Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Stryker Upgrade

ArmyProcurementReconciledBLI0363G85200
Watch this program

Published budget signals for this program, with links to receipts.

Updates appear after a data refresh and publication. No fixed update schedule is available.

Paste the RSS address into a feed reader. No Fiscal Receipts account is required.

RSSAtom

What it is
Stryker Upgrade (0363G85200) is an Army procurement line funded in the Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army account.
What changed
-$252.5M FY25→26 P-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 14 linked award records are listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$676.1MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$388.3MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$135.8MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$252.5MP-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $676.1MFY25: $388.3MFY26: $135.8MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$676.1M
FY25$388.3M
FY26$135.8M

All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$1.08B$1.21B$676.1M
Enacted–$891.2M$614.3M$388.3M
Request––$614.3M$402.8M$135.8M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $614.3M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $676.1M as actual total obligation authority — $61.8M above the request. 676.1 − 614.3 = 61.8 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description — Stryker Upgrade

A dynamic, asymmetric threat and operational environment demands full spectrum, strategically responsive, agile, and dominant land forces. Immediate response by a lethal, versatile, tactically agile joint force capable of operational maneuver is essential to fulfilling the Army's Warfighting needs. The Stryker-equipped Brigade Combat Team (BCT) is this force. The use of a common platform/common chassis design reduces requirements for repair parts and logistics support in the area of operations. In response to operational needs identified in the Theater of Operations, the Stryker Double-V-Hull (DVH) survivability enhancement was approved for development and production by Acquisition Decision Memorandums (ADM) signed April 2010 and May 2011, respectively. A Double-V-Hull (DVH) brigade is constructed through an exchange effort by which components and mission equipment packages are removed from flat bottom hull Strykers to be reassembled in the DVH structure along with the associated DVH unique components. In May 2012, Phase 1 (Technology Development), Stryker Double-V-Hull (DVH) A1 Engineering Change Proposal (DVHA1 ECP), formerly ECP1, development effort was approved to provide power generation, suspension, and network upgrades to restore Stryker DVH Space, Weight, and Power-Cooling (SWaP-C) lost as a result of incorporating vehicle changes to counter threats encountered during deployment operations. In May 2013, Phase II for the Double-V-Hull (DVH) A1 Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) development effort was approved. The Double-V-Hull (DVH) A1 ECP was approved for production in August 2016, with the Double-V-Hull (DVH) A1 ECP vehicles being produced using the exchange production process. Stryker Brigade Combat Teams (SBCTs), equipped with DVH A1 ECP vehicles, can be used across the full spectrum of military operations. Stryker Brigade Combat Teams (SBCTs) are required to deploy rapidly and conduct effective combat operations immediately on arrival to prevent, contain, stabilize, or resolve a conflict through shaping and decisive operations. On 23 March 2018, the Army Requirements Oversight Council (AROC) approved the exchange of all remaining flat bottom hull Stryker Brigades from flat bottom hull to Double-V-Hull (DVH) A1 ECP. Program Office awarded on 30 June 2020 a follow-on DVH A1 ECP requirements contract for FY 2020 - 2025, with an additional one-year option. Production of Stryker DVH A1 Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) vehicles for this contract was produced through a blend of new vehicle production and the current exchange process due to the limited available inventory of flat bottom hull Strykers required to feed the exchange production process. Configurations of Stryker Double-V-Hull (DVH) A1 Engineering Change Proposal vehicles are: Double-V-Hull A1 Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) Infantry Carrier: The DVH A1 ECP Infantry Carrier Vehicle (ICVVA1) carries an infantry squad with individual equipment. The Infantry Carrier Vehicle also provides protected transport and supporting fires for the infantry squad during dismounted assault. DVH A1 ECP Infantry Carrier Vehicles with a Scout Dismount Kit provide for dismounted force situational awareness, gathering, and transmitting real time intelligence while moving throughout the battlefield in close, complex, and urban terrain. Double-V-Hull A1 Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) Mortar Carrier: The DVH A1 ECP Mortar Carrier (MCVVA1) supports infantry units with screening obscurants, suppressive forces and on-call supporting fires. 120mm, 81mm, and 60mm mortars provide complementary capabilities with responsive, accurate and lethal indirect fire support to the dismounted infantry assault. Double-V-Hull A1 Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) Commander's Vehicle: The DVH A1 ECP Commander's Vehicle (CVVA1) provides the brigade commanders and infantry battalion commanders with the means to receive information and data, analyze, prepare, and transmit data, and control the forces/functions carrying out combat missions. Double-V-Hull A1 Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) Fire Support Vehicle: The DVH A1 ECP Fire Support Vehicle (FSVVA1) provides automated enhanced surveillance, target acquisition, target identification, target tracking, target designation, position location, and communications functionality. Targets will be transmitted instantly to the fire support system and shooter. Double-V-Hull A1 Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) Engineer Squad Vehicle: The DVH A1 ECP Engineer Squad Vehicle (ESVVA1) provides maneuver/mobility support capabilities which include obstacle clearing, in-stride breaching of surface mines, proofing of subsurface mines, and smoke generation for local protection. Double-V-Hull A1 Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) Medical Evacuation Vehicle: The DVH A1 ECP Medical Evacuation Vehicle (MEVVA1) is the Battalion Aid Station for brigade units, providing treatment for serious injury and advanced trauma cases. Double-V-Hull A1 Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) Antitank Guided Missile Vehicle: The DVH A1 ECP Antitank Guided Missile Vehicle (ATVVA1) is the brigade's primary tank killing system. The Antitank Guided Missile Vehicle (ATW) reinforces the brigade's infantry battalion, reinforces the brigade reconnaissance squadron, and provides long-range direct fire. Double V Hull A1 (DVHA1) Infantry Carrier Vehicle (ICVVA1)-30mm (formerly Medium Caliber Weapon System (MCWS): The Stryker ICVVA1-30mm integrates a 30mm cannon onto the DVHA1 platform to provide increased lethality, capable of firing a variety of munitions designed to support mounted and dismounted elements when executing combined arms maneuver and wide area security operations. The ICVVA1-30mm provides protected transport for an infantry or cavalry squad with individual equipment. Design, develop, modify, and provide supporting documentation for the Stryker Family of Vehicles (FoV) to resolve configuration management, reliability, lethality, safety, operational, performance degradation, chemical detection and Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Cyber Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C5ISR) obsolescence issues. Primary efforts involve the testing and incorporation of fleet modifications, to include, C5ISR updates, DVH Safety and Survivability updates, training device procurement and the retrofit of Lethality Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) upgrades to enhance the suppressive fire and armored vehicle engagement capabilities of the Army's Stryker Brigade Combat Teams (SBCTs). Fleet modifications include the ICVVA1-30 hardware fixes found during testing, replacement of the obsolete Video Display Electronics Terminal (VDET) with Squad Leader Display (SLDv3), upgrade to electronics power system to support integration of the Mounted-Integrated Tactical Network Stryker (M-ITN-S), and other necessary upgrades to address evolving threats, emerging technologies and unforeseen system deficiencies of the Stryker FoV. Training Aids, Devices, Simulators, and Simulations (TADSS): Funding provides for the integration of the Vehicle Tactical Engagement Simulation System (V-TESS), Javelin Outdoor Training System (JOTS), and supports the United States Army Combined Arms Support Command (CASCOM) and the requirement for the Stryker Vehicle Maintainer Training Course to support establishment of the Stryker-unique 91S Military Occupational Series (MOS). The 91S training course requires purchase of the following training devices: Diagnostic Troubleshooting Trainers (DTTs), Anti-Tank Guided Missile Vehicle Hands-On Trainers (HOTs), Full-Up Power Pack Part Task Trainers (FUPP PTTs), Mortar Carrier Hands-On Trainers (MC HOTs). Retrofit Planning and Site Management: Funding supports kit material handling and fleet-wide retrofits for the Stryker Family of Vehicles (FoV). Test Fleet Maintenance funding maintains the Stryker test fleet, to include contractor repair labor and operations of Stryker repair parts warehouses located at the Army's test centers. Program management, engineering, and logistics support necessary to execute Stryker modifications to include Double V Hull A1 (DVHA1) Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs); Fleet Modifications; Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C5ISR); Next Generation items, and Lethality Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs).

Justification

Justification — Stryker Upgrade

FY 2026 Base procurement dollars in the amount of $135.816 million supports the following: - Fielding Support for DVHA1 including New Equipment Training, transportation, interim Contractor Logistics Support for ICVVA1-30mm (MCWS), and Field Service Representative (FSR) support. - Program management, engineering, logistics and system technical support necessary to execute DVHA1 fielding activities and remaining logistic products. Due to Army Structure Memorandum (ARSTRUC) changes and the Army Transformation Initiative (ATI) EXORD, the Army has directed a cessation of Stryker Double V Hull A1 (DVH A1) vehicle procurement, as outlined in the G8 Memorandum for Record dated 06 JUN 2025. While no DVH A1 vehicles are planned for purchase in FY 2025, fielding of the 4th and 5th DVH A1 brigades, and the 3rd and 4th ICVVA1-30mm (MCWS) brigades, will continue beyond FY26. The FY 2025 quantity of 38 will be updated to 0 prior to the next budget submission. In accordance with Section 1815 of the FY 2008 National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 110-181), this item is necessary for use by the active and reserve components of the Armed Forces for homeland defense missions, domestic emergency responses, and providing military support to civil authorities. Army Acquisition Objective: 4,459 The Army Acquisition Objective includes quantity requirements for Stryker Brigade Combat Teams and other Army programs of record which utilize the Stryker vehicle as their base platform.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, ArmyAFY24 Actuals$676.1M
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, ArmyAFY25 Enacted$388.3M
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, ArmyAFY26 Disc. Request$135.8M
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, ArmyAFY26 Total$135.8M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$5.68B$676.1M$388.3M$135.8M$135.8M

Follow the dollar

Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.

Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →

The program's money traced left to right: the A appropriation, program element 0363G85200 (Stryker Upgrade), its 1 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.
The program's money traced left to right: the A appropriation, program element 0363G85200 (Stryker Upgrade), its 1 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.APPROPRIATIONPROGRAM ELEMENTTOP AWARDSRECIPIENT FAMILIESDISTRICTSAProcurement appropriation0363G85200135.8M FY26W912CH24F0069GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTE…63.4MGeneral Dynamics CorpMI-10

The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.

The diagram as text: one row per congressional district in the diagram, the recipient families shown there, and that district's cited program obligations.
DistrictProgram obligations
MI-10$62.9M

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.

RecipientPIIDConfidence
GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC.W56HZV17DB020high
GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC.W912CH24F0069high
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONW56HZV20D0108high
OSHKOSH DEFENSE LLCW56HZV21D0017high
CARAPACE ARMOR TECHNOLOGY, LLCW912CH24F0191medium
DRS SUSTAINMENT SYSTEMS, INCW912CH25F0181medium
GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC.W56HZV14CB019medium
GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC.W912CH24F0159medium
GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC.W912CH24F0247medium
GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC.W912CH25F0182medium
GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC.W912CH25F0198medium
HDT EXPEDITIONARY SYSTEMS INCW912CH24F0014medium
PEARSON ENGINEERING LIMITEDW912CH24F0230medium
PEARSON ENGINEERING LIMITEDW912CH25F0199medium

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Stryker Upgrade. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.