Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0305199D8Z/ — data as of August 12, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Net Centricity
Budget Figures
$17.1M discretionary + $20.0M one-time reconciliation. Discretionary change vs FY2025 enacted: +10.7%.
Two official figures, one label— reconciled below
Fiscal Receipts uses P-1/R-1 workbook total obligation authority (TOA) as the headline figure sitewide. The workbook TOA includes budget rows (such as advance procurement) that the R-2/P-40 J-book program line excludes. How the two bases relate →
FY26 Request · $37.1M TOA − $17.1M J-book line = 20.0M (37.1 − 17.1 = 20.0)
Figures in the sentence are rounded for reading; the parenthesised arithmetic is the same subtraction in USD millions, at the precision where it closes.
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $21.8M |
| FY25 | $15.5M |
| FY26 | $37.1M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $23.2M | $17.5M | $17.4M | $17.8M | $4.07M | $22.4M | $21.0M | $12.7M | $16.8M | $21.8M | ||
| Enacted | $18.1M | $18.0M | $18.5M | $16.7M | $21.4M | $21.8M | $13.1M | $17.2M | $23.3M | $15.5M | ||
| Request | $18.0M | $18.5M | $16.8M | $21.4M | $21.8M | $13.5M | $17.9M | $23.3M | $20.6M | $37.1M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2019 book requested $16.8M for FY2019; the PB2021 book reported $4.07M as actual total obligation authority — $12.7M below the request. 4.1 − 16.8 = -12.7 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — GIG Evaluation Facilities (GIG-EF) and GIG Enterprise-Wide Systems Engineering Advisory Activities
This program supports the Department's initiatives to deter aggression, defend the homeland, and build enduring advantage by modernizing command, control, and communications (C3) capabilities. The DoD CIO provides strategic direction and oversight for C3 capabilities, including tactical communications, infrastructure, satellite communications (SATCOM), electromagnetic spectrum (EMS) management, positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT), Defense Information Systems Network infrastructure, commercial mobile devices, and emerging 5G capabilities. The C3 modernization (C3M) program provides technical analysis and systems engineering to ensure warfighters have information advantage through C3 systems and shapes the Combined Joint All Domain Command and Control (CJADC2) technology foundation. Specifically, this program enables the research, analysis, evaluation, and management of communication networks in a contested spectrum environment. This includes providing secure information access and services (e.g., cryptographic modernization) and supporting CJADC2 efforts by refining joint protocols.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)
Net Centricity Plans and Accomplishments
Same as program level mission description.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY24 Actuals | $21.8M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY25 Enacted | $15.5M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY25 Total | $15.5M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY26 Disc. Request | $17.1M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY26 Reconciliation | $20.0M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY26 Total | $37.1M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $181.0M | $21.8M | $15.5M | $17.1M | $17.1M |
| 199: GIG Evaluation Facilities (GIG-EF) and GIG Enterprise-Wide Systems Engineering Advisory Activities | $181.0M | $21.8M | $15.5M | $17.1M | $17.1M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Net Centricity — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →