Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems

DISARDT&EPartial Reconciliation0305208K
What it is
Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems (0305208K) is a DISA research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
-$101.0K FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$3.07MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$2.99MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$2.89MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$101.0KR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $3.07MFY25: $2.99MFY26: $2.89MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$3.07M
FY25$2.99M
FY26$2.89M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$3.33M$3.24M$3.03M$2.96M$2.85M$2.98M$6.07M$3.07M$3.07M$3.07M
Enacted$3.24M$3.03M$3.05M$2.97M$2.98M$3.05M$3.07M$3.07M$3.07M$2.99M
Request$3.03M$3.05M$2.97M$2.98M$3.05M$3.07M$3.07M$3.07M$2.99M$2.89M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2021 book requested $3.05M for FY2021; the PB2023 book reported $6.07M as actual total obligation authority — $3.02M above the request. 6.073.05 = 3.02 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems

The Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) Joint Interoperability Test Command (JITC) is the sole joint interoperability certification agent for the Department of Defense (DoD). JITC provides test and evaluation (T&E) services to the Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems (DCGS) Family of Systems (FoS), a major component of the Defense Intelligence Enterprise (DIE). The DIE enables the joint intelligence process and the planning and direction, collection, processing and exploitation, analysis and production, dissemination and integration, and evaluation and feedback of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) needed to answer priority intelligence requirements (PIRs) across military operations. Answering PIRs enables leaders to take decisive military action. DIE components are improving battlespace awareness (BA) through the modernization and evolution of how intelligence is delivered to commanders. Part of this evolution is the development of modernized DIE test, evaluation, and assessment concepts to improve senior leader Military Intelligence Program (MIP) management and investment decisions. The goal is to develop real-time, continuous, metrics collection combined with interactive health and status visualization methods to provide quality data for leadership decision making at the speed of need. Operational testing addresses critical operational issues of a system's effectiveness in combat-like environments. Additionally, operational testing provides key stakeholders and decision makers an independent evaluation of a system’s operational effectiveness, suitability, and cybersecurity posture. Interoperability testing directly contributes to the DoD’s success by ensuring that Military forces, units and/or systems, along with U.S. mission partners, can share the data, information, materiel, and services required to operate collaboratively and effectively. Decision makers must understand the capabilities and risks of new technologies and systems as they are fielded onto warfighters’ hands at an increasingly faster pace. The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security (OUSD(I&S)) sponsored a Capabilities Based Assessment that resulted in an Initial Capability Document (ICD) and Joint Requirements Oversight Council Memorandum ICD for the DCGS Enterprise. These form the foundational evaluation framework for the DIE.

Mission Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems

JITC coordinates with Military Services and Combat Support Agencies (CSA) to conduct DCGS Family of Systems (FoS) and follow-on capabilities testing and analysis, including event coordination, configuration, and instrumentation through the operation of the Enterprise Integration and Test Capability (EITC) and the Test and Evaluation Focus Team (TEFT). The TEFT predominantly executes three functions: • The EITC Focus Function (Lab), which provides and sustains DIE T&E requirements analysis to advance instrumentation and automation of metrics collection. • The Strategy Focus Function, which evaluates DIE T&E methods and capabilities to meet modern software acquisition practices development, integration, and continuous delivery of capabilities. • The Execution Focus Function, which supports DIE demonstration events, such as ENTERPRISE STORMFORCE (aka Enterprise Challenge, STORMFORCE), which is the DIE demonstration series to promote joint interoperability and integration between the Military Services, Defense Intelligence Agencies, Five Eye (FVEY) Allies and select Coalition Partners. Additionally, the TEFT: • Advocates, coordinates, and synchronizes with Military Services and CSAs for the use of existing DoD test facilities, such as the Test Resource Management Center (TRMC), to advance common science, technology, modeling, and simulation that improve DIE test capabilities, capacity, and integration. • Supports data collection activities on secret, top-secret, and Coalition and Partner networks to characterize the state of DIE capabilities. • Teams with JITC DCGS FoS, ISR Platforms, and Command and Control (C2) interoperability testers to advance integrated data collection for DIE capabilities. • Supports DIE-wide acquisitions to advance digital transformation objectives and integrate with Combined Joint All-Domain Command and Control (CJADC2) initiatives. • Supports ENTERPRISE STORMFORCE T&E. These efforts help close Joint capability gaps, promote enterprise interoperability, and enable DCGS and like capabilities integration. This enables improved data sharing between DIE components. • Supports demonstrations and evaluation of capabilities relying on the Defense Intelligence Agency’s data broker (known as the Common Data Fabric, or CDF). The CDF is an enterprise modernization initiative to enable automated machine-to-machine transactions in accordance with data sharing policies to increase the speed of delivery via one-to-many sharing agreements.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)

Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems (DCGS)

The TEFT develops testing, evaluation, assessment concepts, and execution of data collection methods to determine compliance with emergent DIE attributes and applicable interoperability standards. The TEFT supports ENTERPRISE STORMFORCE T&E planning, execution, and data collection to assess the effectiveness of technology demonstrations for initiatives selected by senior intelligence leaders in support of Combatant Command (CCMD) intelligence and BA priorities. Demonstrations occur as follows: • Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) event during a yearly, 4-week demonstration known as STORMFORCE. • Geo-Intelligence (GEOINT) events, known as Enterprise Challenge, in varying venues as coordinated with innovation leads. • Technical collection efforts to support specific technologies, such as the CDF or the legacy DCGS enterprise integration architecture, to ensure interoperable warfighting capabilities during technological transition.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDISAFY24 Actuals$3.07M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDISAFY25 Enacted$2.99M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDISAFY25 Total$2.99M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDISAFY26 Disc. Request$2.89M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDISAFY26 Total$2.89M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$9.26M$3.07M$2.99M$2.89M$2.89M
NF1: Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems$9.26M$3.07M$2.99M$2.89M$2.89M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

2 mentions from the Senate LDA disclosure database.

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONALGround|Surface2024matched 2+ title words

Issues related to classification of certain aerospace components for export licensing purposes Aircraft and helicopter…

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONALGround|Surface2024matched 2+ title words

Issues related to classification of certain aerospace components for export licensing purposes Aircraft and helicopter…

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →