Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

CV-22

Air ForceRDT&EReconciledPE0401318F
Watch this program

Published budget signals for this program, with links to receipts.

Updates appear after a data refresh and publication. No fixed update schedule is available.

Paste the RSS address into a feed reader. No Fiscal Receipts account is required.

RSSAtom

What it is
CV-22 (0401318F) is an Air Force research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
+$5.26M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
RTX leads 2 contractor families sharing $104.4M in high-confidence matched awards.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$16.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$26.2MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$31.5MR-1 TOA · PB2026
97.9% reconciliation

$653.0K discretionary + $30.9M one-time reconciliation. Discretionary change vs FY2025 enacted: -97.5%.

FY25→26 Change
+$5.26MR-1 TOA · PB2026

Two official figures, one label— reconciled below

Fiscal Receipts uses P-1/R-1 workbook total obligation authority (TOA) as the headline figure sitewide. The workbook TOA includes budget rows that the R-2/P-40 J-book program line excludes — advance procurement in an ordinary year, and in FY2026 the one-time reconciliation appropriation as well. Each row below names the one it is. How the two bases relate →

FY26 Request · $31.5M TOA − $653.0K J-book line = 30.9M (31.51 − 0.65 = 30.86) — $30.9M of one-time FY2026 reconciliation money accounts for this gap — not advance procurement

Figures in the sentence are rounded for reading; the parenthesised arithmetic is the same subtraction in USD millions, at the precision where it closes.

Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $16.6MFY25: $26.2MFY26: $31.5MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$16.6M
FY25$26.2M
FY26$31.5M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$37.7M$26.8M$27.7M$17.7M$16.0M$17.4M$17.8M$16.7M$9.68M$16.6M
Enacted$27.8M$28.7M$22.5M$16.5M$17.9M$18.4M$17.2M$10.1M$18.1M$26.2M
Request$16.7M$22.5M$18.5M$17.9M$18.4M$17.2M$10.1M$18.1M$26.2M$31.5M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2017 book requested $16.7M for FY2017; the PB2019 book reported $27.7M as actual total obligation authority — $11.0M above the request. 27.7 − 16.7 = 11.0 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — CV-22 RDT&E POST PRODUCTION

The CV-22 is the Air Force Special Operations Forces (SOF) variant of the joint multi-mission V-22 tilt rotor aircraft. The CV-22 provides long-range, high-speed infiltration, exfiltration, personnel recovery, and resupply to Special Forces teams in hostile, denied, and politically sensitive areas. The Navy is the lead service for the Joint V-22 program. The Joint Program Manager is responsible for managing all variants of the V-22. Department of the Navy (DoN) funds the development of the MV-22 and CMV-22. The Air Force funds the service common portion of the CV-22 while United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) funds the development and procurement of SOF peculiar systems. CV-22 RDT&E funding provides for the development, integration, and testing of service-common, mission critical aircraft modifications to improve operational effectiveness, platform survivability, and aircraft availability. Airframe Enhancements: RDT&E funds the design, development, and testing of improvements to airframe structures, aircraft electro-mechanical and hydraulic hardware, and dynamic components to counteract the effects of structural fatigue and improve the durability and readiness of V-22 aircraft. Refinement of aircraft system's components to improve longevity and/or maintainability while protecting their performance are meant to allow continued CV-22 operation as the aircraft ages. Enhanced Self-Deployment: RDT&E funding provides for the design, development, and testing of aircraft modifications to improve aircraft self-deployment capabilities (e.g. operating range, global response time) to mitigate emerging threats to the aircraft and mission accomplishment, and to identify and assess emerging air vehicle, propulsion system, avionics architecture, electronic warfare, situational awareness, and other weapon system solutions to meet CV-22 Block 20 operational requirements. CV-22 funding also supports innovation activities to include studies, analyses, requirements definition, and quick-reaction capability prototypes/demonstrations to accelerate planning for technology transition, technology insertion and future acquisition programs. This funding may include emerging requirements to support Program Support Costs (PSC), Advisory and Assistant Service (A&AS), system integration lab, trainers, equipment and other government costs. The FY 2026 request for CV-22 includes $653 thousand of discretionary and $30,857 thousand of mandatory (reconciliation) for a total of $31,510 thousand. The mandatory funds both airframe enhancements and enhanced self-deployment efforts. Further information for this reconciliation request is provided in Section 20007 (Air Superiority) of the Reconciliation Exhibit. The FY 2026 request was reduced by $0.655 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative." This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver weapon system capability. The use of such program's funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605827F, 0605828F, 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605832F, 0605833F, 0605898F, and 0606398F. In FY 2024, $0.000 million was expended for civilian pay expenses in this program element, and in FY 2025 $0.000 million is forecast for civilian pay expenses in this program element. This program is in Budget Activity 7, Operational System Development because this budget activity includes development efforts to upgrade systems that have been fielded or have received approval for full rate production and anticipate production funding in the current or subsequent fiscal year.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (2)

Airframe Enhancement

Airframe Enhancements funds the improvement of airframe structures, aircraft electro-mechanical hardware, and dynamic components to counteract the effects of structural fatigue and improve the durability and readiness of V-22 aircraft to include design, development, and testing of V-22 Nacelle components. This RDT&E funding provides for the design, development, and testing of redesign support or loadbearing airframe elements to provide structural reinforcement and improved longevity. Enhanced armor protective performance with reduced weight and space impacts are a possible area for development. Airframe Enhancement funds also provide for refinements of hydraulic, landing gear, or fuel system component to improve and protect their performance. Items such as pumps, lines, tanks/reservoirs/bladders and/or struts may receive enhancements to extend their life and improve their maintainability. Finally, Airframe Enhancements funds target exploring improvements to all V-22 dynamic components, from rotor blades and heads to gearboxes and flight control surfaces with the goals of protecting them from vibrational and frictional wear and enhancing their reliability and readiness.

Enhanced Self-Deployment Capabilities

Develops capabilities to enhance self-deployment, such as improved ice protection, engine performance, performance buyback, navigation, communications, and battle space awareness/networking capabilities/airborne mission networking (ABMN); situational awareness; electronic warfare; weapons systems; defensive avionics systems and architecture; weight reduction initiatives; modular avionics/cyber security implementation and other changes to the underlying aircraft systems necessary to enable these capabilities.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY24 Actuals$16.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$26.2M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Total$26.2M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$653.0K
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Reconciliation$30.9M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Total$31.5M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$187.5M$16.6M$26.2M$653.0K$653.0K
676033: CV-22 RDT&E POST PRODUCTION$187.5M$16.6M$26.2M$653.0K$653.0K

Follow the dollar

Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.

Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →

The program's money traced left to right: the F appropriation, program element 0401318F (CV-22), its 2 largest high-confidence awards, the 2 recipient families behind them, and the 2 congressional districts the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.
The program's money traced left to right: the F appropriation, program element 0401318F (CV-22), its 2 largest high-confidence awards, the 2 recipient families behind them, and the 2 congressional districts the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.APPROPRIATIONPROGRAM ELEMENTTOP AWARDSRECIPIENT FAMILIESDISTRICTSFRDT&E appropriation0401318F31.5M FY26N0042119F0531RAYTHEON COMPANY90.8MN0001923F2620BELL BOEING JOINT PROJECT O…13.5MRTX CorporationBell Boeing Joint Project…IN-07TX-13

The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.

The diagram as text: one row per congressional district in the diagram, the recipient families shown there, and that district's cited program obligations.
DistrictProgram obligations
IN-07$90.8M
TX-13$13.5M

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

RecipientPIIDConfidence
BELL BOEING JOINT PROJECT OFFICEN0001912G0006high
BELL BOEING JOINT PROJECT OFFICEN0001923F2620high
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0042119F0531high

Contractor concentration

HHI Indexⓘ
7742
Highly Concentrated
2023 Merger Guidelines bands
Top Contractor
RTX
Contractor Families
2
Program Obligationsⓘ
$104.4M

High-confidence award links only, pooled across ingested years. The index uses positive obligations; program obligations are net of deobligations. The figures over every published link, including medium-confidence ones, are in the downloadable warehouse, not on this page — why.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not CV-22. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.