ranges. The focus on low size, weight, power, and cost of weapons components and weapon systems, having low manpower and cognitive burdens to operate, with low logistics burdens, stresses technical solutions. Weapons system technologies being developed include fire control, launch and propulsion, precision guidance, navigation, and control, seekers, fuzing, and lethality.
Force Protection
This activity investigates new ways and means to protect forces and materiel across all domain threats in all operational settings, from contested maritime, air, and land domains, to include complex urban environments. The portfolio protects against adversaries' challenges such as guided-rockets and missiles, mobile coastal artillery, threat electronic warfare, and counter intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, and waterborne threats from ports, harbors, and in the littorals. Mines and obstacles, both in the water and ashore, also complicate amphibious operations. The activity invests in vehicle survivability aspects that are exacerbated due to size, weight, power, and cost constraints inherent to Marine Corps operations and the harsh nature of maritime environments. Technologies addressed can include lightweight armor for ballistic and underbody blast protection, advanced sensors for counter tactical surveillance, active protection, signature management, and exploration of expeditionary undersea warfare capabilities. This activity also considers technology for payloads, packages and sensors that are needed by amphibious vehicles (both manned and unmanned) including mine counter measures; explosive hazard defeat systems; and obstacle and threat detection systems as well as technologies for improved protection for individuals against blast, ballistic and blunt impact threats.
Human Performance, Training and Education
This activity investigates two technology investment areas: warrior resilience, and decision-making and expertise development. Warrior resilience is focused on advanced training technologies and methodologies that enhance neural, cognitive, and physical readiness. Decision making and expertise development accelerates and improves the advancement in retention of skills in decision making, situation awareness, including individual and team adaptability and coordination on decentralized, dynamic and dispersed battlefields.
Intelligence, Surveillance, And Reconnaissance (ISR)
This activity investigates enhanced situational awareness, persistent surveillance, and tactical decision making through automated analysis of data and rapid integration of information and acquired knowledge. Specific technologies in this activity effectively present actionable information to decision-makers, especially those at the lower command levels. This includes biometric monitoring for expeditionary operations, operational Course Of Action (COA) development, and autonomous surveillance in support of distributed operations.
USMC FNC Technology Candidates
This R-2 Activity addresses the applied research associated with the Marine Corps' participation in the Department of the Navy's (DoN) Future Naval Capabilities (FNC) Program. The objective of the work in this Program Element (PE) is to develop and mature technologies needed by the Marine Corps to initiate FNCs in PE 0603640M Marine Corps Advanced Technology Development (ATD) that can be commenced at higher Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs). Investments in this activity are coordinated with similar and non-duplicative efforts in PE 0602750N Future Naval Capabilities Applied Research, where the Navy's participation in the FNC Program is funded. The FNC Program is structured to accelerate the transition of new technologies to the Fleet and Force. Each effort is assessed for its technology maturity and transition commitment. Funding for FNCs, which have Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) of 4/5 to 6 and also have transition funding commitments from acquisition Programs of Record, are resourced in PE 0603640M Marine Corps Advanced Technology Development. Funding for technology candidates at lower TRLs (3 to 4) are resourced in this PE 0602131M, Marine Corps Landing Force Technology. ONR works closely with the Resource Sponsors and acquisition stakeholders to develop high priority technological capabilities needed by the operational forces. FNC Budget Activity (BA) 2 investments develop candidate FNC technologies in an agile fashion by exploiting technology advances that respond rapidly to naval needs. This approach facilitates an optimum response when developing and maturing the technology options that can be developed further in PE 0603640M Marine Corps Advanced Technology Development (ATD). The FNC Program favors a high level of collaboration. PE R-2 activities are mostly organized by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) Departments, which are tasked to collaborate with the acquisition stakeholders and their resource sponsors. A complete accounting of the technology candidates being developed and a full disposition of each technology development effort funded in this PE is provided annually to the Congressional oversight committees.
Logistics
This activity investigates the practical discipline and real world application of the deployment, sustainment, reconstitution, and re-deployment of forces engaged in expeditionary operations. Logistics replaces mass with assured knowledge and speed, is equally capable ashore or afloat in austere environments, and is fully scalable to meet uncertain requirements. This includes efficient and responsive force sustainment, planning and directing logistics operations, logistics demand reduction, fleet maintenance, and expeditionary energy. Expeditionary Energy enhances combat capability of expeditionary warfighters by increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of energy production, storage, distribution and use. Beyond traditional energy efforts, this portfolio also looks at other issues, including energy-efficient behaviors and hybridization of energy sources. These pillars are thoroughly integrated and perpetually related in execution.
Maneuver
This activity investigates new ways and means to land forces and material through contested sea-land surface interfaces to then conduct maneuver warfare. In order to enable future Amphibious Operations, research efforts will support autonomous operations across the sea-surf-ground environment, improved fuel efficiency and speed of amphibious vehicles, amphibious vehicle technologies, water performance, and amphibious payloads to change the dynamics of a surface amphibious assault. This includes the emergence of manned-unmanned teaming and autonomous vehicle collaboration. The technologies included in this work address areas of mobility, materials, propulsion, signature reduction, modularity, and unmanned systems.
Future Concepts, Technology Assessment, And Roadmapping
This activity supports the planning and integration of technology development efforts across the entire Program Element (PE). In conjunction with the Concepts Based Capabilities System and the Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory, unique and novel concepts for advanced warfighting are developed and validated. Effectiveness analyses are conducted to identify the synergistic effects that can be achieved through the integration of emerging technology with innovative tactics, doctrine, and techniques. Technology assessments are conducted to determine the supporting technologies that have the highest impact across the warfare areas, and warrant further investment within this PE. Technology Roadmapping is conducted to help identify opportunities to leverage technology development within the Department of the Navy and the Department of Defense, as well as with the commercial sector and university communities. The resultant technology investment strategy is developed and used to guide out-year technology development efforts.
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY24 Actuals | $66.6M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Enacted | $58.5M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Total | $58.5M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Disc. Request | $45.7M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Total | $45.7M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $0 | $66.6M | $58.5M | $45.7M | $45.7M |
| 2958: Cyberspace Activities | $0 | $4.95M | $5.20M | $5.31M | $5.31M |
| 3001: Marine Corps Landing Force Tech | $0 | $52.5M | $48.6M | $40.4M | $40.4M |
| 9999: Congressional Adds | $0 | $9.17M | $4.75M | $0 | $0 |
Follow the dollar
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying mentions
Showing 25 of 33 from the Senate LDA disclosure database.
Funding and policy for water resource investments. Appropriations to support Water Resources Development Act programs…
Funding and policy for water resource investments. Appropriations to support Water Resources Development Act programs…
National Defense Authorization Act, 2027 (HR 8800/S 4784); provisions regarding R&D - Navy, US Marine Corps, Air…
National Defense Authorization Act, 2027 (HR XXXX/S XXXX); provisions regarding R&D - Navy, US Marine Corps, Air…
Marine dredging issues, including coastal storm restoration and permitting issues; Offshore wind energy…
DPA TItle III funding FY27 NDAA FY27 Defense Appropriations Act Issues realted to Army Aviation & combat vehicles; Air…
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 (H.R. 8800, S. 4784); Department of Defense Appropriations…
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 (P.L. 119-60); National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal…
Funding and policy for water resource investments. Appropriations to support Water Resources Development Act programs…
Marine dredging issues, including coastal storm restoration and permitting issues; Offshore wind energy…
Marine dredging issues, including coastal storm restoration and permitting issues; Offshore wind energy…
Marine dredging issues, including coastal storm restoration and permitting issues; Offshore wind energy…
Marine dredging issues, including coastal storm restoration and permitting issues; Offshore wind energy…
FY 2026 Defense Authorization Bill (H.R. 3838, S. 2296); Defense Appropriation Bill for FY 2026 (H.R. 4016, S. 2572)…
FY 2026 Defense Authorization Bill (H.R. 3838, S. 2296, P.L. 119-60); Defense Appropriation Bill for FY 2026 (H.R.…
FY 2026 Defense Authorizations Bill (H.R. 3838, S. 2296); Defense Appropriations Bill for FY 2026 (H.R. 4016)…
FY 2025 Defense Authorization Bill (H.R. 5009); FY 2026 Defense Authorization Bill (no bill number); Defense…
Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2025 (HR 8774/S 4921); provisions regarding R&D-Army, Navy/USMC, Air…
Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2025 (HR 8774/S 4921); provisions regarding R&D-Army, Navy/USMC, Air…
Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2024 (HR 4365/S 2587; PL 118-47) and Further Consolidated Appropriations…
Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2025 (HR 8774/S XXXX); provisions regarding R&D-Army, Navy/USMC, Air…
House (no bill number) and Senate (no bill number) Fiscal Year 2025 Department of Defense Appropriations Bill - issues…
Marine dredging issues, including coastal storm restoration and permitting issues; Offshore wind energy…
Marine dredging issues, including coastal storm restoration and permitting issues; Offshore wind energy…
Marine dredging issues, including coastal storm restoration and permitting issues; Offshore wind energy…
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Marine Corps Landing Force Technology. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J246
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2017 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J216
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2017_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2018 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J240
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2018_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2019 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J242
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2019_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2020 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J261
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2020_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2021 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J273
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2021_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J243
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J234
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J232
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J233
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.